Radical Agenda

Last night, a dozen Democrats did their best impressions of CNN opinion hosts, competing for the chance to lose next year’s presidential election to Donald Trump. I watched every minute of the entire spectacle, and under normal circumstances, would consider it my professional obligation to provide some post debate analysis on today’s episode.

Today’s Democrat Party, however, does not warrant much in the way of analysis. The strategy being deployed has nothing to do with actual policy, and has instead dwindled to what may as well have been grunts and clicks, designed to appeal only to unthinking emotional responses. This exercise in non-reality will be the politics of our future, if immigration is not slowed, and American birthrates are not increased, but the Democrats have, much to their detriment, jumped the gun. The collective IQ of the Nation has not yet dropped so far as to warrant this sort of campaigning, and as a result, Donald Trump is all but guaranteed victory in 2020.

The smart people have already figured this out. Mark Zuckerberg, however countless his flaws, is a smart person.

Seeing the writing on the wall, Zuckerberg has been confidentially meeting with conservative personalities, including Tucker Carlson. This revelation has driven Leftists absolutely insane, resulting in, amongst other things, the hashtag #DeleteFacebook recently trending on Twitter.

Little is known about the contents of their talks, but one imagines it has a great deal to do with Left wing bias in the platform’s staffing and content moderation policies. Republicans have been pointing out that the immunity provisions of the Communications Decency Act, only exempt neutral platforms from lawsuits over content. If Facebook and other social media companies are going to be in the business of content moderation, this in fact makes them publishers, who thus ought to be held legally responsible for the content on their platforms. Seeing the law applied in this way would either put Facebook out of business, or cause them to dramatically alter the way they do business, in the blink of an eye.

It has become obvious that the Trump administration will do nothing to rectify this situation before next year’s election, and so far it has seemed that the search and social media platforms have placed all their eggs in the singular basket, of aiding a Democrat victory in 2020. This path is fraught with perils, for a number of reasons.

The Leftist media is in hysterics over a YouTube video in which Donald Trump’s head is superimposed on a character from a fight scene in a movie. In it, Donald Trump walks into “The Church of Fake News,” wherein all the churchgoers have the logos of media organizations, or the faces of his political enemies, superimposed on them. As per their pattern and practice, the fake news enemies of the people, and their subversive Democrat allies, attempt to kill the President. Unfortunately for these assassins, the President happens to be in possession of a pistol, and superhuman combat abilities, which he uses to lay waste to the whole lot of them.

The Press, suddenly aware of the serious impacts media can have on people’s behavior, are now in full panic mode, concerned this will somehow cause people to go out and murder reporters.

The informed observer has to suspect that this is the voice of a guilty conscience speaking. The traitorous Press has been glorifying the violence of Black Lives Matter and Antifa since prior to the President’s election. They have been hammering home the demonstrably false narrative that Trump is guilty of treason by adhering to foreign foes, which would necessarily subject him to the death penalty. They parade sham psychiatrists around, depicting the President as a “Mad King,” whose assassin would be smiled upon by history. They dedicate inordinate amounts of page space and airtime to mass murderers, gleefully dancing on the yet to be dug graves of the still warm bodies of the victims, celebrating their propaganda victory, and providing incentive to future killers in search of precisely this kind of notoriety.

No wonder the media is so concerned about images depicting their deaths. They know all too well what their intent is, when they promote violence across their mediums. They want Republicans to be assaulted and afraid to show their faces. They want the President to be assassinated, and incapable of leading the country. So they promote exactly that sort of thing across their pages, airwaves, and websites, and they’ve gotten everything but the President’s funeral as a return on their investment.

For the Right to respond in kind, terrifies them, precisely because they know how effective this sort of thing can be. They encouraged violence, they got it, and so they promoted more violence, and watched in glee as the violence escalated unchecked. They do not want to live in a world, where they are actually under the kind of threats they constantly pretend they are under. They fear if these sorts of things continue to proliferate, that the next mass shooter might kill somebody who actually deserves it, and they know full well that they would rank very high on that sort of hit list.

I am usually the first to say that people who act in wicked ways ought not be rewarded with political success.

This is an important lesson our country has yet to learn about the Antifa and Black Lives Matter criminality, which has plagued our streets for several years. The repercussions of this failure will be with us for decades to come, even if we were to correct course right this minute. When violence and deception are rewarded with something so valuable as political power, one cannot be surprised if violence and deception become regular features of our existence.

Unfortunately, it is precisely that failure which has resulted in another sort of violence, far less favored by the media. White racial terrorism used to be a Left wing myth, evidence of which had to be fabricated in the form of fake hate crimes. Today it has become an all too real subject of our political discourse, brought to the forefront of our National conversation by a curious alignment of priorities, between the perpetrators of this violence, and its purported targets.

Stephan Balliet spent substantial time and effort on manufacturing improvised firearms and explosive devices, before carrying out his attempted attack on a synagogue in Halle, Germany. He left behind a manifesto of sorts, detailing more his methods than his motives, but is reported to have confessed his intent to police, and also streamed video of the assault, in which he blamed Jews for all too real problems facing his country, and ours.

He is not the first to do this, obviously. Before him came Patrick Crusius, Brenton Tarrant, Robert Bowers, and Dylann Roof, to name just a few. This list is likely to grow longer, perhaps long enough for us to begin forgetting the names, because of our society’s stubborn refusal to grapple with the root causes of these crimes, and worse, a morbid drive to double down on precisely the misguided and malicious patterns which preceded, and, arguably, necessitated them.

Normally when people resort to political violence, we rightly critique the methods of the criminal. Whatever one’s cause, no matter how righteous, violence, we insist, is never the answer. We live in democratic societies, where avenues are purportedly provided for political and social change, which do not necessitate bloodshed, thereby depriving such acts of justification. We purport to embrace free speech, respect the rights of individuals, and protect minorities from persecution at the hands of the Mob.

Had we continued to honor these time tested traditions, it would be difficult indeed to find a soul on this Earth who would watch the gruesome videos of these attacks, and find them inspiring. Their so-called “manifestos” would be dismissed by all, just as they are currently dismissed today by the majority, as the senseless rantings of deranged criminals. We would find them no more worthy of consideration, than we would the lyrics of gangster rap, or “death metal”.

Sadly, we have not honored these traditions. Some ideas, even some rather substantial facts, have been deemed too dangerous to be discussed openly, by our ruling classes. Their frantic and futile efforts to hide the truth, and suppress dissent, have resulted in precisely the outcome they purport to be trying to prevent. With each such outcome, these censorious efforts are increased, and coupled with ever louder calls to disarm the broader law abiding populace.

The inability to peacefully address legitimate grievances, combined with the drive for disarmament, create a wholly justified sense of dread, and urgency, amongst the growing numbers of people who understand these truths our rulers try so hard to suppress. Seeing in their futures a world where degeneracy, brutality, and chaos, prevail over the forces of decency, law, and order, otherwise good men reach the conclusion that cowardice alone prevents men from taking up arms against these threats to civilization.

People who reach these conclusions are further troubled by the observation that no leader has emerged to guide them toward victory. Anyone who emerges with the potential for that leadership, is rapidly set upon by the powers that be. They are assaulted, silenced, and sucked into costly legal battles which incapacitate them for years at a time.

Simultaneously, they see innocent men imprisoned, bankrupted, slandered, and worse. With time and repetition, the message becomes clear. Innocence is no defense against this threat, and thus remaining innocent has no benefit.

In a rapidly growing number of minds, these circumstances, taken together, spell out a clear choice. Either fight now, and hope that others follow suit, or cower slavishly, secure in the knowledge that far worse evils will result.

To attack the motives of such men, only proves their point. To try and silence these views, only confirms the suspicion. To disarm the populace, only increases the urgency.


Last Friday, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Kevin McAleenan announced his department’s “Strategic Framework for Combating Terrorism and Targeted Violence“. From the title, this would seem an appropriate venture for an arm of the Federal Government, tasked with securing the homeland. Stopping terrorism and other forms of criminal violence are amongst the primary functions of any government, and thus publishing a strategic framework for combating these things ought raise not an eyebrow.

This framework however, did raise a few eyebrows. More than a few.

It was curiously celebrated by the Left wing media, which is profoundly odd, considering their contempt for securing the Nation more generally. They opposed restricting the entry of migrants from countries known for sponsoring terrorism, even migrants from countries the United States is presently at war with. They oppose securing our borders, and enforcing our immigration laws. They support the disenfranchisement and wholesale replacement of the people of this country. They have openly praised violent communist agitators who attack permitted demonstrations, while seemingly failing to notice even more reprehensible Left wing terrorism. They supported the FBI’s attempted overthrow of our duly elected President. They seek to disarm and silence our citizenry, abolish our constitution, and institute in its place a wholly anti-American global order, which subordinates us to other Nations & Peoples.

Just as curiously, some of the most patriotic people in the country were terrified of the news. They feared they might be targeted by their own government. This fear was granted substantial weight by an abundance of evidence of this happening, provided well before the official announcement. Headline after headline has emerged of supposed “White Supremacists” being arrested on charges ranging from a malicious disregard for their claims of self defense, to drugs and weapons, to stretched interpretations of “threats” supposedly uttered on the Internet.

Of particular note were the framework’s focus on “White Supremacy” and seeming lack of concern for violent communist groups like Antifa.

“Skip School & Organize A Climate Strike” reads the website of a religious extremist group. The gods are angry with mankind Personkind, for his their sinful industriousness has given rise to inequality between peoples. For giving this offense to the Climate Goddesses, we are condemned to live in a world in which weather conditions change in perpetuity.

It sounds ominous, I know, but fear not, fellow creature. No matter which of the infinite genders you identify as, there is hope for our collective salvation. If we only make the proper sacrifices, ill-defined though they may be, we can live in a veritable monoclimatic paradise, in which no man, woman, non-binary, nor two-spirit, need purchase clothing for more than a single season.

The path to uniclimatism is long and arduous, but this is the test of our faith which the Goddesses of temperature, precipitation, and breeze, have set for us, and we must meet it, lest we be cursed with this sin for eternity.

Our redemption begins with a global strike, to be led by those who are paid for the service.

The children who have committed the sin of being born, must flee their classrooms studies and bathe their wickedness in the restorative air of flamboyant ignorance.

The workers who constitute the armies of industrial evil, must too flee their posts. As they take to the streets, they will rinse away their corruption through the glory of unproductive activism.

The handful of incredibly wealthy people who have come to epitomize the inequality for which we must be forgiven, shall find their absolution in financing this holy endeavor, without the slightest impact on their bottom line, of course. For without this indulgence, our glorious Climate Based Faith would have no means by which to spread its goodness to the masses.

Once we have all abandoned our labors and our studies. We must then take our vows.

Hear my words and bear witness to my vow.
Climate changes, and now my watch begins.
It shall not change again until my death.
I shall take no spouse, hold no lands, parent no children.
I shall wear no crowns and win no glory.
I shall live and die in idleness.
I shall strive to accomplish nothing.
I am the thermometer in the darkness.
I am the watcher of the weather.
I am the dust that guards the weathervane.
I pledge my life and honor to the Goddesses of Climate, for this season until there are no seasons.


With the shame of our sins behind us, and our vows true in our hearts, we must now set off to spread the Goddesses word to the infidels.

All shall kneel before her magnificence, but let it not be said that we are intolerant. As we bring the glory of the One True Faith to the masses, our good friend, the Jew, shall be spared the sword of conversion. The Islamist too, shall be spared, so long as he bear not his fangs against the non-binary, lest we meet the wrath of his exploding shirt!

The followers of the lower case T however, must disavow their false God to be spared the boot of her divine intervention.

I had a conversation with somebody about the accelerationist factions of the White Nationalist movement recently. During that conversation, I attempted to emphasise that I did not think their advocacy of gunning down non-combatants in houses of worship to be politically helpful, which prompted the question “you don’t mind the violence, you just don’t want to be associated with it?”

The kneejerk reaction to such a question is an instinctive “I oppose violence” but I tend to think of answers like that as a copout, since violence is sort of endemic to the human condition. I gave the example of my desire to see law enforcement bring the coercive force of the State upon criminals who have harmed me, to illustrate this point. Since I agree with our laws which see only minor differences between violence and the threat thereof, I think of this reasonable and lawful exercise as “violence” strictly speaking, and thus I cannot honestly say “I oppose violence”.

When people say “I oppose violence” I tend to think of them as either being intentionally dishonest, or not intelligently processing the question. Violence is neither good nor bad, inherently, prefer though we all may, to live in perfect peace. The Democrat Party claims to oppose violence. By this opposition they advocate seizing firearms from otherwise law abiding citizens. This is quite certainly a violent act, justified by way of deception, and under color of law, though in violation of our constitution. They claim to oppose violence by refusing to enforce our immigration laws, which results in crimes, including but in no way limited to rape and murder, against our citizenry.

If that is what one means by opposition to violence, then I cannot be counted amongst the adherents of such a belief system.

As some of you know, I have recently launched some side projects with the hope of establishing new revenue streams and bringing in new listeners. Among the ones I can talk about publicly at this time are some new websites, a new marketing push, and the beginnings of a couple of different books.

These have occupied nearly all of my free time lately, with the notable exception being time I’ve spent over the last few days monitoring Andrew Anglin’s recent meltdown at the Daily Stormer, which I suspect is largely staged. This was followed by Hunter Wallace publishing the best collection of evidence against Weev published to date. These prompted me to a significant advancement on one of the book projects, writing upwards of 10,000 words, roughly a third of which I will share with you today in place of a timely oration about the news of the day.

Before I get into that, I’d like to tell you about the new sites, some of which you know about, some of which you do not.

Today I published my first piece at TransgenderismToday.com, the tagline of which is “Documenting the Decline”. I go over some recent headlines about the transgender assault on biology and reality, and some important history of the movement, which I’ll read to you on this episode.

We’ve mentioned BlacksHateFags.com on the show a few times recently. There, I’ve written several posts documenting the fact nearly all the violence against transgender people, so often mentioned by the media and the broader Left, is coming from blacks. Universally glossed over by the media, this fact, if widely exposed, shatters the rainbow coalition of mongrels and degenerates threatening the stability of our country. Moreover, it does so with a catchy name suitable for flier campaigns, and other less conventional forms of advertising, thus standing to attract fresh eyes to this and other messages we must spread to salvage that which we value.

Most recently, I covered a story there about a Jewish homosexual who was accosted by a black man on the subway, which was hilarious, and this too, we’ll discuss today.

I also mentioned SaidTheJew.com recently, and the most recent post there provides something of an addendum to the BHF post on the aforemented Jewish homosexual, which I’ll also go over.

Each site has a certain commonality. They each maintain their own independent email list, which visitors are aggressively encouraged to sign up for. Each has its own Telegram channel and RSS feed as well, likewise marketed. Other audience procurement and engagement channels are in the works for all of them, and we’ll unveil those in due course.

Additionally, each site has the same radio players embedded on ChristopherCantwell.com and RadicalAgenda.com, with the hope of bringing new listeners to this show.

I have registered several other domains, and have a list of many others which I am contemplating. These sort of niche sites, even if they only have a few pieces of compelling content, I think have huge potential, and I will create as many of them as I can come up with ideas for, since the hosting requirements of this production provide me with ample resources to host a nearly infinite number of moderately trafficked additional sites.

We’ll talk a lot more about this in the weeks and months ahead.

Anglin’s meltdown at the Daily Stormer was full of inaccuracies, which were, in my mind, purposefully delivered to provoke a response. It followed on months of such provocations, and he finally got what he was looking for, to some degree. I was watching Twitter discuss the situation, and seeing that some important pieces were missing, I set to work on adding those pieces to one of my book projects.

That project, begins as follows;

Next year’s election will mark the first in which people who were not yet born on September 11th, 2001 will have the opportunity to vote for President of the United States.

That scares the heck out of me, if I’m honest with you.

Worse than that, we’ve already had at least one presidential election where people voted who were alive, but do not remember a world before September 11th, 2001, and there will be plenty more of them this time around.

Worse still, I’m 38 years old, and I feel like I’m one of them, sometimes.

I certainly don’t remember politics before that. I never voted before 2004.

A lot of people perceive conservatism, or even Right wing thinking more broadly as trying to turn back the clock, or get back to a simpler time, or something to that effect. That’s never really been my goal, personally. That is what drew me to libertarianism at first, and later to the alt right. That very harsh rejection of Leftism, without the stupid time machine fantasies.

Yet I can’t help but think today that 18 years after those towers came down, we’ve hit this really terrible precipice in time where we might never have the sort of normalcy that, at least I perceived, before that day.

I cannot imagine a world anymore, where I take no interest in what the government is doing. That was certainly my life before I went to work that morning 18 years ago. I couldn’t have told you the difference between a Republican and a Democrat that morning. There are days it is challenging in the current era, of course, but at least now I can say “That is not how a Republican should act” and that would have gone right over my head back then.

Is that the silver lining?

Should we, in a sense, be grateful that 19 cavemen with boxcutters, or whoever, sent world affairs careening out of control nearly two decades ago?

Did the Project for a New American Century have a point in relishing the prospect of “a new Pearl Harbor“?

They had a very different plan than us, of course. The Project for a New American Century was a neocon outfit, led in part by none other than Bill Kristol. They were primarily interested in America’s “global responsibilities” as they put it. Their statement of principles says America needs to “strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values” and “promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad” and “accept responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles”.

And in case it requires clarification, when Bill Kristol says “our security” and “our prosperity” and “our principles” – he is not talking about America’s security, prosperity, or principles. He is talking about his own, in group, if you will.

In fact, here’s what Bill Kristol has to say about Americans in the context of immigration.

Look, to be totally honest, if things are so bad as you say with the white working class, don’t you want to get new Americans in? Seriously, you can make the case—this is going on too long and this is too crazy, probably, and I hope this thing isn’t being videotaped or ever shown anywhere. Whatever tiny, pathetic future I have is going to totally collapse.

You can make a case that America has been great because every—I think John Adams said this—basically if you’re a free society, a capitalist society, after two or three generations of hard work everyone becomes kind of decadent, lazy, spoiled—whatever. Then, luckily, you have these waves of people coming in from Italy, Ireland, Russia, and now Mexico, who really want to work hard and really want to succeed and really want their kids to live better lives than them and aren’t sort of clipping coupons or hoping that they can hang on and meanwhile grew up as spoiled kids and so forth. In that respect, I don’t know how this moment is that different from the early 20th century.

Fortunately, it was recorded.

That is not what you say about “our” country. That’s what you say about “their” country.

Notably, neither Kristol nor anyone else from PNAC says any such things about countries other than yours and mine. Their favorite country, least of all, and I leave it to the reader to guess which is their favorite.

John Bolton, you might have heard, was a director of PNAC before they dissolved in 2006. He was also the National Security Advisor to President Trump until just the other day. Fitting that he depart in time for post 9/11 America to reach the age of majority.

I just saw a story in my news feed that Kamala Harris is on board with Beto’s compulsory gun buyback program. The story was published in a conservative news source, which was unhappy about the position she had taken. I don’t know why everybody is so up in arms about this proposal. I think it actually sounds like a fantastic idea, that fully brings the 2nd amendment into alignment with our Nation’s newly defined concept of Rights.

I’m kidding of course, but bear with me.

Back when I used to spend a lot of time in bars in New York, buyback had a very different connotation than the one being used today in the gun control debate. There, a “buyback” is a free drink, courtesy of the bartender and/or the house, a reward to a good customer/tipper, to keep them coming back.

Now that our country has abandoned the concept of Rights established at the founding, and replaced it with the idea that the government provides us with things we have a right to, such as food, shelter, and medicine, it is time for us to fully honor the 2nd amendment in this context as well. Thusly defined, a mandatory gun buyback program would compel citizens to accept free firearms from the government, or pay a prohibitively expensive fine.

Conservatives may scoff at the proposal for myriad reasons, and I would scoff right back for many more.

“How do we pay for this massive expenditure?” they say…

To which I dutifully respond: “Balderdash!”

At the end of the day, this is an investment in our economy that should grow our wealth as a nation, so the question isn’t how we will pay for it, but what will we do with our new shared prosperity.

The cost of this program will be less than $320,000,000,000. Far less, indeed, since I simply took a rough estimate of 320 million people living in the United States and multiplied it by $1,000. Surely the United States government could provide every man woman and child in the United States with a rifle, a pistol, and a shotgun for less than this, once the bargaining power of such a massive purchase is factored in.

That is less than half of our annual military spending, and will certainly do more to protect the homeland than anything our military has done for Israel in the last 18 years. By putting an AR-15, Glock 17, and Mossberg 88 in the hands of every man, woman, and child in America, our Nation will be the best defended country on the planet.

If there is one thing you can reliably count on Leftists to do, it is to debase language.

Their exploits in this arena are the stuff of legends.

They’ve convinced roughly half the country that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” is somehow ambiguously worded enough to permit not only all manner of “infringements” such as licensing and regulations, but even mass gun confiscation.

Marriage no longer has anything to do with families, nor does it infer any meaningful commitment, it’s just another government program to be inflated away like paper money in an African democracy.

They are in the process of severing the connection between sex and gender in the popular consciousness.

Rape no longer has anything to do with forcible penetration, rape is supposedly woven into the very fabric of our culture.

Riot and protest are now roughly interchangeable terms, depending on what the motivations for the action are. As Jared Howe aptly put it “Their violence is speech, our speech is violence.”

“White Supremacy” is now so all encompassing a term that it has been rendered useless as anything other than pejorative.

The word “Freeedom” no longer carries any connotation of the unrestrained exercise of individual will, but is rather a question of who can afford what, and who will make up the difference when some desirable product or service is out of one’s reach.

“War” in the traditional military context, is something only Republicans engage in, when Democrats embark on identical adventures, they are peacekeeping.

From “global cooling” to “global warming” to the more durable “climate change” – the Left has managed to politicize the weather, and by a surprisingly intricate dot connecting exercise, indecipherable to the average Joe, have managed to frame this once uncontroversial subject of small talk into a racially charged bidding war of other people’s money which, after a 7 hour long auction aired recently on CNN, now stands at approximately 5 trillion dollars.

There are no “illegal aliens” only “undocumented Americans”.

When white people move to an area and improve it, this is considered “Gentrification,” and when they leave, causing a place to decline, this is called “White Flight,” and both are equally racist.

In San Francisco, “justice involved individuals” have replaced convicted felons in the State lexicon, just as “drug addicts” have been replaced by “persons with a history of substance use”.

If you took any of these changes individually you might think the idea was to ratchet up hysteria, or to downplay concerns, and depending on one’s perspective, they might be able to find some justification for either.

Taken together, they represent a far more sinister pursuit. Normalcy is relentlessly attacked, while crime and filth are venerated. The delineation between victim and perpetrator is determined not by their respective deeds, but by how each entity impacts the Left’s pursuit of political power. “Those who control your words, control your mind” as Tucker Carlson so aptly put it on a recent episode.

In no arena is this more evident than in the current battle to define “terrorism”.

It is no longer a thing to concern oneself with when somebody screams “Allahu Akbar!” and teleports directly to paradise, sending all infidels in proximity the opposite direction. This is merely a fact of life, when one lives in a populated bit of geography.

Masked anarchists setting fires, breaking windows, and assaulting people for their political views is “direct action” as part of a “diversity of tactics”, and the people who try to stop them, including law enforcement, are the real threats to National Security. Even when Leftists try to assassinate lawmakers, or firebomb federal facilities, they are scarcely worth mentioning, much less terrorists.

Contrast this with the new definition of terrorism, which is necessarily of the domestic variety. There is no such thing as a foreign threat, once border enforcement is itself considered terrorism.

Elizabeth Warren said that White Nationalism was “domestic terrorism” at a recent presidential debate. It didn’t seem to trouble her that illegal immigrant MS-13 gang members have committed far more murders than any of the ever expanding list of people deemed White Nationalists. Nor does it seem to trouble her that White Nationalism was viewed positively by more than 8% of Americans in a 2017 poll conducted during the media haze of the United the Right rally. Or that issue by issue, anywhere from one-fifth to more than half of the country agrees with White Nationalist ideas. The fact that the President of the United States and the second most popular show in cable news have been deemed White Nationalists by many on the Left, in fact only serves to solidify her point.


When terrorists crashed planes into buildings and sent the world spiraling toward oblivion on September 11th 2001, I really wanted to know why.

I didn’t think I got a very good explanation, to say the least of it.

George W. Bush said “the terrorists” were “evil” and they “hated us for our freedom”. He later seemed to shut down alternative opinions by condemning “ridiculous conspiracy theories”. At the time, I wasn’t much of a conspiracy theorist, but just calling people “evil” really didn’t seem like a valid explanation for such a world altering event.

My dissatisfaction wasn’t entirely about evidence standards, mind you. It wasn’t even some prior distrust for the government. I just thought the bit about the cartoon super villain, cackling with his henchmen about their plans to destroy the world, for no other reason than the sheer joy of doing something terrible, was kind of hard to believe.

Perhaps if I had stronger religious convictions it would have been easier to swallow. “Ah, must be the devil!” wouldn’t bring us any closer to solving such problems, but it would at least give my mind the comfort of considering the puzzle solved.

This being Labor Day, it would be negligent not to address their most abused victims of all. The working class.

“Workers of the World, Unite!” goes the slogan. So in solidarity with the worker are they, that the entirety of their policy agenda revolves around increasing the supply of labor while reducing its demand. Open up the borders, subsidize invasion and sloth, tax and regulate employers out of business, then ship whatever jobs remain off to some foreign hellhole where nets are required to prevent workers from dying when they leap from the windows out of despair.

In this their egalitarianism is revealed for the degrading and soul crushing horror that it is. Equality indeed. Take a capable White man in an industrialized country, then organize public policy to drag his standard of living to equal that of hut dwelling savages. Take from him what wages he is still able to obtain, through force of the tax code, give it to the women he would like to marry, and tell those women that marriage is akin to slavery, until fatherhood is reduced a peculiar rarity the old folks reminisce about.

When the staggering misery such a scheme predictably brings about, has those workers ready to lay down their lives in opposition to it, direct their enmity toward the employers. Pay no attention to the Jew behind the curtain, he is your friend. Unbeknownst to you, the enemy has been signing your checks for the last twenty years and provided you with everything you own. Once he has been eliminated, you and the Jew will rejoice in a workers’ paradise without a hierarchy of any sort. Planetary, even universal, brotherhood lies just over the horizon, once the Jew aids your revolution against the Gentile elites, and the intelligentsia of your society has been slain.

Those with the most cursory understanding of history know all too well, that paradise proves elusive in the end. Rather, an all too familiar hellscape emerges wherein all the features of the human condition which we like to think separate us from lesser animals, vanish before our eyes in the course of a generation. In enough time the people find themselves equal not only to one another, but to beasts and insects as well.

And this, sadly, is what so many celebrate, on “Labor Day”. Just like “Pride Month” the “Women’s March” and “Black Lives Matter” – it is an abuse of language so egregious, that is scarcely comprehensible to the common mind. Whatever they say they are for, one can reliably profit by betting they aim for the precise opposite.

“The Big Lie” as Hitler so aptly put it, in Mein Kampf;

All this was inspired by the principle–which is quite true in itself–that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.

In place of this Big Lie, we might hope to spread a greater Truth. The Marxists have never truly been a friend to the worker, but rather scheme to enslave the Nation and ultimately the whole of the Earth. They are no more in “solidarity” with the worker than the butcher is in solidarity with a cow.

Writers at Gizmodo are throwing temper tantrums over what might be the most predictable of outcomes to Big Tech’s censorious and unlawful efforts to interfere in American politics.

Alyse Stanley commiserates with Twitter’s Trust and Safety Council, about the company becoming unresponsive to their demands, and neglecting to consult them about product and policy changes in advance. Members of the Trust and Safety Council are not employees of Twitter, but rather a group Left wing agitators, almost certainly financed by the same handful of wealthy Jews. Originally formed in 2016, the council hosts roughly 40 organizations and more than a dozen (((experts))) from around the world, according to a blog post announcing its formation.

In illustrating Twitter’s supposed failure to combat hate on the platform, Stanley cites their unwillingness to ban the President of the United States, as well as users who have not been in violation of Twitter’s policies. In Stanley’s talmudic worldview, the fervor of the mob, and the interests of the Democrat Party, are the only requisites for action, and the “Trust & Safety Council” seems to agree.

Unfortunately for the mob however, Twitter is not yet a government. They are a business, and until just last year, not a profitable one. Lacking the capacity to inflate currency or tax, they are compelled to actually meet market demands if they are to survive. Though dressed up in warm and fuzzy language about tolerance and inclusion, the rapacious Left wing hysterics which dominate the company’s corporate ideology, are hostile to anything that even resembles success.

Eventually, if anybody wants to remain in business, they have to tell these idiots to pound sand.

By now, you’ve surely heard everyone with access to a TV camera talk about Trump calling Jewish Democrats “disloyal”. You’ve more than likely heard a whole bunch of Democrats calling it anti-Semitic, and a whole bunch of Republicans trip all over their words trying to find a way to straddle the issue without hurting what little remains of their balls.

I never fully comprehended the concept of trigger warnings, until this week. Things piss me off all the time, and nobody sees fit to warn me in advance. Until now, I had simply taken this as the run of the mill Leftist speech policing.

Now, I realize it is about something much deeper.

Leftists, especially Jews, really do require trigger warnings for their very survival. Jewish neurosis is a contagion spread through media, a terminal mental illness which causes those infected to commit the political equivalent of suicide by cop.

When Trump said Jews were “disloyal” for voting Democrat, it was obvious to sane people he meant they were being disloyal to Israel.

Jews, for better or worse, are not sane people. They hit the fucking ceiling, screaming at everyone who would listen that “disloyalty” is an anti-Semitic trope. “That’s why Hitler wanted to kill us” they shouted, at people who had been propagandized their whole lives to think Hitler killed the Jews for no reason whatsoever.

But the Jew-as-Nazi-Summer-Santa circus did not end there. Every Jew in the world piped up as loudly as they could, to remind Republicans that Jews not only vote overwhelmingly Democrat, but also finance HALF of the Democrat Party, and nearly all of their various subversive activist groups. When Republicans pipe up about facts like that, they get banned from Twitter, but when the Jews do it for us, we get to sit back and giggle at their self own.

Luckily for the Jews, the goyim have been propagandized for generations. The pogroms had not yet started. They now had the perfect time to regain their composure, and quit while they were ahead.

Obviously, they didn’t do that. They never do. The Jewish mind, when triggered, is psychiatric quicksand. The more they fight, the faster they sink, and the faster they sink, the more they fight. When Trump clarified what was obvious to the rest of us, the Jews just refused to take the hint, as usual. Right after they had just got done screaming that nobody could accuse them of dual loyalty, they turned right around and said to Americans, “Well, we’d never be disloyal to our ethnostate!”

Of course, they reconcile this by insisting, in stark contrast to an abundance of evidence, that the interests of Israel and the United States always coincide, without exception. (((Our Greatest Ally))) as the saying goes… Hopefully Trump says something else triggering before the end of the month, and we can get the Jews to start talking about how criticizing the war in Iraq is anti-Semitic. That ought to be fun.

Mind you, that this came in response to Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar’s understandable contempt for the State of Israel. They’ve done and said things that would get any other person hunted down by CNN, doxed, and jumped by a black bloc. None of which seems to be of any particular concern to American Jewry, because “The Squad” is doing such a fine job, in their sick minds, of destroying America. And that’s their true priority.

As I was attempting to prepare for today’s episode of the Outlaw Conservative Podcast, I found myself in a bit of a bind. Literally every story on the radar is racially tinged, and we try to avoid that sort of discussion here, for fear of what the banking system might do to us if we deviate from the Narrative.

Wouldn’t it be nice of more conservative talk shows were this honest?

We are faced with a scenario in which anybody who wishes to speak on the issues of the day will be chased off the internet, unless they lie, and that’s a major problem. Democrats keep screaming simultaneously, that we need to “have a discussion” about race, but everytime someone talks about race in a fashion unfavorable to the Democrat Party, they get accused of hate speech and chased off the Internet.

Here’s a few examples of stories I’d love to cover today, but will have to wait until Friday for the uncensored show to really talk about frankly.

The New York Times “aims to reframe the country’s history” and place “the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of the story we tell ourselves about who we are” in their newly unveiled “1619 Project”.

It’s almost needless to say, that rather than call out the Times for pursuing their own ethnocentric agenda, the New World Order Approved conservative media has rushed to say ridiculous things like “No, America Wasn’t Built On Slavery, But Faith That All Men Are Created Equal“.

And of course, not a day goes by in America without somebody calling the President a Nazi. Speaking of Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib’s support for the Boycott, Divest, and Sanctions movement against Israel, the President said “Any Jewish people that vote for a Democrat — I think it shows either a total lack of knowledge or great disloyalty”.

A Left wing Jewish group called the remarks anti-Semitic, of course.

“This is an explicit dual loyalty charge wielded by the president of the United States against 80 percent of American Jews who voted against him,” the group said in a statement to Newsweek, alluding to 2018 midterm election data from the Pew Research Center.

“It is not merely an anti-Semitic dog whistle—it’s a bullhorn to his white nationalist base,” said IfNotNow. “American Jews and Democratic voters know full well the impact of the racist policies of Netanyahu and the Israeli government on the Palestinian people. This is why an overwhelming majority… oppose those policies, like unchecked settlement expansion.”

If it was a “bullhorn to his White Nationalist base” one might have some trouble reconciling this other headline, which reads “Twitter Ablaze as Trump Gets Praised as ‘King of Israel, Second Coming of God’”

Something tells me the White Nationalists were less than enthusiastic about that “praise”. They would be pretty unlikely to take solace in the King of Israel serving also as President of the United States.

More accusations of racism came as the Trump administration on Wednesday unveiled a sweeping plan to detain migrant families and children for longer periods of time than currently allowed, touting a final regulation that would overhaul the immigration detention system in the U.S. and scrap a longstanding court settlement.

Another accusation of racism comes as the Trump administration announced it will begin enforcing the “public charge” rule against immigrants who come to the United States and live at the expense of taxpayers. Interesting theory, I keep on hearing liberals say that immigrants don’t use welfare. I suppose if I began talking about this subject, I’d be accused of racism too.

Granted, it wouldn’t be completely impossible for me to talk about these things, but it really is telling, I’d say, that only one side is allowed to talk about race, and they do it incessantly, while accusing everybody who responds of being terrorists. I don’t think this situation is likely to improve in the near future without substantial changes to the popular consciousness in America, so I spent some time last night and today thinking about how one might go about making that happen, without running afoul of the thought police.

How might we go about changing the discourse, so as to permit honest discussion?

Writing at Quartz, Klaus Meyer pens a piece of comedic fiction parading as a plan for stopping a fascist takeover, based on what he says are lessons from the Nazi Party’s rise to power. Given his name, and the publication for which he was writing, you might be less than surprised to find out that he did not for one second pause to think about why the NSDAP actually enjoyed popular support before and during their governance of Germany.

Instead, Meyer spins a rather uninteresting tale about a multiparty coalition forming in the small German state of Braunschweig. Humorously, Meyer laments Hitler being granted German citizenship by his allies in that coalition, which ultimately facilitated his rise to Chancellor.

That would be a lesson worth learning for the Left indeed, be more cautious about who you grant citizenship to.

Unsurprisingly, this is not the lesson Meyer wishes the reader to take with them.

Instead, the lessons to be learned, claims Meyer, are as follows;

For voters, be informed and engaged. And steer clear from political groups that are not committed to democratic processes or have racially motivated agendas.

For politicians, sharing power with extremists in your own party, or in other parties, is dangerous. Politicians of the center-left and center-right may see each other as historical opponents, but they should be allied in fighting extremists on either side.

The lesson he hopes for voters to take away is contradictory on its face. One cannot “steer clear” of groups that have “racially motivated agendas” and simultaneously be informed and engaged. He is literally telling them to remain ignorant of people who confess the racial motivations for their agendas, and to disengage from people who openly state such motivations. If groups with racially motivated agendas are attempting to participate in the political process, then trying to stifle them by means other than winning the debate, is contrary to the democratic process Meyer feigns to place such high value upon.

Of course, one doubts Klaus has written many condemnations of the Black Lives Matter movement. A cursory DuckDuckGo search turns up nothing of the sort. Equally lacking is any critique of Zionism, predictably. It would thus appear that some racially motivated agendas are more worthy of condemnation than others, in the view of Mr. Meyer.

Not that this is unusual, obviously.

His warning to politicians is equally humorous. He warns of sharing power with extremists within one’s own party, or in other parties. This, again, would be advice worth heeding, for the Democrats. Their open embrace of extremists within their ranks is the stuff of legends. Then there’s that Democratic Socialist Jew from Vermont who might well be their Presidential nominee. He just announced that he would “go to war” against “racism” in America, going so far as to remind everybody that he thinks every inequality which emerges along racial lines is racism, and will thus be subjected to every dictatorial power he convinces himself he can seize in this pursuit. The Leftist love affair with violent Antifa communists is particularly noteworthy, given the mayhem they waged on camera over the weekend.

These sort of things are precisely what necessitate the rise of authoritarian regimes, thereby facilitating them.

There has been a lot of talk lately about incendiary rhetoric, racism, hate speech, hate crimes, and domestic terrorism. Every time some white guy with an opinion so much as contemplates breaking the law, those stupid enough to take CNN seriously are made to believe there is some kind of existential crisis in America. One which can only be solved by the pseudo-repeal of the First and Second amendments to the US Constitution.

You’ve surely heard just about the entire panel of soon to be failed Democrat Presidential candidates, blame Trump for a mass shooting in El Paso, Texas. According to them, Trump’s observation that millions of military aged males illegally pouring across a sovereign border constitutes an invasion, so warped the mind of one young man, that he threw his life away on a mass shooting. The Antifa cross dresser who killed 9 people in 30 seconds that same weekend, seems to have slipped beneath their radar, except as a footnote in their gun control propaganda.

Just yesterday, Courtney Hagle at Media Matters lamented that “Fox News has called immigration an “invasion” multiple times since El Paso“. Drawing a not at all subtle connection between calling a spade a spade, and mass murder, Hagle continues the Democrat Smear Machine’s vendetta against the only cable news network who dares to deviate from Democrat talking points.

It is easy, and likely even prudent, to dismiss such utterances as mere Jewish nonsense. Perhaps however, we would be well served to consider the implications of the premise. If speaking of a group, in terms which conjure in the mind the image of a threat, predictably results in criminal violence, then clearly our current legal system falls short of providing a remedy. Radical changes will need to be made, prohibiting a broad range of discussion, in order to moderate our discourse, and preserve the peace and prosperity of our society.

To analyze the situation rationally however, we’ll need to stop listening to Jews. We’ll definitely need to talk about something other than the hoax of the White Supremacist threat, if we hope to find ourselves in proximity to credible conclusions. So where else might we seek examples of inflammatory statements resulting in violence?

Not long ago, the New York Times lamented YouTube’s “algorithms” fostering right wing extremism. The Southern Poverty Law Center blamed Google’s search algorithms for radicalizing Dylann Roof. In response to these pressures, Google has blacklisted news sites, demonetized some YouTube producers, and outright banned numerous others.

Interestingly, a YouTube playlist titled “ACAB Fuck The Police Playlist – Kill-A-Cop Hip Hop” wasn’t caught up in the censorship, despite the playlist description reading “Music to kill pigs to” and receiving over 50,000 plays. The playlist contains 48 tracks, only three of which have been deleted. Considering the content of the remaining tracks, one might be justified in concluding the removed tracks were not removed due to community guidelines violations.


Chris Cuomo is a good example of how not to do steroids. The key to proper testosterone supplementation is having a qualified medical professional prescribe the medications, to take them as directed, and to discontinue use if side effects, like extreme shifts in mood, or increased aggression, manifest themselves. Clearly, Mr. Cuomo seems to have obtained his medications from the dark web using Monero, and has eschewed post cycle therapy in favor of the Blast & Cruise lifestyle.

The far left CNN show host was caught on video threatening to throw a Trump supporter down the stairs after the man called him “Fredo” – a moniker foisted upon him by conservative talk radio icon Rush Limbaugh.

In case you’re unfamiliar, Frederico “Fredo” Corleone is a fictional character in Mario Puzo’s novel The Godfather. Fredo is portrayed by actor John Cazale in the Francis Ford Coppola film adaptation and in the sequel, The Godfather Part II. He is typically seen as the weakest and dumbest of Vito Corleone’s sons.

The Governor’s brother later claimed that calling an Italian “Fredo” was an ethnic slur akin to calling a black man “the n-word”.

Here at the Outlaw Conservative, we would not for a moment pretend that White people are any less entitled to racial grievances than other ethnic group. If somebody was being racist toward Chris Cuomo for his Italian heritage, then of course Chris would be perfectly justified in reacting to such an insult the same way any black or Jewish person would be justified.

Which is to say, non-violently.

If some Irishman decided to call him “dego” or “wop” then Chris would have been perfectly within his rights to call that drunken mick a Taig or a Prod. He could even start a racist podcast where he derided the targets of his enmity on the basis of their ethnicity. He could hold a controversial demonstration in a DC exurb, and defend himself with pepper spray, if some Russki tried to stop him.

But to threaten lethal violence over being called Fredo, that reinforces a far more dangerous ethnic stereotype. No Italian ever went to prison for being called Fredo. It wasn’t Vincent’s second son that made it impossible for anyone whose name ended in a vowel to get a garbage route in New York City. The harmful stereotype of Italians is not that we are weak or stupid, but that we are violent, dishonest members of a transnational crime organization.

That is a stereotype Mr. Cuomo reinforces every day through his profession. Day in, and day out, CNN lies to the public, subverts our society, and provides cover to violent criminals.

Fortunately for Italian Americans, they cannot be blamed for that particular transnational gang. Mr. Cuomo’s transgressions, the reason so many Americans despise him, have nothing to do with his perceived fondness for tomato sauce. Rather it is the smug confidence he exudes on camera every weeknight, working for a decidedly different ethnic group, against his own people, and his own country.

If Chris Cuomo were going to threaten violence in defense of his European heritage, that would, by definition, make him a White Supremacist. Of course, Chris would want no part of that mess.

Perhaps Mr. Cuomo should read Max Boot’s column in the Washington Post. “Get a grip, white people. We’re not the victims” said the Jewish columnist.

White people can be pretty clueless. (I know, I’m one myself.) Get a grip, folks. We’re not the victims here. Thinking that we are is not just wrong. It’s dangerous. It’s a mind-set that can justify everything from a public temper tantrum to a shooting spree.

Interesting take. Mr. Boot seems to think airing a racial grievance is justification for mass murder. If carried to its logical conclusion, we should all be very concerned about what we hear today from the Democrat Party. If White people are the oppressors we are made out to be by the likes of CNN, and victimhood fetishes are a “mind-set that can justify everything from a public temper tantrum to a shooting spree” then we might expect to see, blacks rioting and burning their own neighborhoods to the ground, some might even open fire on police officers. By this reasoning, we should be less than shocked to see people trying to firebomb ICE detention centers, or opening fire on ICE offices.

John Hirschauer, writing at the National Review, warns of another danger in Boot’s analysis. White Supremacy!


Tucker Carlson has gone fishing for a few days with his son, leaving Brian Kilmeade and friends to fill his seat on the 2nd most popular show in cable news. We here at the Radical Agenda, of course wish Tucker and his family the best during their long overdue vacation. We hope for a selfie with a large fish, signaling victory over the scum we mutually oppose.

Radical Agenda S05E059 - Of Threats & Hoaxes
Radical Agenda S05E059 – Of Threats & Hoaxes
Ever the dot connectors, CNN speculated this had something to do with Tucker calling “White Supremacy” a hoax. The Jewish press has been in absolute hysterics since Tucker pointed out the obvious, leading many to question whether the timing of Tucker’s vacation was a mere coincidence.

Fox insists the vacation had been in the works prior to these remarks, and that Tucker will be returning on August 19th.

Unsurprisingly, the Leftist media shouts loudly that White Supremacy is not a “hoax”. They point to the Anti-Defamation League for proof, hoping you’re stupid enough not to get the joke. Every “extremist murder” they say, was some kind of right wing extremist in 2018.

I have yet to see anybody check the validity of that data. Which is a shame if you think about it. This is obviously horseshit, and the ADL is long overdue for some well earned embarrassment.

If White Nationalist violence were as big a threat as they make it out to be, Charlottesville would not be the subject of Democrat Presidential talking points. Were we actually laying waste to the Nation as alleged, they wouldn’t keep going back to one landwhale dying in a car accident two years ago as proof. The idea that White Supremacist murders have been happening on a regular basis, without the Jewish press taking notice, is too ridiculous to take seriously. Even their Antifa friend in Dayton, Ohio was simply lumped in with the Nazi terror threat in Leftist media coverage.

Another source of their angst comes from FBI director Christopher Wray, who now famously said “I will say that a majority of the domestic-terrorism cases that we’ve investigated are motivated by some version of what you might call white-supremacist violence, but it does include other things as well,”. Of course, investigations are not necessarily crimes. Lots of investigations are started as a result of false accusations, and nothing is more falsely accused than White Supremacy. Additionally, things “motivated by” so called “white supremacist violence” are not necessarily investigations into white supremacists. All Antifa violence, for example, which is nothing if not domestic terrorism, purports to be motivated by exactly this. Expect not the Jewish Press to point out the obvious in this regard.

Since every Jew in the country is screaming “WHITE SUPREMACY” as loudly as their Zyklon starved lungs will permit, it gets “outsized coverage”, says Kellyanne Conway, wisely.

Indeed, most Americans do not see “White Nationalism” as a threat, according to a Morning Consult/Politico poll released Wednesday, which was taken in the days after a mass shooting in El Paso, Texas, last weekend. Even as every television in the country berated White folks about how evil one must be to think they deserve a country, most rightly dismiss it as Jewish propaganda.

Only forty-seven percent of voters said they perceive white nationalism as a threat. The uptick was obviously larger among Democrats than it was amongst Republicans. The poll found an 11-point increase among Democrats, from 58 percent to 69 percent, and a 12-point jump among independents, from 33 percent to 45 percent. The perceived white nationalist threat among Republicans increased from 17 percent to 22 percent. And so, if 53% of the country does not view it as such, indeed with the vast majority of Republicans, and a somewhat slimmer majority if independents seeing this as a non-issue, it is interesting to see so many with blind faith in “democracy” so uninterested in the majority view.

Perhaps this is why our hooknosed information overlords are no longer trusted by almost anyone. Seventy-two percent of Americans believe “traditional major news sources report news they know to be fake, false, or purposely misleading,” according to a poll from Axios and SurveyMonkey released just over a year ago. The poll of nearly 4,000 adults showed that 92 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are onto the scam. The sentiment extends to those who identify as independents and Democrats, with 79 percent of independents also agreeing. Democrats agree by a slight majority of 53 percent.

Of course, here at the Radical Agenda, we are no more swayed by popular opinion than are the Jews. So let us ask, is White Supremacy a hoax or a threat?

In the wake of a racially motivated mass shooting in El Paso, Texas, President Donald Trump took to the airwaves to condemn racism and White Supremacy, calling for these ideologies to be defeated.

It wasn’t the first time, either. At Trump’s inauguration speech, he said “We will rediscover our loyalty to each other. When you open your heart to patriotism there is no room for prejudice. The Bible tells us how good and pleasant it is when God’s people live together in unity. We must speak our minds openly, debate our disagreements honestly, but always pursue solidarity.” In the wake of the communist riots in Charlottesville, Virginia, the President said racism was evil, and condemned Neo Nazis, the KKK, White Supremacists, and other hate groups. After Robert Bowers shot up a Pittsburgh synagogue, the President said “the vile hate filled poison of anti-Semitism must be condemned and confronted everywhere and anywhere it appears. There must be no tolerance for anti-Semitism in America, or for any form of religious or racial hatred or prejudice“.

Indeed, Donald Trump has often repeated such condemnations. He has always denied and expressed offense at the accusations that he is a racist. His close family ties with Jews seem to make the accusations absurd on their face, but this has never stopped the Left from lobbing them. Perhaps this is because, despite their absurdity, they have been rewarded so frequently with these displays of weakness from the President.

Now, speaking as one who was accused of being a racist and an anti-Semite so many times that I embraced the labels, you can imagine I was less than enthusiastic to hear the President I supported so enthusiastically, condemning what I viewed as simple observations of reality. The President is no dummy, and so one must assume that when he condemns racism, White Supremacy, and anti-Semitism, he means something very different from the idiotic screeching we hear from the Left.

Racism has no doubt been with us for a very long time. Indeed, there is no time in the history of man in which it has not been with us. So if we hope to truly defeat it, we have our work cut out for us. Here, I will try to illustrate a course to excising this “vile hate filled poison” from our National body.

As I see it, there are four steps we must take, which I’ll elaborate upon as we go forward.

1. To claim that racism is evil, we must first acknowledge that evil exists. Racism cannot be wrong, if there is no such thing as morality.
2. To defeat the evil of racism, we must carefully and precisely define it.
3. In defining racism, it must be severed from all that is true and righteous.
4. Identify and eliminate the sources of racial stereotypes

A 21 year old 8chan user named Patrick Crusius is alleged to have used a WASR10 (AK-47) to kill 20 people and wound 26 others in a mass shooting that spanned between a Walmart and a shopping mall in El Paso, Texas. He is reported to have left a poorly written manifesto behind, citing the immigration crisis as his motivation for the slaughter. He said he supported Brenton Tarrant’s slaughter at a New Zealand Mosque, and encouraged others to join in the killing, preferring soft targets where as many invaders as possible could be killed.

Thus far, no reports have emerged of Patrick having a criminal history. One look at him, and you know he’s not in the habit of bullying people.

Predictably, the Jewish press ran with the familiar theme of White Supremacist terrorism, conveniently ignoring the all too familiar statistics on black and interracial crime. They blamed the President of the United States, and feigned curiosity at the lack of Republican interest in condemning White Nationalism, which those familiar with the subject matter will recall, is synonymous with Western Civilization, in their lexicon.

Just 13 hours later, 24-year-old Connor Betts of Bellbrook, Ohio, took an AR-15 with a hundred round drum to a bar called Ned Peppers. In 30 seconds, he murdered his sister and 8 others, leaving at least 26 more people injured. Fortunately for his would be targets, police shot and killed him before he could make use of his spare magazines.

He had a minor criminal history, and had been suspended from school for bringing a kill list and a rape list for men and women respectively, to class.

He left no manifesto, but his Twitter feed told you everything you needed to know about him. He described himself as a Leftist, felt it worth clarifying his pronouns, and has, for more than a year, been spouting violent antifa propaganda. He was following, retweeting, and engaging with known Antifa communists, including Molly Conger (@SocialistDogMom) and Christian Exoo (AntiFash Gordon), and even some that I’m prohibited by court order from mentioning.

Connor repeatedly posted threats of violence to Twitter, and predictably he was never censored. He got it from his mother, we found out, as she too, posted violent communist propaganda to her Twitter feed, and was likewise never censored. The Jews of course, don’t mind violence, so long as it favors their interests, and so such terrorism is free to spread and gain momentum, without any sort of hindrance at all.

Interestingly, if unsurprisingly, this revelation of Connor’s deranged political ideology, and history of threats, changed not the narrative of White Supremacist terrorism. He was White, some of his victims were black, and though he spent his days threatening the lives of everyone Right of Elizabeth Warren, he too was categorized as a White Supremacist terrorist by the Press.

One hopes they have the Internet in Hell, so that he can see what is being done to his name.

My hopes for Kamala Harris to make Leftists the clear aggressor in the coming race war, seem to have been dashed upon the rocks on Wednesday. Tulsi Gabbard wrecked her facade of hip pot smoking negress, by pointing out that Harris was a loyal foot soldier of the White Supremacist justice system, after prostituting her way to becoming a prosecutor.

Not only was the Jew’s favorite Wakandan putting potheads under the jail, she was actively covering up evidence tampering at the crime lab, and blocking DNA testing to see an innocent man executed, for a murder probably committed by her cousin.

Met with the damning truth, Harris was more stunned than she was during that candidate mix tape bit.

She filibustered when offered a chance to respond, later blaming the attacks on poll envy, and the Assad regime in Syria.

Tulsi became the most Googled candidate during that debate. A rather astonishing feat, given that the Jews who run Google had previously relegated her to the spam trap, and invited a long overdue lawsuit in the process. #KamalaHarrisDestroyed trended on Twitter, which apparently managed to slip by the censors unnoticed, despite the best efforts to stamp out such White Supremacy by way of (((algorithms))).

Kamala’s hasbara surrogates quickly got to work blaming the storm on our Lord and Savior, Vladimir Putin. Even Harris’ press secretary, Ian Sams, labeled Gabbard’s supporters part of “the Russian propaganda machine.” One Twitter user said “Putin took Tulsi, an American soldier, and turned her into a Trojan Horse, his own #SiberianCandidate.”

Quite the clever ruse…

But we Nazis, through our use of the Russian encrypted messaging app Telegram, were hip to the real scheme. Vlad stopped by the Radical Agenda Telegram group to yuck it up about about the plot.

We’ve already decided that Kamala Harris will be the Democrat nominee. I had previously predicted that Joe Biden would have deleted his Twitter account by now, but the strategy has shifted, and Vlad is letting him stay so as to further rile up the blacks. As Kamala Harris continues to torture sleepy Joe, and Joe accepts the flogging as penance for his White Privilege, our Cyrillic mission to sow racial discord into American politics will come to a crescendo.

We have cleverly taken credit for Tulsi’s attacks, so no Democrat primary voter can discover her renegade patriotism, or the path to racial harmony which a Tulsi presidency would surely usher in, permanently dismantling the White cis-heteropatriarchy.

Harris will go on to debate Donald Trump, and with a woman of color as the Democrat nominee, Leftist media will invariably construe everything Trump disagrees with her about as racist and sexist. The American people will thus conclude that racism and sexism are good, and the price of Mein Kampf will skyrocket, netting a healthy profit for EdgyGoodies.com.

Many years ago, I took a girl on a date to a circus. On the way in, we saw some animal rights fanatics outside, and my date was drawn to their message.

She spent the duration of the show whining about the cruelty that had to have been involved in training the animals, and it kinda ruined the whole thing. I hated those animal rights people for that.

Last night, I felt similarly about John Delaney, and John Hickenlooper. Here we have this amazing opportunity to watch the Democrat Party destroy itself, and these idiots have to screw it up by reminding Democrat primary voters that math is real and White people still vote. Were it not for them, I suspect we’d have seen proposals to ban algebra for its focus on division, and disparate racial impacts. Candidates would have gone Left of Vermin Supreme, calling “Free Ponies” a “Republican Talking Point” and claiming that Unicorns are, as the name implies, a Universal Human Right.

The Democrats are so shielded from criticism by their big tech and media allies, that they don’t even seem to realize that there are people out there who disagree with radical Leftist policy proposals anymore. To go any further Left, they would have to ban private walls, and demand we build only bridges between what used to be our homes. Abortion wouldn’t just be a right, it would be a duty. The Supreme Court would obviously be packed, with kindergarteners. Venezuela would be granted American statehood, whether they liked it or not. Free trade would become quite literally free, as in, no payments could be made, and this would clearly be unilateral in nature, prohibiting only inbound payments, since every country but the United States is entitled to some degree of sovereignty. Our broader foreign policy agenda would seemingly involve slashing military spending until we were fighting Israeli wars with only milkshakes and sucker punches. And of course we would then have to ban milkshakes a since they are weapons of war which do not belong on our streets.

Delaney and Hickenlooper must have felt a lot like Ron Paul last night, but one doubts they’ll have quite the same legacy. At this rate they’ll be lucky if they don’t get called Nazis and jumped by Antifa.

Like you, I’ve found it profoundly amusing to watch the Left completely lose their composure over the last four years. They’ve obviously been having a blast as well, even if their frenzied ideological crescendo does look more like bad trip from the outside. Loudly complaining, frothing at the mouth with threats and profanity, rioting in the streets, attempting to gun down legislators and burn down federal facilities is, after all, their idea of a good time, sick as that might be.

Viva La Resistance…

I’ve learned a lot from this display, and how it compares to our own adventures of the last few years. I was contemplating those lessons this morning as I watched the aftermath of Robert Mueller’s testimony from Wednesday, and I was chuckling to myself about the implications as I did.

Just a few short years ago, I was pretty well convinced that the entire concept of the State was some kind of unnatural superstition which mankind would have to overcome in order to see his full potential unbound. I suppose one could be forgiven for this worldview, given where things were at during that time. I had a pretty poor conception of what it mean to to be “Right Wing” and the Left seemed to be firmly in control of both parties. If the GOP establishment had their way, our answer to Barack Obama would have been Jeb Bush, and if the libertarians were to prevail, we’d have Rand Paul race shaming us about the drug war’s disparate impact on blacks.

Met with either of those choices, or Hillary Clinton, a bloody civil war which I’d surely not survive, sounded like the more appealing option.

The Trump effect was, and remains, profoundly transformational. Even as he proves a staggering failure in terms of execution, his cultural impact is a rather spectacular gift.

In 2015, you had to be a careful observer to realize that the Left was dangerously out of step with reality. Transgenderism was successfully tailgating gay marriage through our cultural turnstyle, without paying the fare. BLM race riots were accepted by most as a legitimate expression of an oppressed group’s frustration with civil rights abuses. Referring to elected Democrats as communists was largely seen as hyperbolic. It mattered if somebody called you a racist.

The Left had a certain way about them, that they would bombard us with propaganda for some sick idea or another, and without even waiting for that concept to be fully accepted, they would pretend it had been so solidified, and move on to the next. Conservatives, still dizzy from the last battle, abandoned their prior defenses, and rushed to build new ones against the next onslaught, in a ceaselessly repeating pattern of defeat.

The effect was to stifle debate and keep Republicans on constant defense, and without any meaningful opposition to Leftist ideas, we can hardly act surprised that their cultural domination went unabated.

When Trump came in and made immigration the central issue, refusing to budge, and masterfully manipulating the media, the whole process was short circuited. Leftists had only one playbook, and suddenly the rules had changed. They kept trying to propose more and more extreme ideas, but the country was fixated on Trump and the border. Their extremism, which one once could not recognize without fine tuning of one’s perceptions, suddenly became obvious to casual observers.

Robert Mueller sat before two congressional committees to answer questions about his so called Russia investigation. Democrats, still counting on the stupidity of the American electorate, hoped to obtain soundbites for their media propagandist friends to run with, in order to paint the President of the United States as a criminal.

And of course, they found it. Within the first 5 minutes of questioning, committee chairman Jerry Nadler asked Mueller if his report had exonerated of obstructing justice. Mueller predictably responded in the negative, as it is not the role of a prosecutor to exonerate suspects. Before the next 5 minute round of questioning had completed, I saw a news alert on my phone from the SmartNews app, about story from ABC News, headlined “Mueller contradicts Trump, says report did not exonerate him“.

This was in no way news, of course. Mueller never reported to exonerate anyone. It was never his job. His report nonetheless exceeded expectations in this regard, handing congressional Democrats the gift they sought, in stating that they did not clear the President of obstruction. He further called a press conference, and there stated, yet again, that he did not exonerate the President. The “News Alert” thus, was yet more propaganda.

Were anything newsworthy, it would have been the reversal of the burden of proof which has ensued in the course of this ruse, but then again, that particular perversion of our justice system is perhaps as old as the republic itself.

Of course, if the President were, in fact, a criminal, those same talking heads and legislators would be assuring us that all was right with the world.

If criminals were in any way held in the disfavor of the Democrat Party, Christine Pelosi never would have lamented that it is “quite likely that some of our faves are implicated” in the Jeffrey Epstein child molestation scandal. Corey Booker would not be calling for reparations for drug dealers. Bernie Sanders would not be championing the supposed right of convicted murderers to vote from their prison cells. Trump’s criminal justice reform efforts, which we were recently made aware has set violent criminals loose on our streets, and will surely release countless more in the coming years, would have been condemned as loudly and as hysterically as his immigration policies. And of course, speaking of immigration enforcement, this would be wholly uncontroversial.

Were Democrats opposed to the criminal element, Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, and Ayanna Pressley would have unhesitatingly condemned Willem Van Spronsen, the Antifa terrorist who was recently shot while trying to firebomb an ICE detention center in Tacoma, Washington. Trump’s “fine people on both sides” remarks about Charlottesville would have been met with equally hysterical condemnation as they were, but only because of the implication that Antifa terrorists could possibly have been “very fine people”.

Tucker Carlson recently had a segment where he played clips of Democrats out on the campaign trail, repeating the popular slogan that “nobody is above the law,” in their attacks on the President. A phrase often repeated today. He and Victor David Hanson, made quick work of eviscerating this foolishness. Not that of the slogan, of course, which is quite sound, but that of the people saying it, since their entire philosophy rests on some people, most notably illegal immigrants, and their fellow party members, being precisely that. Above the law.

But perhaps it is not so clear as Carlson and Hansen make it out to be. I was made to recall some commentary in this vein by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in The Gulag Archipelago. After a lengthy description of upright people who had been tormented by the State apparatus in the post revolution Soviet Union, Solzhenitsyn explains the theory under which this sort of thing was justified.

Should we wrap it all up and simply say that they arrested the innocent? But we omitted saying that the very concept of guilt had been repealed by the proletarian revolution and, at the beginning of the thirties, was defined as rightist opportunism! So we can’t even discuss these out-of-date concepts, guilt and innocence.

And later

We have once more gone astray with this rightist opportunism—this concept of “guilt,” and of the guilty or innocent. It has, after all, been explained to us that the heart of the matter is not personal guilt, but social danger. One can imprison an innocent person if he is socially hostile. And one can release a guilty man if he is socially friendly.

And in this, the framework of the Democrat sense of justice is revealed. Trump, with all his so called “racist tweets” and unwillingness to sacrifice the interests of his constituency to that of his political opponents, is not socially friendly. He is not, as is often said, a “threat to our Democracy” but rather, a social danger.


Created 1 year, 9 months ago.

150 videos


The Radical Agenda is a live, uncensored, open phones right wing talk radio pogrom.