People keep sending me links to fruit and other stuff testing positive on CV test kits, asking me for my opinion. I am curious, but skeptical, by nature. So I got a bunch of test kits and did my own experiments, simply to add to the body of objective information available. Here is what happened...

My friend noticed the nostrils sticking out from the face of the hill. This creature was large and appears to have had at least one blunt horn on its head.

Bitchute has changed their upload policy unless you pay to upload so my uploads will have to be broken into smaller pieces going forward.

An interesting drainage we stumbled upon that is entirely hidden from most angles. We found two hidden caves in it and some very different rock and soil layers than what we typically find. We also found something else, but I will post that in the next set of videos.

Just a highly unusual area that caught our attention. Small area that looks entirely different than anything we ran across within miles of it. Posting it in case it helps connect something else we find. Quite often, isolated things don't connect until we start finding more of them that demonstrate a pattern or fit in some other possible way. This one may or may not, but since this is about gathering observations, it goes on the roster.

For those who don't have an RF meter or can't afford one, this will give you some idea of the scale of RF being emitted by at least this earpiece.

I have been using Cornet's RF meters for over a decade now, which has been long enough for me to take for granted that not everyone has one or can afford one. After a subscriber asked me about this, I decided to take RF measurements of my own phone in a fairly wide variety of scenarios to hopefully give that subscriber information that he or she may not be able to get. I'm using a Cornet ED88T-Plus, a meter I STRONGLY recommend if you are looking for one. I have zero affiliation with them other than the fact that I have been one of their customers for many years.

I hope this helps people who don't have the means to measure the RF we can't see, the RF being sent from our phones into our brains and bodies.

Correction: In video I reference a comment being left in my 5G pole baseline reading video from a few weeks ago. The comment was actually posted on the video when I was measuring the electromagnetic fields under electric transmission lines in Arizona back in June.

A quick note for those who are sensitive to RF. "Smart" electric meters are easy to overlook because, at least on single family houses, they are mounted to the outside of the house. In most places now, electric utility companies require their meters for multi-family dwellings to be mounted in one location, remote from the building so that the meters can be serviced without entering peoples' yards, which tends to put them at enough distance to make their transmission through the adjacent townhome, condo, or duplex weak. Electric meters are out of sight, out of mind, but if it is mounted to the side of your house, the transmission and reception of broadcast information will likely send RF into your home, at least on the other side of the wall to which it is mounted.

I have measured RF being emitted by broadcasting meters many times and when they broadcast or receive, they spike to somewhere around 1200-1500 milliwatts per meter squared. Each meter tends to generate a huge spike in RF every 60-120 seconds and lasts only a second or two. On multi-family units, where you may have many electric meters present in one location, each meter pulses individually, which basically blows up my meter continuously since they are all spiking up at different times from each other.

As a builder, I always mount electric meters for multi-family housing units on brick pedestal walls remote from the building and face the meters AWAY from the dwelling. The thick brick wall blocks any RF from coming through on the dwelling side, leaving all broadcast RF to move away from the building, not toward it. And on single family dwellings, I always locate the electric meter on the outside corner of the home to the garage wall, as far away from living space as I can possibly go and I mount them to short brick walls on the outside of the home to prevent the RF from coming backwards even into the garage as much as possible. I don't talk about why I have always done this, but it is one way I can try to help people as I build their houses. Maybe one day I will make a short video showing what I am describing here.

Most states now have an opt-out policy or law for broadcasting meters. When I purchased our home, I simply phoned our electric utility and told them I was opting out of the broadcasting meter on the side of our home and requested a non-broadcasting meter. Two days later a non-broadcasting (i.e. non "smart" meter) electric meter had been installed.

My kids were still asleep so I kept quiet, but wanted to measure RF (radio frequency) in our hotel room. If you have never thought of RF, this will seem odd to you, but if you, like me, are sensitive to RF, then you will understand why I like to know. I did three 360-degree sweeps. The first with meter straight out in front of me, basically pointed at about the center of the height of the walls. Next, I did so with the meter pointed upward, toward the top of the walls. Then I did the same pointed at the bottom of the walls.

In the last portion of the video, I was trying to demonstrate different volumes of RF, based on whether the phone was off and/or wrapped up in foil. Since I could not talk without waking up the kids and since there was background RF in the room already, this was not a very useful illustration, but I don't feel like waiting for my slow computer to re-render the video if I chop off the tail end of what I'm uploading.

I just made another video to demonstrate various levels of RF from my cell phone in different circumstances for those who don't have a meter or can't afford to buy one. I will upload that one as soon as I stick the pieces together and render it.

The other two phones, the ones I wrapped in foil, were off during this and my phone, which I was filming with, was in airplane mode.

We ventured into a remote area and became stranded because our number of flat tires exceeded our number of spares. It took about 5-1/2 hours for someone to get a tire plug kit to us so we could hold enough air to at least get out of there. This was during a heat wave in AZ. The thermometer in the vehicle got stuck at 112 on its way up, but I would guess it was well north of 115. Eventually, I realized that there was a giant petrified tree not far from us so I jumped out to take a few minutes of footage. Had only my phone with me.

I don't know if I was filming a fallen giant tree, branches, or an exposed portion of a root system. I know only that there was once a gigantic tree at this location.

I have heard on the periphery a discussion about a mudflood in various areas around the world, but had not looked into it much. What got my attention was a video posted by Jon Levi about multiple below-grade floors of the Mormon temple in Salt Lake being excavated. As a builder, it was a bizarre event to watch occurring.

While in Lawrenceburg, IN, I noticed that there was a lot of at-grade and below-grade windows, doors, and the like in that town. Before Levi's video that I watched, I had never really paid much mind to this. As I walked through the city to grab a handful of video clips of things that no builder in his right mind would do, the subject has moved up the scale of interest to me.

We were simply passing through town and I was not intending to record anything. I wish I would have thought to grab my GoPro for better quality video, but my phone was better than nothing.

This is me merely making quick observations. I can see with my eyes that buildings are sunk into the ground or the ground is higher than it should be around these buildings, but I do not know why this is the case. I put the term "mudflood" into the title because it is the only thing I could think of that gives someone a quick frame of context for the content of the video. I want to understand why this is the way it is, but as of right now, I have no clue.

This is a look at present-day alligator junipers on the ground compared to the giant petrified tree via some drone footage. The similarities are striking.

We are directly below the ridgeline that is the giant petrified tree, at the same elevation we found a fossilized skull in 2019. We stumbled upon something neither of us has seen before.

We have returned to the gigantic petrified tree that gives all kinds of problems to the historical narrative of our world. This thing was, no doubt, a tree of gigantic proportions. Not modern-day Redwood proportions, but exponentially larger. It is what it is and it is time to stop letting the narrative dictate reality. It is time for observation to dictate the reality that once was, the reality of which we don't speak. Having now traveled to this remote location in Arizona and hiked up to this (maybe) ancient petrified giant twice, we are no more certain of exactly what we are looking at, except that it was a tree. Whether we are looking at a root system, the main stem, cones, or anything else, we do not know with any absolute certainty. Considering what we believe to be the base of utterly gigantic trees in the nearby area, which were cut down at some point in the past, we know only that the story which we have been told does not match readily available observation. And this leads us to the realization that we have been asking the wrong questions.

We got out to the base of the small mountain where the giant petrified tree is and were about to head out, but decided to check out a boulder field that we have looked over before because these kinds of fields tend to have fossilized skulls in them.