As a white woman living in Australia who was born twenty years after Martin Luther King Jr delivered his 'I Have a Dream' speech on August 28, 1963 in Washington DC I have never appraised his espoused philosophy of judging people by the co…
As a white woman living in Australia who was born twenty years after Martin Luther King Jr delivered his 'I Have a Dream' speech on August 28, 1963 in Washington DC I have never appraised his espoused philosophy of judging people by the content of their character as anything other than an obvious truth.
The only flaw in his espoused philosophy is the term content is non-descriptive.
I find it somewhat ironic that in less than three months after MLK made his speech President John F Kennedy would be assassinated in Dallas, Texas on the 22nd November, 1963. A world shattering event that literally would bamboozle the world as to the actual culprit(s) for more than fifty years when it should have been obvious to everyone even before JFK's limousine had reached Parkland hospital the Jews were responsible as it was common knowledge JFK's father Joseph Kennedy Sn had done everything humanly possible when he was the US Ambassador to the UK in 1940/41 in averting war with Adolf Hitler for which the Jews were never about to forgive him or his family for doing.
It is more than likely the Jews were responsible for the death of Joseph Kennedy Jr when his plane suspiciously exploded midair soon after take off whilst en route to Germany from England on a special mission during WWII laden with high explosives, despite not having encountered any enemy combatants or weather anomalies. The theory being amongst the high explosives onboard the plane a detonating device had been placed tuned to the frequency used by the British Radar System which had been down for repair when Joseph Kennedy's Jr plane had taken off but had been switched back on when his plane was midair, which just so happened to be the precise time his plane exploded.
Of course, then there is Senator Robert Kennedy's assassination which had almost the exact same modus operandi as JFK's assassination with more gunshots being heard by eyewitnesses than officially recorded along with the same botched police investigation.
What then does constitute content of the character?
Is it an admirable character that allows Western culture to descend into ruin in your life time?
Is it an enviable character that bequeaths a dystopian future without hope or promise to your children?
The first thing anyone would have realised if they had embraced MLK's philosophy back in 1963 of judging people by the content of their character is the Jews are pieces-of-shit as that's the proper use of its application.
It was never meant or intended to serve as some feel good virtue signalling ignore the fucking obvious about people, which is how the Baby Boomers obviously applied it.
A more appropriate title for Martin Luther King's Jr speech would have been "I Have a Nightmare' considering how his philosophy has been misapplied all these years.
