In This Together

Greta Thunbergs tells world leaders they need to act. At least that's what we have been given to believe. But is it true. Are world leaders hanging on her every word?

In December 2018. only a couple of months after starting her one girl global protest , Greta Thunberg somehow found herself speaking at the COP24 United Nations Climate Summit in Poland.

The media reported how she had told world leaders what they needed to do. The mainstream media told us how world leaders really took her message to heart. In this video we look at the reality behind the story.

Did Greta really tell world leaders what they needed to do? Watch to find out.

Video:

https://youtu.be/H8S_SK5PbQs

Thanks for watching. Please don't forget to like, comment, share and subscribe.

Subscribe to In This Together here:

https://www.youtube.com/c/_InThisTogether?sub_confirmation=1

Share:

SHARE URL

If this kind of political and geopolitical analysis interests you then check out my other great videos on my In This Together playlist here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haK1n9xbLSo&list=PLLiuNqA1ORX0x-UVwo9Hn8IuUJGV6FH78

Download my book "A Dangerous Ideology" for FREE from In This Together:

https://in-this-together.com

**~~~~~~~~ Debate Me On ~~~~~~~~**

[Twitter] - https://twitter.com/_InThisTogether
[Steemit] - https://steemit.com/@oyddodat
[Minds] - https://www.minds.com/InThisTogether
[Gab] - https://gab.com/InThisTogether

**~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~**

Take it easy you hoopy froods.

In December 2018. only a couple of months after starting her one girl global protest , Greta Thunberg somehow found herself speaking at the COP24 United Nations Climate Summit in Poland.

The media reported how she had told world leaders what they needed to do. The mainstream media told us how world leaders really took her message to heart. In this video we look at the reality behind the story.

Did Greta really tell world leaders what they needed to do? Watch to find out.

Another excellent report from the UK Column team.

https://ukcolumn.org

In this report we see how a False Flag attack was created in Iraq in 2016 then follow how this fake news was reported to the World by Associated Press. The story is then picked up by major MSM outlets, like the Daily Mail in the UK, and reported as if it were real. This fake news propaganda is then used to promote public support for war and conflict, in this case, in the Middle East.

This is standard procedure for the MSM who are the propaganda wing for the global military industrial and intelligence complex.

https://in-this-together.com/false-flag-attacks-used-to-shape-history/

With the UK parliament seemingly doing everything they can to stop Brexit an early election seems the only hope for frustrated leave voters. To this end Nigel Farage, Brexit Party leader, has seemingly offered the Conservatives, led by Boris Johnson, an electoral pact that could see a huge victory for Leavers.

The New World Order is a thing. A definite concept that has different meanings for different people.

For globalists and world leaders the New World Order means the promise of centralised power and a single point of control of all the world’s resources. Finally extricating themselves from any semblance of democratic oversight, freeing them to do whatever they like with no risk and no possibility of anyone ever interfering in their plans again.

For the people who understand the long, well documented history of the New World Order, from the will of Cecil Rhodes, through the transatlantic partnership of deep state think tanks and policy advisors, to the establishment of federalist super states and global decision making bodies, the New World Order appears to be the very worst from of government lead by the very worst individuals.

For everyone else the New World Order is an antisemitic
conspiracy theory which insists that there is a Jewish plot to enslave humanity. They have been firmly given this delusional idea by the world’s controlled mainstream media and compliant scholars, in order to make sure that they never actually look at the evidence which clearly demonstrates what the New World Order really is.

This tongue in cheek video explores how that mythology has been created as a deception to hide reality.

Video:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/8xGbF3AoZbM/

Thanks for watching. Please don't forget to like, comment, share and subscribe.

Download my book "A Dangerous Ideology" for FREE from In This Together:

https://in-this-together.com

**~~~~~~~~ Debate Me On ~~~~~~~~**

[Twitter] - https://twitter.com/_InThisTogether
[Steemit] - https://steemit.com/@oyddodat
[Minds] - https://www.minds.com/InThisTogether
[Gab] - https://gab.com/InThisTogether

**~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~**

Take it easy you hoopy froods.

Evidence that the Social Media giants are interfering in the U.S elections from UK Column.

It can't have escaped many people's attention that elements within the U.S state have accused Russia of meddling in the U.S 2016 elections. This has been run across half of the U.S news cycle for years and led to a number of investigations by the intelligence and security agencies, law enforcement, so called investigative journalists, judicial inquiries and many more. So far no one has produced any clear evidence that Russia meddled in the U.S 2016 elections.

However, here is clear evidence that the Social Media giants are definitely meddling in the next U.S election. So what makes you think they didn't meddle in the last one? Especially seeing as there is plenty of evidence for that too.

In the UK Column news on 5th July 2019 the team made an observation that the House of Lords (Lord Howell) had discussed the implications for a No Deal Brexit, given that the UK had not yet given notice of its intention to leave the European Economic Area (EEA.)

Intrigued, I looked into it further and you can read my post on the issue here if you are interested.

https://in-this-together.com/no-deal-brexit-no-backstop-no-problem/

The situation is perhaps a bit more complex because some claim, including the UK Government, that Article (126) of the EEA agreement, which defines the territorial extent of the EEA, ‘suggests’ that by leaving the EU the UK also leaves the EEA.

However, I discovered that this is not necessarily the case. In fact, Michael-James Clifton, chief barrister for the EFTA court, has thoroughly highlighted the inconsistencies and frankly weird position the UK government has adopted in regard to EEA membership.

The More I looked into it the weirder it got. Something is most definitely amiss.

My suggested conclusion is that the EEA relationship is hidden from the Brexit debate because it will allow the UK and the EU to resolve the Northern Ireland backstop thereby freeing up the possibility of getting a horrendous May like treaty deal through the UK parliament.

However, this is speculative so I would be interested to know what people think if you have time to read the post. I would like to hear a different perspective.

Speaking at the Munich Security Conference in 2018, the new European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair discuss what appears to be an EU policy commitment to military operations in the Sahel region of Africa.

Anthropogenic Climate Change sceptic Tony Heller demonstrates how and why he believes the climate change data has been manipulated to decrease historic temperatures and increase modern measurements. He asks why NOAA and NASA would have done this.

The Online Harms White Paper was released by the UK state on 08/04/2019. The state claims that it is all about ‘keeping us safe’ online and especially keeping children safe online. Which is a very laudable objective. Who could argue with that?

The problem is that the Online Harms White Paper effectively establishes the legal framework for the censorship of the Internet and takes a sledge hammer to any notion that we have free speech, or a democracy, in the UK.

It is precisely the kind of proposed legislation you would expect to see from a dictatorship. If it passes into law, it will create one in the UK. No matter who you vote for.

Video:

Thanks for watching. Please don't forget to like, comment, share and subscribe.

If this kind of political and geopolitical analysis interests you then check out my other great videos on my In This Together playlist here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haK1n...

Download my book "A Dangerous Ideology" for FREE from In This Together:
https://in-this-together.com

**~~~~~~~~ Debate Me On ~~~~~~~~**
[Twitter] - https://twitter.com/_InThisTogether
[Steemit] - https://steemit.com/@oyddodat
[Minds] - https://www.minds.com/InThisTogether
[Gab] - https://gab.com/InThisTogether

**~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~**

Take it easy you hoopy froods.

An excellent discussion here fro the UK column team about the Btitish governments attempt to censor the Internet.

Check out the associated post here: https://in-this-together.com/online-harms-white-paper/

A researcher called A made an FOI request and established that no physical or material evidence of a body was presented to the jury in the Jo Cox murder trial.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtn2ZbKzcKQ

Part 2 of Richard D Hall's excellent documentary looking into the safety of the conviction of Thomas Mair for the alleged murder of Jo cox MP in 2016.

For the original go to https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=266&part=1&gen=99

Part 3 of Richard D Hall's excellent documentary looking into the safety of the conviction of Thomas Mair for the alleged murder of Jo cox MP in 2016.

For the original go to https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=266&part=1&gen=99

Part 4 of Richard D Hall's excellent documentary looking into the safety of the conviction of Thomas Mair for the alleged murder of Jo cox MP in 2016.

To read the accompanying post go to: - https://in-this-together.com/thomas-mair/

For the original video go to: - https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=266&part=1&gen=99

Part 1 of Richard D Hall's excellent documentary looking into the safety of the conviction of Thomas Mair for the alleged murder of Jo cox MP in 2016.

To read the accompanying post go to: - https://in-this-together.com/thomas-mair/

For the original video go to: - https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=266&part=1&gen=99

The Truth about Brexit isn't easy to accept. Brexit has been a deception to hide an unpalatable reality.

On February 17th 2018, speaking about Defence and security at the Munich Security Conference, regardless of Brexit, UK Prime Minister Theresa May stated that the UK was 'unconditionally' committed to EU defence.

On February 15th 2019 Tony Blair enjoyed being interviewed before a compliant audience at University of Technology, in Munich. During his speech he spoke about EU Defence Union. He acknowledged that the British people wouldn't like it if they discovered the truth. Therefore, he suggested this should be 'handled carefully.' Deception in other words.

The same day the High Representative of the European Union Federica Mogherini spoke about how the EU have now created EU Defence Union as a commitment to the New World Order. Mogherini has worked in close cooperation with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. Despite claims by some, EU Defence Union does not undermine NATO. It is a joint plan with NATO.

While the British People were deliberately distracted by the illusion they could ever leave the EU, the EU (including the UK) have completed total Defence Union. If the British people new the nations ability to defend its sovereignty, had been given away, in their entirety, to the central command and control of the EU, leaving the EU would be a foregone conclusion.

This is why the Brexit vote was offered in the first place. It is all a monumental deception by those who are determined to build the New World Order.

Website: https://in-this-together.com

Brexit not happening? It seems clear May's deal is much worse than no deal and, despite saying "no deal was better than a bad deal," the UK Parliament have connived to ensure Theresa May's bad deal is far worse than a no deal Brexit while, at the same time, removing the option of leaving the EU with no deal.

Whether Parliament extends Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty (Brexit not happening), accepts May's Brexit deal (Brexit not happening) or initiates a second referendum, where the choice is between May's deal or remain (Brexit not happening,) it is clear the UK is not going to leave the EU.

The depth of the betrayal was described succinctly by Gina Miller, prominent remainer, speaking on the BBC's Question Time. What Gina outlined was how terrible May's deal is. For Brexit / Lexit voters, it is worse than staying in the EU. While the UK remains subject to EU laws, economic and trade regulations it gives away all say in decision making. Even for the staunchest leave voter May's Brexit deal is far worse than remain.

I suggest this is no accident. Rather than make a clean break from the EU and then negotiate trade arrangements, the UK political establishment have colluded to make leaving the EU a practical impossibility.

Video URL: https://youtu.be/keh5wLWhGPY

Read the post: https://in-this-together.com/brexit-deception-the-fix-is-in-and-the-plan-is-clear/

Skripal Salisbury Chemical Weapons Attack 2018. An Investigation (2019 Update.) This video explores the nonsense that passes as the official narrative of 2018 Salisbury chemical weapons attack. T has been updated to include recent revelations about Colonel Alison McCourt. Using stock news footage of the Skripal poisoning and mainstream media reports about the supposed Salisbury attack, we consider, with tongue firmly in cheek, if what we are told about the UK chemical weapons attack is remotely plausible.

On March 4th 2018 Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia Skripal were allegedly poisoned with the nerve agent Novichok by two suggested Russian GRU agents. Both Sergei and Yulia thankfully recovered, as did PC Nick Bailey who was also contaminated. However, the British government maintained that Novichok was the most deadly nerve agent ever created. 5 times more Deadly than VX and 8 times more deadly than Sarin. Scientists at Porton Down stated that there was no known antidote. The Skripal’s recovery is therefore just one of the many aspects of the official government narrative that makes no sense whatsoever.

The lack of evidence about the Skripal’s movements in Salisbury, the bizaar tale of how the two GRU agents discarded the Novichok and its later discovery by Charlie Rowley. The sad demise of Rowley’s partner Dawn Sturgess following first response that did not identify the presence of Novichok. The odd route taken by the alleged assassins and their seeming willingness both to leave evidence at the scene of the crime and remain at the crime scene for unfathomable and totally unnecessary reasons.

Hopefully amusing at times but based upon the available evidence I hope you find Skripal – An Investigation a worthwhile watch.

Take it easy.

Operation Gladio was a secret NATO plan to perpetrate a series of false flag terror attacks to undermine the possible threat of communism in Europe. Revealed in a series of court cases in the mid 1980's and officially declared in both the Italian and European parliaments in the early 1990's, the disclosure of Operation Gladio proves that government have committed acts of terrorism against their own populations.

Many people today believe this policy of state sponsored terrorism continues. Often seen as a "conspiracy theory," those who find this suggestion impossible to contemplate may understand why people suspect this possibility if they familiarise themselves with Operation Gladio.

This video is free to share.

Music by: Mattia Cupelli & Co-Ag https://youtu.be/haK1n9xbLSo

Chemtrails Explained explores the science behind persistent contrails, which is what people who don't believe in the existence of chemtrails call 'chemtrails.' Many reject the possibility that geoengineering exists and believe the concept of chemtrails is simply a conspiracy theory.

For the full post go to: https://in-this-together.com/chemtrails-exposed/

Those who support the possible existence of a chemtrail conspiracy do not deny that the history of CIA and Deep State involvement in weather modification experiments suggest a possible large scale conspiracy.

They point to a long history, evidenced through a wealth of documentation and government reports, which show attempts at weather modification throughout the decades since the second world war. In addition they point to known examples of weather modification being used in conflict, as a weapon.

So we explore this evidence here and ask if claiming chemtrails debunked is a legitimate position to hold in light of this evidence.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/p8ygJywzDqI/

The Western military industrial intelligence establishment has a long standing relationship with various Islamist extremist groups stemming back over at least half a century.

Prior to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, in 1979, President Carter's National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski was the key architect of a plan to arm the Afghan Mujaheddin in what would later be known as 'Operation Cyclone.'

Thus began the modern era of cooperation between the Western powers, predominantly the U.S and the UK, and various Islamist extremist groups that has continued to this day.

While Operation Cyclone is widely acknowledged, any suggestion that Western powers continued their strategic support for Islamists groups, beyond the 1989 withdrawal of the Soviets from Afghanistan, is strictly taboo. We are instead asked to accept the simple narrative that the 'war on terror' is essentially a battle of good vs evil.

In reality, the West, ostensibly in the form of the Anglo-American led NATO establishment, often referred to as the U.S led coalition (especially in regard to recent military actions and wars in Libya, Iraq and Syria) has continued to use Islamist terrorists and ground forces as proxies in a game of geostrategic manipulation.

In 1991 both Croatia and Slovenia seceded from the former Yugoslavia, shortly followed by a declaration of independence by Bosnia-Herzegovina. Slobadan Milosevic's Serbian government supported the Bosnian Serb's rejection of the declaration and violence erupted between Bosnian Serbs and Muslims.

Bosnia-Herzegovina devolved into three separate regions. One Muslim Bosniak, another Croat and the other Serbian. During the Bosnian War the Bosnian Muslim were supported by the U.S. and the UK (and earlier Iran and Saudi Arabia), the Croats drew Catholic support from across Europe and the Russians, Israelis, Greeks and Ukrainians supported the Serbs, again drawing fighters from a number of eastern orthodox nations. Effectively, during this peri..

The Western MSM reporting of the violence in Syria is best described as the Syrian conflict deception. Nothing we have been told about the conflict in Syria is true. The origins of the conflict aren't as we led to believe, it's precursors are radically different from what we've been told; the nature of the conflict is not a 'civil war' as our media have tried to convince us and many of the events during the conflicted have been misreported, distorted or have simply been 'fake news.'

However, while war propaganda is nothing new, the public scrutiny afforded by the Internet renders the deception painfully transparent for those who choose to look.

Initially we were told that the U.S Led coalition's 'response' in Syria arose following please from peaceful 'opposition' activists brutally attacked by President Bashar al Assads forces, the Syrian Arab Army (SAA.) However, as this video reveals the plan for 'regime' change in Syria was at least a decade old and was yet another attempt by the West to install the government of its choice in the country. The Testimony of General's Wesley Clarke and former French Foreign minister Roland Dumas makes the long standing Anglo-American plan to oust the Ba'ath party from power clear.

Further testimony from Major General Anwar Al Eshki show that the Saudi's were arming militants in the al Omari Mosque in Deraa where the violence began. This corroborated SAA claims that the violence did not erupt simply because they opened fire on unarmed protestors but rather because they were engaged in a gun battle with militant groups already in place. It is also clear, according to the testimony of General Michael T. Flynn, that the U.S administration made a 'wilful decision' to arm Islamist groups inside Syria in the full knowlwedge that this would likely lead to the creation of a 'Salafist principality. Islamic State in other words.

So was this all just a monumental cock up, as claimed by the Western coalition and their allies? Or does it evidence a committed plan to use Islamist terrorist groups to destabalise a target country for geopolitical, strategic and financial gain?

The Western military industrial intelligence establishment has a long standing relationship with various Islamist extremist groups stemming back over at least half a century.

Prior to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, in 1979, President Carter's National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski was the key architect of a plan to arm the Afghan Mujaheddin in what would later be known as 'Operation Cyclone.'

Thus began the modern era of cooperation between the Western powers, predominantly the U.S and the UK, and various Islamist extremist groups that has continued to this day.

While Operation Cyclone is widely acknowledged, any suggestion that Western powers continued their strategic support for Islamists groups, beyond the 1989 withdrawal of the Soviets from Afghanistan, is strictly taboo. We are instead asked to accept the simple narrative that the 'war on terror' is essentially a battle of good vs evil.

In reality, the West, ostensibly in the form of the Anglo-American led NATO establishment, often referred to as the U.S led coalition (especially in regard to recent military actions and wars in Libya, Iraq and Syria) has continued to use Islamist terrorists and ground forces as proxies in a game of geostrategic manipulation.

In 1991 both Croatia and Slovenia seceded from the former Yugoslavia, shortly followed by a declaration of independence by Bosnia-Herzegovina. Slobadan Milosevic's Serbian government supported the Bosnian Serb's rejection of the declaration and violence erupted between Bosnian Serbs and Muslims.

Bosnia-Herzegovina devolved into three separate regions. One Muslim Bosniak, another Croat and the other Serbian. During the Bosnian War the Bosnian Muslim were supported by the U.S. and the UK (and earlier Iran and Saudi Arabia), the Croats drew Catholic support from across Europe and the Russians, Israelis, Greeks and Ukrainians supported the Serbs, again drawing fighters from a number of eastern orthodox nations. Effectively, during this period, the Bosnian War, the war in Kosovo, The Albanian civil war and the insurgencies in the Presevo Valley and the Republic of Macedonia were all heavily influenced by more powerful, external 'players'. They all exercised their realpolitik through the sponsorship of various military factions.

In 1996 the Dutch Government commissioned a report from the Netherlands Institute for War Documentation (NIOD) into the events surrounding the Bosnian War and, in particular, the massacre at Srebrenica. Their published 2002 report was a product of investigators unrestricted access to Dutch intelligence and high level access to other intelligence service's personnel and documentation. Their finding were extensive and unequivocal. They clarified that the CIA and MI6 were aware of the supply of arms and fighters to support the Bosnian Muslim Army. Rather than attempt to stop it, in 1993, they took it over and expanded so called 'Croatian Pipeline.' It facilitated the shipment of weapons, fighters and equipment via Turkey and Croatia into the war zone. The Dutch report stated:

“Clinton and State Department officials considered supplies via Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan. This was not new: in the 1980s, Saudi Arabia had already supplied arms worth $500 million via the CIA to the Mujahedin fighters in Afghanistan. There had also already been a close relationship with Turkey in the area of intelligence for some considerable time. For instance, there were various American monitoring stations in Turkey, and there was close collaboration of the Turkish domestic security service with the CIA and the FBI.”

This video provides primary evidence that thousands of foreign Islamist fighters were indeed present and engaged in the Bosnian war. It is notable that the MSM Sky news report insinuates that these fighters somehow found their way into the conflict as a result of the Bosnian Governments actions alone. However, as clearly evidenced by the NIOD report this was a distortion of the truth. Fake news in other words. The Western NATO powers were instructive and this is yet more evidence of the continuing support they provided for the Islamist factions, some of whom went on to form al Qaeda.

To fully explore the Wests longstanding relationship with Islamist extremists why not start with the In This Together article at:

https://in-this-together.com/islamist-extremists-proxies-of-the-west-part-1

Recently the Gaza Shooting of unarmed civilian protestors saw the killing of 58 and life changing injuries inflicted upon more than 1,200 protestors by soldiers of the Israeli Defense Force (IDF.) The response by the the British Government of Theresa May reveals the disgusting degree of hypocrisy our political establishment blithely offers us.

The Evidence was clear and unequivocal. Israeli forces had absolutely no justification whatsoever to open fire with live ammunition on these people. The Gaza shooting was an unprovoked massacre of civilians by the IDF, there is a wealth of corroborating evidence to prove the fact. Moreover it is clear that unarmed Palestinian protestors were targeted by IDF snipers with the evident objective of killing them. Many were killed hundreds of meters away from the fence, a high number were shot in the back, the live ammunition used in the Gaza Shooting (7.62mm rounds) was designed to inflict the most severe injuries possible (in the absence of death) and there was no realistic threat to IDF forces and certainly none to Israeli civilians, who weren’t even present. 8 Children were among the 58 murdered Palestinians.

The stark contrast between the British Governments response to the proven actions of the Israel and the alleged actions of Syria in Douma, only a month earlier, reveal the reality of the British Government’s supposed moral indignation.

Speaking on 14th April 2018, a day after the UK, France and the U.S had launched reprisal missile strikes against Syria for the alleged chemical weapons attack in Douma, Theresa May called the attack “a despicable and barbaric attack.” Yet she referred to the mass slaughter of civilians by Israel as “tragic and extremely concerning.” She made no mention at all that it was an undoubted massacre.

Also notable is the difference in the tone of the language used. In reference to Douma, Theresa May was at pains to to highlight “harrowing images” and that “young children were killed,” calling..

SHOW MORE

Created 1 year, 6 months ago.

29 videos

CategoryNews & Politics

Thanks for checking out In this together

It's all about politics, geopolitics, media lies and manipulation, state sponsored terror and cheese polishing.

https://in-this-together.com

I'm Ian and, although I think we’re all being farmed by a corporate and financial oligarchy, I still enjoy cat herding, artistic interpretations of the Jarrow March (through the medium of crochet) and weeping unnoticed. I research and post new videos as often as I can, along with the occasional full length film.

I'm able to leap small foot stools in a single bound and have occasionally been reliable. Some of my friends still talk to me and, best of all, I haven’t been arrested lately. So please check out my channel and please don't forget to subscribe and share.

Take it easy.