Google whistleblower, Zach Vorhies bravely came forward though Project Veritas last August with documents that strongly suggest special interests are colluding with Big Tech and the corporate media to oust the President and to silence and financiall…
Google whistleblower, Zach Vorhies bravely came forward though Project Veritas last August with documents that strongly suggest special interests are colluding with Big Tech and the corporate media to oust the President and to silence and financially disenfrachise anyone in their way (like me).
This is a talk given last weekend by former Google Senior Software Engineer, Zach Vorhies at the American Priority Festival in Miami, Florida. Vorhies provided nearly one thousand pages of documents to the Department of Justice, demonstrating the vast scope of the felonies and frauds being perpetrated by his former employer. He gives his insider's perspective on how Google is actively engaged in a subtle psychological war against the US populace and in the financial destruction of certain targeted sectors.
Google is undertaking to re-program the world according to their disingenuous application of "Social Justice". Social Justice is the friendly-sounding name for an insidious movement that seeks to raze the entire cultural legacy of the West by gradually destabilizing all norms of rationality and logic, according to academic, Michael Rectenwald, who says its ultimate purpose is to implement a global corporate technocratic superstate.
The question remains as to who, exactly is behind Social Justice? Is it a smattering of San Francisco Commie militants drunk on their technocratic power? Is it the CCP? Or is all of this being orchestrated by the éminence grise that controls the world's money supply?
The statements above may sound overblown if one forgets that the Internet of Things will soon be online. The Internet of Things (IOT) is an AI-driven interactive facsimile of the world, in which all mechanical and digital machines, objects, animals and people will be given unique identifiers (UIDs) and will be constantly transferring data over a global network without human-to-human or human-to-computer interaction. Using the 5G network, the IOT will enable self-driving cars and aerial vehicles and it will supposedly save a lot of energy. Such centralization will also make our infrastrucure eminently hackable, especially once quantum computing makes encryption impossible, which is soon.
In financial terms, the Internet of Things may quickly eclipse the power of the physical world and it will enable the Big Data giants, like Google to scale up their de-platforming and de-banking activities of entities large and small into the real world, making China's social credit system look like a 2 year old's birthday party by comparison.
The purported ethos guiding Google is "Social Justice", which rejects objective reality. Google calls objective reality "algorithmically unfair". They seek to re-shape reality through "product interventions" within their search algorithms.
Check it out for yourselves. Go to Google.com and enter "men can" into the search bar. For me, the auto-completes that I see today are: 1. men can have babies 2. men can get breast cancer 3. men can cook 4. men can have periods 5. men can think about nothing 6. men can have babies now 7. men can get pregnant.
Needless to say, these are not the top-searched results for "men can" in the real world. These auto-completes have been savagely intervened upon with the most ham-fisted transgender-centric ideal of "Social Justice".
Vorhies says, "I started to ask myself, why is Google doing this? Why are they intervening in your search results by intervening in their Google News and I think I've got the answer."
He then shows a couple of slides that he discovered in Google's corporate intranet, displaying the flowchart of this particular operation, where it was explicitly stated that the intended outcome of this project was: "People are programmed".
Vorhies shows a video of YouTube CEO, Susan Wojcicki at a tech talk, describing her plan to aggressively boost "authoritative news" outlets, such as the thoroughly discredited CNN and to deboost and "push down" on "fake news" through their machine learning programs. He notes that such "product interventions" went into high gear after the election of Donald Trump.
Vorhies then looked into what was being categorized as "fake news" and found that most of the time, these were bonafide news events. He says, "I started to realize that maybe this wasn't about fake news, maybe this was about controlling the narrative."
Vorhies shows internal slides from Google about how the staff sought to de-platform Right Wing news outlet, Breitbart from Google's advertising program and how they aggressively sought to blacklist certain sites and to disassociate search results that showed any relationship between the Las Vegas shooter, Stephen Paddock and the DNC, while strengthening suggestions of ties between him and Donald Trump.
He gives a chilling, documented example of another intervention by Google, after President Trump famously tweeted upon his return from Saudi Arabia on May 31, 2017, "Despite the negative press coverag.
