This is the CREATOR OF mRna..
I suggest you listen to the Person Who Knows how it Works Because it was him who Made the break through Tec!
And is Proving the Jab is what is Killing people.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bItcoUb5xsw

Its only a Theory To WEF Muppets even after its Proven!
No Rain till its too late for crops and Orange heat domes..
Perfect if you want to buy Farm land and do nothing with it like Bill Gates.

Trudeau Turn on the oil you...............WEF FREAK

Yet they are still pushing it..

They are all The same! Nazis OR Globalist Cowards
One Thing for sure is they are Not listening to the NEEDS Of the Majority of Canadians.
But Now Maybe With Pfizers own documents They will now listen to We the people.

This Video needs to Go viral Please Share and Download!
AP Fact Check is busted and by doing so just helped prove to the world they are helping Trudeau and his Criminal monopoly and conspiracy

Tireroaster's Garage

Tireroaster's Garage

This Should have been the End a long time ago

Oh and Fuck youtube you want to prevent me from making and posting videos on your Communist platform thats one thing but to block access to a Publicly used service, Well Thats a whole other bag of Nazi Bullshit now isnt it. Both are violations of my Rights and To fuck with how you feel you pricks

David Eggen on the rights of Albertans and their oath they swore to uphold and claim they work for us but We are all powerless?

He also Files for the Climate Change issues We all know are causing.

They have no Power, We have no Power. So what is Canada Then?
they dont do their job.. Excuses me
How many ethics committees, how many blocked testimony.
No pal they have proven once in power, We the people are and have always been powerless.

Albertan Challenges Province and Health officials on Covid19 to show there is an emergency on top of justifying these restrictions while trespass on Canadians rights and Freedoms.
Obviously they cant Produce it.
So What are these Jabs Really for then?

Now With patents
Gain-of-function research (GoF research or GoFR) is medical research that alters an organism or disease in a way that increases pathogenesis, transmissibility, or host range (the types of hosts that a microorganism can infect). This research is intended to reveal targets to better predict emerging infectious diseases and to develop vaccines and therapeutics. For example, influenza B can only infect humans and harbor seals.[1] Introducing a mutation that would allow influenza B to infect rabbits in a controlled laboratory situation would be considered a "gain of function" experiment as the virus did not previously have that function.[2][3] However, such an experiment could help reveal which parts of the virus are responsible for its host range, enabling the creation of antiviral medicines which block this function.[3]

In virology, gain-of-function research is employed with the intention of better understanding current and future pandemics.[4] In vaccine development, gain-of-function research is conducted in the hope of gaining a head start on a virus and being able to develop a vaccine or therapeutic before it emerges.[4] The term "gain of function" is sometimes applied more narrowly to refer to "research which could enable a pandemic-potential pathogen to replicate more quickly or cause more harm in humans or other closely-related mammals."[5][6]

Some forms of gain-of-function research (specifically work which involves certain select agent pathogens) carry inherent biosafety and biosecurity risks, and are thus also referred to as dual use research of concern (DURC).[7] To mitigate these risks while allowing the benefits of such research, various governments have mandated that DURC experiments be regulated under additional oversight by institutions (so-called institutional "DURC" committees)[8] and government agencies (such as the NIH's recombinant DNA advisory committee).[9][10][11] A mirrored approach can be seen in the European Union's Dual Use Coordination Group (DUCG).[12][13][14]

Importantly, the US and EU regulations both mandate that an unaffiliated member of the public (or several) be "active participants" in the oversight process.[15][16][17][18] Significant debate has taken place in the scientific community on how to assess the risks and benefit of gain-of-function research, how to publish such research responsibly, and how to engage the public in an open and honest review.[19][20][7][21] As of January 2020, the United States is convening an expert panel to revisit the rules for gain-of-function research and provide more clarity in how such experiments are approved, and when they should be disclosed to the public.[22]