This EMF/RF meter reading of a cell tower in the Harbour Landing neighbourhood of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada shows radiation that is around 20 times higher than safe(r) levels. A baseline used for a safer outdoor exposures is 1,000 microwatts or 1 milliwatts per metre squared. This RF meter records in milliwatts.
This reading is around 20 times higher than the lowest level at which EMF exposure has been shown to cause biological effects. This is just one of dozens of unsafe cell towers installed throughout the city with proposals for even more towers.
This reading is about 20 times higher than the lowest level at which EMF exposure has been shown to cause biological effects. This is just one of dozens of unsafe cell towers installed throughout the city with proposals for even more towers.
A 2004 study titled, "The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone Transmission Mast on the Incidence of Cancer," showed people were three times more likely to get cancer if they lived within 400 metres of a cell tower. There are already thousands of people in Regina and millions of people worldwide living, working, and going to school less than 400 metres from a cell tower.
PDF file - http://www.tetrawatch.net/papers/naila.pdf
Regina City Council is attempting to create a cell tower protocol for the city. One of the major issues is the number of metres a cell tower must be set back from residences, businesses, schools, hospitals, elderly carehomes, libraries, daycares, etc. This protocol would also determine "encouraged sites" versus "discouraged sites" for cell towers. The major problem with this is that there is no known safe distance from 5G-equipped cell towers. 5G radiation is untested for long-term exposures. There are zero scientific studies showing 5G radiation is safe for humans, animals, insects, or plants. Any "safe distance" would be a best guess from a council that has so far underestimated the health and safety dangers of these towers and particularly of 5G cell tower densification.
SaskTel (the major telecommunications company in Saskatchewan) has already balked at a 500 metre set back for cell towers, and this would be the bare minimum distance that could be considered safer, not safe. Council is talking about a setback two or three times the height of each tower - between 90 and 135 metres for 4G/5G towers. We already know people are three times more likely to get cancer if they live within 400 metres of a cell tower, and this is based on 2G or 3G towers. 5G towers produce much higher levels of radiation and many more pulsed frequencies than previous generations, so 90 to 135 meters is not even close to adequate for true safety.
5G small cell installations can be very tiny. They can be affixed to street lights or to buildings, for example. These are not towers in the traditional sense. In this case, the guidelines for setbacks would be entirely inapplicable.
My Delegation to Regina City Council on Cell Tower Protocols - August 17, 2022
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jZ2pEpbA5xsn/
Leader Post article: https://leaderpost.com/news/local-news/city-hall/city-protocol-on-cell-towers-and-5g-off-councils-radar-for-now
Leader Post article: https://leaderpost.com/news/local-news/city-hall/new-cell-towers-in-regina-stalled-as-council-pushes-for-public-consultation
