Candace Owens GOES OFF On Ted Lieu 4/9/19. on last February. As we reported then, Owens said “I actually don’t have any problems at all with the word ‘nationalism’,” later adding “I think that the definition gets poisoned by elitists that actually want globalism. Globalism is what I don’t want… Whenever we say nationalism, the first thing people think about, at least in America, is” Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-PA) followed Lieu and provided the opportunity for Owens to explain her H defense in greater context. Owens said “Yes I think it’s pretty apparent that Mr. Lieu believed that black people are stupid, and will not pursue the full clip in its entirety. He purposely presented an extracted clip.” Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) interrupted Owens, chiding her for apparently “disparagingly to a member of the committee,” to which Owens clarified she was not disparaging Lieu, but rather portraying Lieu’s agenda. Owens then claimed that Lieu was assuming that “black people will not go pursue the full 2-hour clip, and he purposefully extracted, he cut off and you didn’t hear the question that was asked of me,” implicitly urging everyone to watch the entire clip to fully appreciate the context of what she intended to convey.
She then made explicitly clear her intentions, saying “(Lieu’s) trying to present as if I was watching it defense of ...when in fact the question it was asking me was pertaining to whether or not I believed that H , whether or not I believed in na, and that n was bad, and what I responded to is that I do not believe that we should be characterizing
Groups perceived as centrist who already signed the letter include the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee and the Jewish Council for Public Affairs.
Reps. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., introduced the resolution in the US House of Representatives. Sens. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, and Ben Cardin, D-Md., introduced the measure in the Senate.
It's a well-known fact that Twitter doesn't like Conservatives and Libertarians, or anybody else who isn't Politically Correct and doesn't "toe the line" of Leftist "Social Justice." So why is Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey making public apologies to Conservative Commentator Candace Owens, and why is Candace Owens sticking up for Jack Dorsey?
The reason why I find this suspicious is because Twitter has a track record of shadow-banning, censoring, and suspending Conservative and Libertarian voices for absolutely no reason.
We'll be honest. We're pissed. Free speech is NOT negotiable. We literally fought wars for it. Deplatforming anyone - no matter how smart or dumb, no matter how nice or sleezy, no matter how much you may agree or disagree - is WRONG WRONG WRONG. What the MSM and big tech has done to Alex Jones, and what they are doing to anyone and everyone from PewDiePie to Stefan Molyneux is only proving that they do not report the news, they report their opinions, and those opinions cannot stand up to scrutiny. Who's next? Styxx? Crowder? Timcast? Come on! You know even us small fish are on the chopping block. The Young Turks get away with lying, twisting reality, and even openly inciting violence. But that's just fine because that is "right speak" in this Orelian world. It's twisted, it's perverted, and it must stop. We freed Tommy, now #feealexjones and #freespeech
SUPPORT US! Please support us on Patreon so we can get better gear (and more tennis balls for Abby) --- we offer awesome incentives (including commercials on our live show) Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/counterculturewise
BE NICE Don’t use anything we say on this channel as an excuse to pick on people. If you do, you’re a jerk. That’s our job, so stop it. Get your own job.
If you were offended in any way, please fill out the ID10T form on our website and we will take appropriate action.
FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review, and news reporting which constitute the 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review, and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright. We didn’t use much of anyone else’s stuff, so we should be OK here.
Support: http://infowarsStore.com & get the latest books, documentaries, Infowars swag, survival & preparedness gear & nutritional products Alex Jones and his family trust, while supporting the growth of our expanding media operation.
Sign up for the Infowars daily newsletter to become an 'Underground Insider' & bypass censorship bots of social media plus get exclusive content + coupon codes for our shop! - http://www.infowars.com/newsletter