If You Do Not Know Who Ernst Zündel Was, Then You Have Missed Something Extremely Important!
ERNST ZÜNDEL died of a heart-attack in his sleep on Saturday, 5 August 2017. He was 78 years old, having survived decades of legal persecution, threats, violence, and assassination-attempts in the period when he was active as a promoter of Holocaust Revisionism in the 1980s and 1990s — without ever backing down.
We owe largely to Ernst Zündel the establishment of the strong foundation on which Holocaust Revisionism today stands, since it was he who organized Revisionist scholars and commissioned further research for his defense in the famous series of “False News Trials” in 1985, 1988, and 1992. The Leuchter Report was commissioned for the 1988 trial, where celebrity historian David Irving also testified, himself having been convinced by the Leuchter Report.
The reverberations from Zündel’s defense at those False News Trials have not ceased. Not long after the 1988 trial, Professor Yehuda Bauer of the Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum declared that the death-tolls for Auschwitz must be reduced, because they were too high to be credible, and the “neo-nazi deniers of the Holocaust,” he said, would call attention to this. So the death-toll for Auschwitz was drastically reduced in 1990. That solved one problem, but it created other, new problems. The official reduction of the death-toll for Auschwitz means that the confession of one of the commandants of Auschwitz, Rudolf Hoess, was false. This, in turn, means that all such confessions are dubious. After the damage inflicted by Ernst Zündel, the Holocaust has become like a knitted garment unraveling.
Suppression of reporting about Holocaust Revisionism has slowed that process in Europe and the anglophone world, but in the long term there will surely be nothing left of the Holocaust — nothing qualifying it for the enormous attention that it has received — and it was Ernst Zündel who initiated this process.
* * *
Evidence for the “Holocaust”
THE QUESTION WAS asked: “Is there actually any real evidence for the Holocaust?”
There is some evidence — that the Holocaust is either a myth or is, at least, much exaggerated.
The trials of Ernst Zundel in Canada produced some interesting insights that have since been mostly covered up. For one thing, a lot of the so-called eyewitness testimony was proved false. Many survivors lied about what they said they had seen. For example, some survivors stated under oath that they had seen flames shooting out of the crematorium chimneys, bringing up ash, some of which landed on their clothing. It was a lie. It was proved in court that those chimneys were specifically designed not to emit fire or ash, but only warm air.
Holocaust testimony is sometimes in self-conflict, in mutual conflict, in conflict with physical evidence, or in conflict with the laws of Nature.
The chemical “criminal traces” of ferrocyanide on the red bricks forming the alleged gas chamber, where Jews were said to have been killed, isn’t consistent with the near daily use of a brick building as a gas chamber. There just isn’t enough of the bluish “Prussian blue” chemical for that to be the case. Instead, the level of contamination is consistent with a once or twice per year fumigation to kill pests and germs, which wasn’t done during World War 2 by the Germans alone, but also by the Allies, who used the same chemical (hydrogen cyanide, as evolved from Zyklon B) for the same pesticide purpose. Indeed, the alleged gas chamber isn’t the only building to exhibit that trace of ferrocyanide. Other buildings in the Auschwitz camp also show it, including the guards’ barracks. Again, this indicates that Zyklon B was used as a pesticide, not as a gas to kill people. If the Germans wanted to kill people, then there were much more effective gases available to them (which were invented during World War 1 for chemical warfare).
Furthermore, much of the photographic “evidence” was also false, misleading, or intentionally deceptive. Some of the photos did not begin as photos, but as high quality drawings that were then photographed slightly out of focus so that they seemed to be real photographic images. Some of the photos that did begin as photos were altered by drawing in extra objects or human figures that weren’t in the originals. Some photos had misleading captions on them; for example, a photo whose caption said that shown were the dead bodies of Jews from Auschwitz actually showed the dead bodies of Germans from Dresden.
The lesson to learn is not to make assumptions that go beyond what a picture really shows you. Just because you see a pile of dead bodies doesn’t necessarily let you know what those people died from. It doesn’t even tell you who the dead people were. It usually doesn’t tell you where and when the photograph was taken. When a narrator…
Continue reading:
https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/08/evidence-for-the-holocaust/
