You are about to action:
Object being modified by the action
Do you want to proceed?
If you wish to action:
Object being modified by the action
Then please send an email request to [email protected].
When business considers culture an asset it is deployed for a return, what would have to occur for it to become a liability? We discuss "the business" of change .
Time given as a value creates the cognitive domain of rivalling truth claims that leverages what we immanentise to not see this foundational claim for what it is - a lie. We discuss
What would mark an irreconcilable rupture in the world such that this distinction, would separate itself from the ruling paradigm? We explore this through "southern civilisation". In a northern hemisphere centric world where powers centres vie for supremacy we look to where there is no such pretence. It is to people, the no ones of the world this work of finally civilising our planet.
We explore the post consumer transitioning by utilising the Deleuzian concepts of the dark precursor and the larval self to frame this change.
We explore how the rise of authoritarianism is inextricably connected to the form of life of the consumer, and how the spiritual poverty of the "modern world" blinds us to the repercussions of it.
Does self esteem try to make up for a lack of existential integrity in our lives? We explore this question through the marginal self that is a given being market oriented entails.
Price clears more than demand and supply, it clears our way of life and so the relationality of it. We explore the potential for the future when we no longer price change out of existence.
Does the way values become part of marketing, indicate what at first glance would seem improbable, that the form of life of the consumer is failing? We explore this scenario
The self we help when marginally given to life, maintains the way of not questioning it to never see beyond the roles we invest this help in. We explore
How can you economise something that doesn't exist? What happens when our actions necessitates we absence our ourselves to generate a return, when we are never there, given as indivisible. We explore how our actions are expiation rites of a perverse religiosity.
How can we reconcile rendering unto caesar and rendering unto god what is his? What is the marginality we need to address to see pass this division that has framed the separation of "spiritual life" in the west. We discuss
Why do we talk to ourselves the way we do? Do we ever think this has anything to do with the way time is given to us? We explore our conversation as an artefact of our cultural domain in a novel way.
We do not risk anything as consumers of life,? Does the global reset seek to reset the want of the consumer to preserve the order that requires a marginal form of life to give it legitimacy? We explore these questions through Nietzsche's "last man"
We look at cancel culture in reference to our form of life of the consumer and whether it actualises the social death a market way of life legitimises when our relationality is reduced to want.
When we credit each other with creativity our "social credit" cannot be managed in reference to authoritarianism. We are equal to create the world we potentialise, if we so choose. We discuss
A parallel economy that does not differ from the current one, holds out no change for the world, it is rather reactive and so seeks to preserve what already is rather than see an opportunity for life beyond the commerce it is otherwise framed through. We discuss.
We explore the often discussed topic of the age of Aquarius in reference to the axial sign of Leo, and how what is given is rather the alpha and omega point. so a closing off we prepose closes the mythologising of the suns movement and our unavowed religiosity being market oriented entails.
We explore money as a means to secure the independence of our time, a time that is deruitive so has nestled within it an accusation against life.
What is the value of being given as a consumer of life? Do we ever consider our lives holistically in reference to our way of life, whereby the value of our lives is given beyond what we presuppose? What would be the ultimate value we are oblivious to? We discuss.
If there is a division that courses through our lives to undermine the foundations for our lives, how are we to make sense of Christ's statement in reference to our market oriented lives. We discuss
Trans-humanism is always framed outside our way of life., when done so the orientation of our life is presupposed. Can trans-humanism be considered more holistically if we were to approach it this way? Can the form of life of the consumer frame it development thereby making it contingent of what we do? We discuss.
When we believe time to be a thing it is not, we practise a bad faith. The fruits of our religiosity is competing dogmas that vie for ascendancy, we look at wokism as one such example.
Can we save time, is this possible? What opportunity is there for life when time is presupposed to be a thing? What art is there to create? We discuss.
The excluded middle of exchange hides a sanctuary where the phoenix is reborn on the new earth that arises. We discuss
When time is given as an economic good, so is a totalising claim made on life is this the principle injustice we must address in life? We discuss
We are consumers, even now the time you are taking to read this description is as an economic good, time secured as a supplement through the means you made of it. When our time is an economic good utilised to produce the form of life for time to be given as supplementary means there is a totalising claim over life, as there is no outside to the presupposition of time being given as anything other than an economic good. We can say to be a consumer is to literally spend our time to no end, as we will spend it in the manner of how we received it, the factor of our production that allows want to be the extent of our agency.
So how do we create a common surpassing for life so there is not a totalising claim made on it?
If we think being market oriented is about buying shit it is not, there is "no place" for the market for your time. You are beholden to no place you won't recognise compromises life, the places you share as you presuppose your time is unqualified, but it isn't, it is derivative, which make you the product, the consumer, you are sold on life for. You are only given credit for your want, your want of life, you are given no credit to create the world, so the world will be managed on your behalf.
Here lies the issue, and the potential for a new form of life requires a new way of doing things that potentializes our time beyond the economic good to temporalise place for a common surpassing.
This channel is a no ones prescription to remove a spiritual disease, to chart a way out of the labyrinth of our rendition, that is an intractable line. We hope this may inspire action, the 1st initiatory step: the product return of the consumer.