Holocaust, Hate Speech & Were the Germans so Stupid?
By Anthony Lawson
https://codoh.com/library/document/1530/
Having been tortured, Rudolf Höss, who was the commander of Auschwitz from 1940 to 1943, almost certainly lied to save the lives of his wife and children. Even if torture and duress cannot be proven, the overwhelming reason for recognizing the utter falsity of the Höss confession is that the gassing method he described was not scientifically plausible.
Yet Höss’s conviction has stood, by inference, as a testament to the cruelty of Germans in general, since he was tried at Nuremberg, in 1947, and subsequently hanged on April 16th, 1947, in Poland.
Making a statement like this which doubts the officially ordained narrative can be a crime in a number of western "democracies," believe it or not, and it is at least considered to be reprehensible in those countries that have not (yet?) outlawed dissenting views on this topic.
This video discusses the social and judicial persecution of individuals voicing dissident opinions on the historical event usually referred to as the Holocaust. It castigates that persecution and lays bare the illegality and amorality of such activities. In addition, a number of the most striking historical arguments why dissenting = revisionist views on the Holocaust are reasonable, are presented. A brief look into the political agenda of those furthering the orthodox Holocaust narrative rounds up this amazing movie.
NOTE: This Video was originally uploaded to YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gycNMf0xAc), but YouTube deleted it under the pretext of some spurious copyright claim over some of the used footage. Suppressing free and open discussion on any subject, however, is as bad as telling lies, and knowingly suppressing the truth is the biggest lie of all, because it is based, not on a mistake or a genuine error, but on a deliberate intention to deceive.
This is the author's dedication:
With great respect for those who have tried—though harassed, punished, fined, imprisoned and otherwise abused—to tell it like it really was: Arthur R. Butz, Robert Faurisson, Jürgen Graf, Gerd Honsik, David Irving, Kevin Käther, Nicholas Kollerstrom, Fred Leuchter, Horst Mahler, Carlo Mattogno, Ingrid Rimland, Germar Rudolf, Bradley Smith, Wilhelm Stäglich, Sylvia Stolz, Fredrick Toben, Ernst Zündel and many others.
For the HASBARATS (from an archived web page):
I am writing this preface in August of 2003.
The idea of one group of people separating themselves from the rest of humanity and transforming themselves into a higher form of life was not originally a Nazi idea. It was a Jewish idea. The Jews have been doing that for more than 2000 years.
I find myself identifying more and more with the Jews. What they are doing is almost isomorphic to what I am doing. They are trying to do something that cannot be done in any traditional society. They have to undermine all traditional societies at the most fundamental level, and meanwhile they have to hide. I understand that. I am also a stranger in a strange land, just like them. A marrano.
In the psychic subculture, they make a distinction between "open-eye psychics" and "closed-eye psychics." The closed-eye psychics are naive. They really believe that they are telling fortunes, helping people with their problems, etc. They are in denial. The open-eye psychics know perfectly well that what they are doing is a scam. They are taking advantage of ignorant people. They are ripping people off. They acknowledge this (among themselves).
The same distinction can be made in Judaism. Last week I saw a movie, "The Holy Land." One of the characters calls himself The Exterminator (not referring to bugs). He carries a machine gun with him wherever he goes. At one point he says "There is no peace process. That's just a scam for the born-again Christians, to get their money." He is an open-eye Jew, in a movie made by and for open-eye Jews. What they are counting on of course is that very few outsiders ever see such movies, just like very few outsiders read Jewish papers and books intended for internal consumption.
So, if I see them as fellow Transhumanists and marranos, why not join them? I've thought about it. There are many reasons why I would hesitate to do it. In any case I don't think that's a realistic option for me. The open-eye concept can only be carried so far. When a Jew (David Cole, for example) goes too far, they disown him. They certainly wouldn't have room for somebody like me.
WE'RE ON TO THE SCAM - WE CAN SEE YOU NOW.
