Epstein: The Tip of One Tentacle
Copied from https://www.bitchute.com/channel/rogueop/
I haven't listened in full, but I appreciate him touching on matters such as pornography emanating from a psychopathic mind with mutilated genitalia. It impacted me very deeply seeing how 80% of American males have been welcomed into this world: crucified to a board and subjected to a heinous measure of torture for the sake of amputating the most divine portion of their sex organ.
It impacted me more deeply because it wasn't done to me and so I knew perfectly the significance of the amputation. See hashtag circumcision for more uploads on that subject.
As a refresher, Christians were not historically circumcised, not even in a less than radical way. Here's a quick quote corroborating that:
"In R. Isaac's eyes, Christian men were sexual supermen, who could pleasure their women to a degree far beyond the capacities of Jewish men, and who could do so far more often. If virility were to be defined in terms of sexual prowess, Jewish men would fail miserably, because their circumcision has rendered them incapable of pleasuring their women."
From the same source: "The sexual inadequacy of the circumcised man, implicit in the Midrash on Genesis and in Maimonides, becomes explicit in R. Isaac."
Shaye J. D. Cohen, p 156 of Why Aren't Jewish Women Circumcised?: Gender and Covenant in Judaism. 2005.
Should it surprise us that as soon as these crippled sexual failures got control of American medicine they went to work normalizing genital mutilation for all American boys?
We're talking about a procedure called radical circumcision that involves infant torture and drastic sexual crippling.
"Forced genital mutilation of males is no different than forced genital mutilation of females. It has been proven via histological analysis that essentially all the erogenous nerves of the penis are located in the ridged band and frenular delta of the foreskin, both of which are cut off. I was circumcised for pseudomedical reasons by the NHS in the UK when I was 14 and it destroyed my sexual pleasure completely. The glans penis is almost non-erogenous in character. It's like the eyeball--covered in crude free nerves that detect pain and pressure. That's all the circumcised man's left with. Unfortunately many people have bought the baseless folk theory that the glans penis and glans clitoris are the primary sexual organs. This is untrue and no histological evidence exists to back this up."
"Male circumcision is more sexually damaging than FGM. More tissue is excised, more nerves are lost, more functionality is lost. The foreskin has been PROVEN to be the primary sexual tissue with almost all pleasurable properties because the glans has virtually no fine touch reception, mostly protopathic sensitivity [i.e. pressure]. By a simple process of elimination, we can deduce that the foreskin is the hub of pleasure."
Pornography never appealed to me, not in the slightest. I knew right away it was by and for radically circumcised cripples.
|Category||Health & Medical|
|Sensitivity||Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 13+|
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.
1 day, 21 hours ago