Brilliantly astute broadcast back in 1988 by KYTV, report was dead right when originally blaming structural failure, no bomb reside was ever found. Did the insane cost of litigation lead authorities to concoct the terrorist narrative... In the 35 years since this happened no other news outlet has laid out the simple truth behind the explosion. TWA 800 suffered the same structural fault.
Pan Am 103 rained down on the Muckletoon as well as Lockerbie, I recall still finding plane parts years later when grouse beating the moors.
"The time has come to finally review the evidence, usually defined as the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
What do we really know about Pan Am Flight 103?
This reviewing process will be very unnerving as it will force us to ask ourselves a very simple question.
Knowing that the evidence of the crime was obviously fabricated, could the crime itself be a fabrication? In other words, can we be sure it was a bomb, at all?
The magic luggage — An implausible scenario
Noel Koch headed the U.S. Defense Department’s anti-terrorism office from 1981 to 1986.
Koch has ridiculed — and quite rightly so, I must say — the idea that terrorists would gamble on the likelihood that unaccompanied luggage would be successfully transferred twice, first from Malta to Frankfurt, and then from Frankfurt to London. [4]
“I can tell you this much that I know about terrorism: it’s simple. You don’t complicate life. Life’s complicated enough as it is.
If you’ve got a target you want to get as close as you can to it and you don’t go through a series of permutations that provide opportunities for failure and that provide opportunities for discovery. It doesn’t work that way.”
Of course, an astute reader will also be left wondering why a terrorist would set the timer for just a few minutes after take-off instead of a few hours when Pan Am 103 would have exploded over the Atlantic, thus leaving nothing to be investigated?
And if that was not troubling enough, keep in mind that, after being transferred twice, the magic brown Samsonite suitcase was loaded on Pan Am Flight 103 against the fuselage at a very specific location (Sections 41/42) which is known to be the weakest part of the Boeing-747 airliner. Seriously? Only a child would believe such a fairy tale!
Fabricated evidence
After reading my analysis of the “evidence”, UK terrorism researcher Paul Feeney posted the following comment.
“The more I study the collection of evidence related to Lockerbie, the less sure I become that any of it is genuine – other than those items which were the possessions of the victims and which were later identified by their families.
We know PT/35(b) was fake evidence and was probably planted after the explosion, the Malta clothes are just too convenient for the prosecution and there are so many anomalies with the color, design and labels, not to mention the whole Gauci story, that it seems possible that they might have been planted after the explosion.
The white-then-black bits of Toshiba cassette radio, the intact Toshiba manual which had supposedly been wrapped around the IED, and so on. Is it possible that the forensic evidence was also faked? Indeed was any of the Lockerbie evidence genuine?
Is there any genuine, honest evidence; and, ultimately, was the explosion also ‘planted’ to look like a terrorist attack or was it all pre-planned?
At this point it becomes very frightening!”
All the evidence was fabricated...."
https://inteltoday.org/2020/07/20/lockerbie-three-decades-of-lies-jaccuse-chapter-x-what-really-happened-to-pan-am-flight-103/
