I made this little filmlet as a result on the penultimate piece in my series of articles on Timothy Snyder's Yale course on Ukrainian history, and that piece including some of the segment in the Netflix propadoc Turning Point on the cold war where it addresses the '90s Russian oligarchs, and features Bill Browder as an "expert". Here is the url for that piece on my substack: https://men56.substack.com/p/ukraine-russia-and-the-bending-of-c56

A few things to note in the segment on the beginning of Browder's deposition:

- The matter involved is, as you can hear, US vs Prevezon Holdings, which evolved into one of the more notable issues involved in the Russiagate story, linked to the Don Jr. meeting at Trump Tower.

- The deposition took place in April of 2015 and the video of Browder fleeing the subpoena serving into the snowy darkness of Manhattan was posted (by the server) in February of 2015, so I assume that these are regarding the same matter. You can hear from his attorney that Browder is only testifying because he’s been subpoenaed to do so.

- He also clearly wanted the deposition to be confidential, which likely was because he was going to say things that contradicted what he’d been saying (and continues to say) in public. For instance, he always refers to Magnitsky as his lawyer, but I believe somewhere in the deposition he admits Magnitsky wasn’t a lawyer at all, he was an accountant and didn’t have a law degree or any certification to practice law.

- At the swearing-in Browder raises his left hand and has to be told to raise his right - one assumes he did that to avoid being prosecuted for lying under oath, based on a faulty swearing-in.

- At one point the defense attorney mentions Browder’s law firm Firestone Duncan, which includes his attorney in Russia Jamison “Jamie” Firestone (Feuerstein?). Later two of the people listening are identified as Denis Katsyv (owner of Prevezon) and Natalia Veselnitskaya (the Russian attorney who also attended the Don Jr./Manafort Trump Tower meeting).

It's important to remember this lump of feces because he's still out there...

Was 10/7 the moment that changed everything? A brief (??) appraisal of where things stand a half year down that road.

This is a video reading of my substack article posted on April 10, a test of a new feature that I may continue doing, at least from time to time.

Was 10/7 the moment that changed everything? A brief (??) appraisal of where things stand a half year down that road.

This is a video reading of my substack article posted on April 10, a test of a new feature that I may continue doing, at least from time to time.

Was 10/7 the moment that changed everything? A brief (??) appraisal of where things stand a half year down that road.

This is a video reading of my substack article posted on April 10, a test of a new feature that I may continue doing, at least from time to time.

In this final part I cover what Tucker had to say about his vision of his future news network, in which he's revealing of his thoughts about (((power))) reflected in corporate news and his role in changing that. My conclusion is that he and I are same but not same same...

I take a look at last Friday's Glenn Greenwald interview of Tucker Carlson, where for 20-25 minutes they talk almost exclusively about the impact of Jews on our government and society. Of course without ever using the word "Jew" or even really suggesting the reality of the situation.

In part one the subjects are neoconservatism (re Russiagate and Ukraine) and neoliberalism, both getting rightfully bashed. But in part two the subject changes essentially to Holocaustism and Cultural Marxism, as Tucker decides to praise two past ethno-operatives involved at the very beginning of these two belief systems and how much we've lost in their passing from the scene - while their unstated legacy dominates our culture more than ever.

I take a look at last Friday's Glenn Greenwald interview of Tucker Carlson, where for 20-25 minutes they talk almost exclusively about the impact of Jews on our government and society. Of course without ever using the word "Jew" or even really suggesting the reality of the situation.

In part one the subjects are neoconservatism (re Russiagate and Ukraine) and neoliberalism, both getting rightfully bashed. But in part two the subject changes essentially to Holocaustism and Cultural Marxism, as Tucker decides to praise two past ethno-operatives involved at the very beginning of these two belief systems and how much we've lost in their passing from the scene - while their unstated legacy dominates our culture more than ever.

Are we now at the moment where the extent of Jewish power and influence in the US and beyond will rise up to the level of open public discourse? Is the combination of the ethnic-cleansing in Gaza and the resulting suppression of oppositional speech enough to do that at last?
The specific matter today is the open suppression of speech at elite universities, most visibly driven by billionaire Jewish oligarchs. In this video I show two people addressing this, Max Blumenthal and Glenn Greenwald, two post-progressive independent Jewish journalists who in my view are going in separate direction today. While Max is going further than ever before in the direction of addressing the truth, Glenn is playing both sides in an increasingly-obvious way.

I have been discussing this in recent articles on substack, particularly related to Greenwald. Since I rushed through it at the end, here is one on the TikTok/Oracle matter: https://men56.substack.com/p/heebocrisy-ii-tall-tiktok-tales

And here is one where I make a comparison between Blumenthal, Greenwald and Taibbi, examples of this class of journalists getting better, getting worse, and bugging out entirely: https://men56.substack.com/p/pol-pot-ii

A brief lesson on the problem with theyism among quasi-oppositional talking heads, from the sub-sublime to the super ridiculous.

I went into more detail on the 1968 nomination process on my substack posting of this video, here: https://men56.substack.com/p/its-them

https://men56.substack.com/p/before-the-dawn-a-tip-of-the-iceberg

Just an informational/promotional vid on what I'm doing these days and where I'm doing it, including going forward.

Here is the link to my substack: https://men56.substack.com/

It's Rumble weekend... week? (with a little substack thrown in) and my videos focus on two Glenn Greenwald podcasts, interviews with Jeffrey Sachs and RFK Jr. Parts 3 and 4 are on RFK Jr. and focused on his defense of two other accusations, related to his backing away from Roger Waters related to Israel, and his position on the link between vaccines and chronic diseases. This is essentially an appraisal of RFK and the Jewish Question.

Next I will get into his claims about covid vaccines and my past criticism of that - and Kim Iversen's continued fact-manipulation on that to this day. That will lead into his response to GG's questions on his historical anti-vaxxism, which will conclude this series.

It's Rumble weekend... week? (with a little substack thrown in) and my videos focus on two Glenn Greenwald podcasts, interviews with Jeffrey Sachs and RFK Jr. Parts 3 and 4 are on RFK Jr. and focused on his defense of two other accusations, related to his position on Russiagating and his backing away from Roger Waters related to Israel. This is essentially an appraisal of RFK and the Jewish Question.

Next I will get into his claims about covid vaccines and my past criticism of that - and Kim Iversen's continued fact-manipulation on that to this day. That will lead into his response to GG's questions on his historical anti-vaxxism, which will conclude this series.

It's Rumble weekend (with a little substack thrown in) and my videos focus on two Glenn Greenwald podcasts, interviews with Jeffrey Sachs and RFK Jr. The first two parts are on Sachs, part one on his spinning history related to the neoconservative ethno-operation against Russia over the last 25-30 years, and part two his defense against the accusation of being a bloodthirsty neoliberal pied piper in the post-communist 1990s.

The remaining two (or more?) parts will be on RFK Jr. and focused on his defense of two other accusations, related to his backing away from Roger Waters related to Israel, and his position on the link between vaccines and chronic diseases. That will also get into his claims about covid vaccines and my past criticism of that - and Kim Iversen's continued fact-manipulation to this day.

It's Rumble weekend (with a little substack thrown in) and my videos focus on two Glenn Greenwald podcasts, interviews with Jeffrey Sachs and RFK Jr. The first two parts are on Sachs, part one on his spinning history related to the neoconservative ethno-operation against Russia over the last 25-30 years, and part two his defense against the accusation of being a bloodthirsty neoliberal pied piper in the post-communist 1990s.

The remaining two (or more?) parts will be on RFK Jr. and focused on his defense of two other accusations, related to his backing away from Roger Waters related to Israel, and his position on the link between vaccines and chronic diseases. That will also get into his claims about covid vaccines and my past criticism of that - and Kim Iversen's continued fact-manipulation to this day.

Will Catalan Freemasonry rule the day on Sunday?

In today's second video I continue with Tulsi on the Durham Report, on Killary as the face of evil on the Dem side, and end with her stumbling into "truth". Then I switch to Dr. John Campbell on our post-truth world, which was supposed to get me to my close on RFK Jr. and speculation on his anti-vaxx lawyer-like juggling of facts - but Youtube decided to once again be the arbiter of truth and took down his interview. Maybe for the best, because talking about RFK's anti-vaxxing seems to upset true believers, so... 😏

Today's first video is all about the MIC as the war-mongering paradigm of our time, coming from Jeffrey Sachs and Tulsi Gabbard in recent interviews. On Sachs' part it's a clear evolution away from the neoconservatism that he so clearly blamed less than a year ago; on Tulsi's part it's just kind of disappointingly mainstream-expected.

More from my cycling back to old voices on the right, E. Michael Jones, Tim Kelly, and even James Corbett. In parts ten and eleven I conclude with RFK Jr., focused on vaccines, war, censorship, the way that RFK is framed by the (Jewish) MSM, and the very real possibility that he could actually be nominated in the primaries. Then the question becomes, what kind of deal might he strike with the Jews that own the Dem party to get elected? Since he can't get elected without them, that would become the whole ballgame, and would reflect what is truly important to him and what isn't.

More from my cycling back to old voices on the right, E. Michael Jones, Tim Kelly, and even James Corbett. In parts ten and eleven I conclude with RFK Jr., focused on vaccines, war, censorship, the way that RFK is framed by the (Jewish) MSM, and the very real possibility that he could actually be nominated in the primaries. Then the question becomes, what kind of deal might he strike with the Jews that own the Dem party to get elected? Since he can't get elected without them, that would become the whole ballgame, and would reflect what is truly important to him and what isn't.

More from my cycling back to old voices on the right, E. Michael Jones, Tim Kelly, and even James Corbett. In part nine I talk about both the alt left and right being all atwitter about the Tucker Carlson departure from Fox, who I mostly see as just another mainstream media figure if a particularly creative one, and I explain that view of him in terms of both his and Fox's incentives for doing what he's been doing to this point; I have no opinion on why that has ended, unlike seemingly everyone else. I also show a clip from Grayzone where Max goes off on the "Brooklyn Left" for their view of Carlson, including taking real shots at the icons of the progressive left, Brooklyn Bernie and NYC AOC.

Then I start back on RFK Jr., who has received similar attention by these disparate ends of the spectrum, with an interview clip where he gives his elevator speech on the war, vaccines and censorship.

In the final part I'll talk about how views of RFK Jr. and Tucker Carlson (on whose Fox departure it seems everyone in the broad alternative space has felt compelled to comment) are reflective of these people's worldviews and their projections onto these at-minimum mainstream-adjacent figures. I'll finish up on him and this series this week in part ten.

More from my cycling back to old voices on the right, E. Michael Jones, Tim Kelly, and even James Corbett. In this part seven, I start my conclusions, which analyzes the Haemer/Kelly authoritarian resolutions and looks at the Jones/Kelly take. In part eight I cover the non-solutions from Corbett and Iversen, and add a look at Kim's more recent interview of Chris Hedges, mainly focusing on his determinedly-retained western powers defining of the '90s wars in Yugoslavia - another example of Kim pushing non-alt altism.

In the final part I'll talk about how views of RFK Jr. and Tucker Carlson (on whose Fox departure it seems everyone in the broad alternative space has felt compelled to comment) are reflective of these people's worldviews and their projections onto these at-minimum mainstream-adjacent figures.

More from my cycling back to old voices on the right, E. Michael Jones, Tim Kelly, and even James Corbett. In this part seven, I start my conclusions, which analyzes the Haemer/Kelly authoritarian resolutions and looks at the Jones/Kelly take. In part eight I cover the non-solutions from Corbett and Iversen, and add a look at Kim's more recent interview of Chris Hedges, mainly focusing on his determinedly-retained western powers defining of the '90s wars in Yugoslavia - another example of Kim pushing non-alt altism.

In the final part I'll talk about how views of RFK Jr. and Tucker Carlson (on whose Fox departure it seems everyone in the broad alternative space has felt compelled to comment) are reflective of these people's worldviews and their projections onto these at-minimum mainstream-adjacent figures.

More from my cycling back to old voices on the right, E. Michael Jones, Tim Kelly, and even James Corbett. In this part six, after correcting an error I made in part four (sorry about rambling on, but I don't like making mistakes like that), I get back to Tim Kelly and Karl Haemer's concluding Final Resolution to the Jewish Problem as expressed on Tim Kelly's podcast, both in that earlier podcast and in his 2nd visit last week, a much darker approach to a - the? - real problem in our world.

Next up will be my conclusion, which in addition to analyzing the Haemer/Kelly resolutions will look at the Jones/Kelly take and also cover the non-solutions from people like Corbett and Iversen. In that I'll also talk about how views of RFK Jr. and Tucker Carlson (on whose Fox departure it seems everyone in the broad alternative space has felt compelled to comment) are reflective of these people's worldviews and their projections onto these at-minimum mainstream-adjacent figures.

More from my cycling back to old voices on the right, E. Michael Jones, Tim Kelly, and even James Corbett. In part five I cover James Corbett's promotion of the upcoming Better Way Conference, a kind of 21st century neo-hippy alternative conspiratorial world celebration of denial of what are the real issues in today's world, built around covid and the WHO - which is today's neo-Bircher version of the Bircher view of the UN a half-century ago, that in turn a radicalized version of the GOP opposition to the League of Nations a century ago. In other words, the New World Order, the fictionalization of anti-Wilsonian conventional Republican right politics post-WWI.

This is the first bookend to my conclusion of this series of videos, the other being Karl Haemer's concluding Final Resolution to the Jewish Problem as expressed on Tim Kelly's podcast, a much darker approach to a - the? - real problem in our world, which I will address in part six.