The Patriot Badger - on Bitchute (please like, subscribe, share & donate)

Please support the channel - https://www.paypal.me/TheBadgerPatriot

Thank you for watching this video, we look forward to seeing you next time, and thank you for your support.

The opinions expressed through this video are the opinions of the individual author.

Fair Use Disclaimer : In the instance I include footage seen or posted elsewhere, it is covered in Fair Use for Documentary and Educational purposes with the intention of driving commentary and allowing freedom of speech.

Freedom of Speech Laws as they pertain to public forums and local government - Courts have recognized public comment periods as a type of designated or limited forum. See Surita v. Hyde, 665 F.3d 860, 869 (7th Cir.2011); Galena v. Leone, 638 F.3d 186, 198–99 (3d Cir.2011); Steinburg v. Chesterfield Cnty. Planning Com’n, 527 F.3d 377, 384–86 (4th Cir.2008); Eichenlaub v. Twp. of Ind., 385 F.3d 274, 280–81 (3d Cir.2004); Rowe v. City of Cocoa, Fla., 358 F.3d 900, 802 (11th Cir.2004). In such designated or limited public forums the government may enact reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech but cannot restrict the content of speech or restrict speakers based on their viewpoint. Galena v. Leone, 638 F.3d 186, 198 (3d Cir. 2011) (citing Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460,470 (2009)).

The Patriot Badger - on Bitchute (please like, subscribe, share & donate)

Please support the channel - https://www.paypal.me/TheBadgerPatriot

Thank you for watching this video, we look forward to seeing you next time, and thank you for your support.

The opinions expressed through this video are the opinions of the individual author.

Fair Use Disclaimer : In the instance I include footage seen or posted elsewhere, it is covered in Fair Use for Documentary and Educational purposes with the intention of driving commentary and allowing freedom of speech.

Freedom of Speech Laws as they pertain to public forums and local government - Courts have recognized public comment periods as a type of designated or limited forum. See Surita v. Hyde, 665 F.3d 860, 869 (7th Cir.2011); Galena v. Leone, 638 F.3d 186, 198–99 (3d Cir.2011); Steinburg v. Chesterfield Cnty. Planning Com’n, 527 F.3d 377, 384–86 (4th Cir.2008); Eichenlaub v. Twp. of Ind., 385 F.3d 274, 280–81 (3d Cir.2004); Rowe v. City of Cocoa, Fla., 358 F.3d 900, 802 (11th Cir.2004). In such designated or limited public forums the government may enact reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech but cannot restrict the content of speech or restrict speakers based on their viewpoint. Galena v. Leone, 638 F.3d 186, 198 (3d Cir. 2011) (citing Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460,470 (2009)).

The Patriot Badger - on Bitchute (please like, subscribe, share & donate)

Please support the channel - https://www.paypal.me/TheBadgerPatriot

Thank you for watching this video, we look forward to seeing you next time, and thank you for your support.

The opinions expressed through this video are the opinions of the individual author.

Fair Use Disclaimer : In the instance I include footage seen or posted elsewhere, it is covered in Fair Use for Documentary and Educational purposes with the intention of driving commentary and allowing freedom of speech.

Freedom of Speech Laws as they pertain to public forums and local government - Courts have recognized public comment periods as a type of designated or limited forum. See Surita v. Hyde, 665 F.3d 860, 869 (7th Cir.2011); Galena v. Leone, 638 F.3d 186, 198–99 (3d Cir.2011); Steinburg v. Chesterfield Cnty. Planning Com’n, 527 F.3d 377, 384–86 (4th Cir.2008); Eichenlaub v. Twp. of Ind., 385 F.3d 274, 280–81 (3d Cir.2004); Rowe v. City of Cocoa, Fla., 358 F.3d 900, 802 (11th Cir.2004). In such designated or limited public forums the government may enact reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech but cannot restrict the content of speech or restrict speakers based on their viewpoint. Galena v. Leone, 638 F.3d 186, 198 (3d Cir. 2011) (citing Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460,470 (2009)).

ThePatriotBadger - on Bitchute (please like, subscribe, share & donate)

Please support the channel - https://www.paypal.me/TheBadgerPatriot

Thank you for watching this video, we look forward to seeing you next time, and thank you for your support.

The opinions expressed through this video are the opinions of the individual author.

Fair Use Disclaimer : In the instance I include footage seen or posted elsewhere, it is covered in Fair Use for Documentary and Educational purposes with the intention of driving commentary and allowing freedom of speech.

Freedom of Speech Laws as they pertain to public forums and local government - Courts have recognized public comment periods as a type of designated or limited forum. See Surita v. Hyde, 665 F.3d 860, 869 (7th Cir.2011); Galena v. Leone, 638 F.3d 186, 198–99 (3d Cir.2011); Steinburg v. Chesterfield Cnty. Planning Com’n, 527 F.3d 377, 384–86 (4th Cir.2008); Eichenlaub v. Twp. of Ind., 385 F.3d 274, 280–81 (3d Cir.2004); Rowe v. City of Cocoa, Fla., 358 F.3d 900, 802 (11th Cir.2004). In such designated or limited public forums the government may enact reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech but cannot restrict the content of speech or restrict speakers based on their viewpoint. Galena v. Leone, 638 F.3d 186, 198 (3d Cir. 2011) (citing Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460,470 (2009)).

ThePatriotBadger - on Bitchute (please like, subscribe, share & donate)

Please support the channel - https://www.paypal.me/TheBadgerPatriot

Thank you for watching this video, we look forward to seeing you next time, and thank you for your support.

The opinions expressed through this video are the opinions of the individual author.

Fair Use Disclaimer : In the instance I include footage seen or posted elsewhere, it is covered in Fair Use for Documentary and Educational purposes with the intention of driving commentary and allowing freedom of speech.

Freedom of Speech Laws as they pertain to public forums and local government - Courts have recognized public comment periods as a type of designated or limited forum. See Surita v. Hyde, 665 F.3d 860, 869 (7th Cir.2011); Galena v. Leone, 638 F.3d 186, 198–99 (3d Cir.2011); Steinburg v. Chesterfield Cnty. Planning Com’n, 527 F.3d 377, 384–86 (4th Cir.2008); Eichenlaub v. Twp. of Ind., 385 F.3d 274, 280–81 (3d Cir.2004); Rowe v. City of Cocoa, Fla., 358 F.3d 900, 802 (11th Cir.2004). In such designated or limited public forums the government may enact reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech but cannot restrict the content of speech or restrict speakers based on their viewpoint. Galena v. Leone, 638 F.3d 186, 198 (3d Cir. 2011) (citing Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460,470 (2009)).

ThePatriotBadger - on Bitchute (please like, subscribe, share & donate)

Please support the channel - https://www.paypal.me/TheBadgerPatriot

Thank you for watching this video, we look forward to seeing you next time, and thank you for your support.

The opinions expressed through this video are the opinions of the individual author.

Fair Use Disclaimer : In the instance I include footage seen or posted elsewhere, it is covered in Fair Use for Documentary and Educational purposes with the intention of driving commentary and allowing freedom of speech.

Freedom of Speech Laws as they pertain to public forums and local government - Courts have recognized public comment periods as a type of designated or limited forum. See Surita v. Hyde, 665 F.3d 860, 869 (7th Cir.2011); Galena v. Leone, 638 F.3d 186, 198–99 (3d Cir.2011); Steinburg v. Chesterfield Cnty. Planning Com’n, 527 F.3d 377, 384–86 (4th Cir.2008); Eichenlaub v. Twp. of Ind., 385 F.3d 274, 280–81 (3d Cir.2004); Rowe v. City of Cocoa, Fla., 358 F.3d 900, 802 (11th Cir.2004). In such designated or limited public forums the government may enact reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech but cannot restrict the content of speech or restrict speakers based on their viewpoint. Galena v. Leone, 638 F.3d 186, 198 (3d Cir. 2011) (citing Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460,470 (2009)).