You are about to action:
Object being modified by the action
Do you want to proceed?
If you wish to action:
Object being modified by the action
Then please send an email request to [email protected].
Join us! Make a stand and support Action Against 5G outside the London Courts of Justice on 6th and 7th February 2023. Electromagnetic radiation from 5G technologies has risks. However, the government has not incorporated existing and widely recognised scientific evidence of biological harm from 5G and existing pulsed radio-frequency radiation thresholds into the UK's exposure guidelines or safety advice.
We each have a responsibility to inform ourselves. These gatherings are also a great place to do that and we warmly welcome you. Please be there, for mankind and for the changes we all want to happen. If not you, who?
.........
The Case
actionagainst5g.org
Support the cause:
https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/legalactionagainst5g/
Action Against 5G poster download:
www.bit.ly/5Gaction
Inform yourself:
www.rfinfo.co.uk
Technological health/human rights issues:
safetechinternational.org
Significant facts and findings:
https://icbe-emf.org/
Insights and a focus on reforms:
https://phiremedical.org/
South Africa, for decades was immersed in divisive apartheid. Today South Africa's government is poised to completely eradicate citizens' fundamental rights. With proposed changes to the existing National Health Act we'll see the democratisation of human rights abuse, and the reclassification of society into a health caste system where people are regarded by the authorities as "Case", "Contact" or "Suspect." This would mean a reinvention of apartheid, portending an era of renewed paranoia, tension and division. The proposed changes to the existing National Health Act must be rejected.
South Africa is creating an increasingly oppressive "Covid-era" healthcare system now verging on totalitarianism.
AN OUTRAGEOUS ATTEMPT TO SECURE UNCONSTITUTIONAL POWERS.
WE CAN WRITE TO THE INSTIGATORS AND SUPPORTING HEALTH BODIES TO VOICE YOUR CONCERNS AND OPPOSITION TO THE REGULATIONS via this link which has a helpful framework and crucially the email addresses of the pertinent government/health bodies in South Africa. Open to anyone:
South Africa must NOT be allowed to fall into medical tyranny! (substack.com) https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/south-africa-must-not-be-allowed?utm_source=email
Quick way to oppose the proposed regulations if in US: https://alignact.com/go/urgent-help-south-africa-stand-against-medical-apartheid
Take action from South Africa Only: "Shifters Voice recognises that a large percentage of the South African population is left out of the online participation process and has subsequently created this manual process to leave no one behind. Please scan and email this document once completed to [email protected] or WhatsApp to +27 78 351 2321"; see below for web page and form:
Health Act Regulations Amendment – Shifters Voice
- https://www.shiftersvoice.com/campaign2/health-act-amendment2/
National Health Act Amendments: Make Your Voice Heard — The Red List SA - https://theredlist.co.za/en/national-health-act-amendments
COMMENT: Amendments to the Health Act - Dear South Africa
- https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/health-act-amendment/
A portrait of SA Health Care in 1990
"Human rights violations, such as detention without charge or trial, assault and torture in police custody, and restriction orders, have had devastating effects on the health of persons experiencing them. These violations have occurred in the context of a deliberate policy of discriminatory health care favoring the white minority over the black majority."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2214078/
Today's challenge to democracy and human rights:
Recently proposed changes to the Health Act in South Africa "gives the health minister the right to immediately make changes to the regulations without any consultation" including the power to "decide when lockdown should be implemented and when it is to be lifted" and powers that "threatens members of the public with court orders and imprisonment unless they comply and submit to receiving a particular type of treatment"..."patients should not be subjected to medical examinations, admissions, treatment or quarantining without their consent."
"It is not necessary to take the National Disaster Act and make it find expression in the National Health Act. We must not allow a situation where our constitutional rights are undermined in the name of fighting a pandemic." – The Young Nurses Indaba Trade Union (YNITU).
South Africa must not adopt new tyrannical health apartheid rules that the Minister of Health in South Africa (Dr. Joe Phaahla) has proposed. They are entirely degrading and dehumanising in their reclassification of society into a health caste system.
Consult the video, and links herein to find out more.
Advocate Sabelo message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGbZix6pYPc
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/please-listen-to-sabelos-message
National Health Act: Regulations: Surveillance and control of notifiable medical conditions: Amendment: Comments invited (www.gov.za)
2020 - COVID-19: What exactly is the national command council? (ewn.co.za)
- https://ewn.co.za/2020/05/04/covid-19-what-exactly-is-the-national-command-council
Minister-speech-on-The-Repeal-of-Regulations-on-Notifible-Medical-Conditions-Dealing-with-the-Covid-19-and-on-Monkey-Pox-23-June-2022.docx.pdf (health.gov.za)
- https://www.health.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Minister-speech-on-The-Repeal-of-Regulations-on-Notifible-Medical-Conditions-Dealing-with-the-Covid-19-and-on-Monkey-Pox-23-June-2022.docx.pdf
Did you know the UK government is lurching from scandal to scandal, and facing timely legal action over the 5G roll out? Since legal action was launched, the government has aimed to protect the roll out, and further the Internet of Things pertaining to all things digital. 5G is being forced upon people, for industry profits, power and state surveillance, through lobbying, legislation and policy. Without any comprehensive risk assessment, of biological and environmental, or energy consumption impacts, 5G continues to be rolled and is branded as a benefit to all. There is no evidence it is safe, and in light of that, the precautionary principle should have been invoked, globally. Since 2017 5G was slowly emerging, and protest and resistance to it was growing, especially in 2019, but the catalyst for 5G's infrastructure roll out would be the "pandemic/post-pandemic" years of 2020-22, while society was locked up at home and movement was restricted for all but "essential" journeys.
The issue of the 5G roll out and its health implications collided with the Pandemic hysteria. Lockdowns were leveraged to justify advancement of the roll out globally, as people were isolated and sought increased connection and sustained employment by interfacing online in unprecedented numbers and frequency.
5G's new spectra and speed was played as the "future proof" solution and was also played as part of "Building Back Better" in the UK, as part of Net Zero and necessary to "economic recovery". For a technology that hasn't been proven safe, the public relations effort to convince citizens it is and that they must want it has been extraordinary. But do the public want it?
Did you know that the majority don’t want 5G? Or that humans and organic life, like bees and bacteria, are sensitive to radio frequency radiation? 20 years ago the UK government warned citizens to take precautions because radio frequency (wireless) devices, they said, could cause cancer. The Stewart Report made it clear precaution was needed in relation to exposure, and the W.H.O. would publish similar conclusions, making radio frequency radiation (RFR) a class 2A carcinogen. However, apart from cancer, RFR is causing illness and electrohypersensitivity (EHS), resulting from the “electro smog” (the interpenetrating anthropogenic electromagnetic fields and RFR from our technologies.
Today, the government backs industry claims that denser wireless 5G networks are necessary to combat “climate change” (even though a 5G wireless "clean-energy" world requires rare metals and burgeoning Deep Sea Mining and other projects that won't tackle e-waste but only increase it).
Evidently, these are desperate times for the wireless industry and the agencies and politicians they lobby. Industries are greenwashing all they do to desperately brand themselves as "sustainable" in line with UN Agenda 2030 goals. 5G is central to the digital agenda's of organisations like the United Nations, World Health Organisation and World Economic Forum. In the UK the 5G infrastructure has been protected as a national security asset and laws have changed to favour an accelerated roll out.
Are we protected? The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), which isn't independent, as likes to claim, is favoured by industry with its thermal guidelines. The organisation's exposure guidelines are used (in the US, Australia, UK, Europe and Canada) to protect people from thermal harm from the microwave frequencies. Whether they protect everyone debatable. Such guidelines are useful to industry because they ignore the science pertaining to biological harm from radio frequency radiation. The guidelines also don't take into account RFR exposure on the environment and ecosystems. They fall very short of any reliable risk assessment, or thorough science.
Clarity on the health, environmental and energy consumption issues surrounding 5G must prevail. This video is a very good starting point to inform yourself and do further research.
References:
https://rfinfo.co.uk/no-more-lies/
https://bioinitiative.org/
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-report-icnirps-conflicts-interest-corporate-push-5g-moskowitz/?articleId=6680916826442076162
https://www.buglife.org.uk/news/bugs-matter-survey-finds-that-uk-flying-insects-have-declined-by-nearly-60-in-less-than-20-years/
EHTrust support the statement about insect decline
Letters about nature and technology
https://www.ourweb.tech/letters/
The electrosensitive society
https://www.electrosensitivesociety.com/resources/
Detailed, referenced open letter to the UK government MPs to address the issues of consent and safety, advocating the precautionary principle:
https://principia-scientific.com/open-letter-to-uk-parliament-on-the-insane-law-changes-for-5g-rollout/
Short films to inform and draw attention Human Rights issues.