Bhala Sada

Bhala Sada

Bhala Sada

subscribers

The truth about the Asda Bike Gang in Brighton

News: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9740795/boy-12-teen-arrested-bike-yobs-rampaging-asda/
News: https://metro.co.uk/2019/08/09/asda-shopper-punched-bike-thugs-cycling-supermarket-10543362/
Crimebodge: https://youtu.be/Cfbg_Fg2EjM
The Youtube vid: https://youtu.be/6ZsJEjobRj4

In the news a vid was posted where some youths went into Asda in Brighton.

It seems that the vid was made by a Youtuber, known as WHEELIE KAY.

At first, one may presume this group are just thugs, until you look at the youtube vids.

One presumes this group earn or at least have made a LOT of cash via the youtube vids.

Indeed, one could suggest that youtube is rewarding people to commit crime.

However, one will notice that in the vids they promote collectivebikes.com.

Suddenly things start to become interesting, as on the 'team' page one can see they list several of these 'thugs' as part of the 'team'. collectivebikes.com/pages/team

So one then presumes that these youtube vids are promotional vids for this bike shop.

The site gives the returns address as: Collective Bikes – 11c Stephenson Road, Clacton-On-Sea, Essex, CO15 4XA, UK

As it apeas to be a business, one presumes the business carries third party insurance, so one may possibly have a claim against Collective Bikes if you have been assaulted or had your car damaged by any of the team.

You can see the gang on:

Collective Bikes: https://www.youtube.com/c/CollectiveBikes
LittleHarry15: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxNEzBd6sTMkJLBn1Ex6CQQ/
Wheelie Kay: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWJNIts3E71JGtTlQOnQZtQ
Ryan Taylor: https://www.youtube.com/user/Ryantaylorbmx
JAKE 100: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDA4NtWytqZ3aATTUsDe14A
GRADY R: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRumIIsYy3RQTFUIkkrzpVw

In many vids, they seem to break the law with ease and put people at risk by cycling past them.

As these vids seem edited, one wonders if they have removed evidence where people have be..

Not Buying It: The porn word is conveniently usually not included of course, even though it is the driver in so many murders and rapes

Link:

https://twitter.com/not_buyingit/status/1143909485590790144

The porn word is conveniently usually not included of course, even though it is the driver in so many murders and rapes states 'Not Buying It'.

I go online today and see this tweet.

I presume 'Not Buying It' can back up the claim they have made.

So I take it all the stabbings in London recently was due to porn.

I believe studies have shown porn and rape have no connection.

I do not think I have seen anyone make claim porn makes people murder.

I thought people were responsible for there actions, but it turns out, it was porn.

By the way, the only one who I think has ever stated porn made him murder was Ted Bundy, where I believe it was some Christian interviews him and seems to encourage Ted Bundy to say it was porn. Ted Bundy seems to giggle all the time in the interview. I believe in other interviews he blames a relative and I think other things for his murders. As such I think we can take the porn being to blame with a pinch of salt as I do not think there was any evidence that connected porn to murders. I am not even sure Ted Bundy had any porn. I have never heard of the police stating he had porn.

Anyway, I am sure this 'Not Buying It' will have lots of evidence to back up the claims they have made, as I am sure they do not wish to look like morons who make stuff up, after all they are giving evidence to councils about strip clubs. So I am sure they will not wish to look like they cannot be trusted.

I look forward to seeing what evidence they produce.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

Check out LBRY: https://api.lbry.com/user/refer?r=GMrXe7ohro8LpYm4J9zYKYgwdYTbaM1y

Just posting as it is interesting to listen to.

Full film: https://youtu.be/UMLAkAK4pGM

I have improved the sound as you could not hear much.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhal...
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

Giving evidence to Camden Council - Part 1 - Not Buying It

Just posting as it is interesting to listen to.

Full film: https://youtu.be/UMLAkAK4pGM

I have improved the sound as you could not hear much.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

Giving evidence to Camden Council - Part 1 - Not Buying It

Just posting as it is interesting to listen to.

Full film: https://youtu.be/UMLAkAK4pGM

I have improved the sound as you could not hear much.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

Feminists are a religious ideology that harms women and not helps them

The Feminists appear to be a form of religious ideology, than rather than helps women, seems to remove rights from women, that of what they are supposed to think, and what they should be allowed to do.

It is a religion that seems to be performed by mainly white and almost (if not always) middle class women, with interests that are only of the middle class, and not of the working class.

The religion teaches women of today to be victims and to see a life of disadvantage that is going to be life long, that is put in place by every male born today, and has ever lived and probably those that are to come.

These disadvantages are often do not exist and are no more than a pretense.

We see it in such as stating air conditioners are sexist as the temperature we are told is set to help men and to kill women, or some such rubbish.

We are told to see Manspreading, something not a single person was ever bothered about or noticed a few years ago, but we are now told to notice it at all times as for some reason this must affect only females.

We are told women are not safe to be outside, yet men are safe, even though men are often victims of crime and tend to be the ones who get stabbed.

This clearly gives the leaders of the feminist movement a great deal of power over other women, by putting fear into them.

But women themselves who follow this religion, become scared and victims and end up achieving far less than they would have if they had taken no notice of the nonsense.

They are provided with religious verses to quote over and over to others, in the pretense they may seem like they thought of it.

Rather than being told to debate, they run away, screaming that the men or 'mansplaining' or that they are victims of 'misogyny'.

Indeed any argument seems to be dealt with a response 'misogyny', in the same way Christians may reply with 'god works in mysterious ways'.

As with many religions, those with many religions, followers of feminists, believe there way is the correct way and they need to convert everyone at whatever cost. Indeed this goes as far as filming women naked without there consent.

Link: https://youtu.be/aSodLlVRdrY

As with most religions, the views of others do not matter and as such, they see the strippers as beneth them, and they feel they have the right to speak for them and tell them what they should do and think.

We see how they detest the working class women, and rather than support there views, they dismiss them.

Thus proving that while they pretend to be about women's rights and equality, in fact they seek to remove women's rights and wish women to have no say.

Indeed, when it comes to the working class jobs, we hear next to nothing. An example is 50% (give or take) who drive in the UK are women, yet we see hardly any female mechanics. Yet the feminists seem little interest in supporting a working class occupation, but instead are far more interested in having 50% female MP's, something that affects very few women, as very few (just like men) will want to become an MP.

As with most religions, sex and sexuality is a problem to feminists. They see porn as something that only men see and should women see it, then they must be mentally ill, or/and have been sexually abused.

Porn they claim is only made by men, to abuse women. They choose to ignore women who make porn, and should a lesbian dare to make porn, they will suggest she is everything from a man in drag to a devil of women, and that is only if they acknowledge her existence. Often they will simply pretend women do not exist who make porn or own porn sites or own strip clubs. It is far better to pretend it is only run by men.

The feminists will like many religions simply make up fats to fit there beliefs. They will claim suffragettes were feminists, even though the feminist religion did not exists back then.

During both the world wars, women lost husbands, worked in factories, faced there homes being blown up. These were strong women. Today women start to cry if someone calls them dear or love, as the feminists teach them to be as weak as they can, and to find everything upsetting. The feminist religion seems to teach women that the more weak they are, the stronger they are.

And does all this feminist stuff help women at all?

Well businesses now seem reluctant to employ women as at any point they may find something said to upset them, and they will cry 'metoo' and claim that someone who winks at them is the same as being raped, and want compensation.

Or if they do not get the promotion they think they diverse, they may get upset and seek legal means of compensation, as even if they are not that qualified for the promotion, the feminist religion teaches them then they should have that promotion, even if they are not qualified for it and it does not matter if someone else is more qualified.

Being fat i

Feminists are a religious ideology that harms women and not helps them

The Feminists appear to be a form of religious ideology, than rather than helps women, seems to remove rights from women, that of what they are supposed to think, and what they should be allowed to do.

It is a religion that seems to be performed by mainly white and almost (if not always) middle class women, with interests that are only of the middle class, and not of the working class.

The religion teaches women of today to be victims and to see a life of disadvantage that is going to be life long, that is put in place by every male born today, and has ever lived and probably those that are to come.

These disadvantages are often do not exist and are no more than a pretense.

We see it in such as stating air conditioners are sexist as the temperature we are told is set to help men and to kill women, or some such rubbish.

We are told to see Manspreading, something not a single person was ever bothered about or noticed a few years ago, but we are now told to notice it at all times as for some reason this must affect only females.

We are told women are not safe to be outside, yet men are safe, even though men are often victims of crime and tend to be the ones who get stabbed.

This clearly gives the leaders of the feminist movement a great deal of power over other women, by putting fear into them.

But women themselves who follow this religion, become scared and victims and end up achieving far less than they would have if they had taken no notice of the nonsense.

They are provided with religious verses to quote over and over to others, in the pretense they may seem like they thought of it.

Rather than being told to debate, they run away, screaming that the men or 'mansplaining' or that they are victims of 'misogyny'.

Indeed any argument seems to be dealt with a response 'misogyny', in the same way Christians may reply with 'god works in mysterious ways'.

As with many religions, those wi..

Asda sacks worker 'for sharing Billy Connolly video on Facebook'

Links:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/asda-sacks-worker-for-sharing-17113134
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9362238/grandad-asda-sharing-billy-connolly-joke-facebook/
https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/west-yorkshire-news/im-heartbroken-losing-job-sharing-16474726

This is an odd story.

A chap has been sacked from Asda from sharing a joke by Billy Connolly on Facebook.

What someone does on social media should have nothing to do with who they work for.

I could understand IF he worked for the Police, NHS, Army, as then one may have an argument that what one does may reflect on who you work for.

I could also understand if he was a director of Asda, as he may be well known.

However I fail to see what someone who no customer will seek out (unless they are stalking a staff member) matters about what they post.

In this case it was a joke.

If it was criminal what he did, then fine, bring the police in.

But I fail to see why Asda or indeed any company should develop Laws outside its company.

As I do not personally give a rats ass about offending anyone, I shall try to find the clip and post it at some point. I would also hope all Asda staff find it and re-post it too, and inform Asda management, as I suspect they could not sack everyone.

The news reports this:

It includes the lines: "Religion is over, lads, it's f****** over. Take your Reformation, your Vatican, your f****** Mecca, and f*** off.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

Asda sacks worker 'for sharing Billy Connolly video on Facebook'

Links:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/asda-sacks-worker-for-sharing-17113134
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9362238/grandad-asda-sharing-billy-connolly-joke-facebook/
https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/west-yorkshire-news/im-heartbroken-losing-job-sharing-16474726

This is an odd story.

A chap has been sacked from Asda from sharing a joke by Billy Connolly on Facebook.

What someone does on social media should have nothing to do with who they work for.

I could understand IF he worked for the Police, NHS, Army, as then one may have an argument that what one does may reflect on who you work for.

I could also understand if he was a director of Asda, as he may be well known.

However I fail to see what someone who no customer will seek out (unless they are stalking a staff member) matters about what they post.

In this case it was a joke.

If it was criminal what he did, then fine, bring the police in.

But I fail to see why Asda or indeed any company should develop Laws outside its company.

As I do not personally give a rats ass about offending anyone, I shall try to find the clip and post it at some point. I would also hope all Asda staff find it and re-post it too, and inform Asda management, as I suspect they could not sack everyone.

The news reports this:

It includes the lines: "Religion is over, lads, it's f****** over. Take your Reformation, your Vatican, your f****** Mecca, and f*** off.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

Boris Johnson: police called to loud altercation at potential PM's home

Story: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jun/21/police-called-to-loud-altercation-at-boris-johnsons-home

The chances are this was just an augment like most people have.

Indeed my friend will have an argument with me several times a day. When I say argument, I mean she will shout at me for being late, being too early, getting the dogs wet in the rain, not listening to her. In truth I simply ignore her rants and she is happy to have a rant. She is the type who if she ever wins the lottery (not that she is daft enough to waste money doing it), would complain that she had only won a million and not five million and life was not fair.

However, what is alarming, besides the fact that so many people wish to conclude that domestic violence (DV) happened on the basis of no evidence (to think these people could be at court on a jury one day) is that all the tweets I have seen (posted my mainly women who seem to be on the left) seen to all suggest that domestic violence is ONLY male on female. No one seems to have even suggested that it may be that the lady was the domestic abuser and not the male.

Not only is this extremely sexist, but dangerous as men may feel they will not be believed.

My male friend who was in the army was put in hospital by his girlfriend and she nearly killed him (it in in the news if you google it).

Many men will experience violence from there partner. The last thing they need is sexist vile left wing people suggesting this a male on female crime, when it can be female on male and male on male (as in a gay couple), as well as female on female crime (as in a lesbian couple).

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

Boris Johnson: police called to loud altercation at potential PM's home

Story: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jun/21/police-called-to-loud-altercation-at-boris-johnsons-home

The chances are this was just an augment like most people have.

Indeed my friend will have an argument with me several times a day. When I say argument, I mean she will shout at me for being late, being too early, getting the dogs wet in the rain, not listening to her. In truth I simply ignore her rants and she is happy to have a rant. She is the type who if she ever wins the lottery (not that she is daft enough to waste money doing it), would complain that she had only won a million and not five million and life was not fair.

However, what is alarming, besides the fact that so many people wish to conclude that domestic violence (DV) happened on the basis of no evidence (to think these people could be at court on a jury one day) is that all the tweets I have seen (posted my mainly women who seem to be on the left) seen to all suggest that domestic violence is ONLY male on female. No one seems to have even suggested that it may be that the lady was the domestic abuser and not the male.

Not only is this extremely sexist, but dangerous as men may feel they will not be believed.

My male friend who was in the army was put in hospital by his girlfriend and she nearly killed him (it in in the news if you google it).

Many men will experience violence from there partner. The last thing they need is sexist vile left wing people suggesting this a male on female crime, when it can be female on male and male on male (as in a gay couple), as well as female on female crime (as in a lesbian couple).

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

I do not think MP David Lammy was wrong about his Comic Relief/Stacey Dooley's so called 'white saviour' photo comments

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-43387069/david-lammy-on-the-image-of-africa-shown-by-comic-relief

I feel that many seem to have seen what David Lammy said as a bad thing because I presume people may have seen what he said to be an attack on Comic Relief rather than the fact it seems to promote the belief that African countries/states are no more than staring people who need the nice English to save them.

I suspect I do not support David Lammy on many of the things he says, but on this I do.

The problem is, everyone speaks from there on viewpoint on this. This means no one is really wrong. It is a bit like 10000 people stood around a tree. Everyone will describe the tree from there own viewpoint. No one will be wrong, but everyone will give a different description

I am white, but was born in Zambia in the 1970's. .Over my life when people talk to me about Africa (most see Africa as a single country), the view they have is that it is full of starving people living in poverty.

Like many large charities, one wonders how much of the money Comic Relief raises is sieved off, and not goes to those who need it.

The point I would suggest David Lammy is making, is that such as the BBC does not seem to have many MP's or academics or even anyone from any African countries being interviewed interviewed.

Some have stated that they have Lenny Henry, as the token African person to represent Africa. This completely missing the point. It is not about someones color, but the fact if they are African or not. Indeed African representatives may be White Africans. Lenny Henry is English, he was born in England. He cannot represent Africa, no more than Stacey Dooley can represent any African country.

The problem is, this does sound like a lot of left ring people banging on about political correctness again. And I too hate that guff too.

And Afua Hirsch does make some good points on: https://youtu.be/OujZLJY7Q9k

The problem is that this has come across as Black people angry at White people, rather than simply pointing out that the point that was trying to be made was, African countries ALSO need a positive imagine, and not just, the poor Africa that needs saving image.

I was listening to one chap on the radio, and he said (it made me giggle), that people would rather think Aliens had built the pyramids, as that was more realistic in peoples minds in the west, than to think that Africans could have built them.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

I do not think MP David Lammy was wrong about his Comic Relief/Stacey Dooley's so called 'white saviour' photo comments

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-43387069/david-lammy-on-the-image-of-africa-shown-by-comic-relief

I feel that many seem to have seen what David Lammy said as a bad thing because I presume people may have seen what he said to be an attack on Comic Relief rather than the fact it seems to promote the belief that African countries/states are no more than staring people who need the nice English to save them.

I suspect I do not support David Lammy on many of the things he says, but on this I do.

The problem is, everyone speaks from there on viewpoint on this. This means no one is really wrong. It is a bit like 10000 people stood around a tree. Everyone will describe the tree from there own viewpoint. No one will be wrong, but everyone will give a different description

I am white, but was born in Zambia in the 1970's. .Over my life when people talk to me about Africa (most see Africa as a single country), the view they have is that it is full of starving people living in poverty.

Like many large charities, one wonders how much of the money Comic Relief raises is sieved off, and not goes to those who need it.

The point I would suggest David Lammy is making, is that such as the BBC does not seem to have many MP's or academics or even anyone from any African countries being interviewed interviewed.

Some have stated that they have Lenny Henry, as the token African person to represent Africa. This completely missing the point. It is not about someones color, but the fact if they are African or not. Indeed African representatives may be White Africans. Lenny Henry is English, he was born in England. He cannot represent Africa, no more than Stacey Dooley can represent any African country.

The problem is, this does sound like a lot of left ring people banging on about political correctness again. And I too hate that guff too.

And Afua Hirsc..

Spearmint Rhino strippers fighting for the right to strip

Links:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/stories-48629890/spearmint-rhino-strippers-fighting-for-the-right-to-strip
https://www.objectnow.org/past-successes
https://twitter.com/not_buyingit/status/1142382352485834752

In the news we see 'Not Buying It' have:

1. Filmed women presumably naked without consent.
2. Tried to stop working class females getting money to do a degree.
3. Tell women (working class) what they should think and do.

The first thing is that one is shocked that anyone would feel it correct to film women (or indeed men) without consent naked. Should I have done that one presumes you would have called me a pervert and called the police.

One wonders too if 'Not Buying It' also films male strippers, or do they not care about male strippers welfare? If so, they cannot claim to believe in equality.

'Not Buying It' is presumably a feminist thing. And as we all know, feminists tend to be mainly white, and always middle class, who look down upon the working class as dirt who are too stupid to think and so these mainly white middle class women feel the need to tell them what to do and think, by force and humiliation if need be.

Dr Sasha Rakoff, has her qualifications, but for some reason wishes to prevent women who are working class from getting a degree by trying to shut down places they work.

One must remember that people have the choice to work in a strip club, and are free to leave at any time. Indeed most towns have or at least did have several strip clubs to work at, so if one was not nice, they could try others.

One also presumes that if those who worked at such places found abuse, they would report it to the police.

Personally I have not been to a strip club, as it is not my thing. Just in the same way as I have not ever watched football.

One is also puzzled that 'Not Buying It' seem to be obsessed by women showing there boobs, and no harm coming from doing so, when we have male and ..

Does the 'notbuyingit' film even exist?

BBC Link: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/stories-48629890/spearmint-rhino-strippers-fighting-for-the-right-to-strip

My other vid about this: https://youtu.be/aSodLlVRdrY

The evidence seems to be written, and are we supposed to accept that this is true?

Lets say a film does exist, then one should ask a few questions.

1. What was the time scale this was filmed.

Was it filmed in 30 mins, or several hours, or indeed several days/weeks/months, until they found someone willing to break the rules.

2. How much did they offer?

Did the investigators off money and if so how much. Did they do it in a way that they had built up trust, such as doing it over time, or did they trick the strippers in some way?

3. How many strippers did they check out?

4. Why has 'notbuyingit' refused to interview the strippers, or even had one of there investigators interview the strippers?

5. Were the investigators told to not come back until they had got the footage 'notbuyingit' wanted?

By this, I mean, were they made to get the footage in anyway they could?

6. Will people see the footage, or will the Councillors simply accept a written report (that could be made up) as evidence?

7. Will the Councillors listen to the strippers who work at this club?

One wonders if the Councillors will talk to those strippers who work at the club, or will they simply only listen to middle class feminists.

It is very concerning that the evidence is being provided by person(s) who have been paid, and what methods they used to obtain the evidence (if the evidence even exists).

Hearsay is NOT evidence.

On one radio report it stated that Spearmint Rhino had at that point (I am not sure the date) had NOT been given any evidence of what was claimed. It is possible they have since.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:..

Does the 'notbuyingit' film even exist?

BBC Link: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/stories-48629890/spearmint-rhino-strippers-fighting-for-the-right-to-strip

My other vid about this: https://youtu.be/aSodLlVRdrY

The evidence seems to be written, and are we supposed to accept that this is true?

Lets say a film does exist, then one should ask a few questions.

1. What was the time scale this was filmed.

Was it filmed in 30 mins, or several hours, or indeed several days/weeks/months, until they found someone willing to break the rules.

2. How much did they offer?

Did the investigators off money and if so how much. Did they do it in a way that they had built up trust, such as doing it over time, or did they trick the strippers in some way?

3. How many strippers did they check out?

4. Why has 'notbuyingit' refused to interview the strippers, or even had one of there investigators interview the strippers?

5. Were the investigators told to not come back until they had got the footage 'notbuyingit' wanted?

By this, I mean, were they made to get the footage in anyway they could?

6. Will people see the footage, or will the Councillors simply accept a written report (that could be made up) as evidence?

7. Will the Councillors listen to the strippers who work at this club?

One wonders if the Councillors will talk to those strippers who work at the club, or will they simply only listen to middle class feminists.

It is very concerning that the evidence is being provided by person(s) who have been paid, and what methods they used to obtain the evidence (if the evidence even exists).

Hearsay is NOT evidence.

On one radio report it stated that Spearmint Rhino had at that point (I am not sure the date) had NOT been given any evidence of what was claimed. It is possible they have since.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

MP Mark Field was Correct to Remove Protester

I am writing doing this yet again as so many people are using rubbish logic to suggest this chap was in the wrong.

As you can hear alarms were going off. This is very important as not a single person would not find the alarms a worry. If you still claim that he should not have been worried when these alarms are going off, then your simply a fool or telling lies. I do not think any person could have sat not worried having no idea what was going on.

That said, many Labour supporters must have the ability to read minds as they claim they would have known who she was and what she was going to do. But for the rest of us without that power Labour supporters must have, we must presume the worst.

I also presume if your on the left and someone waled into your home and ran about you would do nothing. One suspects you would in fact be worried and try to stop them.

Someone said that she had a banner on her, so he should have known she was ok!!! So someone with acid or a bomb, can not but a t-shirt or something saying green party or whatever? I have a shirt someone gave me of a band I have not heard of. I wear it, yet I have no idea who they are.

One suspects from everything those on the left are saying, is that she could not do wrong because she was a female or/and white. And that she should be treat differently because she was female and/or white. However as we know, Labour has never had a female leader, unlike the Green party, Conservative party (and the Scottish version). In fact almost every party has had a female leader (including UKIP) except Labour. In fact when a Lesbian ran for leadership, she got a huge amount of abuse from the left because she was a lesbian. So we should not be surprised that those on the left still hold sexist ideology, and believe women should be treat differently to men.

I am also a green supporter, and think she and her friends had done jolly well to get in the building.

Security must have been jolly poor.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

MP Mark Field was Correct to Remove Protester

See also:
https://youtu.be/flwYUp19WW8
https://youtu.be/xG71U86C1ds

I am writing doing this yet again as so many people are using rubbish logic to suggest this chap was in the wrong.

As you can hear alarms were going off. This is very important as not a single person would not find the alarms a worry. If you still claim that he should not have been worried when these alarms are going off, then your simply a fool or telling lies. I do not think any person could have sat not worried having no idea what was going on.

That said, many Labour supporters must have the ability to read minds as they claim they would have known who she was and what she was going to do. But for the rest of us without that power Labour supporters must have, we must presume the worst.

I also presume if your on the left and someone waled into your home and ran about you would do nothing. One suspects you would in fact be worried and try to stop them.

Someone said that she had a banner on her, so he should have known she was ok!!! So someone with acid or a bomb, can not but a t-shirt or something saying green party or whatever? I have a shirt someone gave me of a band I have not heard of. I wear it, yet I have no idea who they are.

One suspects from everything those on the left are saying, is that she could not do wrong because she was a female or/and white. And that she should be treat differently because she was female and/or white. However as we know, Labour has never had a female leader, unlike the Green party, Conservative party (and the Scottish version). In fact almost every party has had a female leader (including UKIP) except Labour. In fact when a Lesbian ran for leadership, she got a huge amount of abuse from the left because she was a lesbian. So we should not be surprised that those on the left still hold sexist ideology, and believe women should be treat differently to men.

I am also a green supporter, and think she and her fr..

How To Undress In Front Of Your Husband

I love these old educational films.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

Mark Field suspended as minister after grabbing activist - https://youtu.be/xG71U86C1ds

See also: https://youtu.be/flwYUp19WW8

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48718725

First, I have no problem with the lady activist, she came across as nice.

I have now heard the vid where alarms were going of, and she rushes in.

I feel Mark Field is in the right, as clearly they were told that something was going on, and he had to presume that the people coming in where possibly a danger.

Some state she was not a danger, but unless you can read minds, who in the room could know she was a nice lady from the green party doing a protest. She could have been running in with acid.

Some also state she was not a danger as she was white or/and a female!!!

Others who normally state women should have equality and be treated the same, now state she should be treat differently because she was female!!! So what is it, you believe women are equal, or women are weak and should be treat differently and I presume you must also think, women be paid less as clearly you think them weak.

I was even told I was right ring as I stated this chap was correct in what he did, and that I should always say Conservatives are scum?

The Green party (who I normally support) put out a rather silly reply saying this was to stop the protest.

It is one thing to protest outside, but this was in a building. In these days with acid attacks, one should consider other peoples feelings, and presume that such 'raids' may make people think they are under attack.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

Mark Field suspended as minister after grabbing activist

See also: https://youtu.be/flwYUp19WW8

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48718725

First, I have no problem with the lady activist, she came across as nice.

I have now heard the vid where alarms were going of, and she rushes in.

I feel Mark Field is in the right, as clearly they were told that something was going on, and he had to presume that the people coming in where possibly a danger.

Some state she was not a danger, but unless you can read minds, who in the room could know she was a nice lady from the green party doing a protest. She could have been running in with acid.

Some also state she was not a danger as she was white or/and a female!!!

Others who normally state women should have equality and be treated the same, now state she should be treat differently because she was female!!! So what is it, you believe women are equal, or women are weak and should be treat differently and I presume you must also think, women be paid less as clearly you think them weak.

I was even told I was right ring as I stated this chap was correct in what he did, and that I should always say Conservatives are scum?

The Green party (who I normally support) put out a rather silly reply saying this was to stop the protest.

It is one thing to protest outside, but this was in a building. In these days with acid attacks, one should consider other peoples feelings, and presume that such 'raids' may make people think they are under attack.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

I believe MP Mark Field did no wrong

I am a Greenpeace supporter, however in a world where people have acid and the left almost encourage the use of acid and so on, I feel MP Mark Field did no wrong in quickly removing the Greenpeace activist.

If this had been a terrorist, would the same people saying he was wrong now be saying he was a hero?

One suspects if he had been a Labour MP, the same people would now be defending him.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

I believe MP Mark Field did no wrong

I am a Greenpeace supporter, however in a world where people have acid and the left almost encourage the use of acid and so on, I feel MP Mark Field did no wrong in quickly removing the Greenpeace activist.

If this had been a terrorist, would the same people saying he was wrong now be saying he was a hero?

One suspects if he had been a Labour MP, the same people would now be defending him.

Please follow me on:
https://www.minds.com/jackhorny
https://twitter.com/bhalasada
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bhalasada
https://www.patreon.com/bhalasada

My podcast thing:
https://www.jackhorny.com/

SHOW MORE