#ericcoomer

The deposition of Eric Coomer, Dominion Voting employee and Marxist sympathizer, it available now online.
Find it here: https://archive.org/details/ct-wi-coomer-eric
Here: https://archive.org/details/exhibit-p-23
Here: https://rumble.com/vnmezh-eric-coomer-deposition.html

1 week, 3 days ago

I wasn't easy on Rudy Giuliani in this court file. But my goodness, whatever Giuliani didn't provide by way of receipt, Plaintiff Eric Coomer made up for him. The depsotion... It did NOT go well for Coomer.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzGiDDKdphJ0GFvEd82WfYQ/join

1 week, 4 days ago

Sidney Powell revealed that her legal team is going to be able to ask Eric Coomer — the security director at the Colorado-based Dominion Voting Systems — two hours worth of questions in a deposition on September 23rd.

1 month ago

1. https://www.bitchute.com/video/3UbRiC4bqCGC/

Joe Oltmann exposed one of the men in charge at Dominion, Eric Coomer, an open communist Antifa activist.

#ElectionFraud #DominionMachines #EricCoomer #JoeOltmann #VoterFraud

8 months, 2 weeks ago

No Surprise here.
After stating that he made sure Trump was not going to win and that he made fucking sure of that, Eric Coomer has gone missing, presumed to be in hiding along with another 100 employees of Dominion Voting Machines.

11 months ago

Thank you, Conservative Republican Alliance of New York for putting together such a comprehensive bio of Eric Coomer, the Antifa scumbag VP of Dominion with TDS.

Eric Coomer, VP Executive at Dominion Voting Systems is nowhere to be found after making anti-Trump posts on his social media page and admitting voter fraud.The criminals are FLEEING THE SCENE
#StoptheSteal #DominionVotingSystems

See this full Michelle Malkin interview with Joe Oltmann: https://www.bitchute.com/video/dh1X4s9HuLo/

https://www.unclesamsmisguidedchildren.com/dominion-board-member-eric-coomer-trumps-not-gonna-win-i-made-fg-sure-of-that/

Credit to Dylan Roth: https://www.youtube.com/c/DylanRothVideos/videos
Check out his other great content before youtube bans his channel!
* * * * * * *

11 months ago

"You know what? The voter meant to vote for this candidate"
Ambiguous marks, adjudicator marks ballots for voters, "tool for audits and recounts"
For reviewing ballots, Filter by precincts, or random sample
Risk limiting audits

See this full Michelle Malkin interview with Joe Oltmann: https://www.bitchute.com/video/dh1X4s9HuLo/

https://www.unclesamsmisguidedchildren.com/dominion-board-member-eric-coomer-trumps-not-gonna-win-i-made-fg-sure-of-that/

* * * * * * *

11 months ago

(Original video, audio is very low, sorry - watch previous video to hear better)

From August 2016 - Sharon Meroni - DefendTheVote.com
(Sep. 1, 2016) — On Friday, August 26th, during a meeting at the Illinois State Board of Elections, the Vice President of Engineering for Dominion Voting, Dr. Eric Coomer*, was asked if it was possible to bypass election systems software and go directly to the data tables that manage systems running elections in Illinois. His response was, “Yes, if they have access.”

Bypassing the election systems software means whoever has access can potentially manipulate the vote without many risks of detection. So the question needs to be asked, who has access to these data tables?

We asked Dr. Coomer that question. Dr. Coomer replied, ‘Vendors, election officials, and others who need to be granted access.’

This is explosive information. Dr. Coomer’s statement is an admission that various vendors, election officials, and others have access to the back end data tables that permit bypassing the operating system’s configuration. It is notable that when someone accesses these systems from a data table, their actions are not logged by the system; thereby making detection much more problematic. This contradicts Dr. Coomer’s assurances that the system is secure.

Our letter to the Illinois State Board of Elections on August 17th specifically requested the Board to answer the following questions:

At the ISBE level:
Who has access to software produced by vendors?
Has the ISBE had an expert examine the computer code?
How is access granted and documented?
What role does the ISBE play in monitoring the GEMS software used in each election jurisdiction?

As is typical for the Board members at the Illinois State Board of Elections, with its rich history in treating citizens concerned about election security with disregard and disrespect, the Board refused to say a single word regarding Defend the Vote’s concerns expressed during ‘public comments’. Only 4 of the 8 members of the Board bothered to stay to hear our comments. To date, the Board has failed to provide answers to the questions asked in our letter.

And that is not all! The Board asked Dr. Coomer if he had any comments. In direct response to the Illinois State Board, Dr. Coomer made the following statement:

“We are constantly assessing different threat models against all of our systems we have fielded across the US and internationally as well. Due to the certification environment that we are in, no we are not allowed to do routine updates without having to go through re-certification efforts, but we do routinely give guidance on how to best secure systems and also going back again, to the final mitigation against all of this is a robust auditing canvasing process which all of our jurisdictions have implemented.”

Dr. Coomer failed to mention that Illinois does not have any auditing procedure for absentee mail-in ballots. In 2014, mail-in paper balloting was 8% of the vote. Across Illinois, many election jurisdictions are working to increase this percentage! Illinois does not require any justification when audits show a vote discrepancy. They simply correct the total votes that are reported to the new totals found in the audit. Further, it is not a blind audit. Auditors know what vote totals were reported before they begin the post-election re-count. So much for Coomer’s robust auditing process…

Dr. Coomer’s statement brings to light a very serious issue all voters should understand. Voting systems must be re-certified each time they make changes to the hardware or software. Recertification is an expensive and time consuming process. What Dr. Coomer told the Board is that Dominion Voting does not go back for recertification of software when threats to their code are discovered. Rather, they rely on post-election audits and providing advice to election jurisdictions about security. I have reviewed all of the recertification documents produced by Dominion, and I do not recall any software adjustments for security purposes.

This is the reality of the security of your vote. Software systems that count and record the vote across Illinois and throughout the USA are not updated to address security problems, and even if they were, the software can be completely bypassed by going to the data tables that drive the systems.

I am not an expert on how other states audit the vote after an election. I do know that in Illinois, at least 8% of the vote never see any post-election audit. At least that amount of the vote is vulnerable to be manipulated without much chance for detection.

*Dr. Coomer held senior management roles with both Sequoia and Smartech. Before coming to Dominion Voting, Dr. Coomer was Senior Information Services Manager of Smartmatic Corporation and Vice President of Research and Product Development for Sequoia Voting Systems Inc.

11 months ago

*Blessed be the Name of Jesus Christ*
From August 2016 - Sharon Meroni - DefendTheVote.com
CLICK "SHOW MORE" for important details!

by Sharon Meroni,
(Sep. 1, 2016) — On Friday, August 26th, during a meeting at the Illinois State Board of Elections, the Vice President of Engineering for Dominion Voting, Dr. Eric Coomer*, was asked if it was possible to bypass election systems software and go directly to the data tables that manage systems running elections in Illinois. His response was, “Yes, if they have access.”

Bypassing the election systems software means whoever has access can potentially manipulate the vote without many risks of detection. So the question needs to be asked, who has access to these data tables?

We asked Dr. Coomer that question. Dr. Coomer replied, ‘Vendors, election officials, and others who need to be granted access.’

This is explosive information. Dr. Coomer’s statement is an admission that various vendors, election officials, and others have access to the back end data tables that permit bypassing the operating system’s configuration. It is notable that when someone accesses these systems from a data table, their actions are not logged by the system; thereby making detection much more problematic. This contradicts Dr. Coomer’s assurances that the system is secure.

Our letter to the Illinois State Board of Elections on August 17th specifically requested the Board to answer the following questions:

At the ISBE level:
Who has access to software produced by vendors?
Has the ISBE had an expert examine the computer code?
How is access granted and documented?
What role does the ISBE play in monitoring the GEMS software used in each election jurisdiction?

As is typical for the Board members at the Illinois State Board of Elections, with its rich history in treating citizens concerned about election security with disregard and disrespect, the Board refused to say a single word regarding Defend the Vote’s concerns expressed during ‘public comments’. Only 4 of the 8 members of the Board bothered to stay to hear our comments. To date, the Board has failed to provide answers to the questions asked in our letter.

And that is not all! The Board asked Dr. Coomer if he had any comments. In direct response to the Illinois State Board, Dr. Coomer made the following statement:

“We are constantly assessing different threat models against all of our systems we have fielded across the US and internationally as well. Due to the certification environment that we are in, no we are not allowed to do routine updates without having to go through re-certification efforts, but we do routinely give guidance on how to best secure systems and also going back again, to the final mitigation against all of this is a robust auditing canvasing process which all of our jurisdictions have implemented.”

Dr. Coomer failed to mention that Illinois does not have any auditing procedure for absentee mail-in ballots. In 2014, mail-in paper balloting was 8% of the vote. Across Illinois, many election jurisdictions are working to increase this percentage! Illinois does not require any justification when audits show a vote discrepancy. They simply correct the total votes that are reported to the new totals found in the audit. Further, it is not a blind audit. Auditors know what vote totals were reported before they begin the post-election re-count. So much for Coomer’s robust auditing process…

Dr. Coomer’s statement brings to light a very serious issue all voters should understand. Voting systems must be re-certified each time they make changes to the hardware or software. Recertification is an expensive and time consuming process. What Dr. Coomer told the Board is that Dominion Voting does not go back for recertification of software when threats to their code are discovered. Rather, they rely on post-election audits and providing advice to election jurisdictions about security. I have reviewed all of the recertification documents produced by Dominion, and I do not recall any software adjustments for security purposes.

This is the reality of the security of your vote. Software systems that count and record the vote across Illinois and throughout the USA are not updated to address security problems, and even if they were, the software can be completely bypassed by going to the data tables that drive the systems.

I am not an expert on how other states audit the vote after an election. I do know that in Illinois, at least 8% of the vote never see any post-election audit. At least that amount of the vote is vulnerable to be manipulated without much chance for detection.

*Dr. Coomer held senior management roles with both Sequoia and Smartech. Before coming to Dominion Voting, Dr. Coomer was Senior Information Services Manager of Smartmatic Corporation and Vice President of Research and Product Development for Sequoia Voting Systems Inc.

11 months ago

Head of Dominion Security, Dr. Eric Coomer was quoted that "TRUMP Will Not Win - I made Fucking Sure of That".
Coomer ( linked to Antifa ) was caught during an Antifa Conference telephone call making those remarks.
Fox News says the Election was certainly rigged against Donald Trump.

11 months ago

Breaking: Video of Eric Coomer explain how to alter votes-Smartmatic/Dominion owned by Venezuela business men

11 months ago

Want evidence as to how your vote can be manipulated on a Dominion Voting System? Look no further than Dr. Eric Coomer, VP of US Engineering for Dominion Voting Company - IN HIS OWN WORDS.

This is the same Eric Coomer who said "Don't worry about the election, Trump's not gonna win. I made f**king sure of that!"

Source : Twitter (@hppyjesusfreak) - https://twitter.com/hppyjesusfreak/status/1330786115830247425

11 months ago