This the third in my Climate Science series debunking the so-called 'greenhouse effect'.
Climate Science 1 revealed that our atmosphere is not like a greenhouse; instead it's the exact opposite - it's capable of expansion and convection.
Climate Science 2 explored the science and the climate cycles which the IPCC forgot to mention, and how they are totally controlling all current climate change.
We find that there actually is no 'extra' warming that we need to invoke a supposed 'greenhouse effect' from CO2 or other 'greenhouse gases' to fill.
Climate Science 3 looks into the claim that Venus is hot because of the 'greenhouse effect' of carbon dioxide.
The calculation I did for Venus at 11:30 also works out for Titan, (another body with a surface pressure of over 1 bar). I have done it here;
Titan Tt =∜0.01089 x Te
Tt = 0.323 x 288
Tt = 93 Kelvin
This gives the calculated temperature on Titan at 1 bar as 93 Kelvin.
Measurements by the lander Huygens in it's descent trough the Titan atmosphere, show that the temperature at 1 bar is around 90 Kelvin.
PLEASE!
I did not say that the bottom ~4km of atmosphere of Venus is a 'liquid' or a 'solid'!
It is a super-critical fluid.
Please read the definition here; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercritical_fluid
YouTube Tip: As usual run at Settings; Playback Speed; Times 1.5
References;
Hollingsworth, J., Young, R., Schubert, G., Covey, C., & Grossman, A. (2007). A simple‐physics global circulation model for Venus: Sensitivity assessments of atmospheric superrotation. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(5).
Svedhem, H., Titov, D. V., Taylor, F. W., & Witasse, O. (2007). Venus as a more Earth-like planet. Nature, 450(7170), 629-632.
Landis, G., Dyson, R., McGuire, M., Oleson, S., Schmidt, G., Grantier, J., . . . Fincannon, J. (2011). Human Telerobotic Exploration of Venus: A Flexible Path Design Study. Paper presented at the 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition.
Moroz, V., Ekonomov, A., Moshkin, B., Revercomb, H., Sromovsky, L., Schofield, J., . . . Tomasko, M. G. (1985). Solar and thermal radiation in the Venus atmosphere. Advances in Space Research, 5(11), 197-232.
Jelbring, H. (2003). The “Greenhouse Effect” as a Function of Atmospheric Mass. Energy & Environment, 14(2), 351-356.
Pauli, W. (1988). Exclusion principle, Lorentz group and reflection of space-time and charge Wolfgang Pauli (pp. 459-479): Springer.
YouTube has cut my advertising funding totally!
How to support me, and of course evidence-based science;
Patreon support;
https://www.patreon.com/1000Frolly
To cite my published climate papers;
Holmes, R. I. (2018). Thermal Enhancement on Planetary Bodies and the Relevance of the Molar Mass Version of the Ideal Gas Law to the Null Hypothesis of Climate Change. Earth, 7(3), 107-123.
Robert Ian Holmes, On the Apparent Relationship Between Total Solar Irradiance and the Atmospheric Temperature at 1 Bar on Three Terrestrial-type Bodies, Earth Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 6, 2019, pp. 346-351. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20190806.15
Holmes, R. I. (2017). Molar Mass Version of the Ideal Gas Law Points to a Very Low Climate Sensitivity. Earth Sciences, 6(6), 157.
Links to my published climate papers;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324599511_Thermal_Enhancement_on_Planetary_Bodies_and_the_Relevance_of_the_Molar_Mass_Version_of_the_Ideal_Gas_Law_to_the_Null_Hypothesis_of_Climate_Change
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335927448_On_the_Apparent_Relationship_Between_Total_Solar_Irradiance_and_the_Atmospheric_Temperature_at_1_Bar_on_Three_Terrestrial-type_Bodies
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323106609_Molar_Mass_Version_of_the_Ideal_Gas_Law_Points_to_a_Very_Low_Climate_Sensitivity
