I recently discovered a video on Anton Petrov's Youtube site in one of his
videos from 4 months ago. He is discussing a paper published almost 2 years
AFTER my first real life drives test videos I published on my youtube site.
The paper confirms my findings in my test I conducted over 2 years ago are correct. There is a difference in the method the scientist posted as mine is far more efficient and much easier to build a working space drive than theirs but the paper does show my concept and idea is correct. As Anton mentions in the video to absolutely confirm my drive the next step for me is to find a way to have a prototype "Cubesat" constructed that can be launched into space and tested.
See links below.

Anton Petrov's video "start at 4:20":
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7Z28Ld8CQA&ab_channel=AntonPetrov

My test my first test video posted over 2 years ago on youtube:
There are several test videos from over 2 years ago I conducted.
Link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi0ZW-OALwHeXAQSAnBeO4A

A couple of dead concrete pet rocks killed by raptor motors in starship launch LOL

I have been away for the past 2 years taking care of a sick relative so have not posted anything in a while but they are well now and I am back.
Link to video test mentioned:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O935p24XBJk

Also, I should have said interact with and not push against in the text in the video.

To demonstrate the propulsion is only from the power wire tensing and pulling in one direction when voltage is applied and not from ion wind I hung the cylinder upside down with the open end that the charges are released from facing strait up.
The emitter/cylinders only purpose is to release charges so there is no equal and opposite reaction when the bent wire straitens out. Ion wind from the cylinder getting rid of charges is not what is making this move. The curved/bent wire connected to the cylinder straitening itself out from a bent curved position when power is put through the wire is what is pulling in one direction and causing movement and with the cylinder releasing the charges at the back end that is what allows the wire to straiten out and pull in one direction. If no charges are released from emitter/cylinder on the back end the bent propulsion wire will not try and straiten itself and pull in one direction. A wire straitening itself from bent orientation is what is causing the force and will only do this if the charges on back end have some way to escape. Since you are loosing something from the system there is no equal and opposite reaction and the wire straitening from the bent position is the by product of this.

I am sure many of you are aware of the implications that a drive like this could have
on travel times to various destinations in space.
For those that do not I wanted to post this.
Only fuel is positive only power/electricity so you could accelerate as long as you like
or until you ran out of a means for producing electricity.
At this time on the scale model test "not the 1.6 pound test, just the cylinder test"
my best guess is this propulsion system is producing around a quarter to maybe half of a G
constant acceleration in one direction.
The 3 slides in this video show travel times from Earth at 1G constant acceleration.
At this time it is not producing 1G "as shown in the slides" or over or it would lift itself up into the
air vertically.
I am testing with different gauge wire configurations to see if it is
possible to get this up to one G or over.
Even if I can not, at this point 6 to 8 weeks travel time from Earth once in space
launched by a rocket to Pluto at it's closest approach to Earth is pretty good and that would be beginning deceleration at the
halfway point and stopping at the planet.
Mars at this point in testing would be 4 to 6 days travel time with deceleration at halfway point.
Yes it needs work but the concept and the idea is working in the test.
Once I get the force maximized you would scale it up in size and start working on design issues.

I went to a thinner drive wire.
Went from a 16 gauge to a 24 gauge.
Looks like I may have been correct about the
amount of resistance in the drive wire causing more force/propulsion.
More test coming.

Before I attempt to get this to go strait up in the air I had to determine exactly
what section of the positive only power wire was tensing/pulling and causing the propulsion.
I attached the bare part of the positive only power wire to the front side of
the cylinder cap that releases charges on the back end as mentioned in previous videos.
Then I taped down that wire to front and back support stick for the cylinder AKA what you
would call the drive.
Next I taped down any excess supply wire at the back end to a separate stick to completely
isolate the above mentioned portion of wire you saw circled in red at the beginning of the video
to prove that the excess supply wire was not responsible for propulsion.
I knew if I was able to achieve any movement in this scenario that it was the completely isolated
wire that was attached only to the stick/drive responsible for propulsion.
The great news is that it was only that attached portion to the stick/drive segment responsible for
the propulsion and it shows it is working isolated from the rest of the supply wire as you
can see in this test video.
Now that I know this information it is time to now attempt to see if this is producing enough
force to get something off the ground also.
From previous test I know it will produce constant acceleration in one direction using only electricity
in the vacuum space.
Now let's see if this cannot only be a constant acceleration space drive but can replace rockets to get
humans off the Earth directly also.
One propulsion system responsible for all of it.
Bold attempt and statement I know but go big or go home.
Even if it does not end up being a single propulsion system for all of it
From all the test it is looking like you can still use a rocket to get you into space and this drive I have developed
to get you to the planets and stars using constant acceleration in space with the only fuel being required being electricity alone.
If not 1 G constant a respectable portion of it.

This method of propulsion in space is only dependent of a wire when positive only voltage is applied tensing up and moving.
This test shows a wire will tense up and pull in an almost total vacuum.
I conduct this test in my vacuum chamber using a shorter and thicker piece of insulated wire and take the chamber down to -26.5 which is the lowest negative pressure my chamber can go. - 29.9 is absolute vacuum so this is pretty close to that and there is still movement from the wire tensing when jolted with positive only power which is what is providing the movement in one direction as seen in the other test. Not as much movement when jolted with voltage as this wire is thicker, shorter and not as flexible as other test as the cylinder had to be supported by the wire and not fly off. This proves no air is necessary to only make a wire jump when voltage is applied and the wire jumping when jolted with electricity is the only method of propulsion used in this drive.
NEXT: I want to try different wire configurations to see if it would be possible to get something to lift up vertically from Earth as I know it will work in space.

UPDATE 2/14/21 Sunday Evening:
It has now been 24 hours and still no response from NASA concerning what happened below.
I just checked and I can still login and even post but I am done with NASA.
Will keep posting new test here and on the other propulsion sites as mentioned below.
My thoughts are they either know I have something or they are not watching the entire test videos
"as I posted here multiple times" where I show the receipts for this working.
I am 100 percent for anyone who wants to verify my results, so please feel free to watch
these videos and verify these results.

On Friday 2/12/21 I posted a copy of my previous test here on my BitChute "Moving 1.6 Pounds In Closed System Test At The End But First Complete Explanation" on the NASA Spaceflight forum under "New Physics For Space Technology".
I posted the video itself and did not link it to here on my BitChute.
It got over 650 views in less than 24 hours. No negative responses other than me having to explain which power wire was providing the force to one person which is really good as those guys there are hardcore with this stuff.
That was up all day Friday and part of today Saturday 2/13/21.
Today Saturday 2/13/21 I posted this test video seen here where I figured out how to get more force from the power wire and they removed this new video seen here and took down the one from Friday 2/12/21. This video was a response to show how much force you can get when jolting a power wire with voltage.
I know I posted in the correct category as they left the first post up for over 24 hours but I post this video and they yank it and the previous one.
I tried to contact the moderators to see if I did anything wrong and never received a reply.
I was completely respectful in my request to the moderators also.
I also waited well over 24 hours after the first post to post again.
In contrast, I started posting copies of the same videos on other propulsion sites this week that have nothing to do with NASA and I have been getting WOWS, Shares and Thumbs up, 100 percent positive approval.
My tax dollars pay for NASA and they yank my videos and will not even tell me why?
What is really strange is I can still login there and I could post again so not sure what is going on.
If they ever contact me I will post what happened here.
But until and if that happens, What's Up NASA?

Behind the power supply on the left you can see where the gold colored 16 gauge speaker wire is
connected to the main white positive lead wire from the power supply itself and the gold speaker wire
goes up and is connected to the cylinder. You can see this connection flexing forward and pushing the entire
power supply forward each time I supply power. See previous video for complete explanation. Only way I know to achieve
constant acceleration in space and obey the laws of physics using electricity only. Will begin test of various wire configurations
to achieve the most push or pull when voltage is applied through the wire. Weight in this test is 1.6 pounds.
Positive power only to cylinder in upper left hand corner. Only function of cylinder is to remove positive only charge from system to allow wire to flex and for the wire to flex and either push or pull for propulsion.

I give a complete explanation of how this works. There is also a closed system test at the end of the video. Weight is 1.6 pounds.
In the test video you can see the positive power supply wire tense up which is addressed in this video.
Power supply wire that connects directly to drive/cylinder responsible for all movement of 1.6 pounds is just a single 16 gauge speaker wire.
Once in space this will provide constant acceleration in one direction in a vacuum using only electricity.
No gases needed as in an ion thruster and a lot more force.
Positive power only.
Negative wire end is hanging far away from supply and is taped off in test at the end.
Hissing is inside power supply tube at connectors and would not push 1.6 pounds.
Now that I know cylinder design is just to allow charge to flow out the back so power wire can tense up and cause forward
movement without any detrimental effect from equal and opposite reaction in a closed system I will be working on
power wire configurations to get the most force.
In test at end wall wart connected to Variac to provide power to just the power supply itself had no part
in producing forward only movement in previous test and does not have any effect in test at the end of this video.

To show that this is just a matter of a collection of charges accumulated on the front that
are just being expelled with less resistance at the thinner edges of the paper mache at the back
"force in one direction" as ElectroBOOM talks about in link below, I put a paper mache cake foldout
completely covering up the back of the paper bowl.
Only power connection is positive, no negative no ground.

Check out this video on ElectroBOOM site on Youtube.
Go to 8:10 and watch until 9:20 as he describes what is happening here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QarKXkXox6M

Last 2 videos were basically a small aluminum cylinder with a cap on one end "where only a positive power lead was attached"
and open on the opposite end. Charges built up on the front where the cap is but escape with less resistance around the
open ends circular edge.

Only connection is the positive hot wire, no negative no ground.
No ion wind and it works in a vacuum as I have shown in previous test.
Constant acceleration in space in one direction.
Only fuel is electricity.
Just testing multiple configurations to get the most force.

In this test I tried the same configuration but with a wider diameter plate.
Diameter does not seem to effect force and from previous test neither does thickness
of the plate.
Another thing I learned is if you test a new configuration and it does not move much
then you walk up to it after turning off the power and touch it all that charge
is stored in the plate and you get a huge shock and arc.
If you have a good test with a lot of movement and do the same
there is very little charge left in the plate and it is just a tiny shock
and arc. I plan on conducting experiments to find designs to get the charge moving out
of the back of the plate as quickly and efficiently as possible.
If you are curious how I could do this or have
your doubts I can, check out this video on ElectroBOOM site on Youtube.
Go to 8:10 and watch until 9:20 as he describes what is happening here.
Glad I found a video with a reputable source describing what I am doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QarKXkXox6M

Only connection is the positive hot wire, no negative no ground.
No ion wind and it works in a vacuum as I have shown in previous test.
Constant acceleration in space in one direction.
Only fuel is electricity.
Just testing multiple configurations to get the most force.

To be 100 percent transparent I show the power supply and the single positive
supply wire taped down in this test. If you are curious how I could do this or have
your doubts I can, check out this video on ElectroBOOM site on Youtube.
Go to 8:10 and watch until 9:20 as he describes what is happening here.
Glad I found a video with a reputable source describing what I am doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QarKXkXox6M

In this test I made one myself out of thicker aluminum flashing to test what effect a thicker material
has in relation to force.
Only connection is the positive hot wire, no negative no ground.
No ion wind and it works in a vacuum as I have shown in previous test.
Constant acceleration in space in one direction.
Only fuel is electricity.
Just testing multiple configurations to get the most force.

In this test I powered one paper bowl with 100,000 volts.
I did single pulses and then multiples like in previous video.
I also made this a wider angle so you can see all I am doing is turning
Variac power up and down. If you are curious how I could do this or have
your doubts I can, check out this video on ElectroBOOM site on Youtube.
Go to 8:10 and watch until 9:20 as he describes what is happening here.
Glad I found a video with a reputable source describing what I am doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QarKXkXox6M

No ion wind and it works in a vacuum as I have shown in previous test.
Only connection is the positive hot wire, no negative no ground.
Constant acceleration in space in one direction.
Only fuel is electricity.
Just testing multiple configurations to get the most force.

Aluminum Tin - Out of then in Vacuum Chamber.
Only power connection is positive, no negative no ground.
Force in one direction.
Vacuum at (-)26.5
Lowest negative pressure chamber will go.
If you are curious how I could do this or have
your doubts I can, check out this video on ElectroBOOM site on Youtube.
Go to 8:10 and watch until 9:20 as he describes what is happening here.
Glad I found a video with a reputable source describing what I am doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QarKXkXox6M

No ion wind and it works in a vacuum as I have shown in previous test.
Only connection is the positive hot wire, no negative no ground.
Constant acceleration in space in one direction.
Only fuel is electricity.
NOTE: Any hissing is from power supply not drive.
Just testing multiple configurations to get the most force.

100,000 Volts in a Vacuum Chamber: At atmosphere and at this voltage of 100,000 volts you would usually see a large discharge arc.
At almost perfect vacuum you just see a purple plasma glow from positive and negative supply wire ends.
Test of just high voltage in a vacuum is now complete. Next will move on to attempting to get movement in a vacuum.

Tested and vacuum chamber is now set for testing new drive. Had to do some re wiring on my 100,000 volt power supply seen in
this video but it is working fine now also. Have some things to do tomorrow 12/26 but hopefully I can put 100,000 volts
thru the new drive in the vacuum chamber tomorrow or Sunday and see what happens.

Placed a crushed plastic bottle in new chamber to see what happens.
Chamber is holding at (-) 27.5 inches of mercury.
Next will be testing drive for movement working in a vacuum.
You can see the positive and negative high voltage supply lines that will provide power to
the drive in the chamber under vacuum.
Newest/Most Recent test videos will be at top of channel.
Contact email: [email protected]

In this test I show how to non conductive paper bowls can be attracted together using High Voltage and a difference in charges.
Newest/Most Recent test videos will be at top of channel.
Contact email: [email protected]

Play off using tin pie plates. Shows how just charge separation can cause attraction of 2 non conductive objects.
I am also using this technique in designing new space propulsion drive.
Experimenting with Electropositive and Electronegative materials.
More test coming.
Newest/Most Recent test videos will be at top of channel.
Contact email: [email protected]