JoesGottaKnow

I am sure many of you are aware of the implications that a drive like this could have
on travel times to various destinations in space.
For those that do not I wanted to post this.
Only fuel is positive only power/electricity so you could accelerate as long as you like
or until you ran out of a means for producing electricity.
At this time on the scale model test "not the 1.6 pound test, just the cylinder test"
my best guess is this propulsion system is producing around a quarter to maybe half of a G
constant acceleration in one direction.
The 3 slides in this video show travel times from Earth at 1G constant acceleration.
At this time it is not producing 1G "as shown in the slides" or over or it would lift itself up into the
air vertically.
I am testing with different gauge wire configurations to see if it is
possible to get this up to one G or over.
Even if I can not, at this point 6 to 8 weeks travel time from Earth once in space
launched by a rocket to Pluto at it's closest approach to Earth is pretty good and that would be beginning deceleration at the
halfway point and stopping at the planet.
Mars at this point in testing would be 4 to 6 days travel time with deceleration at halfway point.
Yes it needs work but the concept and the idea is working in the test.
Once I get the force maximized you would scale it up in size and start working on design issues.

I went to a thinner drive wire.
Went from a 16 gauge to a 24 gauge.
Looks like I may have been correct about the
amount of resistance in the drive wire causing more force/propulsion.
More test coming.

******UPDATE 2/24/21*******
The more I look into this the more I believe a lot of the wire flexing may
be due to the connecting of a thinner gauge positive only wire to the thicker gauge
positive only wire coming from the power supply. The thinner gauge positive only power wire
is the last connection in the chain and goes from the power supply wire to the front of the cylinder.
More resistance should equal more flex and propulsion.
Will test the opposite also with thinner to thicker.
Will be testing this over the weekend.

To begin vertical test I used the same setup as in last video with the part
of the positive only supply wire taped to and isolated to the drive that provides
propulsion.
I hung it by twine to see if there would be any lift and create any slack in the twine upward
that it was hanging from when power was jolted through the isolated attached wire.
It pulled but only upward on the side where the wire is attached which was expected.
Will need to make a larger design where I can run a total of 4 supply propulsion wires
and connect them at top to each corner "run one on each side and connect at the top to balance
out the pull upward". Saucer shape is looking like a good starting point.
Just a first try and starting point to build off of and learn from.
I am not claiming this is going to make over 1 G and go up vertically.
Just testing to see what happens.

Before I attempt to get this to go strait up in the air I had to determine exactly
what section of the positive only power wire was tensing/pulling and causing the propulsion.
I attached the bare part of the positive only power wire to the front side of
the cylinder cap that releases charges on the back end as mentioned in previous videos.
Then I taped down that wire to front and back support stick for the cylinder AKA what you
would call the drive.
Next I taped down any excess supply wire at the back end to a separate stick to completely
isolate the above mentioned portion of wire you saw circled in red at the beginning of the video
to prove that the excess supply wire was not responsible for propulsion.
I knew if I was able to achieve any movement in this scenario that it was the completely isolated
wire that was attached only to the stick/drive responsible for propulsion.
The great news is that it was only that attached portion to the stick/drive segment responsible for
the propulsion and it shows it is working isolated from the rest of the supply wire as you
can see in this test video.
Now that I know this information it is time to now attempt to see if this is producing enough
force to get something off the ground also.
From previous test I know it will produce constant acceleration in one direction using only electricity
in the vacuum space.
Now let's see if this cannot only be a constant acceleration space drive but can replace rockets to get
humans off the Earth directly also.
One propulsion system responsible for all of it.
Bold attempt and statement I know but go big or go home.
Even if it does not end up being a single propulsion system for all of it
From all the test it is looking like you can still use a rocket to get you into space and this drive I have developed
to get you to the planets and stars using constant acceleration in space with the only fuel being required being electricity alone.
If not 1 G constant a respectable portion of it.

This method of propulsion in space is only dependent of a wire when positive only voltage is applied tensing up and moving.
This test shows a wire will tense up and pull in an almost total vacuum.
I conduct this test in my vacuum chamber using a shorter and thicker piece of insulated wire and take the chamber down to -26.5 which is the lowest negative pressure my chamber can go. - 29.9 is absolute vacuum so this is pretty close to that and there is still movement from the wire tensing when jolted with positive only power which is what is providing the movement in one direction as seen in the other test. Not as much movement when jolted with voltage as this wire is thicker, shorter and not as flexible as other test as the cylinder had to be supported by the wire and not fly off. This proves no air is necessary to only make a wire jump when voltage is applied and the wire jumping when jolted with electricity is the only method of propulsion used in this drive.
NEXT: I want to try different wire configurations to see if it would be possible to get something to lift up vertically from Earth as I know it will work in space.

UPDATE 2/14/21 Sunday Evening:
It has now been 24 hours and still no response from NASA concerning what happened below.
I just checked and I can still login and even post but I am done with NASA.
Will keep posting new test here and on the other propulsion sites as mentioned below.
My thoughts are they either know I have something or they are not watching the entire test videos
"as I posted here multiple times" where I show the receipts for this working.
I am 100 percent for anyone who wants to verify my results, so please feel free to watch
these videos and verify these results.

On Friday 2/12/21 I posted a copy of my previous test here on my BitChute "Moving 1.6 Pounds In Closed System Test At The End But First Complete Explanation" on the NASA Spaceflight forum under "New Physics For Space Technology".
I posted the video itself and did not link it to here on my BitChute.
It got over 650 views in less than 24 hours. No negative responses other than me having to explain which power wire was providing the force to one person which is really good as those guys there are hardcore with this stuff.
That was up all day Friday and part of today Saturday 2/13/21.
Today Saturday 2/13/21 I posted this test video seen here where I figured out how to get more force from the power wire and they removed this new video seen here and took down the one from Friday 2/12/21. This video was a response to show how much force you can get when jolting a power wire with voltage.
I know I posted in the correct category as they left the first post up for over 24 hours but I post this video and they yank it and the previous one.
I tried to contact the moderators to see if I did anything wrong and never received a reply.
I was completely respectful in my request to the moderators also.
I also waited well over 24 hours after the first post to post again.
In contrast, I started posting copies of the same videos on other propulsion sites this week that have nothing to do with NASA and I have been getting WOWS, Shares and Thumbs up, 100 percent positive approval.
My tax dollars pay for NASA and they yank my videos and will not even tell me why?
What is really strange is I can still login there and I could post again so not sure what is going on.
If they ever contact me I will post what happened here.
But until and if that happens, What's Up NASA?

Behind the power supply on the left you can see where the gold colored 16 gauge speaker wire is
connected to the main white positive lead wire from the power supply itself and the gold speaker wire
goes up and is connected to the cylinder. You can see this connection flexing forward and pushing the entire
power supply forward each time I supply power. See previous video for complete explanation. Only way I know to achieve
constant acceleration in space and obey the laws of physics using electricity only. Will begin test of various wire configurations
to achieve the most push or pull when voltage is applied through the wire. Weight in this test is 1.6 pounds.
Positive power only to cylinder in upper left hand corner. Only function of cylinder is to remove positive only charge from system to allow wire to flex and for the wire to flex and either push or pull for propulsion.

I give a complete explanation of how this works. There is also a closed system test at the end of the video. Weight is 1.6 pounds.
In the test video you can see the positive power supply wire tense up which is addressed in this video.
Power supply wire that connects directly to drive/cylinder responsible for all movement of 1.6 pounds is just a single 16 gauge speaker wire.
Once in space this will provide constant acceleration in one direction in a vacuum using only electricity.
No gases needed as in an ion thruster and a lot more force.
Positive power only.
Negative wire end is hanging far away from supply and is taped off in test at the end.
Hissing is inside power supply tube at connectors and would not push 1.6 pounds.
Now that I know cylinder design is just to allow charge to flow out the back so power wire can tense up and cause forward
movement without any detrimental effect from equal and opposite reaction in a closed system I will be working on
power wire configurations to get the most force.
In test at end wall wart connected to Variac to provide power to just the power supply itself had no part
in producing forward only movement in previous test and does not have any effect in test at the end of this video.

To show that this is just a matter of a collection of charges accumulated on the front that
are just being expelled with less resistance at the thinner edges of the paper mache at the back
"force in one direction" as ElectroBOOM talks about in link below, I put a paper mache cake foldout
completely covering up the back of the paper bowl.
Only power connection is positive, no negative no ground.

Check out this video on ElectroBOOM site on Youtube.
Go to 8:10 and watch until 9:20 as he describes what is happening here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QarKXkXox6M

Last 2 videos were basically a small aluminum cylinder with a cap on one end "where only a positive power lead was attached"
and open on the opposite end. Charges built up on the front where the cap is but escape with less resistance around the
open ends circular edge.

Only connection is the positive hot wire, no negative no ground.
No ion wind and it works in a vacuum as I have shown in previous test.
Constant acceleration in space in one direction.
Only fuel is electricity.
Just testing multiple configurations to get the most force.

In this test I tried the same configuration but with a wider diameter plate.
Diameter does not seem to effect force and from previous test neither does thickness
of the plate.
Another thing I learned is if you test a new configuration and it does not move much
then you walk up to it after turning off the power and touch it all that charge
is stored in the plate and you get a huge shock and arc.
If you have a good test with a lot of movement and do the same
there is very little charge left in the plate and it is just a tiny shock
and arc. I plan on conducting experiments to find designs to get the charge moving out
of the back of the plate as quickly and efficiently as possible.
If you are curious how I could do this or have
your doubts I can, check out this video on ElectroBOOM site on Youtube.
Go to 8:10 and watch until 9:20 as he describes what is happening here.
Glad I found a video with a reputable source describing what I am doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QarKXkXox6M

Only connection is the positive hot wire, no negative no ground.
No ion wind and it works in a vacuum as I have shown in previous test.
Constant acceleration in space in one direction.
Only fuel is electricity.
Just testing multiple configurations to get the most force.

To be 100 percent transparent I show the power supply and the single positive
supply wire taped down in this test. If you are curious how I could do this or have
your doubts I can, check out this video on ElectroBOOM site on Youtube.
Go to 8:10 and watch until 9:20 as he describes what is happening here.
Glad I found a video with a reputable source describing what I am doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QarKXkXox6M

In this test I made one myself out of thicker aluminum flashing to test what effect a thicker material
has in relation to force.
Only connection is the positive hot wire, no negative no ground.
No ion wind and it works in a vacuum as I have shown in previous test.
Constant acceleration in space in one direction.
Only fuel is electricity.
Just testing multiple configurations to get the most force.

In this test I powered one paper bowl with 100,000 volts.
I did single pulses and then multiples like in previous video.
I also made this a wider angle so you can see all I am doing is turning
Variac power up and down. If you are curious how I could do this or have
your doubts I can, check out this video on ElectroBOOM site on Youtube.
Go to 8:10 and watch until 9:20 as he describes what is happening here.
Glad I found a video with a reputable source describing what I am doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QarKXkXox6M

No ion wind and it works in a vacuum as I have shown in previous test.
Only connection is the positive hot wire, no negative no ground.
Constant acceleration in space in one direction.
Only fuel is electricity.
Just testing multiple configurations to get the most force.

Aluminum Tin - Out of then in Vacuum Chamber.
Only power connection is positive, no negative no ground.
Force in one direction.
Vacuum at (-)26.5
Lowest negative pressure chamber will go.
If you are curious how I could do this or have
your doubts I can, check out this video on ElectroBOOM site on Youtube.
Go to 8:10 and watch until 9:20 as he describes what is happening here.
Glad I found a video with a reputable source describing what I am doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QarKXkXox6M

No ion wind and it works in a vacuum as I have shown in previous test.
Only connection is the positive hot wire, no negative no ground.
Constant acceleration in space in one direction.
Only fuel is electricity.
NOTE: Any hissing is from power supply not drive.
Just testing multiple configurations to get the most force.

Here is a piece of Metallic Glass from the roll that was delivered today.
Stuff is paper thin.
Crumples some but pretty much bounces back into shape.
Used a small piece for this test as it is pretty expensive.
Will be testing with this on the drive this upcoming weekend.

UPDATE: 2/4/21
Go to my newer videos.
I found out you only need one positive power connection to make this work.
No negative no ground.
The positive side I had hooked up to just the back tin in this test was causing all the movement.

When I place a thin piece of glass between the plates I get the most noticeable
reaction/movement from the top plate. This is due to glass is considered an Amorphus Solid.
An amorphous solid can be considered to have a random arrangement of atoms, such as in a gas.
Metallic glasses or amorphous metals are newer engineering alloys in which the structure is not crystalline (as it is in most metals) but rather is disordered, with the atoms occupying more-or-less random positions in the structure.
Also relating to metallic glass and Roswell: Metallic glasses exhibit very high strength. If you tear, bend or press a piece of one of these metals, it is so strong that deforming it permanently is very difficult. It can store much more deformation energy than any other metals, making it an ideal spring material.
The Metallic Glass AKA Amorphus Metal I ordered is a thin sheet and lighter than this so will be interesting to
see how it acts between the plates.

This test produced lift and was done at partial vacuum but had to post for the
visual factor.

I had an idea to use just a highly electropostive thin nylon sheet material as the
top plate instead of the conductive aluminum plate. I then tried the Van De Graaf experiment using the 100,000 Volt Power Supply
by just charging the bottom plate positive and the top nylon/plate negative and placed a tin between the two.
This video shows what this setup did at two thirds of an absolute vacuum or (-) 20 inches of mercury.
Just a thought but at Roswell it was said they found thin material you could crumple up and it would reform.
May have been some type of metallic glass which would be a highly electropositive material like the thin nylon sheet
I used in this test as negative plate.
Best results so far at any vacuum. Getting there one test at a time.
More test to come.

I put together this multipart video to demonstrate what I have learned so far.
First I show the difference in behavior of elctropositive and electronegative
materials due to static electric charge at high voltages. I am including a chart
and you can pause the video and reference both ends of the spectrum of materials.
One of these materials would be what the dielectric/crew compartment would be made
of sandwiched in between the top and bottom plate which also can add or negate the
repulsion or attraction characteristics of like and opposite charge effects.
Next, below I talk about the new test conducted today under vacuum and how it relates to the above.
Part 2 Movement In Vacuum.
I am only getting movement in a vacuum at (-) 28 inches of MG by using the asymmetrical size plates.
In this test only the large bottom plate moves and it is in upward direction so watch the bottom plate.
Coulomb's law of electrical charges and equal and opposite reaction is 100 percent correct but I am finding
that a combination of using asymmetrical plates and electropositive and electronegative materials are effecting/bending this law.
After playing around with configurations I found you have to have the larger plate on the bottom with a negative charge
and the smaller plate on top with positive charge. This is only configuration that will pull only the bottom plate upwards
toward the top plate without an equal and opposite reaction acting by pulling down on the top plate at the same time.
Again in this test the effect in vacuum only happened around 60,000 volts.
Next I have to figure out what the dielectric/crew compartment sandwiched between the bottom and top plates should be made of which would resemble the shape and configuration of the classic UFO sightings.
I have 2 choices as I showed in first part of this video of either an electronegative or electropositive material.
More test to come.

I switched to using asymmetrical positive and negative plates and finally got movement in a vacuum. Watch the top plate move under vacuum. Think I need to play with placing larger plate on bottom and smaller on top. What is wild is if you were to put a dielectric/crew compartment between these plates you would have something that resembled the shape of UFO sightings. You can tell this is a vacuum as all you see is purple plasma not large discharge arcs. Was using the 100,000 volt power supply but the movement of top plate happened around 60,000 volts. When I went up to full power at 100,000 volts there was no movement. Will change positions of large and small plate and try again at vacuum.

I tested this using the 100,000 volt power supply with only positive high voltage connected to bottom pie plate to make the bottom plate act as a dome on a Van De Graaf would to mimic the pie plate flying off of a stand alone setup due to like charges repelling. This was done at atmosphere and not in a vacuum yet.

100,000 Volts in a Vacuum Chamber: At atmosphere and at this voltage of 100,000 volts you would usually see a large discharge arc.
At almost perfect vacuum you just see a purple plasma glow from positive and negative supply wire ends.
Test of just high voltage in a vacuum is now complete. Next will move on to attempting to get movement in a vacuum.

Tested and vacuum chamber is now set for testing new drive. Had to do some re wiring on my 100,000 volt power supply seen in
this video but it is working fine now also. Have some things to do tomorrow 12/26 but hopefully I can put 100,000 volts
thru the new drive in the vacuum chamber tomorrow or Sunday and see what happens.

Placed a crushed plastic bottle in new chamber to see what happens.
Chamber is holding at (-) 27.5 inches of mercury.
Next will be testing drive for movement working in a vacuum.
You can see the positive and negative high voltage supply lines that will provide power to
the drive in the chamber under vacuum.
Newest/Most Recent test videos will be at top of channel.
Contact email: [email protected]

In this test I show how to non conductive paper bowls can be attracted together using High Voltage and a difference in charges.
Newest/Most Recent test videos will be at top of channel.
Contact email: [email protected]

SHOW MORE

Created 2 months, 2 weeks ago.

28 videos

Category Science & Technology

Looking up at the stars and the planets in the night sky and knowing we can't get there. Doing my best to change that.
Contact email: [email protected]
Current Location: Bethpage, TN