"something like 1984 could actually happen, this is the direction the world is going in at the present time" "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever" "don't let it happen, it depends on you"
Conservative firebrand and InfoWars founder Alex Jones has been kicked off of just about every social media platform out there. The Left is doing its best to unperson Alex Jones and erase him from the Internet completely.
Twitter, however, has refused to follow the Leftist herd and ban Alex Jones. It's admirable that Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has taken a stand, but I'll tell you why it's not enough.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
This is an original production/video work, includes fair use of footage and music originally composed and licensed for the video game(s)/other works displayed in this video, for the use and purpose of parody/review. Also for entertainment and educational purposes. All rights to the original works go to those that hold them, no copyright infringement intended.
All material used falls under fair use of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (1998). (for commentary, criticism, education and satire.)
Leftist Michigan police hand-cuffs patriotic girl for protesting against disrespectful take-a-knee, kneeling for US National Anthem by libtards at Jackson High School. Michigan.Sep 29, 2017. She should sue the police for violating her First Amendment Constitutional Right.
Prager University FAIR USE STATEMENT This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is being made available within this transformative or derivative work for the purpose of education, commentary and criticism, is being distributed without profit, and is believed to be "fair use" in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107
The word censor comes from the name of a position in the Roman government whose job it was to take census data, and enforce the moral code dictated by the government of Rome.
The duties of a Roman censor were three fold:
Performing the census, registering and collecting information about the citizens of Rome. This is where we get the word census from. Regimen Morum, the enforcement of public morality dictated by the roman government, and The administration of state finances, and the development of state buildings and public work projects.
Number 2 is where we get the definition of the word censor and censorship. The Roman censors had several tools for enforcing the moral code of the roman state. The most common were degrading Roman citizens, branding, and fines. Degrading only meant to lower the social status of some one. For example there was a class of people called Equestrians who were granted state funded horses, and these people could be degraded and have that privilege taken from them. Censorship didn’t necessarily mean removal of citizenship.
This made the position of Censor a feared and coveted position in Rome.
In 1914 the oxford english dictionary records an early use of the word censor to refer to an official who checks private correspondence during war time for any information that might compromise any war efforts.
This use of the word referring to someone that redacts information from a letter is where we get the idea that censorship is only when content is completely or partially removed. I don’t think this is really the only way in which the word censorship could be used. A lot of dictionaries I checked didn’t define censor as removal of content. They generally referred to suppressing content.
After investigating where the word actually comes from I believe the word censorship can be applied much more broadly.
What’s happening with Google, YouTube and other large tech companies I believe falls squarely under the definition of censorship.
Just as the Roman government provided privileges to it’s citizen, so does YouTube, and other services, and they can take away some of those privileges, if you don’t abide by their moral standards.
When a video is put into a limited state, the “SandBox”, that’s similar to having your horse and other privileges if you were a roman in the equestrian class.
And having your content demonetize would be analogous to being degraded, and having your rank stripped from you.
They may not be forcing you or your content off the platform, but they are still censoring you. You’re being encouraged to conform to someone else's moral code.
What Google, Facebook and other big tech companies are doing is censorship. At least by my definition.