Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
ROGER AND RANJAN DISCUSS THE WESTFERRY DEBATE IN PARLIAMENT #NoThereThere
"I think the hon. Gentleman may be unintentionally misleading the House on that point. It did not save the developers £50 million. If he reads the inspector’s report on this, he will see that it quite clearly says that the schedule 15 viability assessment can be rerun in the event that the appeal scheme becomes liable for community infrastructure levy. The report states:
“The adjustment is likely to reduce the amount of affordable housing.”
What the Secretary of State did was to make sure that the right proportion of affordable housing was delivered on that scheme. The hon. Gentleman is saying, quite wrongly, that that was not the reason. If he repeats that, or anyone else does, in this debate, they will therefore be intentionally misleading this House."
Kevin Hollinrake (Thirsk and Malton) (Con)
https://twitter.com/kevinhollinrake
https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2020-06-24/debates/062FA715-C506-4F43-9F2B-0DBDF51331C3/WestferryPrintworksDevelopment
To unravel the hysterics lets just go back to basics.
Planning consents for developments over 100 square meters attract Community Infrastructure levy’s , Tower hamlets had released a revised charging rate up from 2015’s £200 per sqm to £280 per sq m, the charge is not a new thing and the potential increase is also effected by planning guidance on application of the charges weighed against the Affordable housing and other social and commercial benefits any particular Scheme offers to the community in which it is proposed.
Sadiq's "Poor Doors" Bung! a Westferry Printers/ Friary Park Saucy Comparison
https://www.yumpu.com/s/xmjpHkB4ICa2weNg
Tower Hamlets: Did Billionaire Richard Desmond bribe Robert Jenrick?
147 views•Jun 11, 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9aAt2a7Z8I
Westferry Printworks follow up Chat with Financial Eyes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OijogBHXaQ
50MILLIONLOAN #MTANVIL #WESTFERRYPRINTWORKS
Ranjan and Rog discuss Friary Park V Westferry Printers The £50 million quid Stakes
https://youtu.be/A0qvYl4U-2o
#LoftMiles #RealRLD #PlacemakingBasics
Teach a Man to Fish. Westferry Print works , The Kids are All right
https://youtu.be/LRYXH2zVuSU
THE EMPERORS NEW CLOTHES, RUSSEL BRAND
https://www.bitchute.com/video/aITpa3bFd2NW/
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4323536/
Director: Michael Winterbottom
Writers: Russell Brand (made by), Michael Winterbottom (made by)
About
The film contains archival footage from the 21st-century recession paired with "comedic send-ups" from Brand, conducted in the financial districts of London and New York.[1] In one scene in the film, Brand attempts to confront Lord Rothermere, the billionaire owner of the Daily Mail, about his "non-dom" tax status, through which he avoids paying taxes in the United Kingdom by claiming residence elsewhere. When Brand rings the bell at Rothermere's London mansion and asks through the intercom to speak to him, he is told by an unseen person that Rothermere does indeed live there.[2]
Winterbottom stated that the film will explore why "nothing has changed" since the economic crisis in 2008.
"It's about inequality and why the 1 percent (of the world's wealthy) seem to have so much and the rest of us not quite so much," Winterbottom told the BBC in October 2014. "Everyone knows about equality and what's going on in the world, so the idea is to point out the ludicrous extremes of our society."[3]
The documentary began shooting in October. Winterbottom and Brand had previously discussed—but ultimately abandoned—the idea of producing a film version of Brand's first memoir, My Booky Wook.
"I think the hon. Gentleman is unintentionally risking the reputation of this House. Does he not accept the position that I stated earlier? It is not a question of saving the developer up to £50 million. As the inspector himself admitted, it is simply that a commensurate amount of money would have been reduced from the allocation of affordable housing. That is what would have happened. It was not going into the back pocket of the developer. The hon. Gentleman must accept that, or he risks the reputation of this House."
Kevin Hollinrake (Thirsk and Malton) (Con)
Category | None |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Related Videos
Say yes to Life! Blake Europe a prophesy original sunday 24 march 2024
1 day, 21 hours ago
WILLIAM BLAKE EUROPE A PROPHESY AND BOODICA SPEAKS TO THE NWO
2 days, 5 hours ago
Say yes to Life! Blake Europe a prophesy original sunday 24 march 2024
2 days, 16 hours ago
EUROPE A PROPHECY, BREXIT OR EUROPE? ACCORDING TO WILLIAM BLAKE.
3 days, 7 hours ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.