9/11 Planes Research

channel image

9/11 Planes Research

Mark Conlon

subscribers

Analysis enhancement, with contrast adjusted, shows to some degree the plane wing in the high quality version of Keith Lopez video. In the lower quality videos originally uploaded to social media platforms, shows the plane's wing disappearing. This is most likely due to the compression added to the videos when they go through the processing encoding when uploaded to YouTube and other platforms. If you have a higher quality (standard definition) video to begin with, you are less likely to lose as much quality in the video when uploading to media platforms.

This video still does not explain or discount the missing wing and tail section for 6 frames in the Naudet 2nd plane video, or the Luc Courchesne video. Those two videos are the best videos to show genuine anomalies with the plane captured in the videos.

News Report: Inside Look at Tomahawk Missile Facility

This is a documentary about the Tomahawk cruise missile [Uploaded For Research & Archive Purposes Only]

Ellen Mariani talks about her husband's death on United Flight 175. Ellen has doubts her husband (Neil) boarded which allegedly hit the South Tower at 9:03 a.m. on 9/11.

Ellen Mariani was outspoken "9/11 widow" and truth activist. Sadly, Ellen died 31st October 2015.

Ellen Mariani was the first family member to file a lawsuit against various air carriers, security companies and port authorities in what became known as the 9/11 litigation, after which Congress passed special legislation providing for a Victims Compensation Fund and channeling all lawsuits to the Southern District of New York. The VCF was available to those who were willing to forego a lawsuit, but Mariani spurned the Fund and launched her own investigation, at one point even being persuaded to sue George W. Bush.

PAT the Helicopter Visible In NY1 Footage [Archive Purposes Only]

Mark Walsh's show, where he talks with co host Ben and callers discussing 9/11 and the 10th anniversary of the WTC attacks, following Osama Bin Laden's capture May 2011.

Mark Walsh speaks of his experiences on 9/11. Later in the show the discussion returns to 9/11 and Mark Walsh is informed by a caller that he's known as the infamous "Harley Guy" from 9/11 on YouTube, much to his surprise. Walsh has been nicknamed "Harley Guy" on the internet, because he was wearing a Harley Davidson shirt during his 9/11 Fox News interview on 9/11.

This is Jesse Venture's TV Show - Conspiracy Theory, with the episode about the Pentagon attack on 9/11.

1978 movie - The Medusa Touch - shows real plane crash physics, unlike what we seen on 9/11.

001-Simulation UA175 Trajectory [Simon Shack Debunked]
Read my blog article here: https://911planesresearch.blogspot.com/2017/09/simon-shack-misrepresents-plane-flight_25.html

The video below is two short excerpts from "Psycho Mark" Walsh and Ben Sparks' radio broadcast on May 5, 2011. Mark and Ben, including callers discuss 9/11 and the 10th anniversary of the WTC attacks following Osama Bin Laden's capture May 2011. Mark Walsh speaks of his experiences on 9/11. Later in the show the discussion returns to 9/11 and Mark Walsh is informed by a caller that he's known as the infamous "Harley Guy" from 9/11 on YouTube, much to his surprise. Walsh has been nicknamed "Harley Guy" on the internet, because he was wearing a Harley Davidson shirt during his 9/11 Fox News interview on 9/11.

This is an episode from 2012 of Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory - Death Ray

A tape of Flight 77 boarding process does exist and was shown to John Wesley (Husband of Passenger Sarah Clark). It’s very likely this footage won’t be released to the public anytime soon

Thanks to 9/11 Revisionist for bring to my attention, and also
9/11 archivist and X, who posted it at his X account @911_Archivist who posted it the video 22nd Feb 2024.

Just made this video update to let people know I shall be appearing on Math Easy Solutions livestream this Saturday 24th Feb 2024, 8PM UK Time, and 1 PM PST / 3 PM CST / 4 PM EST / 11 PM CAT. See link below:

MES Livestream 25: 9/11 Planes Research Joins the Show
https://www.youtube.com/live/sx1PEDrAtZE?si=VUyaK_FUDfCMLTxo

I also discuss updates with my blog, YouTube and BitChute channels.

Richard D. Hall discusses the video evidence in relation to United Flight 175.

"PAT the Helicopter" Extended Analysis Version used for the critical analysis of Simon Shack's points in his Addendum film.

This is a short study of the trajectory of the alleged engine that exited the South Tower building when United 175 alleged crashed into the building.

Collection of accounts of witnesses. This includes a brief video clip of Patrick Welsh at the beginning, who says he doesn't believe the "fight back" fiction of UA93. Patrick was husband of Debbie Welsh who was a Purser on UA93.

In this video I explore the evidence in relation to damaged caused to a DC-7 aircraft's wing section during its collision with two wooden telegraph poles during an FAA crash test, and contrast and compare AA77's wings collision with 5 metal light poles. I also study the "alleged" damaged caused to the North WTC building caused from AA11's wings apparently slicing through several steel box beam girders.

This is a video of a aircraft crash test with a DC-7 conducted by the FAA. In this video it shows what happens to wing when it comes in contact with a telegraph pole, and what the end result of the collision result is, with the wing being sheered off by the telegraph pole. I am using this evidence of this crash study to inform us what would happen if AA77's aircraft wing on 9/11 collided with multiple (metal) light poles as we were told, however we were led to believe that the wing was still in tact when clearly this would not be the case as proved in this crash study.

This is clear proof in this Aircraft Crash Test Study of a DC-7 aircraft conducted by the FAA, what would happen if an aircraft's wing collides with a telegraph pole. We were told on 9/11 that thin wings can slice through steel columns of the WTC, and slice metal light poles in half near the Pentagon with no damage to the aircraft wings. This is against Newtonian Third Laws of Physics. The evidence is clear in this crash test study video what really happens to aircraft wings when they collide with wooden telegraph poles, never mind steel columns and metal light poles.

Original Source - Aircraft Crash Test - DC-7 - FAA Video:
https://youtu.be/Z-So3btcvCQ?si=41UlqlCaVHeaZe2b

This is an interview with Professor Morgan Reynolds, who brought a Qui Tam case against the government for fraud involving the "alleged" plane crashes stories on 9/11.

Professor Morgan Reynolds website is: nomoregames.net

Colin Scoggins, a military operations specialist at the FAA's Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center, describes a joint FAA/military training exercise held in 1995 or 1996 in which a real American Airlines aircraft apparently played the part of a hijacked plane and this aircraft "actually had passengers on board." Notably, two of the aircraft that were hijacked on 9/11--Flight 11 and Flight 77--were also American Airlines planes. This audio is a taken from Scoggins's interview with the 9/11 Commission on September 24, 2003.

Original Source: https://youtu.be/Z1gfx-1TQpA?si=rhId9p6s7mJlO8H3

Two clinics at the Pentagon held a training exercise in the summer of 2001 that, presciently, was based around the scenario of an airliner crashing into the Pentagon. This is revealed by John Baxter, who was commander of the Air Force Flight Medicine Clinic at the time of the 9/11 attacks. Baxter recalls that in the summer of 2001, he and James Geiling, then commander of the DiLorenzo Tricare Health Clinic, discussed having a joint exercise between their two clinics. They "decided on a scenario of a jetliner striking the Pentagon at the heliport," Baxter says. They didn't envision the crash being the result of terrorism, though. Instead, they were thinking about the fact that planes coming in to land at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport turned right over the Pentagon as they made their final approach to the airport. The two men therefore "thought it would be a somewhat realistic scenario that one of these airliners could get off course, get their altitude wrong, have a mechanical problem, and strike the Pentagon." The resulting exercise helped them identify a few "issues that were deficient" and correct these problems before the Pentagon was attacked on September 11 that year. This is an excerpt from episode 162 of the podcast series, "Borne the Battle," which was released on September 11, 2019.

Original Source: https://youtu.be/vDG3hDKDxb0?si=p0ODq-pUfYKQRaAy

Andy Studdert, chief operating officer of United Airlines on September 11, 2001, describes a shockingly realistic "no-notice drill" he arranged that was held on August 30, 2001. In it, airline employees were led to believe one of their Boeing 747s had crashed while flying over the Pacific Ocean, on its way to Australia. Studdert initially allowed personnel in the airline's operations center to think the crash was real. Many of them were devastated. There were "people throwing up in the hall" and "people crying," Studdert recalls. Only after half an hour did he reveal the truth, announcing, "This has been a no-notice drill, there is no event, everything's fine." Twelve days later, two United Airlines planes were hijacked as part of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Studdert claims that many people subsequently came up to him and thanked him because, as a result of his drill, "we were ready" on September 11. This is an excerpt from "Preparing Your Organization for a Crisis: Lessons From United Airlines Emergency Preparation, Pre-9/11," an interview with Andy Studdert by the Center for Values-Driven Leadership at Benedictine University on February 27, 2012.

Original Source: https://youtu.be/m7XMMoWjffE?si=6Ht5dWHI8An0pGOY

A woman who was working as an ID technician at NORAD's Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) on September 11, 2001, reveals that a C-130--a type of military cargo aircraft--would sometimes be used to play a hijacked plane in NORAD training exercises. The ID tech--either Shelley Watson or Stacie Rountree--explains that when the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was involved in NORAD exercises, "the majority of the time we had a military aircraft, real-world, out there flying over land, coming into our area where we were gonna hold the exercise." The ID tech goes on to specify that the military aircraft playing a hijacked plane in the exercise could be a C-130, saying that the FAA would be instructed, "This guy's a C-130, he's gonna fake these guys out, he's gonna pretend he's hijacked, don't tell [NEADS] who it is." This clip is taken from "Team 8 Interview with Maureen Dooley, Shelley Watson, and Stacie Roundtree of the Northeast Air Defense Sector." 9/11 Commission, October 27, 2003.

Original Source: https://youtu.be/E0bvmbemX4E?si=6ek8b_R2e39nLGFs

This is a short presentation about the discrepancies in the "official" evidence data involving United Airlines, Flight 175. In this short presentation I look at the telemetry data such ACARS data, ELT data and news media reports along with an account by Pilot Steven Miller, who was behind UA175 before it took-off.

Please check out my blog for a detailed version of this presentation:
https://911planesresearch.blogspot.com

SHOW MORE

Created 6 years, 3 months ago.

205 videos

Category Education

9/11 Planes Research BitChute channel is used primarily for hosting 9/11 planes research and other related content, which is in conjunction with the 9/11 Planes Research Blogspot website, hosted by researcher and author Mark Conlon.