This clip was featured in all the first gen 911 conspiracy films, from Loose Change to 9/11 In Plane Sight, casting the illusion of planes melting into the WTC. Since then Jenny has managed to scrub Google/Youtube from featuring her links to this seismic video of Flight 175.
"Despite the stability of the video camera (it appears to be on a dolly as the picture is almost perfectly horizontal throughout the impact sequence. Not bad for an amateur impromptu video recording...) the UA175 aircraft exhibits a vast amount of motion blur as it penetrates the WTC2 (upper frame) in comparison to frames when the aircraft is on the approach to WTC2 (lower frame). If you study the video you will see that the speed of the aircraft is more or less constant, just as it is in other UA175 videos. This sudden acceleration would have been technically impossible for a Boeing 767-200 under the circumstances.

By now it should be apparent to the reader that the Jennifer Spell video has either been manipulated or is fake. The aircraft seems to have been added to the video using the same technique utilised for the CNN Best Angle Video and the Park Foreman Video. But it's the motion blur error that gives the game away. How could any forger make such an obvious and clumsy mistake? Did they do this on purpose? Was the forger whistle-blowing?

Spell, a Brooklyn resident, claims she received a telephone call from her room mate who told her that an aeroplane had flown into the World Trade Centre. She went outside and began filming the World Trade Centre through what looks like a wire fence (below left) and apparently captured the UA175 aircraft as it struck the south wall of WTC2.

"...just about 5 minutes after I got outside and was shooting, the second plane...circled around and it flew over New Jersey and it came in and just..."

How was Spell able to film the aircraft and watch it at the same time and why don't we see video footage of the aircraft as it "circled around" and "flew over New Jersey"?

From '7 Days In September' - 2002 CameraPlanet Inc. Produced and directed by Steve Rosenbaum.
------------------------------------------------
Despite the 'official' version of events stating that WTC2 was hit by a hijacked Boeing 767-200 there is no photographic evidence to support this. Each picture of the supposed UA175 aircraft analysed in this article shows that some kind of unexplainable defect, be it a 'pod', a defective port wing, lighting anomalies or just an airframe that bears no resemblance to a Boeing 767-200. When the UA175 images are analysed comparatively we see glaring inconsistencies in airspeed, airframe symmetry, lighting, descent path angle and airframe attitude.

Some of these deficiencies are so obvious it is as if their creator wanted us to know that they are fakes. We could call these people "Whistle Blowers". There is the distinct possibility that more than one person or organisation is responsible for manufacturing these fake videos and fake images and that what we are seeing here are the differences between the forging standards of each respective party.

It should be apparent to the reader that the visual record of the WTC2 strike has been fabricated or tampered with to make us believe that the tower was hit by an aircraft. This is the Media Hoax. The question is, by how much has the visual record been manipulated? Are they all fakes or just a proportion of them? It is very hard to tell. In my opinion the figure could be as high as 100%. This means that we effectively have no genuine visual record of the WTC2 strike.

So why is the establishment trying to conceal the true nature of this attack? Why manipulate and / or fabricate the videographic and photographic record of the event? The witness reports offer us an explanation. None of them reported seeing a United Airlines Boeing 767-200 collide with the tower. They all describe something different like a "grey plane" or a "non-commercial plane" or "a plane with no windows" or a "small plane".

The reason why the establishment is trying to conceal the true nature of the WTC2 attack is because there was no United Airlines Boeing 767-200 impact with the WTC2 tower on the morning of 911.
https://hercolano2.blogspot.com/2012/03/911-ua175-jennifer-spell-video.html

"Her video is a forgery. The chain link fence should not be in focus. If you don't believe this than try it yourself. Very, very simple." - https://killtown.blogspot.com/2008/12/jennifer-spell-gets-laser-light-myth.html

John Friend interviewed Ace some years ago about what led him to creating the phenomenal film; "9/11 The Great American Psy-Opera"
I wove the imagery into their discussion but this vid was lost when my Utube channel was scrubbed, so it's being archived here for posterity. Ace's channel has partly survived the google/gulag purge but many episodes of his 4 hour feature has been censored. https://www.youtube.com/@CollinAlexander

Footage broadcast by Channel 4 News in the UK on September 12th 2001. This is the longest in-frame clip of Flight 175s final destination - broadcast everywhere immediately after 9/11 but credited to nobody except a 'japanese tourist'.
Missile or bad Special FX?

Reupload as previous Bitchute video that wont play and censored by chinatube etc.

Broadcast worldwide day after 9/11, quite a contrasting trajectory from Sky News live dive bomber, and no 'nose-out'. I have low quality versions from Channel 4 in the UK however NIST released this HQ video back in 2012 under FOI requests. They name Boris Miller as the videographer. This being the only mention of Boris shooting the footage since it happened. Running his name through Gematrix turned up Walt Disney, another great animator.... ;->

WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020 — marking the start of a long, devastating journey
https://www.fox7austin.com/news/who-declared-covid-19-a-pandemic-on-march-11-2020-marking-the-start-of-a-long-devastating-journey

Freemasons up to their old tricks again, what are the chances?
https://www.timeanddate.com/date/durationresult.html?d1=11&m1=03&y1=2020&d2=08&m2=09&y2=2022

Dynamite vid destroying the 9/11 lies, previous upload wont play anymore, nefarious bitchute censorship. Published on Youtube several years ago and long since censored. One of the most complete pictures of the faux planes and victims, plus an exploration of the Half-Truth Movement..

Chaos on some Mathematical Level

You Down With the Sickness?

Anniversary cheddar for those peeps old enough to remember 9Eleven - the Godfather of Hoaxes. Back by unpopular demand, this retro mashup was first published by Muckletoon back in 2007 and long since banned everywhere. From faux planes on 9/11 to the fake Covid 19 virus, the beast system takes shape through false flag frauds. .

'Art student' Hopewell's' fake film of a plane penetrating all the way through the WTC, like a hot knife through butter, was broadcast uncredited by every news network immediately after 9/11. Then in 2006 with the launch of Youtube it was attributed to Tina Cart.
However, in 2017 the MSM dug out Chris Hopewell as the videographer, a former art student; living in squat which was the same location of two others who claimed to capture Flight 175, Robert Clark and Wolfgang Staehle.

The press claim Chris filmed the event for 6 hours but it starts seconds before the second strike, appears with multiple different voice overs (see Park Foreman versus Tina Cart) and only one hour of Hopewell's footage found is online, which includes both towers being demolished.
This clip was aired in 2017 on Fakebook. Very amusing how Chris's art mimics his video of F175, black splodges on blue background.....

"It was a beautiful sunny morning on September 11 as Cunderdin-born Mr Hopewell and his American wife Carol were having breakfast in their Brooklyn apartment on the East River, 1.6km from the twin towers.

After the first attack, he set up his camera on their balcony and captured the chilling footage of the second plane hitting its target.

The camera kept rolling for six hours, capturing the collapse of both towers, and later that afternoon it was shown on TV throughout the world.

Now, on an equally sunny morning around their breakfast table in Beaconsfield, the Fremantle artists are still coming to terms with what they saw and, more importantly, what they felt.

"I couldn't talk about it for years," says 56-year-old Ms Wells.

Mr Hopewell, 53, recalls it "being like a dream" and still has not gone through the whole footage, which is peppered with confused and agonised screams of friends and neighbours in their apartment. "You can't digest it," he says. "It's like some sort of survival thing where you just bury it."

He sold the video to CBS for a five-figure sum and was handsomely rewarded for stills which appeared on the front of Newsweek magazine.

He has pangs of "guilt" for profiting from the tragedy but believes the horror of it all needed to be shown."

https://thewest.com.au/news/world/911-crash-video-haunts-wa-couple-ng-ya-152012

"His photos were shot from the roof of 475 Kent Ave., according to Robert Clark . Coincidentally, UA175 videographer Chris Hopewell (aka Tinacart) has been pinpointed at the same block (building?). (40d 42m 27.90s N, 73d 58m 00.88s W. Ground elevation is 29ft; 6 story building) Again coincidentally, one of three people to capture the first plane "on film" - Wolfgang Staehle - was located also at 475 Kent Ave."

Got my third & final Youtube strike for this video which was set to private and had no public views, then banned without recourse after 15 years. Demonstrating how creepy their AI has become or the censors were combing my unlisted material.

LIE WITNESS Gerard Vowls on the London Bridge terror incident: ‘It was like a sword battle. Anyone that came near them they just stabbed them.’

A heroic punter threw pint glasses at the London Bridge attackers while calling them 'terrorist cowards' as he attempted to lure them towards armed police officers. Gerard Vowls tried to draw the attackers back onto the Borough High Street after watching them stab a woman nearly 50 times as she called out for help.

After following them down Borough High Street, Mr Vowls taunted them, saying 'come and get me,' before lobbing beer bottles and pint glasses at the Islamist killers.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/london-bridge-hero-lobbed-pint-16177652

Examine footage of the three 'terrorists' after being killed by police, not a drop of blood in sight. Shot on potato-cam of course:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGj2dv9vC-U

I also done several searches on how many people in the UK with the surname Vowls - ZERO RESULTS

https://www.familytreeuk.co.uk/results.html?q=vowls#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=vowls&gsc.page=1

Millions Comatose In A World Of Illusion

From silicon tits to a silly con for president.

Vanilla Sky was released on October 2001. Years later once it become clear the depth of fakery surrounding the WTC attack and the evidence many of the victims never existed, skeptics argued about the veracity of the jumpers. Some claimed the towers were evacuated prior to demolition and those seen hanging from the windows and jumping out were CGI creations. Others disagreed and contended latex dummies were used to simulate victims jumping to their deaths to avoid the smoke and inferno. Richard Pecorella is adamant his fiancé is featured in photographs heroically leaping to her death.. .

"Mr Pecarello, 59, made contact with Associated Press photographer Richard Drew, who had captured images of many of the jumpers, and asked to look through his archives. He saw a couple of photographs of a woman in cream trousers and blue top which he is convinced were of Karen.

‘There was one of her standing in a window with flames behind her and one of her falling from the building,’ Mr Pecarello says. ‘It made me feel she didn’t suffer and that she chose death on her terms rather than letting them burn her up.’

When he tried to show the photos to Karen’s staunchly Protestant family back in Indiana, they didn’t want to know. They go by the official version, that nobody jumped."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2035806/9-11-victims-fell-Twin-Towers-appeared-blinded-smoke.html

Open Your Eyes

A Muckletoon Original for Bitchute

Got side-tracked into studying Wadlow and watched all publicly available videos of the giant. Couldn't help notice how easy it would be to forge every single one of them. Wikipedia claim the films are; "irrefutable evidence" but something's up with them big rubber hands & stilt like strut.

Wadlow reached 8 ft 11" (2.72 m) in height his death at age 22. (33 would be too obvious)

'Robert Pershing Wadlow (February 22, 1918 – July 15, 1940), also known as the Alton Giant and the Giant of Illinois, was an American man who was the tallest person in recorded history for whom there is irrefutable evidence. He was born and raised in Alton, Illinois, a small city near St. Louis, Missouri.

Wadlow was a Master Mason under the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge of Illinois A.F. and A.M.

This incredulous angle was broadcast within minutes of the second strike by Sky News. The plane is seen swooping in from high above unlike all other film of Flight 175. However Sky News were sneaky and only broadcast the second half of the clip, albeit numerous times but it hides the full scope of the simulation's conflicting trajectory. My own Sky News recordings from 2001 were further enlightened when the CBS footage appeared on Youtube in 2007. It showing the full descent of the 'plane' into the WTC during the extended video.

Even before the North Tower is detonated, Sky News are seeding the Osama Bin Laden myth. Then while mirroring the FOX News feed the presenter suggests to us that jet fuel will cause steel to melt....

This ancient Oprah episode has been memory-holed from the Internets. She interviews CIA shill Don Dahler and plays the most incriminating clips against hijacked planes hitting the WTC. Don is adamant the first strike was a missile (even ten years later) and sees nothing hit the south tower while watching live. The World Trade Centre demolition is also featured by Winfrey, watch pyroclastic debris chase firemen up the street. The no-plane or missile theory were seeded by Dahler during his live interviews on ABC news with Diane Sawyer. How deep does Don's acting role go? Firing missiles into buildings rigged for demolition doesn't seem feasible to me.
"This theory opens up the possibility that Don Dahler could have been doing more than just reporting on the events of the day. He may also have been orchestrating the events of the day.

Radios can beep regardless of whether the call is incoming or outgoing. What if the beep was outgoing? What if all the people on that particular radio channel could now hear what Don was saying on the air? Couldn’t that be used as an audio cue for the CGI’s to appear?

The time between the radio beep and the explosion is 15 seconds. There is no “live” footage out there that shows the plane appearing prior to this radio beep. Because of the fact that most of these angles show the plane “disappearing” behind the towers, there was an allowable margin of error inherent in those angles.

I can’t even count the number of times I’ve been scrolling through frames of these videos, thinking “damn, why hasn’t the building exploded yet?” The answer to that question may be that the CGI in the video I was analyzing at the time was initiated early.

If you start recording the times between the CGI’s disappearance behind the towers and the “exit face” explosion, these values represent that margin of error. The angle with the least margin of error just happened to be WNYW, or as I prefer to call it, blooper central.

If you read this ABC Nightline Bio of Don Dahler, you’ll see some pretty incredible claims about the “missions” he’s been on. I’ve excerpted three of these below:

1.) “Dahler was among the first American journalists to enter Afghanistan prior to U.S. military action against the Taliban regime.”

2.) “In the summer of 2002, Dahler, a Nightline producer, and camera crew, slipped across the Syrian border into northern Iraq for a series of exclusive reports on the Kurds.”

3.) “Dahler covered the war in Iraq as an embedded journalist with the 101st Airborne, traveling and living with the Army soldiers, going on foot-patrols and aerial assaults alongside the front-line troops.”

If he truly is “Grade (E)9” (Sergeant Major or Command Sergeant Major in the Army), these “missions” wouldn’t seem to be much of a stretch, would they?"

https://911logic.blogspot.com/2006/12/911-eyewitness-report-cards_12.html

Muckle bloke caught on camera back in the day courtesy of korbyn dallas, among the best researchers online right now. http://stolenhistory.org/media/giant-caught-on-film-in-1901.81/

Dashcam witness video, another of the simulations broadcast all around the world immediately after 9/11 and not attributed to anyone. CNNs Aaron Brown explains the nose out illusion succinctly. Begins with the full NIST video release in 2012 then jumps back to demonstrate it being broadcast by the fake news networks on 9/11. Very similar to Gamma Press and Tina Cart, seems this batch of counterfeits were manufactured by the same perps.

It boggles the mind how this bogus clip was broadcast unchallenged all around the world immediately after 9/11. Even the most astute 9/11 sceptics took many years to unwrap this aspect of the hoax. Nobody has ever claimed ownership or been attributed as videographer of this particular clip, no wonder, it being the most fraudulent piece of evidence in support of hijacked planes hitting the World Trade Centre and absolute proof of TV Fakery being the main weapon unleashed on 9/11.

Antonio first published this video on Vimeo on September 11th 2009, 8 years after 9/11, having never been broadcast by any media previously. It's another crafty trick, zooming in prior to impact and Rosario himself not reacting until after the explosion with the obligatory OH MY GOD!
Unlike most of the other videographers Rosario has appeared in public and has his own Youtube channel. However the aluminium plane melts into the WTC and the nose seemingly emerges intact out the other side before dissolving into the explosion. Also unusual is the incredibly high quality of the zoomed in shot, it seems a higher pixel count than when the camera is zoomed out giving a panorama of the city. This artifact is in reverse to how most cameras work as quality often degrades the closer one zooms...

Pavel was one of only two people in New York to capture both towers exploding as they were allegedly being struck but he didn't release this clip until 2003. It's very similar to the uncredited mute splodge but here they have a building in the way to act as a fig leaf masking the plane having no impact as it melts into the World Trade Centre like a ghost.

Much is made of his footage of 'Flight 11' striking the North Tower but this video is less known. The banking, shining, silver plane is in sharp contrast to Park Foreman, Tina Cart & Boris Miller representations. Very few photos appear of Pavel from around 2001 onwards, then he appears a decade later on Czech TV in 2012 giving this extensive interview. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGZyFQlvK4Q

Tape of 9/11 WTC attack surfaces 2 years later -

"The only videotape known to have captured both planes slamming into the World Trade Centre, and only the second image of the first strike, has surfaced on the eve of the second anniversary of the September 11, 2001, attacks.

The footage, obtained by The New York Times, was taken by a Czech immigrant construction worker whose son at one point came close to accidentally erasing the rare, chilling footage, the newspaper reported on its website today.

Federal officials investigating the Trade Centre collapse are trying to obtain a copy of the hourlong tape, which could cast light on the cause of the north tower's collapse by helping to determine factors including the exact speed at which the first plane travelled, The Times said.

The only other known footage of the first plane's impact came from a French film crew making a documentary about a probationary firefighter."

https://www.theage.com.au/national/tape-of-9-11-wtc-attack-surfaces-20030907-gdwawq.html

Cracking no planes video. NIST published this video which lasts 7 minutes back in 2012. The WTC explodes around 4.33 in and the footage is craftily edited to hide what did or didn't hit the skyscraper. Uncredited video but the 'author' gives a brief interview at the end.
On close examination the video appears cleverly layered, the contrast in quality between the WTC in distance and the spectators in the foreground would appear at odds with one another. I'd say it was layered to give authenticity. Released by NIST under FOI in 2012.
No Plane In Sight.

Another atrocious counterfeit appearing ten years after 9/11. Bleached colours and stretched buildings. This appeared on Youtube around 2011 having never seen this wide angle shot broadcast by any news network in the previous ten years, and I spent a lot of time collecting archive footage. It's credited to Holly B, unsure if that is the videographer or female 'newscaster' who sounds very professional but in many cases audio was dubbed over separately and there is no watermark on the video detailing which network broadcast the fake. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Ten seconds of terror - this mute splodge appeared online around 2008, again melting into the WTC defying the laws of physics.
It was not broadcast by any news networks in the months after 9/11, only appearing many years later on Youtube. Uncredited and Unbelievable.

This shot was broadcast everywhere the day after 9/11, quite a contrasting trajectory from SKY dive bomber, and no 'nose-out'. I have low quality versions from Channel 4 in the UK however NIST released this HQ video back in 2012 under FOI requests. They name Boris Miller as the videographer. This being the only mention of Boris shooting the footage since it happened. Running his name through Gematrix turned up Walt Disney, another great animator.... ;->

TV Fakery in Woolwich, the bogus beheading left a bad actor-taste even after all these years. Published in 2013 by Muckletoon and long since banned. Dedicated to the late, great Morris108, without whom this video would never have been produced. Morris lost his life to dengue fever after moving to Cambodia and starting a family. And to Chris Spivey whose life was made a living hell for questioning the man-made tricks.

"A conspiracy theorist claimed Lee Rigby's murder was a hoax and taunted his family by publishing their address online, a court has heard. Chris Spivey, 52, allegedly made a string of outrageous claims about the soldier, including that his family were involved in a conspiracy with M15 to incite anti-Islamic propaganda.
The court heard how the tattoo artist and self-styled internet journalist even claimed that Fusilier Rigby did not exist and that his relatives had doctored their family pictures. He also allegedly accused the 25-year-old of being a rapist and said his wife Amy West was involved in the 'hoax'."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3180080/Conspiracy-theorist-claimed-Lee-Rigby-s-murder-hoax-terrified-family-publishing-addresses-online.html

MORRIS108 on Bitchute before passing - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/VTYOXPcqy3yM/

Morris Herman (Morris108) dies shortly after having his YouTube channel terminated, October 2, 2019
https://letternewsok.blogspot.com/2019/10/morris-herman-morris108-dies-shortly.html