Introducing The Nelo Life Song

Nelo Life has joined the ranks of other multilevel marketing companies that create songs about their alleged opportunity. Is all that glitters really gold? OR is there something more sinister going on given the decades of experience some of their associates bring to the table who have faced litigation and have joined more "opportunities" than you can shake a stick at. But each one is always THE BEST and UNLIKE anything else. Same story just stap a different name in front of it IMO.

AMAZON SHOP LINK (AND YES...I MAKE A SMALL COMMISSION WHEN YOU PURCHASE ANYTHING IN MY SHOP}
https://www.amazon.com/shop/therecoveringhunbot

OTHER OFFERS THROUGH AMAZON - Yes, I earn a small commission
- Try AUDIBLE PLUS - https://amzn.to/45hGhAu
- Try AUDIBLE PREMIUM PLUS - https://amzn.to/3tluLGT
- Join AMAZON PRIME - https://amzn.to/48ByCjy

SUBSCRIBE TO THE RECOVERING HUNBOT
https://www.youtube.com/@RecoveringHunbot?sub_confirmation=1

SUBSCRIBE TO UNSCRIPTED
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC51leKQidL_isplO1hq0AVA?sub_confirmation=1

Donate/Support The Channel Here:
Venmo: @recoveringhunbot

All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).

As was ruled in Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017), clips from an original work may be used to “comment on and critique a work”, and the use of clips is “reasonable to accomplish the transformative purpose of critical commentary”. See also NXIVM v. The Ross Institute, Inc., 364 F.3d 471 (2nd Cir. 2004) (quotations from course materials for critical commentary was fair use). I believe my video is transformative in nature in order to criticize and comment, and is not intended as a market substitute for the original video.

**DISCLAIMER**
The contents of this video is based on my research, experience and opinions. It is intended entertainment purposes. Please..