Quinta Columna / Orwell City
================
(world orders review)
================
Dr. Campra Delivers Official Response to Would Be Dis-creditors of His Pfizer-Vial-Analysis-Validity
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4RU1lnxlUCLV/ [SHARE]
================
@ https://www.bitchute.com/channel/tangentopolis/
(world orders review) sociological comment, reporting, analysis, teaching, scholarship, and research
@ https://odysee.com/@tangentopolis:f
================
Tags: COVID-1984, English subs, Graphene oxide, La Quinta Columna, Official report, Prof. Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid, Ricardo Delgado, Spanish audio, Transhumanism
================
https://www.laquintacolumna.net/
https://www.orwell.city/2021/06/vaccination-vial-analysis-explained.html
================
Dr. Pablo Campra, https://www.docdroid.net/jeK3n6B/comentarios-sobre-peg-y-sacarosa-por-parte-de-la-disidencia-controlada-pdf
================
Since Dr. Pablo Campra published the official preliminary report of the analysis he carried out on a Pfizer vaccination vial, the attacks against him and La Quinta Columna haven't ceased. Certain individuals and groups have gone to great lengths to discredit his work, even arguing that what he has found 'isn't graphene oxide but polyethylene glycol.'
The saddest part of the situation is that collectives that call themselves 'For the Truth' are some of those who try to discredit the finding that's impossible to counter because it's real.
The false dissidence and the globalist media have tried everything to make people believe that the analysis is fake, but their 'arguments' are increasingly weak and easily countered.
Orwell City brings us the official statement emitted by Dr. Pablo Campra through La Quinta Columna a few hours ago into English.
================
Ricardo Delgado: This is what Dr. Campra has shared. You see his digital signature down here. So, everything here in this communiqué is under his name.
'Comment on the hypothesis of microscopy identification of polyethylene glycol in the sample as COMIRNATY RD1' RD1 = Ricardo Delgado Martin. That's the sample that I sent. This is signed by Dr. Pablo Campra. This statement alludes to certain individuals who have shared a photograph to question, with some lack of scientific rigor. And the saddest part is that it has been shared in both forums and channels of Biologists for Truth. Now we understand the degree of ignorance and lack of knowledge of certain groups. To this, Dr. Campra responds:
'The proponents of the hypothesis don't present original observations nor do they provide bibliographic reference of the photograph presented to evaluate the hypothesis. Both polyethylene glycol and sucrose are part of the composition of the product, according to the manufacturer. But they cannot be identified by microscopy.'
Dr. Campra made it very clear in the preliminary report itself. They're swept with hexane. Those elements disappear from the sample, OK? Both the PEG (the polyethylene glycol) and the sucrose. Let's be clear.
'According to the manufacturer, PEG would be part, along with 3 other lipids of the outer membrane of the lipid nanoparticles. A membrane that, in theory, was disintegrated when the aqueous phase was separated with hexane.'
'The polyethylene glycol molecules remain dissolved in the aqueous phase without forming any membrane observable under the microscope. The aqueous phase of the COMIRNATY RD1 sample showed the main signal corresponding to sucrose when scanned in Raman (NMR). However, when evaluating only the components, only the components of the aqueous fraction showed ultraviolet absorption. A maximum of 270 nm was detected, which is compatible with the trace of the genetic material (RNA), graphene, and many other substances with chromophore groups, which don't include sucrose, which has...'
'...a different peak at 197 nm...' That is, there was no sucrose or PEG because they were dissolved, '...which doesn't show absorption to ultraviolet radiation. Of this absorbance, 270 nm, only a minimal part can be ascribed to RNA at 1%. The substance or substances responsible for this absorption haven't been definitively characterized by spectroscopy.'
Yes. All the rest is assumed to be the fashionable material we know.
'The sample also showed fluorescence at 340 nm compatible with graphene and other substances but not with sucrose or PEG. PEG doesn't show UV absorption because it has no active chromophore group for UV absorption unless some are added, such as metallic particles. Polyethylene glycol molecules cannot be observed under the electron microscope unless they're functionalized with opaque nanoparticles such as metals...
[complete transcript; slides @ Orwell City] https://www.orwell.city/2021/09/official-response.html
=================
