How to expose 9/11 “skeptics” and “debunkers”, Part 3

How to expose 9/11 “skeptics” and “debunkers”, Part 3

9/11 “skeptics” use distraction and insults because they worship the official story. In their minds, any eyewitness who contradicts their holy government texts is confused or lying.

SKEPTIC: “Some people knew that WTC Building 7 was going to fall on 9/11 because it was showing signs of structural failure.”

TRUTH: No one has provided visual evidence to support the claim that structural failure of WTC7 was apparent in the hours before its collapse. In fact, top structural engineers were baffled by the collapse of this building for years, so the idea that people on the ground knew it would collapse on its own just from observation is ridiculous.

Some “skeptics” point to a photo that shows a gash in the side of WTC7, possibly created by falling debris from the Twin Towers. But these same skeptics also defend the NIST 9/11 report that states the office fires, not debris damage, caused the building’s collapse.

It’s true that many people in lower Manhattan knew WTC7 would come down. The question is how?

Multiple first responders reported that WTC7 would be intentionally demolished. One that was recorded by CNN said, “The building is about to blow up.” Others were told by emergency officials that it would be brought down on purpose. This doesn’t mean that firefighters planted explosives in the building, but the message was spread throughout the area.

The “debunkers” will dismiss these eyewitnesses as being wrong simply because the testimonies are at odds with their religion: undying belief in the government’s version of events. In their church, heretics can never be tolerated.

Richard Gage, AIA

How to expose 9/11 “skeptics” and “debunkers”, Part 3