A virtual representation of the Ghostnuts Podcast #64 which can be found at https://ghostnutspodcast.com
The World Economic Forum (WEF) will stage a ‘cyber attack exercise’ to prepare for a “potential cyber pandemic”, that founder Klaus Schwab says will be worse than the current crisis.
Cyber Polygon combines the world’s largest technical training for corporate teams and an online conference featuring senior officials from international organisations and leading corporations. Every year, the training brings together a wide range of global businesses and government structures, while the live stream gathers millions of spectators from across the world. This year, the event is taking a bit of a more serious tone, given uncertainties in the world.
According to the WEF, COVID-19 was known as an ‘anticipated risk’, and so is its digital equivalent. “A cyber attack with COVID-like characteristics would spread faster and farther than any biological virus. Its reproductive rate would be around 10 times greater than what we’ve experienced with the coronavirus.” — Klaus Schwab
“Some will say that a ‘cyberpandemic’ is an inevitable consequence of the quickly developing hi-tech world in which we live, but it still fair to point out that 2021 is the year that many have been predicting for the financial destruction of big institutions that will lead to new economic systems that align with the Great Reset,”
These trends include:
-A desire to immunize the internet with digital antibodies to ‘protect’ society from cyberattacks and misinformation by exploiting ransomware attacks and a public health crisis to justify the centralization of power and control.
-A demonization of cryptocurrencies in favor of central bank digital currencies where all transactions are recorded on a centralized ledger and have the ability to grant permissions on purchases, which further consolidates power.
-A closer merger of corporation and state as the solution to any given crisis, be it cybersecurity, climate change, or COVID-19, without ever being put to a vote by the will of the people.
The World Economic Forum and partners do not like decentralized cryptocurrencies. Instead, the unelected bureaucrats prefer the centralization and consolidation of power that Central Bank Digital Currencies can provide. Therefore, WEF members will take any opportunity to demonize decentralized cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. At Cyber Polygon 2021, the globalists took aim at the “Ransomware as a Service” business model as a means to target cryptocurrencies more broadly.
Another Cyber Polygon 2021 discussion panel had a rather peculiar title: “New World — New Currency,” which elaborated on how central banks were looking to implement digital currencies where all transactions would be recorded on a single ledger. The panel highlighted central bank efforts to roll out digital currencies that can be programmed with permissions on transactions, with the ability to restrict certain purchases. For example, imagine that you are able to give your kids some money in digital dollars and then restrict their use to purchase junk food.
World Bank (The World Bank is an international financial institution that provides loans and grants to the governments of low- and middle-income countries.) sold "World Pandemic Bonds" ($500m in bonds, oversubscribed by 200%. Plan references "derivatives & complex financial instruments" so it may have been more.)
World Bank partnered with World Health Organization 6 months later.
The prospectus has fine print of certain conditions in which the bonds would not pay out.
Five US governors and leaders in other countries put recovering Covid-19 patients into nursing homes. Some disallowed nursing homes from testing incoming patients for Covid-19 (!)
With the deaths increasing and now hitting the conditions in the prospectus -- World Bank was able to keep the money, which was then distributed globally to key players in this global operation. The pandemic was declared about a month before the deadline that would have returned investors money.
SPECULATION: There was limited controversy surrounding the failing of these bonds because the major stakeholders may have been organizations who would profit from the pandemic.
This may have been the money laundering scheme that financed this global operation.
I'm wondering if it's a way to mask who was involved with funding this crisis. The elites are well known for moving money discreetly through charity and non-profits. Maybe this was another form of that.
DISCLAIMER: All topics discussed are hypothetical and may or may not be true, it is just a couple of friend's take on the subjects brought up. We advise you to please do your own research and don't just take what we say as gospel. This is all for fun and entertainment. Godspeed.
439
45:07
