"THERE WAS NEVER ANY NEED TO LOCKDOWN THE WORLD; NOR TO HAVE A VACCINE FOR COVID 19" ~ Prof. Cahill

From 1hr: 22 interview with French Genecist, posted on this channel Jan 25

Partial Transcript:

.....Essentially, we had a disease that was well known could be treated and totally prevented - through zinc, hydroxhlorine, vit c, d - so that no one need die if it was treated properly. And this was well known, and in studies, for 20 years, that zinc, vit d c and hydrochloriquine could help.

There was really never any need to lockdown the world. But also there is no need to have a vaccine for it, because you actually have treatments that are among the safest in the world . ..

The harm from RNA vacciness - which are not safe. So doing a harm-benefit analysis was potentially significant because when u do the analysis in a common sense way if animals get sick when you give them an intervention, those medical products,  which peoples often make money from, if more people get sick than from the actual disease, they should not be given to people and they should not be licensed.

What people really need to know in a common sense way is a harm-benefit analysis .....
There has been no RNA vaccines for corona viruses in the past 17 years when they did the analysis the animals got sick, something like 1 in 3 or 1 in 10. And therefoe when the covid 19 pandemic was declared in march last year, the chance of dying from it was 1 in 1.8 million, if the chance of being harmed by the vaccine is say 1 in 10, that means in... 2 million people maybe 1 person would die from corona virus/covid 19; but you couldn't have 100,000 or 200,000 people having an adverse reaction from the vaccine.

And so the the harm of the intervention - a cov vaxx - is multiple times the harm of the actusl disese

Basically, there is no justification on a common sense, or a legal, or moral, or an ethical, thing for the intervention [developing a covid vaccine].