When it comes to chromosomes, you have been misled

channel image

When it comes to chromosomes, you have been misled

Dr. Frank Abernathy

subscribers

Typical high school and college textbooks always display mitosis as bunches of chromosomes being pulled apart in order to form daughter cells. However, this is not always the case. Powerpoint XV download available at: https://evolution4.wordpress.com

This video contains photomicrographs of dying mouse cells taken over 30 years ago at Ohio State University. They reveal remarkable substructures that have yet to be explained by the scientific community. Do you believe they should be more thoroughly investigated? If so, you can learn more about them by visiting http://evolution4.wordpress.com. Please watch the next video below this one:

Please support this research at Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=7263094

This movie should have been posted long before all the other ones. It explains as succinctly as possible why the evidence I obtained almost 30 years ago at Ohio State University should blow away any misconceptions about how DNA is arranged within our chromosomes. Ignoring obvious facts that are staring you right in the face does not make them “go away”, no matter how inconvenient or unpopular they may be. Facts are patient things and the passage of time always has a way of bringing them to the forefront.

My apologies for revisiting so many videos. It's just that I keep finding things to include in them after the fact. If you watched the last video, I will save you time by allowing you to fast forward to the spot I just edited (forward to 10:23). Otherwise, just watch this video instead of the first one.

This movie should have been posted long before all the other ones. It explains as succinctly as possible why the evidence I obtained almost 30 years ago at Ohio State University should blow away any misconceptions about how DNA is arranged within our chromosomes. Ignoring obvious facts that are staring you right in the face does not make them “go away”, no matter how inconvenient or unpopular they may be. Facts are patient things and the passage of time always has a way of bringing them to the forefront.

This movie is a grand summation of how hierarchical endosymbiosis may have been used to build the chromosomes we see in animals today and how cellular differentiation may occur in such chromosomes. It brings home the idea that animal centrosomes allowed hierarchical endosymbiosis to be used to build up chromosome structure very rapidly. In contrast, plants and fungi without centrosomes were unable to do this, mainly because of the presence of cell walls which interfere with uptake of whole cell endosymbionts (see also the movie “A Grand Unifying Theory of Biology?”.

It also discusses the paradox of Dolly, the cloned sheep. If DNA is irreversibly altered in adult cells and stem cells during embryonic development and later, how can a fully functioning adult sheep be cloned from an adult cell? As with all the other videos and blog, questions and interaction with the author are welcomed. This material is being freely presented as a public service to enhance such discussions in order to develop a better understanding of chromosome structure and how DNA and related molecules work together to make animals such as ourselves what we are today.

This movie is a grand summation of how hierarchical endosymbiosis may have been used to build the chromosomes we see in animals today and how cellular differentiation may occur in such chromosomes. It brings home the idea that animal centrosomes allowed hierarchical endosymbiosis to be used to build up chromosome structure very rapidly. In contrast, plants and fungi without centrosomes were unable to do this, mainly because of the presence of cell walls which interfere with uptake of whole cell endosymbionts (see also the movie “A Grand Unifying Theory of Biology?”.

It also discusses the paradox of Dolly, the cloned sheep. If DNA is irreversibly altered in adult cells and stem cells during embryonic development and later, how can a fully functioning adult sheep be cloned from an adult cell?

As with all the other videos and blog, questions and interaction with the author are welcomed. This material is being freely presented as a public service to enhance such discussions in order to develop a better understanding of chromosome structure and how DNA and related molecules work together to make animals such as ourselves what we are today.

There are some minor mistakes near the end of the movie and I fixed most of them but in the process also lost the ability to remake the movie. So you will have to watch it with a few minor “warts”. Also, the red text is a bit blurry, but again, that would require a major makeover; so my apologies in advance.

There have been a number of comments that suggest that live streaming coupled with comments might be something people might be interested in doing. Whether this is true or not depends upon you, the viewer. Are you interested in interacting with me? If so, I will need your email so I can let you know when a live stream becomes available. Hopefully, this short video will help you in your decision making process.

How are animals, plants, fungi, and simple one celled organisms like Euglena related? Why do animals have so many different kinds of cells compared to plants and fungi? Why do animals get cancer? How do bacteria fit in? Chromosome Video VIII 2019.

If you find this video interesting or even compelling, please watch the earlier ones and help me find a way to fund research in this area. This is not even orphan research. It's more like research in an induced coma.

Here are some terms you may want to look up to better understand the video:

Centrosome, centriole, basal body: used in the formation of microtubules of mitotic spindles and at the base of flagella and cilia.

Microtubules, used in the mitotic spindle and attach to the centromeres of chromosomes, also associated with flagella and cilia.

Phagocytosis, literally cell eating, may involve a cytopharnyx opening in a cell using a flagellum as a means for capturing prey. Once inside, the prey is encapsulated and fused with a lysosome which is a bag of digestive enzymes.

Endosymbiont: literally an organism living within a larger organism. In the case of cells, this might be a bacterium or a larger more complex cell type.

Incorporating smaller cells into larger cells via hierarchical endosymbiosis by using larger cell centrosomes to capture smaller cell centrosomes. Such a process may have led to the creation of complex multicellular animals with hundreds of cell types. The absence of centrosomes in most fungi and plants may explain why they never developed hundreds of tissue types (see the Bitchute video on this channel: A Grand Unifying Theory of Biology? https://www.bitchute.com/video/s5aTwd5kJdHH/

This video brings the ARR manuscripts “home” by providing a visual interpretation of the data within them that precluded the discovery of the amazing circular structures shown in some of my videos and in my blog: http://evolution4.wordpress.com. It complements and elaborates on the preceding “ARR video. Alkali resistant RNA (ARR) may be used as a marker to determine where origins of replication exist within DNA. Such origins of replication may be involved in differentiation of primitive cells into specialized cells which is at the very core of cancer, genetics, aging, evolution, and embryogenesis.

This video is specifically about three manuscripts uploaded to my blog, http://evolution4.wordpress.com. They can be found on the page tab called "Manuscripts and Data". The files are called "ARR" which stands for alkali resistant RNA. They were so controversial 30 years ago that they could never get past peer review. Peer review involves a "back and forth" between the investigator(s) that wrote the manuscript and the reviewers. It is supposed to provide investigators with suggestions for improving the manuscript. However, that is not always the case. Sometimes it involves blatant censorship based upon ideological biases more akin to a religious cult.

This video is about what has been occurring on my blog since July, 2019 (Evolution4.wordpress.com). People are downloading unpublished manuscripts, a powerpoint presentation, and my entire Ph.D. dissertation. What will they find? Well, let me save you a lot of trouble here. Those manuscripts with the "ARR" in front of them refer to something I call alkali resistant RNA. I can hear crickets chirping now. Ok, let me fill in some details here. RNA ain't supposed to be alkali resistant. Quite the opposite. When reviewers read this they immediately go into rejection mode.

Ok, here are some more details. Unlike "normal" RNA, DNA is alkali resistant because of one chemical alteration in the sugar of the sugar/phosphate backbone that helps hold strands together. RNA is called ribonucleic acid for a reason. Ribose is the five carbon cyclic sugar that holds its strands together. Let me explain what cyclic means here. Envision a five beaded necklace where each bead is an atom. That is a cyclic molecule. For ribose it's a bit more complicated than this but you get the idea. DNA is called deoxyribonucleic acid and is named after its five carbon cyclic sugar called deoxyribose. The only difference between ribose and deoxyribose is at the 2' carbon atom within each respective ring. The 2' carbon atom in ribose has a hydroxyl group attached to it whereas deoxyribose is missing this group, hence its name. The presence or absence of this hydroxyl group determines whether the nucleic acid strands are alkali resistant or not.

Ok, so far so good. So how could RNA ever become alkali resistant like DNA? This can happen whenever the hydroxyl group on the ribose chemically binds with another chemical group. Within cells, likely candidates would be methyl or phosphate groups. However, it is also possible for two RNA strands to hybridize together and form a double strand like DNA. Under these conditions the sister strands could form a bridge between them by sharing a phosphate group. Such a bridge would be alkali resistant.

At this point, you have every right to ask where I am going with all of this. Well, this is where models and hypotheses come in which can be found in abundance on my blog: evolution4.wordpress.com. However, for the sake of brevity I’ll give you a “quick and dirty” here in an attempt to whet your appetite. Alkali resistant RNA (ARR) may be used as a marker to determine where origins of replication exist within DNA. Such origins of replication may be involved in differentiation of primitive cells into specialized cells which is at the very core of evolution, embryogenesis, and cancer. Nuff said for now.

This is Dr. Frank's final video on cancer. It is a video for everybody, even scientists!

Watch out folks! Dr. Frank is at it again! He’s gonna try and reel you in again with some fancy music and then throw his credentials at you. Keep your head down on this one!

This is a "catch all" video. If you're not sure what that means, by all means, watch it!

This is a silent video with only text, like a powerpoint presentation. It describes a way to exploit the DNA superstructure of cancer-causing chromosomes like those with translocations (pieces of DNA that have been cut out and transferred to another place on the chromosome, to a different chromosome, or used to make a new, smaller chromosome. It discusses using monoclonal antibodies as "smart bombs" to home in on translocation sites and deliver a lethal payload to the cell. It also compares the annual budgets of government research foundations to that of the military. The comparisons will absolutely shock you! It is dedicated to members of my family diagnosed with leukemia.

People come up with cancer cures everyday, right? Drink this, eat that, do this, do that. All for a price, of course. However, my gig's a little different. It's actually based upon real, verifiable, off the shelf science. I'm sharing it for free, provided there's any real interest in it. Otherwise, it goes nowhere, right? In the meantime, people continue to die. Do I have a cure you can purchase on Amazon? Nope. In fact, it may not even work. But then again, it might! Guess we'll never know, huh? It would have to be tested in a laboratory and that does require lab space and money. That's reality. Oh well, back to the cat videos.

Is a cancer cure possible based upon DNA superstructure?

This is the last of a series of videos started in 2018 regarding how our chromosomes may actually be put together. You always save the best for last!

This is a revised version of the last video. If you watched it before, the new changes start after roughly 21.5 minutes. Hopefully, it will make the last video much easier to understand. In short, how can you make a human being out of a single cell, or any other complex animal for that matter! Welcome to 2019!

This movie goes beyond what you may have seen in earlier ”rubber band” videos. It discusses chromosome differentiation based upon what you may have seen in those earlier videos. It focuses on the crux of how we become who and what we are from conception to death. It also briefly discusses the use of stem cells in animal cloning. I suggest you look at one of those earlier videos first. This one will require some patience and serious cerebration on your part.

The first ten seconds of this video gives you a still view of how our chromosomes may actually be put together as compared to actual photomicrographic evidence. Mac users may access it at http://youtu.be/gpzo3r9CXC4. This video is an upgrade from the last one based on feedback I received. The rest of the video tries to explain chromosome structure in terms that you should understand. Please watch at least nine minutes of it. The rest is optional. Once you do, you will wonder why mainstream science has ignored all of this for almost 30 years.

This video (http://youtu.be/l8z5a0aC4dU) is an overview explanation of how our chromosomes may actually be put together using rubber bands as models. A companion video can be found on you tube by searching for the channel: Cryptic Chromosome Structure (http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLbnsB-6oAvg4lLcQfsb6vA).

These beautiful circles were formed during the disintegration of mouse cells and were photomicrographed almost 30 years ago at Ohio State University. Since that time they have been virtually ignored by the scientific community as evidenced by the lack of any reference to them in professional publications. This is a form of truth censorship because they are in fact real objects that have been seen by four people under the microscope when they were first discovered. These people have names: Dr. Frank Abernathy (myself), Jeff Sneddon, Pat Elder, and Laura Lantry, all of whom worked in Dr. Ralph Stephens laboratory at the time. Dr. Stephens wasn’t present at the time but did view the photomicrographs shortly thereafter.

Over the years, I have discussed my findings with a sizable number of scientists, all to no avail. It reminds of a “catch-22” scenario which happens in other endeavors with little known authors or artists who are not yet “branded”. The only difference here is that continued ignorance about what these circles are could be considered as bordering on the criminal. No one is in any position to make judgment calls about how “significant” these findings are because nobody knows what they are.

Let me put it another way: Are all genetic diseases including cancer cured? Is anybody on the planet in a position to claim they fully understand how chromosomes are put together? What are the implications such knowledge could have on understanding and treating genetic diseases? Without that knowledge, no one is in any position to ignore unexplained discoveries that may have relevance for understanding how our cells are actually put together.

In the meantime, people are still suffering and dying from an incomplete understanding of how our chromosomes are actually put together and operate. The solution should be obvious: Leave no stone unturned, back off of cookie cutter research, quit promoting agenda-oriented highly branded research fraud, and get real.

Living Dust (Watch this video second)

From dust you came: Living dust. What is it? This video is based on a powerpoint presentation which can be downloaded for free at http://evolution4.wordpress.com.

Please support this research at Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=7263094

SHOW MORE

Created 6 years, 7 months ago.

26 videos

Category Science & Technology

Everything you thought you knew about chromosomes is about to be turned upside down.

These videos relate to the following web blog: http://evolution4.wordpress.com. I suggest you watch them in the order suggested, starting with "What Are They?" followed by "Living Dust". Please help fund this research with Patreon.

https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=7263094

If you are a scientist or simply a hard core skeptic that wants links to references regarding everything shown on these videos, I applaud you for it. Here is the link: https://evolution4.wordpress.com/additional-references/

If you want to review my original work, Ph.D.dissertation or manuscripts, here is a link for that:
https://evolution4.wordpress.com/manuscripts-and-data/

There are 12 page tabs there in all, located just below the main blog picture.

The beautiful circles shown in these videos were formed during the disintegration of mouse cells and were photomicrographed almost 30 years ago at Ohio State University. Since that time they have been virtually ignored by the scientific community as evidenced by the lack of any reference to them in professional publications. This is a form of truth censorship because they are in fact real objects that have been seen by four people under the microscope when they were first discovered. These people have names: Dr. Frank Abernathy (myself), Jeff Sneddon, Pat Elder, and Laura Lantry, all of whom worked in Dr. Ralph Stephens laboratory at the time. Dr. Stephens wasn’t present at the time but did view the photomicrographs shortly thereafter.

Over the years, I have discussed my findings with a sizable number of scientists, all to no avail. It reminds of a “catch-22” scenario which happens in other endeavors with little known authors or artists who are not yet “branded”. The only difference here is that continued ignorance about what these circles are could be considered as bordering on the criminal. No one is in any position to make judgment calls about how “significant” these findings are because nobody knows what they are.

Let me put it another way: Are all genetic diseases including cancer cured? Is anybody on the planet in a position to claim they fully understand how chromosomes are put together? What are the implications such knowledge could have on understanding and treating genetic diseases? Without that knowledge, no one is in any position to ignore unexplained discoveries that may have relevance for understanding how our cells are actually put together.

In the meantime, people are still suffering and dying from an incomplete understanding of how our chromosomes are actually put together and operate. The solution should be obvious: Leave no stone unturned, back off of cookie cutter research, quit promoting agenda-oriented highly branded research fraud, and get real.

Dr. Frank Abernathy
[email protected]