Climate Change

“Behind the green mask UN Agenda 21” Rosa Koire is the executive director of the Post Sustainability Institute. Impacting every aspect of our lives, UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is a corporate manipulation using the Green Mask of environmental concern to forward a globalist plan. Rosa speaks across the world and is a regular blogger on her website Democrats Against UN Agenda 21 dot com. Her book, BEHIND THE GREEN MASK: UN Agenda 21 is available on Amazon.com, Kindle, and Nook, and at her website. Websites: www.DemocratsAgainstUNAgenda21.com www.PostSustainabilityInstitute.org.

This detailed presentation clearly explains the connection between sustainable development and Agenda 21 as defined by the UN. In depth research shows how Agenda 21 will ultimately compromise your property rights.

Regarding Ms. Bruntdland: Some have suggested she is merely a Democrat and I am way off base. First off, Norway does not have a Democratic Party, but rather Socialist democrats. Hopefully there is a difference. Internet research can be a challenge, so I respect those who engage in it! However, check out the XX Congress of the Socialist International in NY. Gro was the first VP of the Socialist International whose goal is to interact with labour, social democrats and socialists worldwide to spread the socialist concept of democracy. It is quite possible to be member of the Democratic Party and a Socialist at the same time. It is members like Gro whose desire it is to move the Democratic party more toward the Social Democratic Party.

I also want to thank “6or8pack” for pointing out my error in mentioning that Betty Perry’s nose was injured by handcuffs. In fact, she slipped during her interaction with officers and hit her nose on the steps. Betty was aware of local ordinances, but chose to ignore them. This landed her in the holding pen. This error is mine.

Some have suggested they have “read Agenda 21 ” and there is nothing dangerous in the book and besides, the document has no power to override their Constitutional right to own and control private property.

To read the book alone, without reading the preceeding and following documentation and activites would be somewhat like looking at a map of Brazil and feeling you now know how Brazilians think and feel.

The name A21 refers not only to the actual book, but to the entire sustainable development movement as defined by the United Nations dating back to the 1970’s through today. That is why it is important to not only listen to the entire video, but research on your own to gain more information. Since this presentation was completed vast new volumes of information have been compiled. Check the sources in the back of the presentation and the United Nation’s own websites to draw your own conclusions.

Agenda 21 or Agenda 2030 The Plan To Kill You - David Icke - The United Nations Depopulation Plan

The global cabal of U.N. Agenda 21 is behind global warming, regionalism, zoning, land and water use control, wealth redistribution, weakening and eventual replacement of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, global warming, cap and trade, Smart Grid, Smart Meters, carbon taxes, high gasoline prices, global citizens, IB World Schools, Common Core nationalized education standards, biofuels, Marxist advancement across the globe, food control, water access control via the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST), gun control, health control, the Arab Spring/Winter, unchecked illegal immigration, and they are unstoppable.’

We’ve all heard of “sustainable development,” but what does it actually mean? Is it really about protecting the earth, or is it just another tool for foisting an agenda of carbon eugenics and technocracy? Join us this week on The Corbett Report as we rip off the green mask of the oiligarchs and expose the 2030 Agenda for what it really is.

SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=24543

Ann Bressington Exposes Agenda 21, Club of Rome, Sustainable Development, at the Lord Monckton Launch 2 Feb 2013 at the Adelaide Convention Centre.

Lefty wing-nuts in the media and on twitter have gone into meltdown as a rare bit of truth is spoken in the Australian Senate.
In his spot-on maiden speech this week, new Senator Malcolm Roberts lambasted the UN, the climate hysteria, carbon taxes and the establishment.

Speaking about the United Nations, Mr Roberts called the organisation a “socialist monolithic monster” full of “un-elected swill”. The 9 eco-extremist Greens senators refused to congratulate Roberts on his maiden speech.

Some Highlights;
“We need an Aus-exit,” (from the UN) he said. “The people of Australia are desperate to regain our sovereignty. We need to rebuild our nation.”

He also questioned modern climate science, saying that global temperatures have not been rising since 1995.

“Temperatures are now cooler than 130 years ago and this is the reverse of what we’re blatantly told by the Bureau of Meteorology that has manipulated cooling trends into false warming trends.”

“I have used freedom-of-information requests, correspondence and reports from the heads of the CSIRO, the Bureau of Meteorology, the UN [and] universities to show there is no data proving human use of hydro-carbon fuels effects climate. None."

“Yet the core climate claim is that carbon dioxide from our human activity will one day, some day, catastrophically warm our planet.”

Relevant information:

Published on August 23, 2019 - Breaking News: Dr Tim Ball Defeats Michael Mann’s Climate Lawsuit!
https://principia-scientific.org/breaking-news-dr-tim-ball-defeats-michael-manns-climate-lawsuit/

James Corbett of the Corbettreport.com responds to a question about climate change

The Global Warming Petition project started by Dr Art Robinson in response to the false alarm over CO2
http://www.petitionproject.org/seitz_letter.php
and
http://www.petitionproject.org/index.php
Was signed by 31,487 scientists (in the USA alone) list here
http://www.petitionproject.org/signers_by_last_name.php?run=all
They all say that there is no cause for any alarm over our CO2 emissions.
On the other side, there are just 18 scientists who worked on attribution in the WG1 of the IPCC's latest report, AR5.

At least 3 of those 18 are still students.
Here is a list of all 18

Kabumbwe HANSINGO
Rachid SEBBARI
Suman JAIN
Krishna-Mirle ACHUTARAO
Robert VAUTARD
Peter STOTT
Myles ALLEN
Nathan GILLETT
David GUTZLER
Nathaniel BINDOFF
Gabriele HEGERL
Yongyun HU
Igor MOKHOV
James OVERLAND
Judith PERLWITZ
Xuebin ZHANG
Judit BARTHOLY
Tetsuzo YASUNARI

Here Tim Ball presents the evidence and reasons to why climate science has become corrupted

Get the full historical background behind the Climategate II story provided by NOAA whistleblower Dr John Bates.

https://larouchepac.com/green-fascism

https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/greenfascismpromo/globalwarming_index.html

Daily Mail expose, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html

“NOAA breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.”

Based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data
• Preliminary, unverified version of the data
• Never subjected to NOAA’s internal evaluation process
• None of the data was properly ‘archived’
• NOAA superiors overrode objections

Cover-up?
• NOAA refused Congressional subpoenas
• NOAA claimed no internal concerns raised
• Data lost in a mysterious ‘complete failure’

Whistleblower Dr. John Bates

• 40-year career in meteorology & climate science at NOAA, retiring in 2016
• 14 years at NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (now NCEI) as a Principal Scientist
• NOAA Administrator’s Award 2004 for “outstanding administration and leadership in developing a new division to meet the challenges to NOAA in the area of climate applications related to remotely sensed data”
• U.S. Department of Commerce Gold Medal in 2014 for visionary work in the acquisition, production, and preservation of climate data records

‘Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus,’ June 2015, Science
• Tripled warming trend in ocean data (favored ship intake data over buoy measurements)
• Software used to combine land and sea data was shown to be buggy and inconsistent
• Ignored satellite measurements
• Release was obviously timed to influence opinion going into the 2015 UN climate conference

Canadian Senate Hearing on Climate Change, 15th December, 2011
Professor Ross McKitrick
Professor Timothy Patterson
Professor Jan Veizer
Professor Ian Clark
These four professors explain the science of climate change in words of one syllable to skeptical Senators.

Here we see four former NASA scientists trash the global warming hysteria.
Dr Hal Doiron
Leighton Steward
Tom Wysmuller
Walter Cunningham

Back in the days when NASA was a genuine scientific organisation, and did real science, such as moon trips, these four men worked there.They represent a group of 25 former NASA scientists / astronauts, who now run the climate realist website;
http://www.therightclimatestuff.com/
and wrote this report for policy-makers in 2013;
Doiron, H. H. (2014). BOUNDING GHG CLIMATE SENSITIVITY FOR USE IN REGULATORY DECISIONS.
It can be found here;
https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/executivesummaryboundingghgclimatesensitivityforuseinregulatorydecisions1402281.pdf
Using data and logic, here they throw cold water on the hysterical CO2 fanatics who are crying and whining about the coming fictitious 'climate catastrophe'.
The 25 former NASA scientists also sent the incoming President, Donald Trump, this report on climate science in November, 2016;
https://nebula.wsimg.com/1ca304a328496c0c011ac02790fc56ed?AccessKeyId=4E2A86EA65583CBC15DE&disposition=0&alloworigin=1

The US has by far the best temperature data set in the world. It is also the most heavily tampered with and manipulated by government agencies. In this video I show how 61% of the data is now fake.

References here: https://realclimatescience.com/2019/02/61-of-noaa-ushcn-adjusted-temperature-data-is-now-fake/

This is the first of a series of videos exposing the dishonest practices of the government scientists who wrote the 2018 National Climate Assessment. They have an agenda, and the agenda has nothing to do with informing the public about climate.

You can find links and references here: https://realclimatescience.com/fraud-in-the-national-climate-assessment-part-1/

The National Climate Assessment contains an extremely misleading sea ice graph. I document it in this video.

You can find links and references here: https://realclimatescience.com/fraud-in-the-national-climate-assessment-part-2/

The Climate Industrial Complex

This video is the first in a series which will outline the scientific reasons why a new null hypothesis of climate change is needed, and what is wrong with the current one, which assumes a 33c surface enhancement from the so-called "Greenhouse Effect" of "Greenhouse Gases".
it will be shown that there is another cause of this surface thermal enhancement, and that the so-called "Greenhouse Gases" cannot be responsible for it.
The 'greenhouse effect' is where a 33c atmospheric thermal enhancement at the Earth's surface, is alleged to be caused by a class of gases called 'greenhouse gases'.
I will show, in this series, that the claimed 33c enhancement from those gases does not exist.
YouTube Tip: As usual run at Settings; Playback Speed; Times 1.5

References;
Holmes, R. I. (2018). Thermal Enhancement on Planetary Bodies and the Relevance of the Molar Mass Version of the Ideal Gas Law to the Null Hypothesis of Climate Change. Earth, 7(3), 107-123.
YouTube has cut my advertising funding totally!
How to support me, and of course evidence-based science;
Patreon support;
https://www.patreon.com/1000Frolly

My paper related to the pressure/TSI relationship between Venus, Earth and Titan has now been published;
Robert Ian Holmes, On the Apparent Relationship Between Total Solar Irradiance and the Atmospheric Temperature at 1 Bar on Three Terrestrial-type Bodies, Earth Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 6, 2019, pp. 346-351. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20190806.15
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335927448_On_the_Apparent_Relationship_Between_Total_Solar_Irradiance_and_the_Atmospheric_Temperature_at_1_Bar_on_Three_Terrestrial-type_Bodies

To cite my published climate papers;
Holmes, R. I. (2018). Thermal Enhancement on Planetary Bodies and the Relevance of the Molar Mass Version of the Ideal Gas Law to the Null Hypothesis of Climate Change. Earth, 7(3), 107-123.
Robert Ian Holmes, On the Apparent Relationship Between Total Solar Irradiance and the Atmospheric Temperature at 1 Bar on Three Terrestrial-type Bodies, Earth Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 6, 2019, pp. 346-351. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20190806.15
Holmes, R. I. (2017). Molar Mass Version of the Ideal Gas Law Points to a Very Low Climate Sensitivity. Earth Sciences, 6(6), 157.

Links to my published climate papers;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324599511_Thermal_Enhancement_on_Planetary_Bodies_and_the_Relevance_of_the_Molar_Mass_Version_of_the_Ideal_Gas_Law_to_the_Null_Hypothesis_of_Climate_Change
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335927448_On_the_Apparent_Relationship_Between_Total_Solar_Irradiance_and_the_Atmospheric_Temperature_at_1_Bar_on_Three_Terrestrial-type_Bodies
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323106609_Molar_Mass_Version_of_the_Ideal_Gas_Law_Points_to_a_Very_Low_Climate_Sensitivity

This the second in my Climate Science series debunking the greenhouse effect.
Climate Science 1 revealed that our atmosphere is not like a greenhouse; instead it's the exact opposite - it's capable of expansion and convection.
Here we explore the science and the climate cycles which the IPCC forgot to mention, and how they are totally controlling all current climate change.
We find that there actually is no 'extra' warming that we need to invoke a supposed 'greenhouse effect' from CO2 or other 'greenhouse gases' to fill.
Correction to CO2 forcing at 9:42 it is 0.01W/m2 not 0.1W/m2.
YouTube Tip: As usual run at Settings; Playback Speed; Times 1.5

References;
Shaviv, N. J. (2003). The spiral structure of the Milky Way, cosmic rays, and ice age epochs on Earth. New Astronomy, 8(1), 39-77.
Cederlöf, M. (2014). Using seasonal variations to estimate earth's response to radiative forcing.
Shaviv, N. J. (2003). The spiral structure of the Milky Way, cosmic rays, and ice age epochs on Earth. New Astronomy, 8(1), 39-77.
65 million years of climate change (WIKI Commons)
5 million years of climate change (WIKI Commons)
Loehle, C. (2007). A 2000-year global temperature reconstruction based on non-treering proxies. Energy & Environment, 18(7), 1049-1058.
Usoskin, I. G., Solanki, S., & Kovaltsov, G. (2007). Grand minima and maxima of solar activity: new observational constraints. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 471(1), 301-309.
Steinhilber, F., Abreu, J. A., Beer, J., Brunner, I., Christl, M., Fischer, H., . . . McCracken, K. G. (2012). 9,400 years of cosmic radiation and solar activity from ice cores and tree rings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(16), 5967-5971.
Lüdecke, H.-J. (2011). Long-term instrumental and reconstructed temperature records contradict anthropogenic global warming. Energy & Environment, 22(6), 723-745.
C-14 record from the USGA
Lüdecke, H.-J., Hempelmann, A., & Weiss, C. (2013). Multi-periodic climate dynamics: spectral analysis of long-term instrumental and proxy temperature records. Climate of the Past, 9(1), 447-452.
Sromovsky, L., Fry, P., Limaye, S., & Baines, K. (2003). The nature of Neptune’s increasing brightness: Evidence for a seasonal response. Icarus, 163(1), 256-261.
Schmude Jr, R. W., Baker, R. E., Fox, J., Krobusek, B. A., Pavlov, H., & Mallama, A. (2016). The secular and rotational brightness variations of Neptune. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.00518.

YouTube has cut my advertising funding totally!
How to support me, and of course evidence-based science;
Patreon support;
https://www.patreon.com/1000Frolly

To cite my published climate papers;
Holmes, R. I. (2018). Thermal Enhancement on Planetary Bodies and the Relevance of the Molar Mass Version of the Ideal Gas Law to the Null Hypothesis of Climate Change. Earth, 7(3), 107-123.
Robert Ian Holmes, On the Apparent Relationship Between Total Solar Irradiance and the Atmospheric Temperature at 1 Bar on Three Terrestrial-type Bodies, Earth Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 6, 2019, pp. 346-351. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20190806.15
Holmes, R. I. (2017). Molar Mass Version of the Ideal Gas Law Points to a Very Low Climate Sensitivity. Earth Sciences, 6(6), 157.

Links to my published climate papers;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324599511_Thermal_Enhancement_on_Planetary_Bodies_and_the_Relevance_of_the_Molar_Mass_Version_of_the_Ideal_Gas_Law_to_the_Null_Hypothesis_of_Climate_Change
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335927448_On_the_Apparent_Relationship_Between_Total_Solar_Irradiance_and_the_Atmospheric_Temperature_at_1_Bar_on_Three_Terrestrial-type_Bodies
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323106609_Molar_Mass_Version_of_the_Ideal_Gas_Law_Points_to_a_Very_Low_Climate_Sensitivity

This the third in my Climate Science series debunking the so-called 'greenhouse effect'.
Climate Science 1 revealed that our atmosphere is not like a greenhouse; instead it's the exact opposite - it's capable of expansion and convection.
Climate Science 2 explored the science and the climate cycles which the IPCC forgot to mention, and how they are totally controlling all current climate change.
We find that there actually is no 'extra' warming that we need to invoke a supposed 'greenhouse effect' from CO2 or other 'greenhouse gases' to fill.
Climate Science 3 looks into the claim that Venus is hot because of the 'greenhouse effect' of carbon dioxide.
The calculation I did for Venus at 11:30 also works out for Titan, (another body with a surface pressure of over 1 bar). I have done it here;
Titan Tt =∜0.01089 x Te
Tt = 0.323 x 288
Tt = 93 Kelvin
This gives the calculated temperature on Titan at 1 bar as 93 Kelvin.
Measurements by the lander Huygens in it's descent trough the Titan atmosphere, show that the temperature at 1 bar is around 90 Kelvin.
PLEASE!
I did not say that the bottom ~4km of atmosphere of Venus is a 'liquid' or a 'solid'!
It is a super-critical fluid.
Please read the definition here; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercritical_fluid
YouTube Tip: As usual run at Settings; Playback Speed; Times 1.5

References;
Hollingsworth, J., Young, R., Schubert, G., Covey, C., & Grossman, A. (2007). A simple‐physics global circulation model for Venus: Sensitivity assessments of atmospheric superrotation. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(5).
Svedhem, H., Titov, D. V., Taylor, F. W., & Witasse, O. (2007). Venus as a more Earth-like planet. Nature, 450(7170), 629-632.
Landis, G., Dyson, R., McGuire, M., Oleson, S., Schmidt, G., Grantier, J., . . . Fincannon, J. (2011). Human Telerobotic Exploration of Venus: A Flexible Path Design Study. Paper presented at the 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition.
Moroz, V., Ekonomov, A., Moshkin, B., Revercomb, H., Sromovsky, L., Schofield, J., . . . Tomasko, M. G. (1985). Solar and thermal radiation in the Venus atmosphere. Advances in Space Research, 5(11), 197-232.
Jelbring, H. (2003). The “Greenhouse Effect” as a Function of Atmospheric Mass. Energy & Environment, 14(2), 351-356.
Pauli, W. (1988). Exclusion principle, Lorentz group and reflection of space-time and charge Wolfgang Pauli (pp. 459-479): Springer.

YouTube has cut my advertising funding totally!
How to support me, and of course evidence-based science;
Patreon support;
https://www.patreon.com/1000Frolly

To cite my published climate papers;

Holmes, R. I. (2018). Thermal Enhancement on Planetary Bodies and the Relevance of the Molar Mass Version of the Ideal Gas Law to the Null Hypothesis of Climate Change. Earth, 7(3), 107-123.
Robert Ian Holmes, On the Apparent Relationship Between Total Solar Irradiance and the Atmospheric Temperature at 1 Bar on Three Terrestrial-type Bodies, Earth Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 6, 2019, pp. 346-351. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20190806.15
Holmes, R. I. (2017). Molar Mass Version of the Ideal Gas Law Points to a Very Low Climate Sensitivity. Earth Sciences, 6(6), 157.

Links to my published climate papers;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324599511_Thermal_Enhancement_on_Planetary_Bodies_and_the_Relevance_of_the_Molar_Mass_Version_of_the_Ideal_Gas_Law_to_the_Null_Hypothesis_of_Climate_Change
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335927448_On_the_Apparent_Relationship_Between_Total_Solar_Irradiance_and_the_Atmospheric_Temperature_at_1_Bar_on_Three_Terrestrial-type_Bodies
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323106609_Molar_Mass_Version_of_the_Ideal_Gas_Law_Points_to_a_Very_Low_Climate_Sensitivity

This the fourth in my Climate Science series debunking the so-called 'greenhouse effect'.
Climate Science 4; The Ice Core Record of CO2 is "Probably Wrong" Too.
Climate Science 1 revealed that our atmosphere is not like a greenhouse; instead it's the exact opposite - it's capable of expansion and convection.
Climate Science 2 explored the science and the climate cycles which the IPCC forgot to mention, and how they are totally controlling all current climate change.
We find that there actually is no 'extra' warming that we need to invoke a supposed 'greenhouse effect' from CO2 or other 'greenhouse gases' to fill.
Climate Science 3 looked into the claim that Venus is hot because of the 'greenhouse effect' of carbon dioxide.
Climate Science 4 looks into the ice core record for CO2, and critically examines whether it is correct or not.

REFERENCES;
UAH MSU satellite temperature graph, 1979-2019
EPICA DOME C ice core record, NOAA Luthi, 2008.
Earth System Laboratory, Moana Loa CO2 record, 1958-2019n
Petit, J.-R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N. I., Barnola, J.-M., Basile, I., . . . Delaygue, G. (1999). Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature, 399(6735), 429-436.
Shaviv, N. J., & Veizer, J. (2003). Celestial driver of Phanerozoic climate? GSA today, 13(7), 4-10.
IPCC AR5 Synthesis Report 2014
Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J., . . . Heimann, M. (2014). Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 465-570): Cambridge University Press.
Steinthorsdottir, M., Wohlfarth, B., Kylander, M. E., Blaauw, M., & Reimer, P. J. (2013). Stomatal proxy record of CO 2 concentrations from the last termination suggests an important role for CO 2 at climate change transitions. Quaternary science reviews, 68, 43-58.
Barnola, J. M., Raynaud, D. Y. S. N., Korotkevich, Y. S., & Lorius, C. (1987). Vostok ice core provides 160,000-year record of atmospheric CO2. Nature, 329(6138), 408.
Barnola, J., Anklin, M., Porcheron, J., Raynaud, D., Schwander, J., & Stauffer, B. (1995). CO2 evolution during the last millennium as recorded by Antarctic and Greenland ice. Tellus B, 47(1‐2), 264-272.
McKay, C. P., Pollack, J. B., & Courtin, R. (1991). The greenhouse and antigreenhouse effects on Titan. Science, 253(5024), 1118-1121.
Jaworowski, Z., Segalstad, T. V., & Ono, N. (1992). Do glaciers tell a true atmospheric CO 2 story? Science of the total environment, 114, 227-284.
Kouwenberg, L. L. R. (2004). Application of conifer needles in the reconstruction of Holocene CO2 levels.
Liu, Y., Cai, Q., Song, H., An, Z., & Linderholm, H. W. (2011). Amplitudes, rates, periodicities and causes of temperature variations in the past 2485 years and future trends over the central-eastern Tibetan Plateau. Chinese science bulletin, 56(28), 2986-2994.
Fonselius, S., Koroleff, F., & WÄRME, K. E. (1956). Carbon dioxide variations in the atmosphere. Tellus, 8(2), 176-183.
Slocum, G. (1955). Has the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere changed significantly since the beginning of the twentieth century. Month. Weather Rev, 83, 225-231.
Lepori, L., Bussolino, G., Matteoli, E., & Spanedda, A. On the increase of fossil CO2 in the atmosphere.
Segalstad, T. V. (1998). Carbon cycle modelling and the residence time of natural and anthropogenic atmospheric CO2. BATE, R.(Ed., 1998): Global Warming, 184-219.
Quirk, T. (2009). Sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Energy & Environment, 20(1), 105-121.
Harde, H. (2014). Advanced Two-Layer Climate Model for the Assessment of Global Warming by CO2.
Harde, H. (2017). Scrutinizing the carbon cycle and CO 2 residence time in the atmosphere. Global and Planetary Change, 152, 19-26.
Lepori, L., Bussolino, G., Matteoli, E., & Spanedda, A. On the increase of fossil CO2 in the atmosphere.
Allen, M. R., Barros, V. R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., Church, J. A., . . . Dubash, N. K. (2014). IPCC Fifth Assessment Synthesis Report-Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report.
Essenhigh, R. H. (2009). Potential dependence of global warming on the residence time (RT) in the atmosphere of anthropogenically sourced carbon dioxide. Energy & Fuels, 23(5), 2773-2784.
Lüdecke, H.-J., Weiss, C., & Hempelmann, A. (2015). Paleoclimate forcing by the solar De Vries/Suess cycle. Climate of the Past Discussions, 11(1), 279-305.
Last Graph; Neff, U., Burns, S., Mangini, A., Mudelsee, M., Fleitmann, D., & Matter, A. (2001). Strong coherence between solar variability and the monsoon in Oman between 9 and 6 ky ago. Nature, 411(6835), 290-293.

How to support me, and of course evidence-based science;
Patreon support;
https://www.patreon.com/1000Frolly

This the fifth in my Climate Science series debunking the so-called 'greenhouse effect'.
Climate Science 5; The IPCCs Forcing Estimates are Wrong Too.
Apology - mistake at 11:05 it was Mt Tambora not Krakatoa which exploded in 1815.
REFERENCES;
Neyman, J. (1937). X—outline of a theory of statistical estimation based on the classical theory of probability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.
CMIP5 Models uses 73 and 42 models. Compartison with HadCRUT4 courtesy Ed Hawkins, 2013.
Carbon-14 from the US Geological Survey, last 1,000 years.
HadCRUT3 data; https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data//temperature/HadCRUT3-gl.dat
Scafetta, N. (2010). Empirical evidence for a celestial origin of the climate oscillations and its implications. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 72(13), 951-970.
Foukal, P., at al (2006). Variations in solar luminosity and their effect on the Earth's climate. Nature, 443(7108), 161-166.
Svensmark, H. (2007b). Cosmoclimatology: a new theory emerges. Astronomy & Geophysics, 48(1), 1.18-11.24.
Aizen, E. M., et al (2016). Abrupt and moderate climate changes in the mid-latitudes of Asia during the Holocene. Journal of glaciology, 62(233), 411-439.
Rosenthal, Y., Linsley, B. K., & Oppo, D. W. (2013). Pacific ocean heat content during the past 10,000 years. Science, 342(6158), 617-621.
Lüdecke, H.-J. (2011). Long-term instrumental and reconstructed temperature records contradict anthropogenic global warming. Energy & Environment, 22(6), 723-745.
Rydval, M., et al. (2017). Reconstructing 800 years of summer temperatures in Scotland from tree rings. Climate Dynamics, 1-24.
Zhang, H., at al (2015). Late Holocene climate change and anthropogenic activities in north Xinjiang: Evidence from a peatland archive, the Caotanhu wetland. The Holocene, 25(2), 323-332.
Yan, H., et al. (2014). Higher sea surface temperature in the northern South China Sea during the natural warm periods of late Holocene than recent decades. Chinese science bulletin, 59(31), 4115-4122.
Orth, R., et al (2016). Did European temperatures in 1540 exceed present-day records? Environmental Research Letters, 11(11), 114021.
Kaniewski, D.et al (2011). The medieval climate anomaly and the Little Ice Age in coastal Syria inferred from pollen-derived palaeoclimatic patterns. Global and Planetary Change, 78(3), 178-187.
Ladurie, E. L. R., Delibrias, G., & Ladurie, M. L. R. (1975). La forêt de Grindelwald: nouvelles datations. Paper presented at the Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations.
Lamb, H. H. (2013). Climate: Present, Past and Future (Routledge Revivals): Volume 1: Fundamentals and Climate Now (Vol. 1): Routledge.
Tozer, C. R., Vance, T. R., Roberts, J. L., Kiem, A. S., Curran, M. A., & Moy, A. D. (2016). An ice core derived 1013-year catchment-scale annual rainfall reconstruction in subtropical eastern Australia. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20(5), 1703.
He, Y., Liu, W., Zhao, C., Wang, Z., Wang, H., Liu, Y., . . . Liu, Z. (2013). Solar influenced late Holocene temperature changes
Usoskin, I. G., Solanki, S., & Kovaltsov, G. (2007). Grand minima and maxima of solar activity: new observational constraints.
Solanki, S. K., Usoskin, I. G., Kromer, B., Schüssler, M., & Beer, J. (2004). Unusual activity of the Sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000 years. Nature, 431(7012), 1084-1087.
Scafetta, N., & Willson, R. C. (2014). ACRIM total solar irradiance satellite composite validation versus TSI proxy models.
Shapiro, A., Schmutz, W., Rozanov, E., Schoell, M., Haberreiter, M., Shapiro, A., & Nyeki, S. (2011). A new approach to the long-term reconstruction of the solar irradiance leads to large historical solar forcing. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 529, A67.
Herrera, V. V., Mendoza, B., & Herrera, G. V. (2015). Reconstruction and prediction of the total solar irradiance:
Svensmark, H. (2007b). Cosmoclimatology: a new theory emerges. Astronomy & Geophysics, 48(1), 1.18-11.24.
Shaviv, N. J. (2008). Using the oceans as a calorimeter to quantify the solar radiative forcing. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 113(A11).
Neff, U., Burns, S., Mangini, A., Mudelsee, M., Fleitmann, D., & Matter, A. (2001). Strong coherence between solar variability and the monsoon in Oman between 9 and 6 ky ago. Nature, 411(6835), 290-293.
Gouretski, V., Kennedy, J., Boyer, T., & Köhl, A. (2012). Consistent near‐surface ocean warming since 1900 in two largely independent observing networks.
Lansner, F., & Pedersen, J. O. P. (2018). Temperature trends with reduced impact of ocean air temperature, Energy & Environment
Ljungqvist, F. C. (2010). A new reconstruction of temperature variability in the extra-tropical Northern Hemisphere during the last two millennia.

Climate Scientist Dr Holmes presents the new science which completely demolishes the very existence of the so-called "Greenhouse Effect" through "Greenhouse Gases".
All our efforts to "stop man-made climate change" through reducing our emissions of so-called "Greenhouse Gases" like CO2 or CH4 are therefore demonstrated to be futile, expensive and a foolish diversion from solving real problems.

Presented here is an interview conducted by Ricky Petersen of 'Climate Realism' in Denmark.
It can be viewed here;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JU7DT9ux

To cite my published climate papers;

1) Holmes, R. I. (2018). Thermal Enhancement on Planetary Bodies and the Relevance of the Molar Mass Version of the Ideal Gas Law to the Null Hypothesis of Climate Change. Earth, 7(3), 107-123. (doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20180703.13)

2) Holmes, R. I. (2019). On the Apparent Relationship Between Total Solar Irradiance and the Atmospheric Temperature at 1 Bar on Three Terrestrial-type Bodies. Earth, 8(6), 346-351. (doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20190806.15)

3) Robert, I. H. (2018). Thermal Gradients on Planetary Bodies and the Molar Mass Ideal Gas Law. J Phys Astron, 6(1), 134.

I see from the comments that some are still pretty confused!

What my papers do is invalidate the "Greenhouse Gas Hypothesis" (the 'Greenhouse Effect') in two very different ways.

It is correct to say that the molar mass version of the ideal gas law cannot be used to determine what causes a warming!
However, it CAN be used (see my 2018 paper) to determine what is NOT causing a warming.

This is where my first invalidation of the 'GHE' comes in - both through a terminal conflict (due to problems with the IPCC's so-called 'equilibration time'), and through the above; that is the non-appearance of a large anomalous change to gas pressure and/or density. This MUST happen if there is such a thing as a separate class of "Greenhouse gases" which cause anomalous warming - and yet it doesn't - and actually it can't, unless the IGL is wrong.

Either the Ideal Gas Law is correct or the Greenhouse Effect is correct - both CANNOT be correct.

My second invalidation of the GHE comes from atmospheric measurements at 1 bar - showing that different atmospheric percentages of 'GHG' do not affect temperature - only insolation does.
See my last paper (2019).

"I was contacted by a reporter for National Public Radio. He offered to interview me, but only if I would state that the warming was due to human activity. When I refused to do so, he hung up on me.

I had another interesting experience around the time my paper in Science was published. I received an astonishing email from a major researcher in the area of climate change. He said, "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."

Dr. David Deming - University of Oklahoma's College of Geosciences

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRECB-2006-pt14/html/CRECB-2006-pt14-Pg19154.htm

by; Robert Ian Holmes PhD
Bringing real empirical science into the climate debate.

This is a podcast I did in February 2023 with Tom Nelson it can be found at; • Robert Ian Holmes...
In this video I mainly delve into something which is ignored by the IPCC and the climate science community - CLIMATE CYCLES.

CLIMATE CYCLES DOMINATE ALL CLIMATE CHANGES
One cannot understand climate change or global warming properly, unless one knows about climate cycles. They have always dominated climate changes on Earth, and still do today. The four key climate cycles which are most relevant to the current period of global warming (which started in 1690) are the Yoshimura, De-Vries, Bond and the Bray.

WHY CURRENT CLIMATE MODELS ARE WORTHLESS
None of the above four climate cycles are in any IPCC report, or in any climate models; also missing from the climate models are accurate representations of clouds and convection. These problems, and the fact that climate models incorporate an incorrect null hypothesis of climate which includes a 'Greenhouse Gas Effect', mean that the models - and their results - are completely worthless. Yet the 'scenario projections' from these worthless models are what all Western governments are now relying on to form our energy and other policies.

Slides for this presentation: https://tomn.substack.com/api/v1/file/04c7463b-1434-4252-bda7-f94697a19f56.pdf
https://twitter.com/1000Frolly
https://www.youtube.com/user/1000frolly

My Publications;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338393205_On_the_Apparent_Relationship_Between_Total_Solar_Irradiance_and_the_Atmospheric_Temperature_at_1_Bar_on_Three_Terrestrial-type_Bodies
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324599511_Thermal_Enhancement_on_Planetary_Bodies_and_the_Relevance_of_the_Molar_Mass_Version_of_the_Ideal_Gas_Law_to_the_Null_Hypothesis_of_Climate_Change
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323106609_Molar_Mass_Version_of_the_Ideal_Gas_Law_Points_to_a_Very_Low_Climate_Sensitivity

Current ResearchGate discussion on the null hypothesis is here;
https://www.researchgate.net/post/CLIMATE_CHANGE_GLOBAL_WARMING_is_the_Assumed_Null_Hypothesis_Wrong

CHAPTERS
00:00 Introduction
02:32 Presentation starts
03:22 16 cycles
05:53 Ignoring the past
09:05 Cosmic rays
13:18 Warmer oceans release CO2
17:03 Plants love CO2
19:35 CO2 as high or higher 1500 years ago?
20:43 Discrepancies between ice core and stomata CO2 data
22:28 Global temperature vs cloud cover
25:36 You can get warming from the sun when there's less solar activity
26:12 Cosmic rays and clouds
29:58 65 million years of climate change
31:47 Last 3M years: Very, very cold
33:10 Downwelling long wave radiation from the Sun
35:57 Net economic benefit up to 3C warming?
37:57 Global warming on Neptune and Pluto
42:20 Current high solar activity
45:45 Who really worked on critical IPCC attribution
49:14 Hockey stick
51:47 Cooling the past
54:52 Central England record
56:17 Climate sensitivity