Free Speech Warrior

On 10-11 of December 2018 Marrakesh some UN countries came to a "Global Compact on Migration" which emphasizes that all migrants are entitled to universal human rights to effectively enter participating nations.
"... Although this joint agreement isn't binding, it's still meant to be the legal framework on which the participating countries commit themselves to build new legislation. And one basic element of this new agreement is the extension of the definition of "Hate Speech". The agreement want to criminalize migration speech. Criticism of migration will become a criminal offence and media outlets, and that also concerns you, that give room to criticism of migration can be shut down. The compact for migration is legalization of mass migration..."
Their excuse is to eliminate all forms of speech that they deem to be anti-migration.
Don't want to believe this nonsense.... check it out here: https://www.un.org/en/conf/migration/https://www.un.org/en/conf/migration/
On 19 December 2018, the United Nations General Assembly endorsed the compact through a vote. 152 countries voted in favor of the resolution to endorse it, while the United States, Hungary, Israel, Czech Republic and Poland voted against it. Countries abstained or did not attend the vote, Algeria, Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Chile, Dominican Republic, Estonia, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Romania, Singapore, Slovakia and Switzerland

This is the greatest video you will see that exposes the complete lies and fabricated stories the MSM in conjunction with social media spread at the behest of radical leftist agenda's. This is Tommy Robinson's acceptance speech for the Sappho Award at the Danish Parliament hosted by the Free-Press Society where he exposes the weaponization of the MSM and Social Media by the Leftist, Globalist political cabal. Tommy Robinson... YOU ARE A TRUE FREE SPEECH WARRIOR!!! 📣 👏👏👏👏
If you can, please support his work here - https://www.tr.news/support-us/ ; Join him on Telegram here - https://t.me/TommyRobinsonNews

Oxford Union debate on "No Platforming". This was an eight person debate on 9th May 2019. The speakers supporting the "No Platforming" side were Celeste McGinley, Robert French, Jack Salmon and Mariah Idrissi. Speakers against "No Platforming" were Harry Deacon, Toby Young, Kate Hopkins and Ann Widdecombe. This is Katie Hopkins witty, funny and uncensored contribution for the against side. An exemplary performance 👏👏👏👏

Oxford Union debate on "No Platforming". This was an eight person debate on 9th May 2019. The speakers supporting the "No Platforming" side were Celeste McGinley, Robert French, Jack Salmon and Mariah Idrissi. Speakers against "No Platforming" were Harry Deacon, Toby Young, Kate Hopkins and Ann Widdecombe. This is the closing speech by Ann Widdecombe (8 of 8) in which she receives an arousing ovation and rightly so. This is one of the best speeches you could hear that supports the notion of "Free Speech".
“… and just remember this, you may feel virtuous today in what you may not hear but tomorrow somebody may feel virtuous in not hearing what you have to say. Free speech is for all, not for the privileged few.” - Ann Widdecombe 👏👏👏👏

PS: The Oxford Union voted by a huge margin (224 to 49) not to support no-platforming and accorded a standing ovation to the case against.

PragerU v. YouTube: Perhaps one of the most important legal cases being contested to defend the right to “Free Speech” and thus the 1st Amendment. This presentation by the legal counsel for PragerU clearly articulates the issue of censorship by FaceBook, Twitter, YouTube et al. and the need to defend the censorship YouTube has taken against PragerU. The argument between the status of being a publisher or public forum is clearly articulated. Something for those Faux Conservatives who defend the right of a private company to make policies of their choice and if you don’t like it, start a competitive company.

Check out PragerU here: https://www.prageru.com/ or here: https://www.youtube.com/user/PragerUniversity

Watch Tommy catch the so called journalist numerous times..... It shows clearly the agenda's, censorship and fake news openly spread. Enjoy!!
Note: the first 26 sec's are muffled but the remainder is clear. In the muffled section at the beginning Tommy is trying to establish if there is any Saudi money involved. The interviewer states that he doesn't know if there is any Saudi money and there is nobody telling him what to write. Tommy then asks the interviewer if he will label him as "Far Right" after that point the video is clear.

Dec 2-3, 2019 The World Health Organization (W.H.O.) hosted the Global Vaccine Safety Summit in Geneva Switzerland where the cameras captured top health officials admitting they don't know if vaccines are safe. Dr Soumya Swaminathan, M.D. Chief Scientist W.H.O. ..."I think we cannot overemphasize the fact that we really don't have very good safety monitoring systems in many countries, and this adds to the miscommunication and the misapprehensions because we're not able to give clear-cut answers when people ask questions about the deaths that have occurred due to a particular vaccine, and this always gets blown up in the media. One should be able to give a very factual account of exactly what happened and what the cause of the deaths are, but in most cases there is some obfuscation at that level, and therefore, there is less and less trust then in the system..." There are a number of other officials who add further to this compelling video providing clear evidence that Governments in conjunction with W.H.O. have been lying to their constituents. As for the claim of ...."always gets blown up in the media...", that is pure nonsense. The media cover up these deaths.

Some of the highlights:
An admission that vaccine adjuvants increase cell death and damage to vaccine recipients:
Dr. Stephen Evans, Professor of Pharmacoepidemiology – It seems to me that adjuvants multiply the immunogenicity of the antigens that they are added to, and that is their intention. It seems to me they multiply the reactogenicity in many instances, and therefore it seems to me that it is not unexpected if they multiply the incidence of adverse reactions that are associated with the antigen…

Warnings about long-term effects from vaccine adjuvants:
Dr. Martin Howell Friede – You are correct. As we add adjuvants, especially some of the more recent adjuvants, such as the ASO1, saponin-derived adjuvants , we do see increased local reactogenicity… The major health concern which we are seeing are accusations of long term, long term effects. An admission that the W.H.O. is panicking over the fact that many doctors and nurses are finally starting to question the safety and vaccines and are becoming aware of the coordinated cover-up of vaccine injuries:

Prof. Heidi Larson, PhD, Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project – We have a very wobbly health professional front line that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. When the front line professionals are starting to question or they don’t feel like they have enough confidence about the safety to stand up to it to the person asking them the questions. I mean most medical school curriculums, even nursing curriculums, I mean in medical school you’re lucky if you have a half-day on vaccines. Never mind keeping up to date with all this.

Also from Prof. Heidi Larson, PhD – You can’t repurpose the same old science to make it sound better if you don’t have the science that’s relevant to the new problem. So we need much more investment in safety science.

An admission that vaccine clinical trials are insufficient and that vaccines are approved without adequate safety data. Also admits that vaccines damage children far more than they damage elderly adults:

Dr. Marion Gruber – Director, Office of Vaccines Research and Review Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. FDA – And again as you mentioned pre-licensure clinical trials may not be powered enough. It’s also the subject population that you administer the adjuvant to because we’ve seen data presented to us where an adjuvant, a particular adjuvant added to a vaccine antigen did really nothing when administered to a certain population and usually the elderly, you know, compared to administering the same formulation to younger age strata.

A warning about the lack of vaccine safety monitoring systems around the world:
Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, M.D., Chief Scientist, W.H.O., Pediatrician – I think we cannot overemphasize the fact that we really don’t have very good safety monitoring systems in many countries, and this adds to the miscommunication and the misapprehensions because we’re not able to give clear-cut answers when people ask questions about the deaths that have occurred due to a particular vaccine…

Here’s an admission that viral fragments don’t work as promised by immunization theory and that it’s the adjuvants which are responsible for the inflammatory response to vaccines. In other words, vaccine science as described by the vaccine establishment, is quackery:

Dr. Martin Howell Friede, Coordinator, Initiative for Vaccine Research, W.H.O. – Without adjuvants, we are not going to have the next generation of vaccines. And many of the vaccines that we do have, ranging from tetanus through to HPV require adjuvants in order for them to work. We do not add adjuvants to vaccines because we want to do so.

Feel a bit like a Guinea Pig?

Chanel Rion interviews Katie Hopkins (British Columnist) who warns of the perils of Socialism, what "Hate Speech" laws have done to the UK and what we MUST defend against. "The UK no longer has freedom of speech" - Katie Hopkins. This is compelling for freedom minded individuals and Kryptonite to our Progressive friends

As only an Aussie could explain 🤣🤣🤣🤣

WOW.... Yet another compelling watch from the foremost expert on Islam. The Imam destroyer at his very best. Robert explains in detail the Palestinian delusion using provable and factual historical events. A true example of.... 'When facts make opinions obsolete'.
Want the full story, Order "The Palestinian Delusion: The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process" here: https://www.amazon.com/Palestinian-Delusion-Catastrophic-History-Process/dp/164293254X/

Nothing more needs to be said... Enjoy all you progressives

The Australian Fire Catastrophe currently happening 2019/20 didn't need to happen as the problems and issues were clearly explained by Victor Steffensen back in 2016 due to fire storms happening back then. This clip is extracted from the Australian SBS Insights program February 16, 2016. But due to vested interests and the warped ideology of environmentalists combined with layers of Government regulations as a result of that mentality, the lack of a cohesive policy still exists thus South Eastern Australia is being wiped out by uncontrolled fire storms in 2019/20. Wait for the BS claim of 'Climate Change' as the reason for this man made catastrophe by the so called Environmentalists. At the time of this upload, more than
500,000,000 animals or wildlife have perished, colony's of rare and endangered species, thousands made homeless, 200+ fires with 60+ uncontrolled covering hundreds of miles of wilderness, ski resorts, and countless towns and properties have been all but wiped out. The notion and idea that everything must remain lush and green all the time is a complete fallacy. Annual burn off's should be happening but this hasn't been the case. The end of the clip is most telling. Given the abundance of Australian Eucalyptus and other fire prone species in CA and other locations in the USA, this is what should also be incorporated in the USA too but sadly the same moronic mentality exists here too. It is sad that this keeps happening when logic should prevail.

Both Nancy and son Paul Pelosi have some questions to answer

Tucker: ‘Facebook, Google & Twitter actively sensor and ban Conservatives’. Tucker exposes numerous factors including 22 so called Conservative non-profits based in DC such as American’s for Prosperity, The Heritage Foundation, The American Conservative Union, The American Enterprise Institute, The National Review Institute, The Competitive Enterprise Institute, The Mercatus Center (all part of the Koch network) supporting Facebook & Google whilst taking money from these very companies.

How old was Aisha (Ayesha) when Muhammad married her? According to all the CORRECT and true Islamic sources, Aisha was six when Mohamed married her and nine when Muhammad consummated the marriage. Consummated the marriage means he had sexual relations with her.

Today because many Muslims are embarrassed by this fact and they are trying to make up lies that Aisha was 18. They are lying to people to try to convert or revert them so hide and cover up the truth because around the world that would be unacceptable and repugnant to most normal thinking people.
Here is just SOME of the proof proving Aisha was 6 and 9 when Muhammad had sex with her;

Sahih Bukhari 5:58:236
Narrated Hisham's father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed (sic -- consummated) that marriage when she was nine years old. Here is just SOME of the proof proving Aisha was 6 and 9 when Muhammad had sex with her; Sahih Bukhari 5:58:236 Narrated Hisham's father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed (sic -- consummated) that marriage when she was nine years old.

Sahih Bukhari 7:62:64
Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

Sahih Bukhari 7:62:65
Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that 'Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death)." what you know of the Quran (by heart)' Sahih Bukhari 7:62:65 Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that 'Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death)." what you know of the Quran (by heart)'

Sahih Bukhari 7:62:88
Narrated 'Ursa: The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with 'Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).

Abu Dawud 41:4915
Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin: The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) married me when I was seven or six. When we came to Medina, some women came. according to Bishr's version: Umm Ruman came to me when I was swinging. They took me, made me prepared and decorated me. I was then brought to the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him), and he took up cohabitation with me when I was nine. She halted me at the door, and I burst into laughter.

Sahih Muslim 8:3311
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and he was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.

Sahih Bukhari 5:58:234
Narrated Aisha: "The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Alright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, "Best wishes and Allah's Blessing and a good luck." Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah's Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.

Abu-Dawud 2:2116
"Aisha said, "The Apostle of Allah married me when I was seven years old." (The narrator Sulaiman said: "Or six years."). "He had intercourse with me when I was 9 years old."

The Senate Judiciary Committee hear from DOJ IG Michael Horowitz - Dec 11, 2019
Ted Cruz (R-TX) questioning to the IG summarizes the “Grotesque Abuse of Power”. This is not what the Democrats and biased MSM would have you believe. Don’t want to believe it? Take a listen

Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee holds hearing on "DOJ OIG FISA Report: Methodology, Scope, and Findings." Dept of Justice Inspector Gen Michael Horowitz testifies - Dec 18, 2019
Rand Paul (R-KY) questioning to the IG confirms there was both "Bias" and "Malfeasance" with the IG not wanting to impinge on anyone’s rights hence the finding and subsequent referrals to DOJ. So what have AG Barr and Special Prosecutor Durham uncovered to move it to a criminal investigation? – tic tok. This is not what the Democrats and biased MSM would have you believe. For our Leftist friends who don’t want to believe it, here you go....

Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee holds hearing on "DOJ OIG FISA Report: Methodology, Scope, and Findings." Dept of Justice Inspector Gen Michael Horowitz testifies - Dec 18, 2019
Senator Gary Peters (D-MI) thought he would get a simple confirmation that there was no Bias..... Well....., he didn't expect the answer he got.

WOW..... "Brits told the hard-left, institutionally antisemitic, Brexit blocking, identity politics obsessed, climate-change hysteric's of the Labor party, lead by terrorist sympathizing Socialist Simpleton Jeremy Corbyn, to get stuffed".

You've got to love the bluntness of the Aussies!

Both Constitutional Lawyers discuss all aspects of the impending partisan impeachment of POTUS. They cover the very concerns of the founding fathers of the Constitution around the political bias that is playing out by the majority in Congress. They also discuss many prior acts by notable Presidents which were far worse than what Trump is being accused of. A compelling watch if you want the facts. Alan also discusses the accusations made against him regarding the Epstein circus. For our friends on the Radical Left, you may just learn a thing or two.

Life, Liberty & Levin 12/14/19

A 14 yr old white boy wearing a Trump 2020 hat was violently attacked by 6 black kids. Where has been the reporting by the MSM? Crickets! Where are all those bleeding heart liberals condemning this brutal and violent attack. Just imagine if it were the other way around? Endless coverage, Doxing, calls for criminal charges, calls of "hate crime" and so on..... The sheer hypocrisy of the media ironically not on full display. This event apparently occurred on 11/22/19.
https://twitter.com/americandiaries/status/1197902111981342720

Here's the link on Twitter.... make it go viral: https://twitter.com/AmericanDiaries/status/1205178650301227010/video/1

This is the opening monologue of the show. Greg and guests totally destroy the whole impeachment debacle. 🤣🤣🤣 Enjoy!

Mark Levin totally destroys the Democrats move to Impeach. He also points out some very salient historical facts about the Democrat Party which will no doubt trigger our Leftist friends. This clip was taken from Hannity 12/12/19

Child marriage is sanctioned in Islam.

Islamic tradition records that Muhammad consummated his marriage with (i.e., raped) Aisha when she was nine, and the resultant fact that child marriage is accepted in wide swaths of the Islamic world. Child marriage has abundant attestation in Islamic tradition and law.

Turkey’s directorate of religious affairs (Diyanet) said in January 2018 that under Islamic law, girls as young as nine can marry.

“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria

“There is no minimum marriage age for either men or women in Islamic law. The law in many countries permits girls to marry only from the age of 18. This is arbitrary legislation, not Islamic law.” — Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-‘Ubeidi, Iraqi expert on Islamic law

There is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.” — Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council

“Islam does not forbid marriage of young children.” — Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology

Hadiths that Muslims consider authentic record that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was six when Muhammad wedded her and nine when he consummated the marriage:

“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).

As to the video..... “Palestinian Preacher Yusuf Al-Makharze: there is a lot of talk nowadays about a convention that was created by the infidels in 1979. It is called CEDAW. This convention calls for absolute equality between men and women, [claiming that] there are no differences whatsoever between men and women. This convention seeks to change people’s norms, moral values, and laws so that they conform with it. The Arab countries, with few exceptions signed this convention. It is said that Sudan has yet to sign this convention. The Palestinian Authority has signed the convention. It jumped on the bandwagon of absolute equality and liberation that the infidels desire for women.

[…]

Allah permitted the Prophet Muhammad to marry Aisha when she was 9 years old. He married her when she was 9 years old. I am talking about the Messenger of Allah! So we are not supposed to accept what he did because it contradicts international standards and drives the U.N. mad?

[…]

There are signs on the bodies of women and men that indicate [their readiness for] marriage, as approved for us by Allah. When a woman begins to menstruate, Allah creates an egg cell inside her every month. This egg cell is waiting to be [fertilized]. If there is no pregnancy, the woman menstruates, because the pregnancy failed. Allah is saying: “This woman is ready for marriage, so marry her off!”

[…]

When a woman is ready for marriage, you should marry her off. Don’t you believe in freedom? If a girl wants to marry, why should the country’s president have the right to prevent this, after Allah, His Prophet, and the girl’s guardian allowed her to do so? Mr. President, who gave you the right to prevent our girls from getting married? Do you want them to commit obscene acts? What do you want? Like the infidels, you too want them to commit obscene acts. You obey the infidels in everything."

SHOW MORE

Created 1 year, 5 months ago.

68 videos

CategoryOther