Bar & restaurant owners have no duty of care to protect the public from any risk that is widely known to the community and no one is a direct threat without a judicial determination. There is no public health emergency in Ohio. This is the text from the letter that can be used to communicate with the LCC or other agencies. It's generic and needs to be edited for each situation. Remember to get your separate bank accounts to process payments and avoid unfair fines.
This letter pertains to the association of retail business owners and entrepreneurs in Ohio, specifically, those with permits for selling beer, wine and spirits. We have had enough of the fake pandemic. Demand is made upon each of you to answer the following questions; however, we know that you will not because you are perpetrating the biggest fraud this state has ever witnessed. You are therefore advised of the following questions and demands:
You will describe the nature of the emergency that pertains to section “4301:1-80” that supposedly limits hours for sales of beer, wine and liquor.
Describe the duty of care you claim that retailers (public accommodations), especially bar owners, have to protect the public from danger when the risks are widely known to the community.1
Provide a list of the individuals who have submitted to a bona fide medical examination and been determined to be infected with a communicable disease, along with a copy or citation of the court order making such determination.
What facts were used to determine that there is a public emergency?
According to official public records of the Ohio Medical Examiner’s Office, the total mortality rate has remained about the same when comparing the years 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020. Where is the public health emergency?
By what authority do you proclaim a public emergency when there is no evidence of any public emergency?
Maybe the emergency is financial and the state has declared a public health emergency so that it can pillage public funds and participate in the disaster fraud. According to the Office of Budget and Management, Ohio received $4.5 Billion in Coronavirus Relief Funds with $3.7 billion going to the state and the rest going directly to local governments with populations over 500,000. Of the state share, $2.8 billion had been appropriated prior to Friday’s announcement.
If the governor has been declaring a state of emergency for a year, and has not ended the emergency, why is the governor still permitted to receive funding and make rules regarding the presumption of ending the so-called emergency? He has failed to end any emergency, even if there is one. By definition, an emergency has a very short period of time, such as minutes, hours or several days, and a year far exceeds the definition of being an emergency. Instead, it is very much a business franchise of the World Bank Group who is providing the funding and approving the rules being forced onto everyone through the WHO, CDC, states, counties and cities.2
By what authority do administrative rules repeal or amend state law or the medical privacy rights of people?
Describe the steps taken to comply with emergency rule making and amendments to the Ohio Administrative Code under 111.15(B)(2).
Has the “emergency rule” 4301:1-1-80 been filed as a “nonemergency rule in compliance with division (B)(1) of Ohio Revised Code (ORC) Section 111.15(B)(2)?
As per the provisions for an “emergency rule” which has substantially and adversely impacted businesses, has the Liquor Control Commission (LCC) or any state board, department, division, or bureau filed the business impact analysis, along with recommendations received from the common sense initiative office, and the associated memorandum of response along with the proposed rule? Provide copies or citations of each.
How does changing liquor sales, hours of operation and imposing control measures such as mask-wearing, mitigate any dangers from the claimed public emergency?
The LCC lacks any legislative authority to impose public health control measures, or other measures intended for “public health”.
Furthermore, the LLC lacks the legislative approval to indemnify and reimburse any retailer for lost revenue, injury or damages resulting from imposing illegal medical interventions upon patrons.
The LLC is without any authority or obligation to act in the capacity of a public health officer as it has never been delegated such authority or obligation.
The LCC is thereby not authorized to delegate any function of a public health officer, just like an actual public health officer cannot delegate its authority or obligations to a private business, any more than a private business owner cannot require its patrons and employees to submit to any medical interventions, especially in violation of public policy as established in the Public Health Preparedness Bench Book.
What facts or studies have established the necessity or efficacy of su
High fives are a modern demonstration of success, joy and celebration between people. Hand shakes are how people communicate respect, care and agreement with each other.
Hugs of course are how we express our love and affection and respect for each other.
In fact, high fives, hand shakes and hugs are actually part of the stimuli that keep our natural immunity and health in the very best condition.
These are such natural behaviors and have been part of every culture since people have existed. Now is the time, more than ever, for all of us to practice high fives, hand shakes and hugs everyday.
I'm going to be adding to this video with more and more of the same meme and I encourage each of you to make your own videos of people hugging, hand-shaking and high-fiving and publish everywhere you can.
This is an introduction to how you could organize a home schooling association within your immediate neighborhood.
IT’S NOT A VACCINE – IT’S A MEDICAL DEVICE
IT IS THE DISEASE!
It is not a vaccine, it is a medical device, a synthetic pathogen, it is the disease!
This excerpt from Dr. David Martin’s and Dr. Judy A. Mikovits’ discussion with Rocco Galati and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in January of 2021:
“Let’s stipulate that this is not a vaccine. We need to be really clear, we’re using the term the vaccine to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine, this is a [an] mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device devise designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator. It is not a vaccine.
Vaccines are legally defined term and they are a legally defined health term under public health law; they are a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards, and a vaccine specifically has to stimulate both an immunity within the person receiving it, but it also has to disrupt transmission. And that is not what this is, they have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop transmission, it is a treatment.
But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health authorities because then people would say well then what other treatments are there. The use of term “vaccine” is unconscionable for both the legal definition term of it but also because it actually is the sucker punch to pen and free discourse. Because by saying vaccine, you dump it into a thing where you can any or pro the therapy. But if you actually talked about it as a therapy, and remember, people forget this, Modeno was started as a chemo-therapy company for cancer, not a vaccine manufacturer for Sars.
Th, you know, if we said you know we’re going to give people prophylactic therapy for the cancer they don’t have, you’d be laughed out of a room, because it’s a stupid idea. That’s exactly what this is, this is a mechanical device in the form of a very small packet of technology, that is being inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogen manufacturing site.
And I refuse to stipulate in any conversations that this is in fact a vaccine issue. The only reason why the term is being used is to abuse the 1905 Jacobsen case2 that has been misrepresented since it was written. And if we were honest with this, we would actually call it what it is; it is a chemical pathogen device that is actually meant to unleash a chemical pathogen production action within a cell. It is a medical device, not a drug, because it meets the CDRH3 definition of a device. This is not a living system, it is not a biologic system, it is a physical technology, it happens to just come in the size of a molecular package.
So we need to be really clear on making sure we don’t fall for their game because their game is if we talk about it as a vaccine then we’re going to get into a vaccine conversation. But this is not,by their own admission, a vaccine.
And as a result it must be clear to everyone listening that we will not fall for this failed definition, just like we won’t fall for their industrial chemical definition of health. Because both of them are functionally flawed and are an explicit violation of the legal construct that is being exploited.
Mr. Galati asks Dr. Mikovits to comment.
“It’s a synthetic pathogen. They’ve literally injected the very pathogenic part of the virus into every cell of the body.
Mr. Galati, “When you say pathogen, that’s says to me, it’s gonna make me sick.”
Dr. Mikovits, “Correct.”
Dr. Martin, “It’s made to make you sick Rocco. Rocco, remember that 80% of the people allegedly exposed to allegedly SarsCov2, so let’s not get into that rabbit hole, but 80% of the people who are exposed to allegedly the virus have no symptoms at all. They’re called asymptomatic carriers. 80% of the people who get this injected into them have a clinical adverse event. You are getting injected with a chemical substance to induce illness, no to induce a immuno-transmissive response. In other words, nothing about this is going to stop you from transmitting anything. This is about getting you sick and having your own cells be the thing that get you sick.”
Dr. Mikovits, agrees that this causes an auto-immune response and states that it also causes “multiple sclerosis, Lou Gherics Disease, Alzheimer’s disease because that’s what the expression of that pathogenic envelope, it can cause accelerated cancer, that’s what the expression of that piece of virus, that cincidin alone has been known to do for decades. You injected the disease, literally.”
see more, www.aceofcoins.com/fakepandemic
This is how you get the bogus criminal and civil trespass and disorderly conduct cases dismissed, especially the criminal ones. Did you know that if you do not enter a plea at the arraignment, you will never be charged with a crime? You simply refuse to comply with the demonic mask-wearing cult and you will be unlawfully denied access to the court, and then the case will eventually be dismissed with prejudice (forever) for denial of your rights to a speedy trial.
If you are confronted this situation, you want to avoid arguing with the police, but you can ask these questions and make these comments before leaving:
"Please be advised that I am an invitee shopping at a public accommodation during regular business hours."
"Do you have evidence of a violation?"
Please cite the law.
"You and I both know that I cannot be cited for a crime for something that is not a crime, and if you want to do that, you have no immunity for false arrest or whatever other violations you commit."
We are discussing: Retailers and public accommodations do not have any "duty of care" when a risk or health threat is widely known to the community. Likewise, the determination of what constitutes a "direct threat" can only be made by a court of law. How do you know that a public accommodation has no duty of care? Because it cannot get insurance for what it claims to be the risk.
Demonstration of ignorant Costco employees, parroting the same erroneous claim "we are a private business and can make whatever policies we want... yet claim to be penalized for not complying with CDC guidelines which are not even laws, they of course can never recognize this contradiction. And notice the police officer who says "I'm in charge here" and then calls his supervisor so he doesn't have to make any decisions on his own LOL. Then we discuss the legal aspects of this and entertain the likely future trends of this con.
Catherine spells it out for us, the future plans for the evil fake pandemic.
Dr. Steph and I are discussing the details for identifying legal violations by retailers and how to serve notice and sue for an injunction and we cover a few more things. Check out her website at http://thezeropointlife.com/clinic
We're discussing how to document wrongful termination and what options and actions to consider.
We now have the police telling retailers that its legal to force medical interventions on their customers and that if the customers refuse to submit, it's okay to cite them for an unrelated crime such as trespass or disorderly conduct or even make up a fake situation and accuse the customer of assault. This puts the burden of seeking a remedy on the customer, requiring the customer to sue the retailer so a judge can order the retailer to stop breaking the law. Unbelievable, but this is what we have to do. Here is an explanation of the process, using Costco as an example.
These are the beginning steps to make a complaint against the airlines for imposing illegal medical interventions as a condition for passengers. Consider this Part I, the next part we'll discuss taking your complaint from the Complaint Resolution Officer (CRO) response to the DOT and then to the U.S. District Court of Appeals.
A few examples of what businesses can do and what they can expect when refusing to participate in the fake pandemic.
Created 2 years, 9 months ago.