Price increases vs calling dibs as a method for having enough product. The lockdown is due to regulations, not the virus itself, as admitted by State official.

Price increases vs calling dibs as a method for having enough product. The lockdown is due to regulations, not the virus itself, as admitted by State official.

The injunction on enforcing the new definition of the public charge rule has been lifted. The case has yet to be finally decided. Although the US Federal Government is not going to apply ANYTHING in a sane and efficient manner or without committing thefts, the rule, AS WRITTEN, is not an act of aggression.

https://www.uscis.gov/legal-resources/final-rule-public-charge-ground-inadmissibility

https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/19A785-1.pdf

None

None

None

None

Draft Dodging

Objection must be based on a god, not just moral or philosophical values. 380 U.S. 163 (1965) UNITED STATES v. SEEGER. Welsh inconclusively expands the exemption.

“A further word may be said to clarify our statutory holding. Apart from abstract theological reservations, two other sorts of reservations concerning use of force have been thought by lower courts not to defeat a conscientious objector claim. Willingness to use force in self-defense, in defense of home and family, or in defense against immediate acts of aggressive violence toward other persons in the community, has not been regarded as inconsistent with a claim of conscientious objection to war as such.” Gillette v. United States, 401 US 437 - Supreme Court 1971 Must object to ALL war.

Can not claim status after inducted. Ehlert v. United States, 402 US 99 - Supreme Court 1971

“He must show that he is conscientiously opposed to war in any form. Gillette v. United States, 401 U. S. 437. He must show that this opposition is based upon religious training and belief, as the term has been construed in our decisions. United States v. Seeger, 380 U. S. 163; Welsh v. United States, 398 U. S. 333. And he must show that this objection is sincere.Witmer v. United States, 348 U. S. 375."
Clay v. United States, 403 US 698 - Supreme Court 1971

Its cool if you want to fight in Armageddon. Sicurella v. United States, 348 US 385 - Supreme Court 1955

Have to be a real minister. Dickinson v. United States, 346 US 389 - Supreme Court 1953

Fire- Theft or Piracy?

Leaving Your Children to Die in a Car is Marxist

In the first episode of Total Anarchy we discussed defensive force against cops, the appropriate argument to make to your audience, the NAP status of welfare, the NAP status of immigration, and the NAP statute of advocating an increase in statism.

Next episode will be filmed on a different application and will be higher quality.