You are about to action:

Object being modified by the action

Do you want to proceed?

Share Video Link

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5QpTqBKcfTBd/

Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.

Embed Video HTML

Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.

Share to Social Media

Share to social media by clicking on the quick share links.

Reason

Please select the most appropriate reason from the list provided.

Note: For a more detailed description of each reason, see our Community Guidelines.

Additional Comments

Please add any additonal comments that will help with the assessment of your request.

Note: Copyright claims must contain all the items specified within the Copyright Policy.

Email Submissions

We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.

We will investigate and take the appropriate action.

Add to Playlist

Jacob 2:30 – The Loophole That Never Was

Next video playing soon

Click to cancel

Autoplay has been paused

Click to watch next video

First published at 16:27 UTC on March 23rd, 2023.

subscribers

BitChute Advertisement

The pro-polygamous LDS interpretation of Jacob 2:30 is textually and contextually ludicrous. There are lots of alternate interpretations, like that of the bloggers here (https://oneclimbs.com/2017/01/05/a-proposed-reinterpretation-of-jacob-230/)
and here (https://bookofmormonism.com/2022/01/31/jacob-230-raising-up-seed-and-the-polygamy-question/). Almost any interpretation is more likely than the standard LDS definition, but naturally I like mine the best. Let me know what you think in the comments.

Webster’s 1828 dictionary definition of “for:” https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/for

LESS