One has no right to rule what they have no right to. To exercise power illegitimately is to rule by the law of the jungle. In the law of the jungle might makes right and the end justifies the means. Only the worker earns the value and therefore the right, to rule. We own what we create, and no one created the natural world but God. No one has a right to dominate and rule the world by God. Labor creates and owns everything else. The right belongs to us, not the state.

The reader probably thinks he or she does not want to know how to drive down wages and make a nation poor, yet it is pretty obvious there are a lot of people who do know how to do this and make use of the knowledge, otherwise wages would not be declining relative to prices and nations would not be suffering under ever mounting debt loads. Perhaps if you learned what they know you would understand what they are doing and put a stop to it.

Socialism is considered to produce less efficient results than a market. Regardless, of how one may argue the point, no one has actually established a mechanism for eliminating the need or preference for at least some public sector engagement; until now. Socialism can be utterly eliminated by eliminating the need for the public sector. And it is not as difficult as you think.

There is not one infinitely complex world that contains and encompasses everything. Such a reality cannot contain absolute truth for absolute truth is incompatible with a world in which truth is relative and man is free to follow any path of his or her choosing. This essay sets out the other option.

Christians have been readier to embrace the politics of peace than the scripture of war. Militarism is considered a sin in many Christian pulpits. But the language and motifs of war are found everywhere in the Bible.

The Golden Age is often mocked but refuses to die. Few people of any maturity do not feel the past was somehow better, even when considering such things as the primitive level of medicine. Is this desire for a past Golden Age just a longing for childhood or is there something more to our looking back with some regret. When we talk of the Golden Age of Rome, Athens or Islam, we are not fantasizing, so what if there was something more substantial about the Wests reminiscing, than a dream of childhood? What makes for a Golden Age and can we start to dream of a future Golden Age, rather than one viewed in hindsight.

It is not only economists who are victimized by these errors, our Western Civilizations used them for the foundation of their cultures. If things shaky now it is because the faults upon which our cultures are based, are starting to crumble.

The fall of Babylon is only possible if the church rises, they hold an inverse relationship. There is not a third or fourth alternative organizational model to follow. There is no range of possibilities. We are either in the church obeying God or we are in Babylon and building it up.

Poverty cannot be solved by greed nor by force. We cannot expect the most ruthless and selfish of men become altruistic, especially when part of a system that rewards selfish, self-interest and penalizes anyone motivated by pity. But it does not help much if the state steps in and attempts to bury the worst effects of greed by systematic expropriations and handouts. Indeed, the socialism of the state is likely only to worsen things in the long run, as the rich fight harder to retain what is theirs and the poor get used to going to the state for the things they need.

God has the solution to globalism, if you want it.

It may be impossible to eliminate crime and sin but it is possible to separate from it by making it too expensive to engage in it, at least where we are. Learn how to separate from crime, as a church.

Universalism is a form of apologetics that argues that if a belief is true, it is universal, if a solution is a solution, is applies to all cases and situations. There is no singular or partial truth nor disassociated solution without relevance to the single, all-encompassing solution. In short, Universalism points to the origin of truth. If you know one truth, you know all truth. If you have a solution, you have all solutions. By the same token, you embrace one lie you embrace all lies. If you have one problem, you have all problems. Many like to think they know mostly truth but are infected with a few partial truths, or that they have some problems but mostly the problems are only the solution improperly implemented. But lies and truth cannot be reconciled or made compatible in some way. Universalism is the truth and is the whole, all-encompassing truth that wipes out all problems, including unemployment, debt, poverty, inflation, pollution, waste, taxation, homelessness, war, property crime and the cost of the state generally. The reality is, if you do not embrace the truth, you have these problems. If you have any of these problems you have rejected the truth.

Many people think there are an infinite number of universes, others say there is but one. But the theory of many universes means the metaverse is the true universe and all the versions of the universe are really parts of a larger universal whole. Those who claim there is one universe acknowledge there are many different ways of thinking about what this universe looks like. The one universe is composed of an infinite number of actual ways of thinking what the universe looks like. So the one universe has an infinite number of version. These two extremes then are the same theory expressed in two different ways. We call this the One Reality Hypothesis because in this theory there are many related versions about what is real, but they all assume reality is relative to the observer. Those who subscribe to The One Reality Hypothesis thinks reality is real, but reality is contingent upon the observer. There is no absolute, non-contingent truths in this way of thinking about what is real. But if this reality is valid, where do absolute truths come from. If numbers and truth are not real things, why do they exist?

Is there no truth and no source of truth. Ultimately, is there no meaning in the universe? That cannot be or we would cease to be rational, as there would be no meaning to the idea. If there is reason and truth in this universe it has to be identifiable, meaning, lies cannot be true and bad cannot be good. There must be a type of thing we can know as being true and good that is separate from all the many other things we can identify as being lies and bad. But the source of truth must be a mind and this mind must encompass all that is true and good, otherwise it would not be true and good, as nature cannot produce truth or meaning. All truth and meaning and all that is good must come from a Universal Mind, a Mind that contains all that is good and true, because it is this mind that defines what is true and what is good.

There is a reason why we talk of the church and state as if they were polar opposites and why there is an ongoing discussion over which institution has the greater right when it comes to education and the nature of morality. In our hearts we know there is a conflict between them even if we may not understand it in our heads. However, in this regard atheists tend to be far more aware of the incompatibility of church and state than Christians. The latter seem always hopeful for some kind of reconciliation or negotiated settlement. Atheists seem well aware that the two are incompatible and ultimately what the two sides are engaged in, is a fight to the death.

This world has many disciplines but there is only one science. This has to be so or there is not but one, all-encompassing truth. If this was so and there is but one science, there cannot be more than one all-encompassing experiment. But agreeing to this also means that there is but one Control Group and since this Control Group encompasses the world, it must leave us with one problem: how do we construct the Test Group? Who is in it and how is its performance quantified? Ultimately, one truth leads to another, if there is any truth at all, the conclusion must be reality is an experiment between those who live right and those who live in error. The details of the experiment tells us where the line must be drawn. In fact, the experiment must already exist, we only need to formalize it with the development of the Test Group.

The church is incompatible with the state. They exist in an inverse relationship. Most Christians would argue that their first love is the church and that while they obey the law they do so only from necessity. Christian would summarily reject they are the main contributor to the state and the main reason why the state persists. Yet, it is the sin of the Christian that gives the state its power.

Every nation is a pyramid and every pyramid focuses power onto the center. These pyramids all seek to concentrate power at the center. Over time the centers will learn to cooperate to further consolidate their power. This gives rise to globalism. Globalism is the inevitable outcome of nations organized pyramidically. There is no pyramidal structure that can serve as an alternative to and antidote for, globalism. No nation can defeat globalism as there is no nation that opposes globalism.

If truth exists it cannot contradict itself or it is not truth. There must be a way to reconcile all sciences and if there is a true religion, it must also be reconcilable with all other truth. If there is a truth, then truth would result in the elimination of all problems, at least in the theoretical sense. There would be solutions to unemployment, debt, poverty, inflation, pollution, waste, taxation, homelessness, war, property crime and the cost of the state generally. Even if not used the solution would have to be there. Which means, if we have social problems, it is because we choose to have them and we have chosen, for our own reasons, not to eliminate them. The Christian Theory of Everything proves this is true, also it proves Christianity is one hundred percent consistent with the truth and contains solutions to every problem, implicitly and explicitly and the only reason the church has problems is because of our failure to embrace the truths of Scripture.

If we stated it is impossible to eliminate crime, no one would notice.
If we claimed crime could be eliminated, a storm of criticism would emerge. Those who did not respond, would be convinced it was a police state that was being promoted. The problem is we live in a monochrome world, in which every issue is black and white and every solution, a shade of grey. But crime is a black and white issue.

What is good and evil if not subjective? But if good and evil are what we each decide, the very idea of there being a good and evil is invalidated. There must be an objective good, measurable and quantifiable, if it is to be real and divisible from evil.

It seems a given that unions are obsolete. But change their name to an association and they become vital players in workers rights, at least if the worker is a tradesperson or professional. Unions seem to have lost relevance only for the poorer and less powerful category of employee.

The Ecumenical Hardline is a response to the ecumenical compromises that has been the path the Christian churches have followed to date. Ecumenical compromise is the equivalent of Chamberlains policy of appeasement. We never negotiate with evil; we do not attempt to reconcile with the devil

In this essay we make the argument that poor persons may manifest God but to demonstrate the existence of God in a scientific and replicable way, there has to be a manifestation of economic superiority. Man cannot live right, in obedience to God, without living a better life, this requires property. The pious individual is a real thing but the obedient community living in poverty is unbiblical. This is not about the prosperity gospel; it is about God being in charge.

Ecumenicalism is usually considered a process of bringing the churches together. It is this but it is more about dealing with the wolves among us.
We cannot solve problems by embracing the symptoms. The symptoms are the worlds system. Jesus did not for nothing reject the devils offer of food, security and power. We need to do the same.
There is only one solution and that is the one in the Bible. We must separate from evil; it is not up to us to solve it nor to subsidize it. We need to start an ecumenical movement that not only brings the faithful together, it also divides us from the problem, which is the world.