Part 2: The Atomistic fallacy and psychosis of the so-called "electron" particle
The discoverer of the PRINCIPLE of the Electron JJ Thomson denied forever that the electron was a particle. Electricity is utterly a mass-free phenomena, as mentioned by many including Dr. Wilhelm Reich in his “Cosmic Superimposition”. Mass has no logical or theoretical place in electrical units and all particle-based conceptions of it are impossible. There is no mass in T.E.M. (transverse electromagnetism).
Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview: On the whole subject of matter, in fact, Dr. Tesla holds views that are startlingly original. He disagrees with the accepted atomic theory of matter, and does not believe in the existence of an “electron” as pictured by science. “To account for its apparently small mass, science conceives of the electron as a hollow sphere, a sort of bubble, such a bubble could exist in a medium as a gas or liquid because its internal pressure is not altered by deformation. But if, as supposed, the internal pressure of an electron is due to the repulsion of electric masses, the slightest conceivable deformation must result in the destruction of the bubble! Just to mention another improbability...” - Nikola Tesla Article: “A Famous Prophet of Science Looks into the Future” (Popular Science Monthly)
“My ideas regarding the electron are at variance with those generally entertained. I hold that it is a relatively large entity carrying a surface charge and is not an elementary unit (particle). When the ‘electron’ leaves an electrode of high potential and in a high vacuum it carries an electrostatic charge many times greater than normal.” – N. Tesla
“In the theoretical treatment of these electrons we are faced with the difficulty that electro-dynamic theory by itself is unable to give an account of their nature.” “For since electrical masses constituting the electron would necessarily be scattered under the influence of their mutual repulsions, unless there are forces of another kind operating between them the nature of which has hitherto remained obscure to us.” - Einstein on electrons; “Relativity”, by Albert Einstein, Random House Publisher, 1916
“To describe an electron as a negatively charged body is equivalent to saying that it is an expanding-contracting particle. There is no such condition in nature as a negative charge, nor are there negatively charged particles. Charge and discharge are opposite conditions, as filling and emptying, or compressing and expanding are opposite conditions.” – W. Russell
JJ Thomson developed the “Ether Atom” ideas of M. Faraday into his “Electronic Corpuscle”, this indivisible unit. One corpuscle terminates on one Faradic tube of force, and this quantifies as one Coulomb. This corpuscle is not and electron, it is a constituent of what today is known incorrectly as an “electron”. (Thomson relates 1000 corpuscles per electron) In this view, that taken by W. Crookes, J.J. Thomson, and N. Tesla, the cathode ray is not electrons, but in actuality corpuscles of the Ether.” – E. Dollard
“There is no rest mass to an ‘electron’. It is given here the ‘electron’ is no more than a broken loose “hold fast” under the grip of the tensions within the dielectric lines of force. They are the broken ends of the split in half package of spaghetti. Obviously this reasoning is not welcome in the realm of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity.” – E. Dollard
“Unfortunately to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro-static charge, the ‘electron’, on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the magnetic and dielectric. This makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated” - C.P. Steinmetz (Electric Discharges,
The idea of electricity as a flow of ‘electrons’ in a conductor was regarded by Oliver Heaviside as “a psychosis”. This encouraged Heaviside to begin a series of writings
Also consider the J.J. Thomson concept of the "electron" (his own discovery). Thomson considered the electron the terminal end of one unit line of dielectric induction.
“Electrons as a separate, distinct entity…doesn’t really exist, they are merely bumps in something called a ‘field’.” - Dr. Steve Biller
BBC attacks electrical safety for their religion of Climate Change (13Sept19)
The disgusting BBC are using their religion of climate change, to attack the electricity indusrty safety - especially the protection of electricity workers,, wheels in shit for brains environmental nut to help the BBC's cause,.
While the BBC - consumers of multiple MegaWatts of electricity, expect to have electricity delivered for use safely, and not kill anyone on BBC premises because of electric companies safety standards.
Recorded from BBC News Channel HD, 13 September 2019.
Published on Sep 23, 2016 In this video, Gerard gives a bit of an update as to what he found on the inside of the pancake motors he has had for years. More confirmation of what is possible when you understand the differences in Electrons, and what makes up volts, and how to manipulate it. It's right under our nose.
The relationship between Electricity, Magnetism and Gravity.
11:48 It even explains the non-sense of: If you can't measure it, it doesn't exist. 12:12 M.C. Esher's staircase explained 28:28 The loss of weight. 35:00 The orbit of the electron explained by the gyroscope. 40:00 18 pound gyro 47:00 Scientific conformity 54:54 Swiss gyro bus
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Another implementation of Lord Kelvin's Thunderstorm. I tried to make it easy to construct out of materials available at a local hardware store. I think it could be adjusted to produce a larger spark or more frequent sparks, but it does okay as shown. The hope is to use it in a thermodynamics demonstration talking about exergy; available work and recovered work. Obviously, very little available work is recovered by the electrostatic motor.
It is called resonate frequency, and there is a magnetic flux, the magnets are repelling each other creating magnetic resistance. The copper coil is also tuned to the same frequency as the magnetic field as well. Study electromagnetism, every frequency of electromagnetic radiation can be converted into usable current as well.
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purpose such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use."
I do not claim to own this material and it is simply for the educational & entertainment purpose and I do not make money for this.
This presentation by Eric P. Dollard has been uploaded by others and was mis-titled as "The Theory of Anti-Relativity". That title is actually a paper by Eric and this presentation is the History and Theory of Electricity. Eric Dollard's nickname for this presentation is "Explosion in the Shipyard" because of one story shared. Eric Dollard gave this presentation at the Tesla Society around 2007.
This is the only version authorized by Eric P. Dollard as any version that has any other subtitle other than EricPDollard.com is in violation of Eric's copyrights. If Eric's middle initial P is missing from the domain name, it is an imposter website that was setup without Eric's knowledge or consent.
24 AWG for secondary coil. Sparks from a Tesla Coil setup, Jacob's ladder for a different coil, and example of coronal wind between open electrodes. The setup I used for both coils was a ballast driving a flyback transformer. I used a couple of vertical wires for spark gap. For the capacitor, I used to plastic storage bin coated with tinfoil on inside and outside.