channel image




Failure of WHO Pandemic Treaty Means the Sheeple Will Soon Be Released From the Human Animal Farm | Updated

May 16, 2024

The white hat victory in the battle for the planet Earth is now becoming obvious in multiple ways. For example, as Reuters reports: “Talks to draw up a global pact to help fight future pandemics have ended without a draft agreement by the expected deadline…the World Health Organization said on Friday.”

[Here is the first example above. This is not necessarily a win for our side. They are trying to get people to sign it before the document is completed so they can alter it after the signatures. This could be a part of that tactic. Stalling negotiations also could be because public favor is not on side yet. It does not necessarily mean its over, and that the pandemic treaty is dead]

We also now confirmed from Pentagon sources that the millions of military-age male illegal immigrants who came into the US since 2021 were brought in to enforce the planned implementation of the (now failed) Khazarian Mafia WHO pandemic treaty. These men will now be rounded up and sent home.

[Another statement, ok we will see if they will be rounded up, where is the plan to do this and who is going to do it specifically?]

There are many other signs of KM defeat we will discuss below. The implications of this are far bigger than most people realize. A good metaphor for what is about to happen is the movie “The Island.” In this movie, people were living in an underground bunker and were told they were sheltering from a natural disaster. However, lucky people would be allowed to go soon to an “Island paradise.” The reality is these people were clones whose purpose was to supply organs to rich clientele. Traveling to “The Island” meant organ removal and death. At the end of the movie, the clones were set free to live out their natural lives.

[I am not going to comment any more on his article, I think you will all see a few areas below that are questionable, dolphin plasty, thousand year life spans, etc.]

The equivalent is about to happen to all of us. We now live short, miserable lives and are literally worked to death far before our natural lifespans. Soon we will all be free, work 20 hours per week or less and live like millionaires for thousands of years.

If it sounds improbable consider the implications of this following news item:

A British girl has had her hearing restored after becoming the first person worldwide to take part in a pioneering new gene therapy trial.

This was accomplished by adding a few genes to the region of her ear. This is just one proof of the fact we have the ability to edit our genes in any way we want. It means we can change the genes that shorten our lifespans. We can also add superpowers such as the radar abilities of a bat or the eyes of an eagle.

Until now, the controllers of the planet forbade medicine from being used to enhance people. The only thing the medical community is allowed to do is to cure illness. The result was that pharmaceutical companies were given multi-trillion-dollar incentives to create illnesses in order to make money by curing them.

The Rockefellers and other owners of the privately owned non-governmental organization WHO have created cancer, HIV and countless other diseases in order to do just that. Imagine if they could instead make trillions of dollars by enhancing humans.

The old establishment put out all sorts of lame excuses as to why we must prohibit people from enhancing their genes. They are also spurious. For example, they say it would create genetic gaps between the rich and the poor. The answer to that is to make this technology available to anyone who wants it. They say it could cause permanent genetic changes that would be passed on to children. That’s a lie because we have the ability to undo these changes if we want. The only legitimate argument they make is that we need to make sure it doesn’t have unexpected side effects. This means careful testing is needed.

Also, it will be entirely a question of free choice. For sure, just like the Amish chose to stick with 19th-century technology, many people will choose to continue to live short, genetically un-enhanced lives. That would be their choice and who knows, maybe evolution will prove them right.

However, many of us will want to become virtually immortal super-humans. My own wish is to someday be able to convert my body into something like a dolphin so that I can explore the ocean.

Read more:

Lucis Trust and the New World Order

A powerful wing of the Anglo-American Establishment is currently under investigation by this news service for its role in promoting the cults of Satanism and Luciferianism, for spawning an entire subculture of drug-induced violence be­ lieved to be behind the recent pattern of hideous ritual mur­ ders. As Dianne Core, a leading British expert in the battle against Satanism, put it recently, "We are in the middle of spiritual warfare, and the Satanic weapons are all pointed at the young."

It is no coincidence, that this wing of the Establishment includes many of the leading advocates of a New Yalta deal with Moscow-top figures of the United Nations bureauc­ racy, and leading elite families. As we document below, they even look to Mikhail Gorbachov as the premier world cult leader in what they call their "Externalized Hierarchy."

In this article, the first of an ongoing series, we present a dossier of some of the principal institutions and individuals behind this evil "New Age" movement.

The reader will learn, how behind the oh-so-nice U.N. brochures and talk about "peace," some of the leading figures of this grouping have been exposed as practising the most obscene homosexual and child pornography rituals imagi­ nable. Take the notorious case of Canon Edward West, the coordinator of the American association of the Most Vener­able Order of St. John.

Eyewitness accounts indicate that during the 1980s, he was a frequent participant in obscene sexual rituals at homosexual S&M clubs in Manhattan, in­ cluding the Mineshaft and the Hellfire Club (named after an 18th-century English secret Satanic society). Favorite "en­ tertainment" at the Mineshaft included having children uri­ nate on the patrons. In the mid-1980s, the club was shut down, following an investigation by the New York Police Department, which found links to organized crime circles, including those of John Zaccaro, the husband of 1984 Dem­ ocratic vice presidential nominee Geraldine Ferraro.

The evil friends of Bishop Moore

The Cathedral of St. John the Divine, the medieval tem­ ple of the Episcopalian Archdiocese of New York, has be­ come the mother institution of the New Age movement in the United States, whose goal is to eclipse the Age of Pisces (Christianity) with an Age of Aquarius (Lucifer). The presid­ ing bishop of the cathedral, Bishop Paul Moore, whose fam ily is heir to the Nabisco company fortune, has been in the forefront of creating this Satanic "new world order," since at least the late 1950s, when, as a priest in Indianapolis, Indi­ ana, he gave the "People's Temple" cult of Jim Jones its start.

Later in 1977, Bishop Moore rocked the Christian world, when he ordained a militant lesbian, Ellen Marie Barrett, who told Time magazine that it was her lesbian love affair that gave her strength to serve God. Bishop Moore claims that the ordination of lesbians, and his other Gnostic heresies, are merely part of the ongoing revelation of God's truth to man by the Holy Spirit, which had been prophesied by the Disciple John.

With this dissembling rationale, Bishop Moore has trans­ formed the Cathedral of St. John the Divine into a Gnostic stronghold for such organizations as:

• The Lucis Trust, founded in 1922 by Alice Bailey, a disciple of Theosophist Madame Helena Blavatsky. Origi­ nally named the Lucifer Trust, it became a mother institution of the modem New Age movement;
• The Temple of Understanding, which is headquar­ tered at the cathedral under its president, the Very Reverend Dean James Parks Morton, dean of the cathedral. It has turned the cathedral into a harbor for Gnostic religions rang­ ing from Tibetan Buddhism to Sufi Freemasonry;
• The medieval village of Lindisfarne, New York, which is to be the model for a New Age lifestyle, once the Earth has been purified of its billions of non-white souls;
• A special ministry to Sufi Freemasons, who were a historical deployment against the Arab Rennaissance, and whose modem-day cathedral affiliates have been linked to the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat;
• The Zen Center� which teaches meditation to the elite of the Liberal Establishment;
• Gay and lesbian organizations, which seek to legit­ imize their sin by arguing that the "beloved disciple" John had a homosexual affair with Christ, or else by creating Mother Goddess religions in the cathedral's crypts;
• A medieval chivalric order known as the Most Ven­ erable Order of the Hospital of St. John, which, under the direction of the Duke of Gloucester of the British Royal Family, has inculcated the "Episcopagan" American Estab­ lishment in such Gnostic evil as the necessity to spread Shi'ite fundamentalism under the Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran, be cause the Shah had "sinned" by trying to industrialize his nation.

Download Full PDF

Race as a Biological Reality and Social Construct

by Kevin MacDonald

I WAS pleasantly surprised to see an article on a radical website that actually says something positive about biological approaches to ethnicity, citing Frank Salter (pictured) and me (Jay Knott, “Invention, Imagination, Race, and Nation,” posted on Dissident Voice). A couple comments:

Shlomo Sand: I really don’t know how anyone can take Sand seriously given that he simply dismisses the data on Jewish population genetics. But Knott is right:

Sand accepts that his work has had no effect on Israeli nationalism nor on Jewish identity worldwide. Why is this so? If you expose a delusion, wouldn’t you expect significant numbers to abandon it, and thank you?

Good point. Jewish ethnocentrism is legendary — I use the term ‘hyper-ethnocentrism’ to describe it (here are some contemporary examples from Israel). It’s beyond rational discussion and cries out for a biological explanation. Sand’s rational arguments, whatever their merit, are not going to persuade rabbis who are convinced that non-Jews are a lower life form.

The Ethics of Ethnocentrism: Knott accepts that there is a biology of ethnocentrism, but regards it as immoral. Commenting on Frank Salter’s opposition to immigration to Australia, he writes “Considering how white Australia was founded, it’s unethical to try to stop third world refugees settling there.” And he goes on to note that:

American evolutionary historian professor Kevin MacDonald is also a right-winger. His Evolutionary Strategies of Ethnocentric Behavior argues that “ethnic affiliations are extraordinarily robust” and that this is because racial identity is biologically beneficial to the genes which cause it.

But the notion that racial identity is adaptive does not imply that it is morally justifiable, any more than accepting the obvious fact that heterosexuality is more adaptive than homosexuality has any consequences whatever for one’s views on gay rights.

From an evolutionary point of view, moral idealism is a very dangerous idea because it may well lead to altruism and evolutionary death. A moral idealism that results in displacement-level immigration is obviously an evolutionary dead end. Evolution is a game that, if one decides not to play, one automatically loses.

The reality is that Whites are the only people who have developed moral idealism — in my view a unique feature of Western individualistic culture where groups are constructed less on the basis of kinship than on the basis of ideology and moral reputation (see here, p. 14ff). Whites are loudly encouraged to act on the basis of these moral ideals by elites in the Western media and academic world. But a moral idealism that doesn’t take account of human nature and continues to promote non-White ethnocentrism may well end in a moral disaster — for example, the many millions in the USSR murdered in pursuit of the highest moral ideal of a classless society:

The current multicultural zeitgeist, based as it is on moral idealism and idealized images of human nature, may … suffer a similar fate [to that of societies based on the utopian idealism of Marxism]. While there is no question that the ideology of multiculturalism supported by strong social controls may result in compliance and even a substantial degree of internalization of the ideology, there is accumulating empirical evidence suggesting that, like Marxism, it is based on inadequate science and therefore likely to suffer a similar fate. A widely replicated finding is that, because of closer ties of kinship and culture, ethnically homogeneous societies are more likely to invest in social capital for the entire society (e.g., welfare programs, universal health care ) (e.g., Salter, 2005) [— the present gridlock over Obamacare is an excellent example]. Multicultural societies therefore are likely to have more conflict as different groups attempt to influence public policy in their favor while tending to avoid contributions to public goods. Moreover, Putnam (2007) has shown that ethnic homogeneity is associated with greater social solidarity and greater social capital, as well as more trust of others and greater political participation. In multicultural societies, trust (even of one’s own race) is lower, altruism and community cooperation rarer, friends fewer. (“Evolution and a Dual Processing Theory of Culture: Applications to Moral Idealism and Political Philosophy”)

Despite the long history of ethnic and religious conflict between groups, the West has embarked on a path of officially promoting high levels of immigration of ethnic groups from around the world. Population projections in many Western countries, including the United States, show that as a direct result of these policies, the traditional peoples of these…

Read more:

Racial Solidarity is Love

And discrimination is part of that.

by Hadding Scott

OXYTOCIN IS A neurotransmitter “intricately involved in social behaviors such as mother-child bonding, feelings of trust and love, and group recognition,” according to social psychologist Dr. Carsten De Dreu of the University of Amsterdam.

A study conducted by Dr. De Dreu and published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences documents a connection between oxytocin and racial discrimination. “Under oxytocin we saw an increase of in-group favoritism, which has the downside of discrimination against people who are not part of your group,” says Dr. De Dreu.

In all of the experiments, men who snorted a dose of oxytocin showed stronger and more frequent favoritism towards their countrymen over rival groups. Men who whiffed a placebo still showed signs of favoritism, but less frequently and at weaker levels. [Dave Mosher, “‘Cuddle Chemical’ Also Fuels Favoritism, Bigotry,” Wired, 12 January 2011]

Dr. De Dreu acknowledges the survival value of such discrimination: “We thought it was odd a neurological system that survived evolution would make people indiscriminately loving toward others.”

* * *

Race as a Biological Reality and Social Construct

by Kevin MacDonald

I WAS pleasantly surprised to see an article on a radical website that actually says something positive about biological approaches to ethnicity, citing Frank Salter (pictured) and me (Jay Knott, “Invention, Imagination, Race, and Nation,” posted on Dissident Voice). A couple comments:

Shlomo Sand: I really don’t know how anyone can take Sand seriously given that he simply dismisses the data on Jewish population genetics. But Knott is right:

Sand accepts that his work has had no effect on Israeli nationalism nor on Jewish identity worldwide. Why is this so? If you expose a delusion, wouldn’t you expect significant numbers to abandon it, and thank you?

Good point. Jewish ethnocentrism is legendary — I use the term ‘hyper-ethnocentrism’ to describe it (here are some contemporary examples from Israel). It’s beyond rational discussion and cries out for a biological explanation. Sand’s rational arguments, whatever their merit, are not going to persuade rabbis who are convinced that non-Jews are a lower life form.

The Ethics of Ethnocentrism: Knott accepts that there is a biology of ethnocentrism, but regards it as immoral. Commenting on Frank Salter’s opposition to immigration to Australia, he writes “Considering how white Australia was founded, it’s unethical to try to stop third world refugees settling there.” And he goes on to note that:

American evolutionary historian professor Kevin MacDonald is also a right-winger. His Evolutionary Strategies of Ethnocentric Behavior argues that “ethnic affiliations are extraordinarily robust” and that this is because racial identity is biologically beneficial to the genes which cause it.

But the notion that racial identity is adaptive does not imply that it is morally justifiable, any more than accepting the obvious fact that heterosexuality is more adaptive than homosexuality has any consequences whatever for one’s views on gay rights.

From an evolutionary point of view, moral idealism is a very dangerous idea because it may well lead to altruism and evolutionary death. A moral idealism that results in displacement-level immigration is obviously an evolutionary dead end. Evolution is a game that, if one decides not to play, one automatically loses.

The reality is that Whites are the only people who have developed moral idealism — in my view a unique feature of Western individualistic culture where groups are constructed less on the basis of kinship than on the basis of ideology and moral reputation (see here, p. 14ff). Whites are loudly encouraged to act on the basis of these moral ideals by elites in the Western media and academic world. But a moral idealism that doesn’t take account of human nature and continues to promote non-White ethnocentrism may well end in a moral disaster — for example, the many millions in the USSR murdered in pursuit of the highest moral ideal of a classless society:

The current multicultural zeitgeist, based as it is on moral idealism and idealized images of human nature, may … suffer a similar fate [to that of societies based on the utopian idealism of Marxism]. While there is no question that the ideology of multiculturalism supported by strong social controls may result in compliance and even a substantial degree of internalization of the ideology, there is accumulating empirical evidence suggesting that, like Marxism, it is based on inadequate science and therefore likely to suffer a similar fate.

Read more:

You're listening to the official audio for America - "A Horse With No Name" from their self-titled debut album. 'America 50th Anniversary: The Collection'

A Horse With No Name


On the first part of the journey
I was looking at all the life
There were plants and birds and rocks and things
There was sand and hills and rings
The first thing I met was a fly with a buzz
And the sky with no clouds
The heat was hot and the ground was dry
But the air was full of sound

I've been through the desert on a horse with no name
It felt good to be out of the rain
In the desert you can remember your name
'Cause there ain't no one for to give you no pain
La, la, la la la la, la la la, la la...
La, la, la la la la, la la la, la la...

After two days in the desert sun
My skin began to turn red
After three days in the desert fun
I was looking at a river bed
And the story it told of a river that flowed
Made me sad to think it was dead

You see I've been through the desert on a horse with no name
It felt good to be out of the rain
In the desert you can remember your name
'Cause there ain't no one for to give you no pain
La, la, la la la la, la la la, la la...

After nine days I let the horse run free
'Cause the desert had turned to sea
There were plants and birds and rocks and things
There was sand and hills and rings
The ocean is a desert with its life underground
And a perfect disguise all above
Under the cities lies a heart made of ground
But the humans will give no love

You see I've been through the desert on a horse with no name
It felt good to be out of the rain
In the desert you can remember your name
'Cause there ain't no one for to give you no pain
La, la, la la la la, la la la, la la... [repeats]


Red America

by Douglas Mercer

SCOTT MCMEEKIN’S BOOK Stalin’s War (2021) is eye-opening and stomach-churning. It reveals in fine detail and straightforward prose that everything you heard about the communist subversion of America is not only absolutely true but is even much worse than you’ve been led to believe. Every true American should read it, to find out about the origins of today’s Red America.

McMeekin is a professor in good standing at Bard College, so naturally he is reticent about the all-important Jewish factor, but anyone can read between the lines. The president of Bard College is Leon Botstein, whose daughter is Ken Burns’ longtime collaborator. This Jewess just pumped out a poisonous documentary about America and the “Holocaust.” So McMeekin is not exactly going to print the name of every Jew in blue; though, if he did, the text would look like the inside of a Zyklon canister.

The truth is this: If you control the media and the educational system in a country for going on decades you can get people to believe anything, no matter how outlandish. Members of the Bush team who met with Gorbachev after the USSR fell swear that he sincerely believed that the material aid provided by America to the Soviets in World War 2 was insignificant. That means that an entire society from top to bottom had been deluded — a situation we fast approach, though on other and far more important issues.

Remember the term “Red Scare” from the post-World War 1 era, and how the alarm over communist infiltration of American institutions was supposedly so exaggerated?

It was not exaggerated. It was all true.

Notice how FDR is lionized and McCarthy is spat on? The reverse should be true.

Remember the Hollywood Blacklist and how it “stifled creativity and freedom of expression”? The ones they said were communists were all communists. (Though the blacklist purposely never touched the upper echelon men at the studios, and it should have.) And a huge percentage of them were Jews, too.

And remember how World War 2 was the “good war”?

Well, nothing could be further from the truth.

Any more victories like that and we are done for.

This is all what comes when Jews control your media and your education system for decades. Pretty soon the entire society is brainwashed from top to bottom. Anyone telling the truth will be looked at as if he had three eyes. And just about everything that people think they know as a matter of course, everything that is “obviously true,” is a lie.

* * *

Franklin Delano Roosevelt despised Germans from the beginning. He thought the Versailles treaty was too lenient, that after the Great War the Allies should have subjugated Germany permanently. When he became President, he vowed to himself never to make that mistake again.

You know who else hated the Germans from the beginning?

The Jews.

Judea famously declared war on Germany in 1933. And they also got their military war against Germany. That it was “America” that was waging the war doesn’t change a thing in this world of illusion. It was Jews...

Read more:

The Darkest Hour Just Got Darker: Race-Mixing Propaganda Even in WW2

LAST NIGHT I watched The Darkest Hour.

I’ve been a despiser of Churchill since even before I was JWoke and it’s certainly interesting that in both this film and, even more, last year’s Churchill, the great man is now being portrayed (accurately) as a kind of doddering, drink-besotted buffoon, lapsing into senility, with only a few lucid moments here and there. (See some of the books in my Books list if you’re interested in exploring critical perspectives on Churchill.)

The film hinges on the debate over whether Britain should have sought some accommodation with Hitler or continued to fight him. It’s worth noting that Hitler displayed no animosity to Britain and had offered to guarantee its safety and the integrity of the British empire, even to the extent of deploying German forces to secure it if necessary. Hitler wanted a free hand to attack the Soviet Union, which he saw as a mortal menace to our civilisation. That he was basically right about this is evidenced by the fact that we spent decades after the war locked in a struggle with it, here and there brushing up against the genuine possibility of global destruction.

But no such nuances are apparent in this movie rendering of the debate. Here the “appeasers” are cowards, dastards and schemers. They put pressure on Churchill and manage to plant doubt even in the great man’s mind.

The “train scene” (shown in the video) appears to be the key moment when Churchill resolves to carry on with the struggle. He goes on to an underground train for the first time and asks people what they think about the war, whether they still have the will to fight on.

You might think a WW2 movie would at least be free of race-mixing propaganda. But no. They managed to find a way to get it in, even here. On the train is a Negro, apparently in an intimate relationship with a White woman from the way she nudges and looks at him. And this is no ordinary Negro. His super-dark complexion, rubber lips and thick nose make him an almost caricature Sambo figure.

There is an interesting moment when someone observes to Churchill about the war, “Some people say it’s a lost cause.” “Lost causes are the only ones worth fighting for,” he retorts. The Negro and the White woman then exchange knowing looks and nod their heads, as if they had had some special experience in the matter. What is implied here? The terrible struggle against “prejudice” the girl must have faced as the concubine of a Negro? Implying an equivalence between Britain’s patriotic wartime resistance and the desire of a White woman to mate with an African?

The Negro is also super-patriotic. “They’ll never take Picadilly!” he exclaims.

Churchill ends by quoting one of the Lays of Ancient Rome by Thomas Babington Macaulay. The Negro helps him by filling in the last lines. Now Macaulay is a very minor English poet. Even people well versed in English literature might well have only a passing acquaintance with his work. But this super-Negro knows it off by heart. He has plumbed the depths of England’s literature, as well as its women. Since the words are a celebration of ancestral belonging, they are, of course, particularly ironic coming from an African in wartime England.

“Then out spake brave Horatius,
The Captain of the Gate:
To every man upon this earth
Death cometh soon or late.
And how can man die better
Than facing fearful odds,
For the ashes of his fathers,
And the temples of his gods”

Neither the director nor the writer of this film appear to be Jewish but the director Joe Wright is married to an Indian woman, Anoushka Shankar (daughter of Ravi Shankar). He clearly has a personal stake in promoting the race-mixing ideal. [The film is issued by Focus Films, a part of very Jewish NBCUniversal. — Ed.]


Psychologist: Most Whites Are Disgusted by Interracial Couples

Revulsion at the very sight of racial mixing exists on a subconscious, instinctual level.

NEXT YEAR marks the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision which ruled that state bans on interracial marriage were “unconstitutional.” While the ruling in Loving v. Virginia (1967) was controversial at the time — in 1958 just 4 per cent. of Americans approved of marriages between Whites and non-Whites — today polls indicate that most Americans (87 per cent.) accept interracial marriage.

Yet is that acceptance real — or pretended? Are people being socially pressured to go against what they really feel?

Social psychologist Allison Skinner states in a recent article that, despite the polls, there is an underlying bias against interracial couples — something not captured by self-reported polls. She states: “To test this, my colleague Caitlin Hudac and I designed a series…

Read more:

Understanding the Real Struggle

[As Related to H. Millard]

SOME WHITES who seem to be pro-White do not fully understand that our real struggle is all about genes, and, specifically, White genes vs non-White genes.

This lack of understanding is sometimes shown by how easy it is for some to get distracted and fall for the lies about our struggle really being about ideology and not about White genes.

By putting ideology before White genes, they open the door to some non-Whites who seemingly agree with them. Accepting any non-Whites into one’s supposedly pro-White circles brings in non-White genes and these non-White genes are discordant and intrinsically opposed to White genes in the eternal and necessary Gene Wars — whether the humans with these genes know it or not.

It’s not a matter of ideology when we face the reality of the eternal Gene Wars, it is a matter of Nature — and, as some of us say, it is how God-as-He-Truly-Is has ordered things.

Some of these pro-Whites call themselves “race realists.” By this they mean that they take an “even-handed” approach to race, but believe the races are different and have different abilities and talents, etc. Okay, so far that sounds reasonable — even though they are still called “racists,” etc. by those who hate Whites — but some take this too far, and show weakness by gushing over non-Whites who may take some similar positions as the ones these putative pro-Whites take.

If you visit the sites where some of these “fair-minded” pro-Whites dwell, you’ll see that they are increasingly featuring columns and comments from all manner of non-Whites; they have Jews, Asians, Blacks, Browns, Native Americans all commenting and muddying the waters about what is really important: White genes, the White genome, the White race, Whiteness itself.

And, instead of putting Whiteness before all else, they substitute endless and aimless talk and comments about understanding that “race is real” and that the races are different. That’s true as far as it goes, but you’ll notice that they’ve shifted from being exclusively White to using vague terms about the races in general — and they ignore the pivotal fact that we are in an evolutionary struggle (that’s what the eternal Gene Wars are all about).

And then you’ll see comments from some presumed Whites saying how they really like this or that Black or Asian or whatever because, golly, that non-White is also a “race realist.” This is a slippery slope leading to mingling and mating with non-Whites because those with such sentiments have put genes in a secondary position to mere ideology. The next downward step is to date and mate with non-Whites and produce children who have been born by hijacking White sperm or White eggs to make non-Whites.

And, of course, there are some Whites who gush in this way because they are trying to hide behind non-Whites by claiming, “See, I’m not a ‘racist’ because I like this (fill in the blank with Black, Latino, Asian, Native American) who agrees with my position.” In their own minds they are quivering and saying “So please don’t call me a ‘racist,’ sob, sob, sob.”

There are also those who are intentionally muddying the waters and trying to shift the discussion to be about ideology and nothing else — and trying to specifically make it not about genes or race except in the vague and PC sense of holding that race is real and the races are different. In such circles and their publications, you will find little or no talk about racial separation, which is essential for Whites to have and maintain — and which is commanded of us by the Higher Power (read God-as-He-Truly-Is).

Those Whites who truly understand the nature of our struggle have an exclusively White gene-based ideology that is one with religion, politics, social views, and the way they live — the way they see the world around them and what they do. Everything is based on the reality of White genes and no other genes. Ideology flows from their core belief in White genes over all else. Their ideology is one with their White gene-patterns and can’t be separated from them.

There are also some groups of Whites who promote the pre-Christian religions of our White European ancestors — but many of those promoting these religions are not explicitly White and actually promote race-mixing by admitting non-Whites into their groups with open arms. This is a major error in thinking and harms Whites.

The will of God-as-He-Truly-Is, is for us to remain White and separate for all time from all other races. This is not something we vote on or reach a consensus on. This is from God-as-He-Truly-Is. He says stay White in all ways. Stay separate. Do not mix or mate with any non-Whites. That is His law, His command, His demand for us.

Read more:

The Jews created Islam and the Muslims are the Jew’s Trained Dogs just like the Niggers and Chinese. There’s wear a black cube on their forehead just like the Muslims who worship the black cube of Satan (Saturn). The cube and cross fit inside the satanic Jewish Star of Remphan with 6 points, 6 triangles and 6 sides of the hexagram inside the star (666). The Jews created the CCP and control Chinese through scholarships. Jews use universities as immigration centers and Jewish Community Centers as Embassies. They use NGOs to bypass immigration and Russia banned NGOs. The worlds largest Jewish Community Center was in Ukraine.

Their goal is to flood nations with these races and then use them once they have majority to murder whites or enslave them like they did in South Africa. It’s Genocide and it’s a planned invasion to create a mixed race of brown mud races that serve the Jews on their third temple in Greater Israel. Jews boast that each Jew will own 2,800 slaves. This is why they are educating these races at Jew owned universities to prepare for their new world of brown people to replace whites.


Jews Starting to Talk About “White Genocide” and Kalergi

Michael Savage, a nationally syndicated conservative radio host, is promoting the popular White nationalist trope that there is an ongoing and intentional “cultural genocide” being carried out against the “white race.”

On Monday, Savage spent his entire show on the topic, the Southern Poverty Law Center noted in a blog post.

“White supremacists typically accuse Jewish people of engineering this plot,” the SPLC wrote.

But Savage, who is Jewish himself, instead blames Democrats.

“Unless we stand up to the racists and the genocidal maniacs who are attacking, attacking, attacking,” Savage said, “there will be nothing left to protect, there will be nothing left to save. Everything of our culture will be gone.”

I WAS PUZZLED a few times in recent weeks by seeing people I know to be committed (non-Jewish) philosemites making reference to the Kalergi Plan. Now we’re seeing Jews talking about “White Genocide”. Of course, they don’t blame it on Jews. They blame it on the “Democrats, the “Left”, “Cultural Marxism”, etc.

In part this testifies to the irresistible strength of our ideas. Our memes are making a difference. They are shaping the perceptions even of people who disagree with us or despise us. But it could also be interpreted as an instance of the classic Jewish strategy of infiltrate, co-opt and divert. According to this approach, once an autonomous movement, potentially threatening to Jews, has acquired an unstoppable momentum, if it can no longer be stopped altogether it needs to be harmlessly rerouted.

Perhaps the ultimate example of this was Marxism itself. It’s often forgotten now how anti-Semitic the early Socialist movement was. Then as now, many of the major financial and business scandals of the age involved Jews. These could have catastrophic effects. Without counter-cyclical government action, such as welfare spending or active management of the economy, business depressions could be intense and prolonged. People would actually starve to death. A Jewish financial scam could bring about a recession that would plunge millions into ruin. And, of course, lacking sympathy with the goyim, Jews were among the most ruthless of the capitalist exploiters.

Marxism could be interpreted as an attempt to divert this rebellious energy and canalize it in ways that would be unthreatening to Jews. As perceptions of an ethnic adversary were gaining strength among the European populace, along came a Jew and said “Let them eat class warfare!” Any talk of ethnic rivalry was dismissed as “false consciousness”. Now, as Goyim Knowing grows, and that same ethnic adversary comes into focus once again, along come Jews and their acolytes saying “Oy vey, white genocide, Kalergi. Resist Cultural Marxism!”

Whenever you see a Jew or philo-Semite talking about the Kalergi Plan, just point out this quote to them if you want to shut them up. It’s from Hitler’s second book, written in 1928 but unpublished during his lifetime. Hitler’s harsh condemnation of Kalergi (full name Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi) was strangely prophetic.


Austria: Jews Forbid Long List of License Plate Number and Letter Combinations

This is hilarious, and Austrian patriots should prank the censors by coming up with 100,000 new “secret codes” that will then be forbidden too.

AUSTRIA is cracking down on personalised number plates used by neo-Nazis, by banning lesser-known codes with hidden far-right symbolism. (ILLUSTRATION: Austria was joined to Nazi Germany from 1938-1945.)

Read more:

Which Way, Western Man?

European man must assert himself or perish.

by Revilo P. Oliver

EDITOR’S NOTE: This review of William Gayley Simpson’s Which Way Western Man? was published — in an abridged version — by NATIONAL VANGUARD in 1979. When William Simpson (pictured) died at the age of 99 in 1991, he had completed a series of supplementary notes and emendations he wished to be added to his monumental book.

William Pierce promised him that the book would be revised and expanded as he intended, a task which was entrusted to and completed by J.N. Abbott — and published in a new authorized edition by Simpson’s estate. — Ed.

* * *

TO ANSWER THE QUESTION posed in the title of his book, William Gayley Simpson has condensed into 762 closely-printed pages the experience, the research, and the philosophical thought of a lifetime. He is now 87, and he began to write the present book thirty-five years ago. It is a veritable encyclopaedia of everything that is directly pertinent to our race’s position in the world today and our problematic future.

The book is unique. What makes it so cogent is that it is both an intellectual autobiography and a synoptic treatise. The reader, even if he begins with conditioned reflexes that make him hostile to his own race, can follow, step by step, the process by which reason and intellectual honesty forced Mr. Simpson to his conclusions. His work may also be taken symbolically as an epitome or recapitulation of the course of Western civilization, which likewise began with the Christian faith of the Dark Ages and has now brought us to the point where we can no longer refuse to face the grim realities of the world in which we must either live or perish.

Born in 1892 in an educated but sternly Christian family, Mr. Simpson was graduated, magna cum laude, from a highly reputed theological seminary, became a minister, and, unlike most clergymen, he had a religious faith so ardent that instead of regarding some of the most striking parts of Christian doctrine as convenient subjects for professional oratory, he, like St. Francis, tried to live in logical conformity with them. Our race, like some others, has a strain of sentiment that can be excited by the idea of tapas, the mirific virtue and spiritual power produced by austerity, self-sacrifice, and self-mortification. The notion of tapas was a fundamental part of Aryan religions from India to Scandinavia, and it was not remarkable that our ancestors, accustomed to venerate Odin, a god who, by an act of supreme self-sacrifice, hanged himself on the great world-tree so that he might arise from the dead, should have accepted the cult of a god who had himself crucified and likewise rose from the dead; nor that, so long as they believed in their new religion, they held to the faith that spiritual excellence could be attained by inflicting degradation and pain on oneself. St. Francis was merely one of the many who had the fortitude to live up to that faith.

Mr. Simpson, too, tried to carry the religion to its practical consequences, but, unlike St. Francis, he did not lapse into a kind of amiable insanity. He learned from his dolorous experience that reality is not to be denied and that magic is either clever trickery or an hallucination. He realized that there was no way in which he “could be an honest man and remain a minister.”

Innumerable clerics, even in the darkest ages of Faith, found their creed unbelievable, but either took refuge in the Mediaeval aphorism, “populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur,” or, if not without honesty, accepted Cardinal Dubois’s celebrated dictum that God is a bogey that must be brandished in order to scare the masses into some semblance of civilized behavior. But since the forced unity of Christendom was effectively broken in the Sixteenth Century, not a few clergymen have publicly denounced the religion to which they gave assent in their youth. It will be worth while to illustrate the profound difference between their reactions and Mr. Simpson’s. And it will suffice to list the five who are now most generally remembered in this country.

Early in the Eighteenth Century the Reverend Mr. Thomas Woolston set out to “establish the truth of the Scriptures.” He soon saw that it was no longer possible to claim that the various tales in the Christian Bible were historical accounts of events that had actually happened, so he tried to defend them as allegories, as edifying and somewhat more dignified than Aesop’s fables. That device, however, was a rod that broke in his hands. He became a deist and published his Discourses, of which sixty thousand copies are said to have been sold in the brief time before the corporations in the salvation-business took alarm and he was, by a pious perversion of the law, thrown into the prison in which he died in 1731. He is remembered now for…

Read more:

After 1918, the term "Freikorps" referred to various —yet, still, loosely affiliated — paramilitary organizations that sprang up across Germany following the country's defeat in World War I. Of the numerous Weimar paramilitary groups active during that time, the Freikorps were, and remain, the most notable. While exact numbers are difficult to determine, historians agree that some 500,000 men were formal Freikorps members with another 1.5 million men participating informally.Amongst the social, political, and economic upheavals that marked the early years of the Weimar Republic, the tenuous German government under Friedrich Ebert, leader of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands, SPD), utilized the Freikorps to quell socialist and communist uprisings. Minister of Defence and SPD member Gustav Noske also relied on the Freikorps to suppress the German Revolution of 1918-19 as well as the Marxist Spartacist League, culminating in the summary execution of revolutionary communist leaders Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg on 15 January 1919. The Freikorps also took part in smashing the Bavarian Soviet as well as against communists and Bolsheviks in Eastern Europe, most notably East Prussia, Latvia, Silesia, and Poland. Many Freikorps members then went on to join the NSDAP

Song List:

00:00 - Freikorps Voran! -- Freikorps Forward!
2:08 - Ein Landsknecht bin ich von Natur -- I am a Landsknecht by My Nature
3:51 - Wir traben ins rote Turnei -- We ride into the Red Tide
5:03 - So ziehn wir unter fremder Fahne -- So we fly under a foreign flag
7:06 - Lied der Freikorps Epp -- Song of the Freikorps Epp
7:48 - Durchs Gebirge -- Through the Mountains
11:35 - Des Kaisers letzte Erben -- The Kaiser's Last Heirs
13:23 - Wanderjugend Gibor -- Wanderjugend of Gibor
15:40 - Weißgardisten vom Kuban -- White Guards of the Kuban
19:22 - Wandervögel Lied - Nach Osten zu Fahren -- Wandervögel Song - To Drive East
22:10 - Zu Ende ist das frohe Wandern -- Happy Wandering is Over
23:46 - Wenn den Marsch nach Osten Geht -- When the March goes East
26:30 - Die Grenzwacht hielt im Ostem -- The Borderguard stopped in the East
29:22 - Nach Nordland -- To Nordland
31:38 - Ritt am Morgen -- Morning Ride
33:58 - Nach Ostland zu Fahren -- To the East we Drive
36:46 - Für Deutschland Kamerad -- For Germany, Comrade!
39:07 - Nachts steht Hunger starr in unserm Traum -- At Night Hunger stands Rigid in Our Dreams
41:47 - Reiht euch ein ins Freikorps Epp -- Join the Freikorps Epp
44:13 - Marsch der Marine-Brigade Ehrhardt -- March of the Marine Brigade Erhardt
48:22 - Laßt weh'n die schwarze Fahne -- Let the Black Flag fly
50:54 - Feindwärts knattert die Fahne -- The flag is Waving Towards the Enemy
52:59 - Auf baltischer Wacht -- On Watch in the Baltic
57:40 - Der Tod in Flandern -- Death in Flanders

The Jews Behind the 1919 Spartacist Uprising in Berlin

by Karl Radl

THE Spartacist Uprising of January 1919 in Berlin, Germany is often treated with kid gloves by historians, while the nationalists who suppressed it are openly vilified as proto-Nazi monsters.

The reality however is that the nationalists – aka the Freikorps – were in many respects the heroes of the affair, because by their prompt action they put down one of Lenin’s best hopes for spreading the Bolshevik revolution across Europe and ultimately the world.

The roots of the Spartacist Uprising lie in the split between the pro and anti-war factions of the German Socialist Party (SPD). In 1914 the lone voice in the SPD against voting war credits to German government was a radical socialist deputy named Karl Liebknecht. Despite often being thought of as being of Jewish origin, this was not in fact the case.

Liebknecht spent the entire First World War – even when in prison – mobilising as many people against the war as he could and preaching that their real enemies weren’t the Allies, but rather their ‘class enemies’ at home.

Things began moving more quickly in January 1916 when anonymous letters signed ‘Spartacus’ began circulating that preached this same message to their primarily working class readership.

These were written by Leo Jogiches, Paul Levi, Karl Liebknecht, Rosa Luxembourg, Franz Mehring, Clara Zetkin among others, (6) but were all based off of Rosa Luxembourg’s — a Jewish Marxist theorist from Poland – pamphlet ‘The Crisis of German Social Democracy’ that was signed ‘Junius’ and published in December 1915.

Of these individuals: Leo Jogiches, Paul Levi and Rosa Luxembourg were Jewish.

These Spartacus letters continued to be written and circulated to the end of the war – giving some credence to the supposed ‘Stab in the Back’ legend – despite Jogiches, Liebknecht and Luxembourg being imprisoned for sedition by the Imperial German authorities.

Read more:

We Live in Weimar 2.0 — But What Was Weimar 1.0?

IN AMERICA, the public is given zero information on the “Weimar Republic,” the period in Germany post-WWI that led to the rise of the National Socialists in 1933.

This is deliberate. The period holds too many secrets to the modern world.

This thread will expose those secrets.

First, a tweet on what Germany was pre-Weimar:

As the Holy Roman Empire ended, Germans united throughout the 18th and 19th centuries under strong leadership, loyal monarchs, and good governance.

Germany was a bustling European center of industry, military, culture & Christianity.

Then World War I happened.

Largely orchestrated by corrupt Global interests, it was a disaster for Germany.

Germany had a string of victories, and sought a peaceful truce.

But Global financiers behind the war would lose money and their agenda, so they brought in America in 1917.

How the war ended is crucial to setting the stage for Weimar.

The German war effort collapsed in 1918 when Communists led strikes in munitions factories and launched a violent Revolution in Germany.

The monarchy fell, the war ended with no truce, and Liberal Elites create Weimar.

Before I get into who comprised this new “Liberal Elite” in Germany, first, a look at who was behind the Revolution:

Rosa Luxemburg
Kurt Eisner
Paul Levi
Leo Jogiches
Ernst Toller
Erich Muhsam
Gustav Landauer
Eugen Levine
Karl Radek

Guess what they all have in common…

At the Treaty of Versailles, a crippled Germany was carved up by the Global Elite, with no opposition from the new Weimar leaders.

Who were the key representatives letting this happen?

Paul Hirsch (Prime Minister of Prussia)
Otto Landsberg (Versailles Delegate)

And they were?

The term “Weimar” comes from the city of Weimar where this new, liberal democratic government was first assembled.

In this unnatural, fragmented Germany, a new constitution was foisted on the people.

Who wrote it?

Hugo Preuss.

What was he?

For nearly a decade, this government was overwhelmingly run by Left, Liberal, non-German influences.

Walther Rathenau (Foreign Minister)
Rudolf Hilferding (Finance Minister)
Bernhard Isidor Weiss (Police Chief)
Eduard Bernstein (main member of Social Democrats)

For the 70-80 years leading up to Weimar, Left-Liberal socialists had been wreaking havoc across Germany, preventing the people from knowing real peace.

Who were the earliest leaders?

Ferdinand Lassalle and Leopold Sonnemann.

Guess what they were…

The early years of Weimar were filled with turmoil and suffering.

The people weren’t organized.

The extreme Left launched frequent rebellions.

There were food shortages and poverty. France invaded Germany in 1923-1925 to collect WWI reparations.

It was an absolute mess.

The ineffectual government was often embroiled in scandal, with one group at the center.

Barmat Scandal
Sklarek Scandal
Kutisker Case
Katzenellenbogen Case

All involved Jewish crime rings scamming Germany with political corruption, bribery, fraud, war-profiteering, etc.

Accompanying Weimar’s broken political world was an equally sick and degenerate culture and society.

Everything was tolerated.

Berlin became the sin capital of the world.

Many poor, desperate Germans sold themselves like cheap goods.

No sexual perversion was off the table.

At the center of this sexual “revolution” was Magnus Hirschfeld.

He created the “Institute of Sexual Research,” located in Berlin, celebrating all kinds of sexual fetishes, conducting trans-surgery, research, etc.

Sound familiar?

It’s all happened before, in Weimar, Germany.

The “German” Film Industry was also filled with degenerate themes.

Some of main producers, directors, and actors in Weimar:

Paul Davidson
Joseph “Joe May” Mandel
Jules Greenbaum
Max Reinhardt
Josef Von Sternberg
Fritz Kohn
Otto Wallburg
Peter “Lorre” Lowenstein

And many more…

The Pornography business also became extremely popular and lucrative during Weimar, often taking advantage of German women looking for work.

People like Kurt Tucholsky made sure everyone got their fix.

Art in Weimar experienced a similar descent into meaningless, perverse works that inspired nothing but sadness and discord.
“Dadaism” and “Cubism” were all the rage.

The Elites promoted this as “intellectual” and modern.

Sound familiar?

Painters like Hanns Ludwig Katz did well.

Even prominent photographers, like Erwin BlumenfeId, sought to inject subversive, anti-German themes into their work.

Here’s one of his photos.

Can you see what he was selling, even all the way back then?

Something similar to what they’re selling today.

Read more (photos):

In this video we examine one of the most important elements of Jungian psychology - the individuation process. Carl Jung believed that the quality of one's life is very much a function of the manner in which this natural process unfolds.



Far too many of us are oblivious to the dangers that some of our behavioural patterns pose to our long-term well-being. Instead of facing up to our problems, we either try and convince ourselves that our issues are trivial and so can be ignored, or we pretend that the problems do not exist at all. We can only delude ourselves for so long, as eventually what were once manageable problems turn into problems of unmanageable proportions. For this reason, Carl Jung maintained that a crucial first step toward self-improvement is simply to become more aware of the reality of one’s situation.

Jung, however, is not unique in this respect as many philosophers and psychologists, both past and present, share in this view. Where he is more unique is in his belief that not only do we have to overcome our ignorance regarding the reality of our external situation, but just as importantly we need to become more aware of what he called the reality of our psyche.

“What most people overlook or seem unable to understand is the fact that I regard the psyche as real.” (Carl Jung, Answer to Job)

The psyche, in Jung’s view is not merely a by-product of a certain configuration of matter. Rather the psyche is an irreducible, a priori fact of nature that should be considered as real as the physical world, and just as impactful to our overall well-being. Most people, however, know little of this world within.

One reason for this lack of knowledge can be attributed to our Christian heritage and the associated belief in an omniscient god who not only knew if we were committing bad deeds, but also if we were thinking blasphemous thoughts. While belief in such a god has dwindled, there remains a tendency to repress elements of our personality which run counter to the moral system of our day and thus to strive for a type of moral perfectionism.

Jung was no proponent of this ideal. Striving after perfection is like chasing after wind and far from making us better people it in fact greatly hinders our development. The more we strive for perfection, the further we fuel our dark side and lose control over how it manifests itself in our day-to-day actions. In addition, if we constantly repress thoughts which run counter to the dominant moral system of our society, we will never reach the deeper layers of the psyche, an awareness of which can often substantially improve our lives.

“One should never think that man can reach perfection,” wrote Jung “he can only aim at completion – not to be perfect but to be complete. That would be the necessity and the indispensable condition if there were any question of perfection at all. For how can you perfect a thing if it is not complete?

Make it complete first and see what it is then. But to make it complete is already a mountain of a task, and by the time you arrive at absolute completion, you find that you are already dead, so you never reach that preliminary condition for perfecting yourself.” (Carl Jung, Visions: Notes of the Seminar Given in 1930 -1934)

The task of striving toward completeness, or what is also referred to as “wholeness of the personality”, was of such great importance that most of Jung’s career was dedicated to exploring this process, a process he would eventually call individuation.

Jung did not use the term individuation until 1921, however the seeds of this idea reach back to his doctoral dissertation. In this dissertation, titled, “On the Psychology and Pathology of So-called Occult Phenomena”, Jung attempted to explain his observations of a medium who claimed to interact with spirits during seances. To account for this Jung hypothesized that the manifestation of these spirits was the result of “splinter personalities” which lay dormant in the unconscious mind of the medium but which were somehow brought to her conscious awareness by the act of the seance. Rather than accepting that these “splinter personalities” emerged from within, from the reality of her psyche, the medium believed they were spirits manifesting themselves from a realm independent of her.

As Jung’s study of the psyche progressed he came to believe that the experience of this medium was but one example of a more general phenomenon. All of us have unconscious components which reside dormant in our psyche and as Jolande Jacobi explains in her book The Way of Individuation:

“. . .it remained Jung’s untiring scientific and psychotherapeutic endeavor to work out a methodological procedure for bringing these components to consciousness and associating them with the ego, in order to…

Read more:

Democracy Is an Ideal Government for Jewish Influence

Democracy gives us so many choices!
by Thomas Dalton, Ph.D.

[D]emocracy has become a tool in the hand of that [Jewish] race that, because of its inner goals, must shun the open light — as it has always done and will always do. Only the Jew can praise an institution which is as corrupt and false as himself.
— Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, circa 1924 [1]

Democracy is now currently defined in Europe as ‘a country run by Jews.’
— Ezra Pound, circa 1940 [2]

IN HIS RECENT State of the Union speech, Joe Biden referred to “democracy” nearly a dozen times. Democracy, he said, was currently “under assault” and “under attack”; the January 6 riot put a “dagger to [its] throat” and was its “gravest threat.” As a result, democracy “must be defended”; and indeed, we must “embrace” it. Or so says our doddering president.

Our polyracial vice president speaks in a similar vein. Regarding Donald Trump, Kamala Harris informs us that “we must recognize the profound threat he poses… to our democracy.” This has been a recurrent message from her for years. When she was running for president herself back in 2019, she called Trump “a clear and present danger to democracy” — and the theme has never left her side.

Mainstream media are no better. The constant banter, on both the left and the right, is that democracy is all, democracy is under threat (by candidate X), and democracy must be protected and defended, no matter the cost. The Atlantic tells us that Trump poses “a systemic threat to democracy.” Trump, in turn, calls Biden “a destroyer of democracy.” On and on it goes. Democracy, it seems, is all-important, the very essence of America, and that one thing to which all else must yield. It is, said Biden, a “sacred cause”; democracy is our secular religion and our secular god, all rolled into one.

Notably, there are several assumptions here, and several points unstated, which cast a whole new light on our beloved and “sacred” democracy. Of specific importance are four assumptions, all of which are false. These are:

We actually have democracy.
Democracy is a good thing.
The only alternative to democracy is authoritarianism.
“Democracy” is a clear and obvious concept.
Again, all four of these are false, and therefore the current left-right worship of democracy collapses into a pile of nonsense. I discuss all these issues below, but in brief:

(1) Our current systems of government in the US, Canada, and Europe resemble true democracy in name only. What we have is a fake democracy, or “democracy,” which is used to placate and stupefy the masses so that they don’t question the current power structures of the West or seek alternatives. It has long been recognized that the US, for example, is far closer to an oligarchy (“rule by the rich few”) than to a populist democracy in which the will of the masses prevails. [3] Crucially, though, the specific identities of those “rich few” are never examined. Apart from this, even in their very workings, the American (and Western) systems are a far cry from true democracy, as I will show.

(2) Democracy is good for those who profit directly from it: the elite, the rich, celebrities, pop stars. But for the vast majority of people in the so-called democratic nations, the cost to their well-being is extraordinarily high — and largely unacknowledged.

(3) There are in fact several alternatives to democracy, most of which are superior to it — at least, if we believe our wisest thinkers on this matter. Even on the face of it, democracy, as a “rule by the people,” is actually mass-rule, or mob-rule; and everyone knows that the intellectual and moral level of the mass is very low indeed. A basic analysis of any campaign speech confirms this point. [4]

(4) Throughout history, there have been many variants on the democratic model, so to speak of ‘democracy’ as a single, clear idea is ridiculous. Nearly everyone who uses the term today, and certainly those in power, have no real idea of what the theory is.

But the central point here is that, above all, democracy is a means by which a small, invasive minority — the Jews — have proven able to assume power, to acquire vast wealth, and to largely impose their will on a non-Jewish majority, all while keeping these facts largely hidden from view. “Democracy,” or rule by the people, is now a codeword for “Judeocracy,” or rule by the Jews. How this came about is an enlightening story.

Democracy or “Democracy”?

When our leading figures speak of democracy, it is not clear what they mean — nor do I think they even know themselves what they mean. It is pointless to talk about things if we don’t even understand the words we are using. So here is a brief review; apologies to those already knowledgeable on these matters.

Read more:

Killing Non-Jews in Israel: “The New Normal”

A BOOK BY hardline Israeli rabbis justifying the murder of non-Jews will not have to face charges of inciting violence, the Jerusalem High Court said.

Israeli newspaper The Jerusalem Post reported Thursday that the court ruled there was “no basis” for the charges, upholding a 2012 decision by Israel’s Attorney General to not pursue a criminal investigation.

The Torat Hamelech (The King’s Torah) was published in 2009 and sparked controversy and a debate on free speech by arguing that Jewish law allowed, in some cases, for Jewish people to kill non-Jews without being to court.

According to The Jerusalem Post, the book states that anyone who opposes “our kingdom” or encourages attacks against them can be killed, as can children “if there is a good chance they will grow up to be like their evil parents.”

The Attorney General’s 2012 decision argued that the book was a religious study and not aimed at encouraging individuals to violence, despite concern within Israeli society that it could lead to violence against Palestinians.

Several Jewish groups objected the groups, as did senior Rabbis, including the Israel Movement for Reform and Progressive Judaism, which petitioned the High Court to question why there have been no investigation for racial incitement.

Israeli blog Reform Judaism, which supported the petition, wrote in 2012 that the book was “a manual on how Jewish law can justify hate and violence.”

“When the Mufti of Jerusalem gave a sermon about killing Jews, the State opened a criminal investigation in less than a week,” the blog wrote. “When rabbis widely distribute their manual for violence to the masses, the State remains silent.”

* * *

Rabbi: It Is Moral for Jews to Kill Civilians and Children

But we should have “zero tolerance” for Palestinian rock-throwers

by Rabbi Manis Friedman
Bais Chana Institute of Jewish Studies
St. Paul, Minnesota

I DON’T believe in Western morality (i.e. don’t kill civilians or children, don’t destroy holy sites, don’t fight during holiday seasons, don’t bomb cemeteries, don’t shoot until they shoot first because it is immoral).

The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women, and children (and cattle).

The first Israeli prime minister who declares that he will follow the Old Testament will finally bring peace to the Middle East.

First, the Arabs will stop using children as shields. Second, they will stop taking hostages knowing that we will not be intimidated. Third, with their holy sites destroyed, they will stop believing that G-d is on their side. Result: no civilian casualties, no children in the line of fire, no false sense of righteousness — in fact, no war.

Zero tolerance for stone throwing, for rockets, for kidnapping will mean that the state has achieved sovereignty. Living by Torah values will make us a light unto the nations, who suffer defeat because of a disastrous morality of human invention.

(The rabbi later issued a statement claiming that his words referred only to peoples with whom the Jews were at war.)

* * *

Orwell Alert — America’s “Special” Relationship with Israel… in the United States of Clown-World

Why Confronting Israel is Important

The Jewish State is No Friend

by Philip Giraldi

I am often asked why I have this “thing” about Israel, with friends suggesting that I would be much more respected as a pundit if I were to instead concentrate on national security and political corruption. The problem with that formulation is that the so-called “special relationship” with Israel is itself the result of terrible national security and foreign policy choices that is sustained by pervasive political and media corruption, so any honest attempt to examine the one inevitably leads to the other. Most talking heads in the media avoid that dilemma by choosing to completely ignore the dark side of Israel.

Israel – not Russia – is the one foreign country that can interfere with impunity with the political processes in the United States yet it is immune from criticism. It is also the single most significant threat to genuine national security as it and its powerful domestic lobby have been major advocates for the continuation of America’s interventionist warfare state. The decision to go to war on false pretenses against Iraq, largely promoted by a cabal of prominent American Jews in the Pentagon and in the media, killed 4,424 Americans as well as hundreds of thousands Iraqis and will wind up costing the American taxpayer $7 trillion dollars when all the bills...

Read more:

Benjamin Fulford Report: The White Hats Have Won: The United States and Israel Will Cease To Exist; World Peace Will Begin

May 6, 2024

The white hats have won the secret war for the planet Earth. We are now in an interregnum. However, not much will be visible to the public until preparatory work for new institutions and world norms is finished. Public announcements are likely in the autumn.

Nonetheless here are the rough outlines of what is about to happen: The United States of America Corporation will officially declare bankruptcy. The Republic of the United States of North America will replace it. It will build a new capital, possibly in Winnipeg, Manitoba. The state of Israel will also cease to exist. It will be replaced by the state of Judea. The original Judeans (misleadingly called Palestinians) will manage the new state together with the European immigrants. Both peoples will have equal rights and guarantees of religious and personal freedom.

The United Nations Security Council will be replaced with a seven-member World Council. It will probably be headquartered in Laos. The members will be representatives from Africa, the Americas, China, and East Asia excluding China (but including Oceania), Europe (including Russia), India and the Muslim world. Decisions on issues affecting the entire planet will be reached by a majority vote. Each region will have a veto only applicable to that region. With the two exceptions mentioned above, existing nation-states and corporations will continue business as usual.

The transition process to the new system will start with a jubilee. This will involve a one-time cancellation of all debts, public and private. It will also involve a redistribution of assets. The details will be worked out in public with feedback from the people, the private sector, governments and other interested parties.

There will also be war crimes tribunals together with a truth and reconciliation process to ensure the criminality that infested so many governments and institutions is removed root and branch.

The functional parts of the World Bank, the IMF, the BIS, etc. will be taken over by a newly established meritocratically staffed Future Planning Organization. Each region will have its own separate future planning systems.

The Western military-industrial complex will be given a new mission. Instead of stealing resources for oligarchs, they will be protecting earth life, including human life. This means they will be using force, if necessary, to stop things like the destruction of rainforests and overfishing. They will also hunt down and destroy transnational criminal organizations, in particular the global slave traders. They will be subject to international law and act as the enforcement arm of the International Criminal Court.

The decisions mentioned above are the result of years of negotiations between representatives of the East, West, North and South.

A hundred trillion dollars’ worth of gold-backed dollars will be issued to make all these changes possible. Also, as soon as the systems are in place, more funding will be made available to start a massive campaign to end poverty, stop environmental destruction and then massively increase the amount and variety of life.

The big breakthrough that made all this possible came last week when Russia and Persia gave the US military an ultimatum:

Either abandon Israel or watch it be annihilated by nuclear warheads delivered by hypersonic missiles.

Here is what a US Space Force Commander had to say about the situation:

“Persia has more than 30 nuclear active warheads. Persia and Russia are the only nations that have hypersonic missiles with a speed over Mach 20. The Israelis and the Americans don’t have the technology to detect it, let alone intercept them.

This advanced technology from Persia to the US military alliance scientists (under CIC Trump) will be given in exchange for peace in the region.

The US government has agreed to throw Israel under the bus in exchange for this technology.

The US government has sold out Israel, but they have to keep face to the rest of the world.

Israel will pay a heavy price once the situation is sorted out. An independent Palestinian State will be approved within the United Nations, which is going to be done sooner rather than later. It is most likely that the State of Israel will cease to exist and all of Palestine [Judea]: will be restored again.

Israel will have to pay war damages to the Palestinian [Judean] Nation and will have to rebuild the whole Nation free for the Palestinian [Judean] people which means what is left of the Zionist Deep State will have to pay for the reconstruction.

Read more:

Guns = Masculine Generative Principle
Roses = Feminine Generative Principle


National Socialism: World Creed for the Future

WITH THE gigantic catastrophe of 1945, the greatest setback to human evolution in recorded history, still close behind us, its chilling and choking memory still omnipresent, and before us difficulties and disadvantages so gigantic as to deny us any immediate or early prospect of gaining power over our respective countries, what can be done?

One option it may be instantly stated with certainty we do not have in this doleful situation, and whereby it is vastly less doleful than otherwise, is of course to give up.

This is something which a real National Socialist is by nature and by definition utterly incapable of doing because the will to struggle, which is the elixir of National Socialism, is in the very bones of his being.

Without it he would not be who he is, but some spiritual eunuch of the living dead. A real National Socialist is one who, in the last resort, even if it could be proved to him with mathematical certainty that physical defeat would attend all his efforts, would still go on fighting.

He would do so, inflicting as much punishment as possible on the enemy, and with a warrior’s song in his heart, because it is his nature to do so, and because a victory of the spirit is always won thereby.

But having ruled out surrender, what else? In the new convulsive decade of the 1980s is National Socialism to become at best the minute defiant echo of a bygone age, a barren exercise in nostalgia, or at worst the puerile mummery of morons and misfits; or is it to be subjected to cosmetic surgery which National Socialism amounts to castration in order to fit the times? Or is there a way in which it can both respond to circumstances with hope of success, and yet retain its integrity?

Now, on the threshold of a new decade, is high time for some careful and comprehensive stocktaking which must begin with a sharp scrutiny and a complete survey of our ideology.

Changing and Unchanging Creed

A creed is not, while it thrives, a static conception, but something lifelike, growing in the minds of its upholders. Absolute fixity comes only with what amounts to death and mummification.

The measure of its historical stature, its relevance and consequent longevity, lies in its fusion of the timeless and the time-full, or the extent to which it combines a permanent constancy of basic principle with a supple adaptability of form and method to time and place, along with a capacity to grow by the development of its potentialities. Where adaptability encroaches on basic principle itself, modifying this in the pursuit of expediency, the trespass creates its own penalty in the fatal illusion of quicker and easier success, for the creed itself fails and disappears through dismemberment. Therein lies the blindness and folly of compromise.

On the other hand, where inviolability, which belongs to basic principle, is attached to form and method, and where even that change which is pure progression or germination is denied, then the result is no less disastrous. The creed atrophies and becomes a sterile husk because of this particular confusion of the time-full and the timeless. Therein lies the blindness and folly of rigidity.

There is the further complication that ways and means, however optional and variable otherwise, must be consistent with basic principles and thus ultimate objectives. That the ends justify the means is a facile assertion much misunderstood and misapplied in the absence of its corollary, which is that those means must, ipso facto, be in harmony with those ends, which can logically be nothing other than the fulfilment of the basic principles, in order to receive their justification thereby. In fact the ends prescribe the means, and the means, determine the actual results. That is the precise interaction. To repeat an old but worthy analogy: you cannot combat cannibalism by consuming cannibals.

Illusion in Compromise

One cannot promote National Socialism by departing from it, either in the sense of discarding or postponing vital aspects of it, as distinct from truly transitory details of time and place, or resorting to methods which are at variance with basic principles. Those who attempt to do so on the pretext of increasing popularity and quickening victory, and with the assurance that thereafter the real thing will follow, fail to comprehend two facts.

Firstly, they fail to perceive the addictive consequences of compromise, according to which power gained by means of compromise is so likely to be used to retain power by means of compromise.

Secondly, they fail to perceive that the ultimate end or true purpose of National Socialism is not merely a revolution in the state, but a revolution in the minds of…

Read more:

“Scientists” Lie About Transgenderism

HERE’S ANOTHER educational lesson in how the media, including the academic media, lie to people.

A study done by leftist academics concluded that transgender “therapy,” including puberty blockers and opposite sex hormones, “improved the mental health” of children. This conclusion was drawn despite a lack of any evidence which the study discovered. The authors of the study just made it up for reasons pertaining to their political ideology. After their study was published, all the other leftist academics and the “mainstream” (read: Jewish-run) media treated its conclusions as if they were the unquestionable truth, when, indeed, those conclusions were false.

[The study claimed to be following individual adolescents in two cohorts, blocker-taking (defined as “receiving gender-affirming care”) and non-takers, but, among other things, one “cohort” shrank from almost 100 individuals to just six at the end, and the other varied almost as much. When the data clearly showed that the drug-takers had no improvement over time in their perceived mental health, the authors suddenly switched their focus to differences between the cohorts instead, which were meaningless considering that more than 90% of participants dropped out or were not present initially. The really important takeaway from these data, by the way, is that all these people are profoundly mentally ill — an illness induced largely by the Jews’ latest project to disrupt White people’s reproduction, “transgenderism.” — NV Editor]

On “public” radio’s Science Friday, two Jews presented the fraudulent study in full-on propaganda mode:

[Host] IRA FLATOW: Diana, can you walk me through what you found in this study about trans and nonbinary kids and teens?

DIANA TORDOFF: Absolutely. Thank you for having us here today. Our study was conducted at Seattle Children’s Hospital’s Gender Clinic. And our goal was to prospectively follow youth during their first year of receiving care to better understand their experiences, their well-being, as well as barriers they faced in accessing care. So we enrolled 104 trans youth, who are aged 13 to 20. And we found that youth who received puberty blockers or gender-affirming hormones were 60% less likely to be depressed and 73% less likely to have suicidal thoughts, compared to youth who did not receive these medications.

IRA FLATOW: That’s a huge difference.


IRA FLATOW: And major medical associations support gender-affirming care, right?

DIANA TORDOFF: Absolutely. These medications are both safe. And their use in adolescents is supported by a large number of medical and professional societies, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association.

Here’s a brief quote from an article exposing this outrageous fraud (“Researchers Found Puberty Blockers and Hormones Didn’t Improve Trans Kids’ Mental Health at Their Clinic. Then They Published a Study Claiming The Opposite,” Singal-Minded, 6 April 2022):

What’s surprising, in light of all these quotes, is that the kids who took puberty blockers or hormones experienced no statistically significant mental health improvement during the study. The claim that they did improve, which was presented to the public in the study itself, in publicity materials, and on social media (repeatedly) by one of the authors, is false.

The take-away lesson in this is that we have evidence that the academic establishment, in particular the psychiatric and social leftists who pretend to be scientists, are lying to us. We catch them doing it once in a while. This should be enough to destroy the credibility of leftist academics and their politically manipulated study findings.

Furthermore, it seems rather certain that they are lying more often than we can prove that they are lying. It is only common sense to think that anything they might say is fishy, and that we should doubt everything they say.

There are no transgender people because it is not possible to change anyone’s sex. It remains the same no matter what alterations are done to the mind and the body. Jen Psaki has referred to transgender surgery for children as “medically necessary life-saving health care,” and that is a damned lie. Transgender surgery is mutilation. Almost all of those children, if left alone, will be comfortable with the sex into which they were born as they grow older. They’ve been propagandized into entertaining transgenderism as a fad, and they think it won’t harm them because their lying teachers said that…

Read more:

* * *

The Jews Have Created a Transgender Cult: How I Saved My Daughter

On Deportation

THE RACE PROBLEM necessitates deportation / repatriation / resettlement / expulsion. Just as aliens have swamped our territory — have been physically transferred into our homelands to destroy our people — they can be transferred out.

The first step is to immediately and completely halt all “legal” and illegal non-white immigration.

The second step is to reverse the formidable mass of economic and political incentives that were crafted to create the present debacle. This includes enforcing existing immigration law, which is routinely violated by local, state, and federal governments, the judiciary, and law enforcement. It is widely-recognized that such changes would powerfully encourage so-called “self-deportation.”

Though such measures provide a good start and are essential components of any healthy population policy, they are not enough. Inasmuch as we are confronted with an imminent threat to our survival, all non-whites, including Jews, must go. It does not matter how rough the process must be, just as it does not matter to Jews, government, and other anti-white elements how catastrophic their policies are to us (or, for that matter, to Middle Easterners).

The sooner such measures are implemented, the less assimilated and hybridized the imported arrivals remain, the easier and cleaner the process will be. It will become more difficult — though no less necessary — with each passing year before decisive action is taken.

Elsewhere I have noted that not only did Abraham Lincoln not advocate racial mixing, he favored the resettlement of American blacks outside the United States.

Nevertheless, his position was less radical than it sounds. Most blacks did not want to go — quite sensibly from their point of view, since they did not consider themselves Africans — and hardly anyplace wanted to accept them. However, Lincoln insisted that emigration must be noncompulsory and conducted at government expense.

His Virginia-born Attorney General Edward Bates, on the other hand, demanded compulsory deportation: the Negro, he maintained, would never leave voluntarily. Since the correctness of Bates’ position is unassailable, Lincoln’s resettlement policy obviously was not a far-reaching program. (Bates and his South Carolinian wife, by the way, had 17 children in an era when childbirth was nowhere near as safe, or infant mortality rates as inconsequential, as they are today.)

Contra Lincoln, everywhere whites live, in addition to closing the gates to the artificially-created flood of racial aliens, resettlement must be mandatory.

The prevailing policy of white racial destruction — genocide — is a crime according to international law. Because the perpetrators constitute the ruling class, they will not prosecute themselves, any more than Communists were punished after the “fall” of that System.

Mexicans being deported from Los Angeles, 1931
It is palpable that today’s criminals do not occupy any kind of moral high ground. They stand self-condemned under their own laws, never mind their constantly reiterated, hypocritical moral pronouncements.

Ethnic cleansing and genocide conducted by means of mass immigration and other methods are not morally superior to racial separation through mass deportation. What is presently being done is by far the greater evil. Concealment of crimes by the media or elites is not equivalent to non-commission of the underlying acts.

Replacement migration constitutes the next-to-last stage in a comprehensive program that began with anti-colonialism and the relinquishment of white colonies overseas, followed by the destruction of several white-ruled First World nations in southern Africa, one of which possessed nuclear weapons. The latter governments were replaced by black-Jewish coalitions of “ex-” Communists.

As a New York Times reviewer noted, “ethnic cleansing was viewed not so long ago as a legitimate tool of foreign policy. In the early part of the 20th century, forced population shifts were not uncommon, as multicultural empires crumbled and nationalism drove the formation of new, ethnically homogenous countries.”

There are numerous historical precedents for removal, including

Expulsions of Jews from various countries in Europe (1290–1944)
Expulsion of Moors and Moriscos from Spain (1492/1609)
Repatriation of blacks to Africa: The American Colonization Society and Liberia (1816–1847)
The Indian Removal Act (US, 1830)
Russian resettlement of Muslim Circassians, Ubykhs, Abkhaz, and Abaza to the Ottoman Empire (1864–1867)
Reciprocal mass expulsions from Greece and Turkey (the Lausanne Agreement, 1923)
Mexican Repatriation (US, 1930–1935)
Soviet deportation of Koreans to Soviet Central Asia (1937)
Soviet deportation of 1.5 million Crimean Tatars…

Read more:

The Germania, written by the Roman historian Publius Cornelius Tacitus around 98 AD and originally entitled On the Origin and Situation of the Germans (Latin: De origine et situ Germanorum), is a historical and ethnographic work on the Germanic peoples outside the Roman Empire.



Chapter I
Geography of Germany. "The various peoples of Germany are separated from the Gauls by the Rhine, from the Raetians and Pannonians by the Danube, and from the Sarmatians and Dacians by mountains - or, where there are no mountains, by mutual fear.

The northern parts of the country are girdles by the sea, flowing round broad peninsulas and vast islands where a campaign of the present century has revealed to us the existence of some nations and kings hitherto unknown.

The Rhine rises in a remote and precipitous height of the Raetian alps and afterwards turns slightly westward to flow into the North Sea. The Danube issues from a gentle slope of moderate height in the Black Forest, and after passing more peoples than the Rhine in its course discharges itself into the Black Sea through six channels - a seventh mouth being lost in the marshlands.

Chapter II
The Inhabitants. Origins of the Name "Germany". The Germans themselves I should regard as aboriginal, and not mixed at all with other races through immigration or intercourse. For, in former times it was not by land but on shipboard that those who sought to emigrate would arrive; and the boundless and, so to speak, hostile ocean beyond us, is seldom entered by a sail from our world.

And, beside the perils of rough and unknown seas, who would leave Asia, or Africa or Italy for Germany, with its wild country, its inclement skies, its sullen manners and aspect, unless indeed it were his home?

In their ancient songs, their only way of remembering or recording the past they celebrate an earth-born god Tuisco, and his son Mannus, as the origin of their race, as their founders. To Mannus they assign three sons, from whose names, they say, the coast tribes are called Ingaevones; those of the interior, Herminones; all the rest, Istaevones.

Some, with the freedom of conjecture permitted by antiquity, assert that the god had several descendants, and the nation several appellations, as Marsi, Gambrivii, Suevi, Vandilii, and that these are nine old names.

The name Germany, on the other hand, they say is modern and newly introduced, from the fact that the tribes which first crossed the Rhine and drove out the Gauls, and are now called Tungrians, were then called Germans.

Thus what was the name of a tribe, and not of a race, gradually prevailed, till all called themselves by this self-invented name of Germans, which the conquerors had first employed to inspire terror.

Chapter III
The National War-Songs. They say that Hercules, too, once visited them; and when going into battle, they sing of him first of all heroes.

They have also those songs of theirs, by the recital of which ("baritus," they call it), they rouse their courage, while from the note they augur the result of the approaching conflict. For, as their line shouts, they inspire or feel alarm.

It is not so much an articulate sound, as a general cry of valor. They aim chiefly at a harsh note and a confused roar, putting their shields to their mouth, so that, by reverberation, it may swell into a fuller and deeper sound.

Ulysses also, in all those fabled wanderings of his, is supposed by some to have reached the northern sea and visited German lands, and to have founded and named Asciburgium, a town on the Rhine inhabited to this day.

They even add that an altar consecrated by Ulysses and inscribed also with the name of his father Laertes was discovered long ago at this same place, and that certain barrows with monuments upon them bearing Greek inscriptions still exist on the borders of Germany and Raetia.

I do not intend to argue either for or against these assertions; each man must accept or reject them as he feels inclined.

Chapter IV
Physical Characteristics. For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes of Germany are free from all taint of intermarriages with foreign nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout so vast a population.

All have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion. They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their climate and their soil inure them.

Chapter V
Climate and Soil. Precious Metals. Their country, though somewhat various in appearance, yet generally either bristles with forests or reeks with swamps; it is more rainy on the side of Gaul, bleaker on that of Noricum and Pannonia.

Read more:

ARYANS: Who We Are - Indo-European Conquerors

By Dr. William L. Pierce

- Indo-Europeans Conquered Middle East, Perished through Racemixing
- Mighty Hittite Empire Was Built by Nordics, Destroyed by Nordics
- Aryan Warriors Ruled Persian Empire, India
Only Total Separation Can Preserve Racial Quality

BEFORE WE DEAL with the next Indo-European peoples of the Classical Age — the Macedonians and the Romans — let us review briefly the history of our race to this point, and let us also look at the fate of some Indo-Europeans who, unlike those we have already studied, invaded Asia instead of Europe.

The White race of today consists of three principal White elements — plus, unfortunately, a certain admixture of non-White elements. The former are the Cro-Magnon element, a White Mediterranean element, and the Nordic element.

Original Europeans

The Cro-Magnons were the original White people of Europe. Their traces go back 35,000 years, into the last of the great Ice Ages. They were a tall, rugged race, a race of hunters, who thrived on the frozen tundra which covered most of Europe during Upper Paleolithic times. They were the most culturally advanced race on the planet during those times: their art and their skill in making weapons, clothing, and tools surpassed those of all other races.

When the glaciers retreated about 10,000 years ago, some Cro-Magnon tribes followed them northward, continuing their ages-old lifestyle as big-game hunters. Their descendants today are to be found primarily in Scandinavia and the British Isles.

Other Cro-Magnon tribes learned new lifestyles along the seacoasts of northern Europe or in the forests which sprang up across Europe in the wake of the glaciers. But these Cro-Magnon tribes of the Mesolithic Age, whose members lived by hunting, fishing, and gathering, were spread quite thinly across Europe, Their lifestyles were not suited for a high population density.

Neolithic Revolution

Along the southern coastal fringes of Europe and in adjacent areas of northern Africa and the Middle East — areas which had been less affected by the great ice sheets of the previous age — lived men who were smaller and more gracile than the Cro-Magnons of the northern forests and coasts. Collectively they were the Mediterraneans, although they were by no means as nearly racially homogenous a group as the Cro-Magnons. Some we would have regarded as White and some as non-White, although it might have been difficult to decide just where to draw the line.

When the glaciers began retreating in Europe, the climate of the Mediterranean area changed as well. Varieties of wild, grain-bearing grasses flourished, and men began deliberately cultivating these grasses as a food supply. They also began keeping animals as a food source, instead of relying solely upon hunting. Thus began the Neolithic Revolution.

The Neolithic Revolution caused a population explosion, with an enormous increase in population density in those areas which had shifted from hunting and gathering foodstuffs to stock raising and farming. As the climatic zone suitable for farming advanced northward, the farming peoples flooded into a Europe with a relatively low population density, racially swamping the Cro-Magnon inhabitants in many areas.

Two civilizations arose in the wake of the Neolithic Revolution, one in the Middle East and one in Europe. The latter civilization, centered in the Balkan area, we have called Old Europe.


Then, around the middle of the fifth millennium B.C., a new racial type made its first impact on Old Europe. The people of this type were taller and more rugged than the White Mediterraneans, but not so tall or rugged as the Cro-Magnons. They were the Nordics, and 7,000 years ago they occupied a large area in Russia, mostly steppeland, north of the Black Sea and between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea.

Their language was Proto-Indo-European, from which Greek and Latin and the great Germanic, Celtic, and Slavic language families of Europe evolved. They were an extraordinarily energetic people, who hunted, farmed, and raised livestock. In particular, they domesticated horses, riding them and using them to pull their swift, light, two-wheeled chariots over the grassy plains.

Their social structure was aristocratic, and their religion was solar. They were, in contrast to the Mediterraneans, quite homogeneous racially and culturally. Homogeneity was a consequence of the mobility which their use of horses gave them; men from the extreme limits of the ancient Nordic homeland were able to remain in genetic and cultural contact.

When these Nordic horsemen of the northern steppes (or battle-axe people, as they have been called) outgrew their grassy homeland, some of them migrated westward into Europe. We have followed the fortunes…

Read more:

Germany: Jewish Propaganda Losing its Grip

ONE IN EVERY TEN Germans wants their country to be led by a ‘Führer’ applying ‘a firm hand for the common good.’

And 71 years after National Socialist Germany was overrun by Communist and “democratic” conquerors, 11 per cent of people questioned by the university researchers said Jews have too much influence in society.

Overall 12 per cent think Germans are by nature superior to certain other peoples [the original article did not specify further]. Other findings included four out of every ten people thinking Muslims should be prohibited from immigrating to the country and half of respondents in a survey of 2,240 people saying they feel like ‘foreigners in their own country.’

Thirty per cent claimed Germany had been ‘infiltrated by too many foreigners in a dangerous way.’ And three out of every five Germans believe migrants who have arrived in the country seeking sanctuary from war and terror are bogus. ‘They are not really at risk of any persecution in their home country” was the question they agreed with.

The study entitled ‘The uninhibited middle’ argues “extremist” thinking has become more acceptable in mainstream German society — and some Germans are actually daring to express the radical “extremist” idea that they should have their own country again.

The immigrant-critical Alternative for Germany (AfD) party delivered hammer blows to Chancellor Angela Merkel’s CDU conservatives in regional polls in March and looks set to send MPs into national government in the general election in the autumn of next year.

Report co-author Dr Elmar Braehler said ‘The potential for extreme right or populist right-wing parties is still higher than what electoral results have yet shown.’

The survey noted an increase in negative attitudes towards Gypsies, with half of respondents saying such people should be banned from city centres.

And attitudes toward perverts are moving in the opposite direction from those desired by the billionaire Jews and their politician employees: 40 percent of people said they found it ‘disgusting’ when homosexuals kissed in public — an increase of 15 per cent in a similar survey in 2011.

* * *

Countering Jewish CivNat Propaganda

I SAW an Internet commenter’s thread promoting civic nationalism, and chimed in with some important facts of which his readers needed to become aware.

* * *

YOU WERE doing well, Dennis, until you started trying to distinguish nationalism from racism. Nationalism is about race, always. (If there’s a word for “allegiance to the state,” it doesn’t come to mind just now.)

The key to understanding the meaning of nationalism correctly is found it the first three letters of that word: *nat.*

It means birth, and it prefixes a number of words that should illustrate the principle involved.


And nationalism: a love of the people who share with you a common birth (or ancestry).

A nationalist is someone who loves the people who are descended from the same fathers that are his fathers also. Nationalism is racism. Your race is your nation.

Any alternative way of defining citizenship defines a country; it does not define a nation.

The governments of many countries have long engaged in a form of semantic propaganda, in which they (try to) seduce people into the belief that the country and the nation are the same thing. It isn’t.

Humans evolved to be tribal. And whereas it may be possible, at times, to configure a country that works (is productive, is at peace with itself) while being multi-racial, this state is difficult to maintain because it is psychologically unstable. It will fall apart like a house of cards when adversity arises.

It is much better, by far, to organize a country as a nation, with one race, and one race only. This was Hitler’s idea, and it was, and still is, a good idea. Of course, there are other potential causes of disunity, including religious differences, but when you make a true nation — that is, a racially homogeneous country — you eliminate the biggest source of disunity.

Now I understand that you are Jewish, and that Jews have a long, long, long habit of going into other people’s territories, and then changing the cultural norms and the social value systems and the laws of the host peoples, converting what had been a nation into a mere country, beset by problems with cultural conflict, misinformation, and debts arising out of usury.

Your ideal is the Jewish one, and it is a parasite’s ideal, the ideal of a people who use other people to gain what they want.

There are niches in Nature for parasites. But only a hypocrite blames the animal who does his best to scratch the fleas out of his fur or bite off any tick that has bitten him. And that, really, is what…

Read more:

* * *

The Jews Are Our Misfortune Redux

American Dissident Voices broadcast of 4 May, 2024

Listen to Broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

FOR SEVERAL years now, especially since the George Floyd riots and the 2021 coup that installed Resident Biden, anti-White and Soros-backed prosecutors’ offices in our major cities have refused to prosecute even flagrant cases of shoplifting, theft, rioting, mayhem, and other crimes, including some violent crimes. Some cities have even openly announced that certain laws will no longer be enforced, because they want to stop what they sometimes refer to as the “disproportionate policing” of “people of color,” a part of America’s massive “systemic racism” problem, they claim. So criminals, Brown criminals anyway, go free. Officers are basically forbidden to make arrests for a long list of infractions. The thieves and looters have free rein and no fear of arrest across many major urban areas. Thousands of business closures have been the result. There are now entire YouTube channels devoted to showing the empty buildings in our cities which just a few years ago were filled with thriving businesses. The private property of homeowners and business owners large and small are unprotected and have been for several years now.

But all of sudden, this week, for “some reason or other,” everything changed. Hundreds of super-aggressive, violent, and legally questionable arrests suddenly started being made — ostensibly, to protect the “private property rights” of universities. The real reason, though, was this: The “word went out” from the real rulers of America and the West — the Jewish power structure — that the increasingly massive and spontaneous protests on US campuses against Israel’s genocide of Palestinians “must be shut down.”

The protests have mostly taken the form of meetings, speeches, and tent encampments that last for days or weeks on open squares of the college grounds. In some cases, the students have also occupied university buildings. The Jewish-controlled media, Republican Israel-worshippers, and university spokesmen have repeatedly claimed that “outside agitators” deserve credit for the protests, but have provided almost zero evidence of this. (I think if you went down to the protest in your city and handed out a few dozen National Alliance fliers or stickers — not a bad idea, really — there would instantly be claims in the media that “racist Nazi outside agitators” from Upper East Tennessee were really controlling everything. What fun!) But this is mainly a real student-driven phenomenon. These young people come from a lot of different backgrounds, but nearly all of them, including protest leaders, really are students and really are deeply outraged at the ongoing invasion, displacement, starvation, daily torture, and massacre of the Jews’ latest innocent victims. The students are demanding an end to Israel’s war against largely defenseless Gaza that has killed nearly 40,000 so far and destroyed the homes and workplaces of millions, and they are also demanding that their universities’ typically massive endowment funds divest themselves completely from Israel-linked companies and thereby stop funding the Israeli war machine. They also decry US support for the genocidal Jewish state.

I’ve seen drone footage from some of these protests, and they are massive. The encampment squares often overflow with people, doubtless including thousands who have come to listen and learn, and the crowd sometimes spreads out to cover the streets for blocks. It’s true, I suppose, that these squares and buildings are technically the private property of the anti-White propaganda mills and financial behemoths that our universities have become, but I can’t fault the students — many of whose families slave to pay huge tuitions, or who mortgage their futures to rapacious Jewish banks so they can attend — for having a certain feeling of ownership there. And I also can’t fault them for their encampments and their civil disobedience. Wasn’t the Jewish press all warm and fuzzy about civil disobedience back when St. Michael King was using it as a tactic against the “evil Whites” who used to run America? They loved civil disobedience then. But now that students are protesting against Israel and Zionism — and their murderous crimes — and their power over America, well now it’s time to start swinging billy clubs and bashing heads and making arrests! (And they’ve done more than that. Jewish-run political agitators have actually printed the names and faces and residencies of pro-Palestinian protestors on the sides of huge trucks, along with accusations that these people are “terrorists,” and driven the…

Read more:

If the concept of problem, reaction, solution had a mascot it would the this group of psychiatrists.

Also see the Frankfurt School.


You’re Being Manipulated

OUR REALITY is carefully constructed by powerful corporate, political and special interest sources in order to covertly sway public opinion. Blatant lies are often televised regarding terrorism, food, war, health, etc. They are fashioned to sway public opinion and condition viewers to accept what have become destructive societal norms.

The practice of manipulating and controlling public opinion with distorted media messages has become so common that there is a whole industry formed around this. The entire role of this brainwashing industry is to figure out how to spin information to journalists, similar to the lobbying of government. It is never really clear just how much truth the journalists receive because the news industry has become complacent. The messages that it presents are shaped by corporate powers who often spend millions on advertising with the six conglomerates that own 90% of the media: General Electric (GE), News-Corp, Disney, Viacom, Time Warner, and CBS. Yet, these corporations function under many different brands, such as Fox, ABC, CNN, Comcast, Wall Street Journal, etc, giving people the perception of choice.

“As Tavistock’s researchers showed, it was important that the victims of mass brainwashing not be aware that their environment was being controlled; there should thus be a vast number of sources for information, whose messages could be varied slightly, so as to mask the sense of external control.” — Specialist of mass brainwashing, L. Wolfe

New Brainwashing Tactics Called ‘Astroturf’

With alternative media on the rise, the propaganda machine continues to expand. Below is a video of Sharyl Attkisson, investigative reporter with CBS, during which she explains how “astroturf,” or fake grassroots movements, are used to spin information not only to influence journalists but to sway public opinion.

“Astroturf is a perversion of grassroots. Astroturf is when political, corporate or other special interests disguise themselves and publish blogs, start facebook and twitter accounts, publish ads, letters to the editor, or simply post comments online, to try to fool you into thinking an independent or grassroots movement is speaking.” ~ Sharyl Attkisson, Investigative Reporter

Astroturf and manipulation of media messages | Sharyl Attkisson | TEDxUniversityofNevada

How do you separate fact from fiction? Sharyl Attkisson finishes her talk with some insights on how to identify signs of propaganda and astroturf.

Here is a summary of astroturf tactics. Once you’re aware of them, you will notice just how popular they have truly become:

- Creating of Wikipedia pages, monitored by corporations.
- Creating a social media presence, including Facebook and Twitter accounts, run by paid professionals.
- Secretly funding non-profit organizations to create third-party support and web presence.
- Search engine optimizing web pages such as blogs and third-party sites that support a specific agenda.
- Financing industry research that is deceitfully presented as independent opinion.
- Funding experts working on unrelated projects, while in reality creating paid consultants.

These methods are used to give people the impression that there is widespread support for an agenda, when, in reality, one may not exist. Astroturf tactics are also used to discredit or criticize those that disagree with certain agendas, using stereotypical names such as conspiracy theorist or quack. When in fact when someone dares to reveal the truth or questions the ‘official’ story, it should spark a deeper curiosity and encourage further scrutiny of the information.

* * *

What is Cultural Marxism?

What is Cultural Marxism?

Bradford Hanson BRADFORD HANSON (EDITOR) · 13 FEBRUARY, 2019

MARXISM ENTERED the world stage in 1848 when the Jew Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published The Communist Manifesto. It’s important to understand that communism’s ultimate goal was always a worldwide revolution and worldwide government. As it was the rich, white West that dominated world affairs at that point in time, it was the West that communists sought to attack, believing (with good reason) that the rest of the world would fall after the West was conquered.

Communism won a substantial victory when Russia was captured during the “Russian” revolution in 1917. The Marxists believed that world war would cause the workers to rise up and seize power in Western countries — but it didn’t happen; the workers didn’t revolt, despite the destitution that followed WWI. The Marxist theorists subsequently set about…

Read more:

We thought we knew Paris Hilton. We were wrong. This is the untold true story that shaped the woman, and the iconic character she created.

Text PARIS to 833-240-3728 for updates

0:00 Intro
5:20 Paris’ Early Years
12:00 Nicky Weighs In
16:37 A Crazy Lifestyle
31:25 Nightmares
44:28 The Teenage Years
51:08 Bad Relationships
1:09:53 Stories of Abuse
1:20:50 Survivors Reunion
1:30:02 Breaking the Silence
1:37:45 Telling Mom The Truth
1:42:02 Credits


Paris and her Sister are both male MTF Androgyne Trannies like Jessica Simpson, Jennifer Aniston, and the rest of Victoria’s Secret Models (See Mr. E). This is why Paris needed to use a surrogate to have children. You can see by her nipples they are small male nipples and under her panties in many of her photos is a very small penis from taking female hormones since birth just like Jennifer Anniston’s bikini photos of her on the beach.


Paris Hilton And Kim Kardashian Best Friends Forever Turned Frenamies | TransVestigation LadyBoys Let's go Transpocalypse | Tyrannosaurus Jurassic Treat Awaits YOU!


Paris Hilton gets candid about why she thought she was asexual

Paris Hilton is getting candid about navigating her sexuality and why she thought she was asexual in her 20s.

Hilton became a household name in the early 2000s, and her fame was magnified by her 2003 reality show The Simple Life, in which she starred alongside Nicole Richie.

Throughout her time in the spotlight, Hilton had several high-profile relationships, and she recently opened up about her journey with her sexuality throughout her early 20s.

Hilton explained that she privately thought of herself as asexual because of her disinterest in sex, saying “anything sexual terrified” her.

“I was known as a sex symbol, but anything sexual terrified me,” she told Harper’s Bazaar.

“I called myself the ‘kissing bandit’ because I only liked to make out. A lot of my relationships didn’t work out because of that.”

Hilton described how her view of herself and her sexuality was complicated because of her past experiences. She recounted being groomed by a male teacher in middle school, her sex tape was released against her will in 2004 and she was romantically linked with a celebrity each week.

It wasn’t until she met her now-husband, Carter Reum, in 2019 that she felt comfortable with her sexuality. She came to better understand herself and realised that asexual was no longer the best way to describe herself.

“It wasn’t until Carter that I finally am not that way,” she said. “I enjoy hooking up with my husband.”

Paris Hilton described Reum as the “opposite of what [she] had been used to when [she] was looking for guys”. She said he is “smart” and a “good person”.

The couple fell in love quickly after meeting in 2019, moved in together and got married in November 2021. They welcomed their first child together, via surrogate, earlier this year.

“I just feel like after all the hell I’ve been through, I’m finally getting what I deserve, which is someone I can trust and someone to build a real life with,” Hilton said.

Paris Hilton also reflected on the way she was treated by the media and the public abuse she faced in the 2000s. She said she was treated like “sport” alongside Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan

“We were just young girls discovering life, going out to a party. And we were villainized for it,” she said.

She added that she’s happy to have made it out on the other side and “proud of the woman that [she’s] become”.

Paris Hilton has been a long-term friend of Britney Spears and openly spoke out against Spears’ conservatorship, which long traumatised and exploited the “Toxic” singer.

When Spears’ conservatorship ended in 2021, Hilton tweeted that she was “so happy that this day has finally come”. Hilton said the singer was the most “resilient, kind and inspiring soul”.

In 2022, Hilton revealed she turned down a gig to perform for president Joe Biden and “all the leaders of the world” because she didn’t want to miss Spears’ wedding.

The reality TV star said the wedding was “one of the most iconic nights” of her life, and she was emotional when Spears walked down the aisle.

“Seeing her walk down the aisle, this angel, who’s just had a horrible time these past 13 years to finally have her freedom and to be able to do what she wants and have that happy fairytale ending was just beautiful,” Hilton said.




Diversity is THEIR Strength: The Elites’ War on Humanity

by Dr. William L. Pierce

THREE OR FOUR years ago the slogan most diligently promoted by the controlled mass media was “diversity is our strength.” Posters with this slogan and a broad, multi-hued band of stripes representing skin colors of various races were displayed in classrooms and workplaces all over the country. Clothing advertisements in all of the slick, yuppie magazines pushed the same theme. The idea was that the fewer White people and the more Blacks and Browns and Yellows we have in America, the stronger and more prosperous we’ll be.

I had friends who laughed at this propaganda campaign. They couldn’t believe that anything so stupid would catch on. I didn’t laugh, because I had learned long ago that P.T. Barnum was right on target when he said that no one had ever lost a nickel by underestimating the intelligence of the American public. Actually, it’s not that the public is stupid in the sense that they can’t learn how to tie their shoes or get across the street safely. It is that the public will believe anything if they believe that others believe it. That’s the lemming factor. And this “diversity is our strength” brainwashing campaign was pushed hard. You saw this foolishness wherever you looked. And pretty soon it was clear that the lemmings had begun to believe it. My hate mail began containing indignant questions such as, “Why are you against immigration? Don’t you know that diversity is our strength?”

This promotion by the Clinton government and the media of the nutty idea that the more diversity we have the stronger we are didn’t really change any policies or trends. I suspect that the aim of the media bosses in launching it was to head off growing restlessness about the refusal of the government to control America’s borders. Illegal immigrants were pouring into the country — and of course, still are — and the Clinton government was pretending not to notice, but many ordinary citizens were noticing and weren’t happy. The media bosses decided to stifle the criticism of the Clinton government’s immigration policies by persuading the lemmings that immigration, legal or illegal, is a good thing, as long as the immigrants aren’t White, because non-White immigrants add to our “diversity” and thereby make the country stronger.

And the government kept doing just what it had been doing, and the diversity has kept increasing. The consequences are catching up with us, and they aren’t good — but the diversity-mongers are maintaining their pretense that we’re becoming stronger and stronger by becoming less and less White. A few days ago I saw a brief report on the CNN news program I watch about the increasing diversity in America’s classrooms. More and more of the children in America’s schools were born in the Third World, or their parents were, and, oh, isn’t it a wonderful thing? Just imagine how much stronger our schools are than they used to be!

Well, yes: we have a lot more metal detectors in the schools than we used to. I guess that’s a sign of strength. We’ve had more school shootings since the beginning of the Clinton era than in the whole prior existence of the United States. The experience of dodging bullets undoubtedly strengthens the students. The pregnancy rate of unwed White female teenagers in the schools is approaching the Black rate. Probably that’s a sign of strength too.

One of the nuttiest expositions of the “diversity is our strength” creed that I’ve heard is the one put forth by Federal Judge Patrick Duggan last December in his ruling on a discrimination suit against the University of Michigan by two White students who were denied admission while less-qualified non-White students were admitted. The judge, in ruling against the White students and in favor of the university’s racial quota system, abandoned the old liberal argument that quotas are needed to make up for supposed past injustices to Blacks and other non-Whites. The reason for making the university more “diverse,” according to the judge, was not to benefit minorities. It was to benefit the university and its White students. The real goal of our universities is not to educate students in the traditional sense but rather to condition them to become “active participants in our pluralistic, democratic society once they leave.”

Judge Duggan believes — or says he believes — that racial diversity strengthens the university and the White students in it by rubbing their noses in as much diversity as possible and thus conditioning them for life in the New World Order of democracy and multiculturalism where there will be no White majority in America or anywhere else, if he and his kind are successful.

Read more:


Created 3 years, 10 months ago.

1768 videos

Category News & Politics

The Patriot Channel delivers videos and documentaries online on The Patriot Channel reaches tens of thousands of people every month seeking an alternative to the mainstream media covering politics, entertainment and current events from a pro-white pro-European Paleo-conservative perspective. The Patriot Channel has over 1,750 videos and over 800,000 views.


Subscribe to the Patriot Channel

National Vanguard News


Hot Dating


Unalienable Rights

Unalienable Rights are the Inherent, Sovereign, Natural Rights that existed before the creation of the State, and which, being antecedent to and above the State, can never be taken away, diminished, altered, or levied by the State, except by Due Process of Law.

The Original, Permanent, Unalienable Rights of every Man or Woman, includes:

1.) The Right to Life, Freedom, Health and the Pursuit of Happiness
2.) The Right to Contract, or Not to Contract, which is Unlimited
3.) The Right to Eama Living Income by being Compensated with Wages or a
Salary in a Fair Exchange for one's Work
4.) The Right to Travel in the Ordinary Course of one's Life and Business
5.) The Right to Privacy and Confidentiality, free from Unwarranted Invasion
6.) The Right to Own, and Hold Property, lawfully without Trespass
7.) The Right to Self-Defense when threatened with Harm, Loss, or Deceit
8.) The Right to Due Process of Law, with Notice and Opportunity to Defend
9.) The Right to be Presumed Innocent, suffering No Detention or Arrest, No Search or Seizure, without Reasonable Cause
10.) The Right to Remain Silent when accused, to avoid Self-Incrimination
11.) The Right to Equality in the eyes of the Law, and to Equal Representation
12.) The Right to Trial by Jury, being an Impartial Panel of one's Peers
13.) The Right to Appeal in Law against Conviction or Sentence, or both
14.) The Right to Expose Knowledge necessary to one's Rights and Freedoms
15.) The Right to Peaceful Association, Assembly, Expression, and Protest
16.) The Right to Practice a Religion, and to have Beliefs, of one's choosing
17.) The Right to Love, and to Consensual Marriage with Children, as a Family
18.) The Right to Security from Abuse, Persecution, Tyranny, and War
19.) The Right to Refuse to Kill under command, by reason of Conscience
20.) The Right to Live in Peace and be left alone when Law-Abiding

Surely, the most critical failure of The People is their failure to ensure the teaching and common knowledge of their Unalienable Rights if you do not know your Rights, you effectively have none. By the path of ignorance, whether by Apathy or Deception. The People arrive in a State of Exploitation, Oppression, and Tyranny.


The Consent of the Governed Essential Principles

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed "

The United States of America was the first modern state formed around the principle of consent of the governed. The term implies that the people of a country or territory have the right of self-rule and must consent, either in a direct referendum or through elected representatives, to the establishment of their own government. In most modern cases, the form of the state is a repubic, or rule by voting citizens within an agreed-upon constitutional and legal framework. But some monarchies also operate with the consent of the governed, as in the United Kingdom, where over time the monarch has given up most political and administrative functions to elected officials and the government is formed through regular elections.

Government / Aristocracy has no power except the power bestowed upon it by the people.


Information on this website is for informational and educational and entertainment purposes. This website contains humor, parody, and satire. We have included this disclaimer for our protection, on the advice of legal counsel.

Please use your own discernment when reading, watching or engaging in the content shared on this website whether intentionally or involuntarily, directly or indirectly. The views expressed in the articles, videos and other content are those of third party content authors and do not necessarily reflect the perspective or beliefs of The Patriot Channel staff or affiliated and unaffiliated person(s) or personnel.