Smudgination

RAW file label: Voice 025further 4 sides

RAW file label: Voice 023south African parliamentary politics
conjoined with:
Voice 024addendum South African parliamentary

12th July 2019

RAW file label: Voice 023south African parliamentary politics

12th July 2019

RAW file label: Voice 013 further psych

11th July 2019

RAW file label: Voice 020constituion equality racism

10th July 2019

This recording is meant to a more complete treatment of the points raised in my 'synopsis recording', which didn't clearly draw out the Constitutional issues, and was quite an imperfect recording in many respects.

Tracing out the Legal and ideological histories of state and moral corruption in the South African context.

RAW file label: Voice 016nick mindv4 sides lecture

5 July 2019

Theoretical speculation of extending Linda Berens 4 sides of the mind

Attempting to expand my theory of mind into Linda Berens MBTI system. I have since made quite a few further extensions to what is discussed, owing to further discovery in Linda Berens MBTI model.

RAW file label: Voice 017synposis of issues

8 July 2019

RAW file label: Voice 010 explaining my system therapy spec

should of said "substitute" instead of displace

This recording is still quite far from of the new observations I have gone onto to recognize..

RAW file label: Voice 014big dialog

4 July 2019

the treatment of these issues is not exhaustive

I am a little worried about the feminism issue, raised here because I need to set up that issue on its own and make all the correct contextual qualifications: that issue is dealt with a bit more details here: https://youtu.be/aPpJ3HXTHMw

label of raw file: Voice 013 recording

2 July 2019

Clearing up semantic toxicity and fumbles that I made in my last recording... attempting to make further over-arching points and commentary on rhetorical engagement

Hopefully a condensed summary of my general position on those matters, with specific reference to the official opposition.

time of recording: 2019 05 01 152442

only post pt 2 and then add an addendum about:
women who isolate their romantic partners is an example... the isolation within the codependency, the surreal bubble. acting 'on behalf of X-faction/ ie. men.... when anyone speaks they are speaking AS A/N X (ie. AS A MAN)--- when for the individualist, this phrase means something totally different when spoken... as a man, is just one of the many facets, it is purely descriptive and open to radical contextualization and use, and even prone to complete absurdity at the whim of such a user... whereas as a man when used by a follower of the false prophet, is seeking to make a categorical claim about an objective narrative that is framed as being morally authoritative: in a way that imposes itself a priori, [utterly] without communication, or even persuasion: it grants unilateral authoritarian permissions to itself.

time of recording: 2019 04 30 123932

original file name: 2019 04 15 195106 identity pliotcs new dissection

The stuff at the end about framing identity politics as an intrinsically feminist project, is pointedly, a counter-veiling relativistic assessment that should be intellectual borne out by those who embrace the branding of 'group-liberation', it does not pertain to those who take responsibility as individuals foremost; individuals might contemplatively, regard themselves a member to groups in their own subjective and abstract accounting: which does not serve a factual claim, but a simply a vehicle for 'owning' one's own bullshit, if one had wished to navigate by such group-categorization; which does not yield solid enough generalizations to ever pertain to individual participants in any wholesale fashion, but certainly cannot be escaped by those who profess belonging as the mode that fully describes or delivers moral-autonomy (as self-antagonizing and conceptually oxymoronical as that proposition is contended by those who trade ethical grounding for mythological facts, which arbitrarily divides history to obfuscate group-accountability 'as necessary', into a counterfeit narrative of group entities that pertain to solitary and rigid morality monitoring--- so that life will be translated into an ideological formula of objects that the ideology foremost wants to relate itself to: into the waiting arms ineffectual organizers that can only destabilize and destroy, with its consort of spin doctoring until the demogoguary is at last distilled to take its place as the avatar of the mob: the guardian of "justice", the Fuhrer of the identity matrix to fulfill the false promises of equality for the identity; and power for no-one but some authorized representative— confirmed only by the mantra of a rehearsed chorus from all the same, drilled, dogmatic-narrative: which someone must generate the expertise to deliver, excavated out from some historical deposit of stolen racialist-pride).

RAW file name: 20190412 1141282nd recording in progress SA event

raw file name: 20190412 08214 comment on progress SA event

Response to Emerge Podcast's

Miki Kasthan - The Inseparability of Psychological and Social Transformation

source link: https://anchor.fm/emerge/episodes/Miki-Kasthan---The-Inseparability-of-Psychological-and-Social-Transformation-e3bv2p

my original file name: 2019 03 21 001921 emerge podcast Miki

original file name:
2019 03 20_ 013243 deeper analysis comedy tragedy

response to video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nsd9w3dHrI

and mildly some commentary on this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6orCV4I7jjU

original file name:
20190318 221429timcast response combined

response to video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mXz1YohsiQ

original file name:
20190317 222436sam vaknin getting dissed by ex client

responding primarily to this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2677&v=Dsrw7Sq0GGs

Part 1: https://youtu.be/MrpXC8vKksg

I want to also add a small note to emphasize something I touched on:

Having anyone introduce a pervasive model of coordination within a decentralized system, will automatically create a systemic hazard, which reestablishes an imperative to have a compatible platform to support an ongoing form of compatible mutual styles of structures within the decentralization. There are so many issues in decentralization, which would have to develop systems to both preserve decentralization while also some kind of system of transparent signalling and coordination: the only way to resolve these problems, is that it must be treated as a paradox, to get properly curated: which effectively can only be done within units of a vibrant political interaction; these issues are further compounded by vast inequality in the realm of prestige, human intelligence is itself a scarce commodity, to analogize this issue, if we lived in a society where some people were 50 times taller than the average, it would 'look' strange, but this is the level of vibrant differentiation we have within our population, and if we cannot preserve contract within a decentralized system, it will likely devolve into some cult of lowest-common-denominator edifice of slave-morality and group-think, where prestige will be limited within a narrow field of in-group security provision: without the correct calibration of 'enlightened' structures--- the negotiation of the nitty-gritty structure, and technology of how to forge agreement for those arrangements, are all overlooked by the sociological level of analysis.

original file names; combined: 2019 03 15 031326 4th Jordan hall and 3rd combined.

responding primarily to this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2677&v=Dsrw7Sq0GGs

Part 2: https://youtu.be/4GU0UNn4LH4

I want to also add a small note to emphasize something I touched on:

Having anyone introduce a pervasive model of coordination within a decentralized system, will automatically create a systemic hazard, which reestablishes an imperative to have a compatible platform to support an ongoing form of compatible mutual styles of structures within the decentralization. There are so many issues in decentralization, which would have to develop systems to both preserve decentralization while also some kind of system of transparent signalling and coordination: the only way to resolve these problems, is that it must be treated as a paradox, to get properly curated: which effectively can only be done within units of a vibrant political interaction; these issues are further compounded by vast inequality in the realm of prestige, human intelligence is itself a scarce commodity, to analogize this issue, if we lived in a society where some people were 50 times taller than the average, it would 'look' strange, but this is the level of vibrant differentiation we have within our population, and if we cannot preserve contract within a decentralized system, it will likely devolve into some cult of lowest-common-denominator edifice of slave-morality and group-think, where prestige will be limited within a narrow field of in-group security provision: without the correct calibration of 'enlightened' structures--- the negotiation of the nitty-gritty structure, and technology of how to forge agreement for those arrangements, are all overlooked by the sociological level of analysis.

Original file name: 2019 03 14 003453 jordan hall

SHOW MORE

Created 1 year, 3 months ago.

49 videos

CategoryNews & Politics

Philosophy by Psyche
philosophy and politics