Being a good little conformist NPC, I've decided I'm not gonna believe any of this happened unless I see it reported by CNN, the news network to whom I have outsourced all my thinking. Remember folks: if a tree falls in a forest and the mainstream media doesn't report it, the tree never really fell. Likewise, if an otherwise perfectly healthy nurse collapses at a news conference, a mere few minutes after taking a "100% safe" vaccine, and the mainstream media ignores it, it didn't really happen.
Video source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBcCwlXN_OY&feature=emb_title&ab_channel=undefined
A few amusing comments beneath the above-linked video:
"Politicians need to be vaccinated first. If they live, then the vaccine is safe. If they die, our country is safe."
"Reporters at the end frantically texting their family members: "don't take the vaccine!!!"
"I'm surprised YouTube hasn't pulled this down and censored it immediately."
"If someone dies from the effects of the vaccine, it's okay. They were protected from COVID."
-----------------------
Imagine a vaccine so safe you have to be threatened to take it, for a disease so deadly you have to be tested to know you have it.
There are only two possibilities:
1. the vaccine is relatively safe, efficacious and reliable, or
2. the vaccine is not relatively safe, efficacious and reliable.
If the vaccine is not reliable, why would you be interested in getting everyone to take it, particularly when the virus it's supposed to be protecting against has an infection fatality rate of 0.23%* (as per WHO October study carried out by Dr John Ionnidas)?
If the vaccine is reliable, then great! Everyone can conduct their own personal risk assessment like autonomous, grown adults and those who choose to take the vaccine will, in their minds, be protected from those who don't, and those who don't take the vaccine will be protected from the coercion of those who think they should. Everyone's happy.
This is real simple. It doesn't even qualify as a moral dilemma... Well, at least in a free, non-occupied, non-nanny state it doesn't.
*The COVID-19 IFR is 0.23% weighted across all age groups, a figure which falls to 0.05% when you exclude the over 70s, and much lower than that when you also exclude those with comorbidities and poor metabolic health.
----------------------------
For more content that counters the media's fallacious, one-sided, hysterical, sensationalist & fear-mongering propaganda, check out the following must-watch videos from my COVID-1984 series:
The Science, Logic and Data of COVID-19 Explained (Ivor Cummins)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wCFjZfBhWa0u/
Crucial Viral Update (15th Oct) Why are the Media Undermining Science and Data? (Ivor Cummins)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cFgk9eXNMdUB/
Mexican TV guest exposes the Corona Hoax
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VbQP0pb1pGiX/
Doctors speak out on misinformation surrounding the coronavirus
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ue32HBoivLtE/
Amazing Debate on Lockdown Ideology versus Scientific Approach - Unmissable! (Ivor Cummins)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tAJt4TQvUWxs/
Dr Mike Yeadon on the Coronavirus Plandemic
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FERjy3DyYt8S/
CRUCIAL Viral Update Critique of Data sending UK into Lockdown Meltdown (Ivor Cummins)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GECvPRwzerj7/
UK Lockdown Tyranny (Ivor Cummins)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gR9lEW69gfWQ/
CRUCIAL Viral Update Dec 7th - Europe and USA Explained! (Ivor Cummins)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/9niC5zHeIjdD/
Experts Warn Against Rushed Roll-out Of COVID-19 Vaccine
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tigk8ccm6aso/
