how is saying, their son would never disappear & later sightings match him, ilogical?

there is no evidence to suggest what happened after he was missing nor has anything emerged subsequently which could
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Steven_Koecher

https://archive.fo/cC8Rm
You can't have this both ways. You emphasize the family's word that descriptions of sightings match, which is often a sign of a family's hopefulness rather than coming to terms with the loss of a loved one, but dismiss the family's insistence that Steven would never disappear and put his family through that devastation, especially his father. The sightings in this case are nonsense, just like the ones in so many others, Laci Peterson, for example

COPPA children's on line privacy protection act disclosure & DISCLAIMER
the uploader of this video is NOT the website, service, or app operator &
has NO ability to collect, use, or disclose ANYONE'S personal information &
has a general mixed audience that is EXEMPT from triggering COPPA

my work is transformative in nature as a criticism so some usage of the original is required but uses no more of the original than is necessary & this has no negative affect on the market for the original work its self & my work is protected speech as outlined by the 1st amendment to the united states constitution & falls under fair use as outlined in united states copyright laws

http://bitchute.com/channel/waptek/
http://bitchute.com/channel/waptek2/
http://bitchute.com/channel/waptek0/
http://bitchute.com/channel/waptek1/

http://youtube.com/waptek1
http://youtube.com/waptek2
http://youtube.com/waptek0
http://youtube.com/channel/UC6svPRqDNU8L7q2qUxV60rg