Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
ADOLF HITLER - THE REBIRTH OF GERMANY
Hitler’s Revolutionary Anti-Capitalism
Below is a landmark essay which burnishes the revolutionary, anti-capitalist credentials of Hitler’s Germany which fought a war to the last against the forces of both Anglo-American plutocracy and Soviet Bolshevism, two sides of the same “kosher sandwich”. I’ve made some minor edits. — Dissident Millennial
People Versus Plutocrats: Hitler’s Anti-Capitalist Legacy
by Ahab | April 20, 2020
TODAY MARKS 131 years since the birth of Adolf Hitler – the man whose life and legacy form a stark outline, the shape of which the entire present world order was constructed against.
Within the dissident right, there is a perceptible reassessment of Hitler under way. For years, Hitler was seen by many as simply a meme – a kind of shorthand for the most radical defiance to oppressive PC culture. Some within white nationalist circles, reacting to the omnipresent specter of Hitler as psychological weapon of the mass media, have sought to minimize his importance, dismissing him as a figure of German history whose relevance is long past. A few have gone to the other extreme, elevating Hitler to a figure of esoteric religious veneration.
What seems to be changing is a more serious political assessment of Hitler as leader of a revolutionary party, as head of a real government with real policies, and as founder of a definite ideology with vast implications for our own time. Confronting the political issues and problems of the 21st century, there is a new interest in taking the politics of Hitler seriously. This trend is being driven by study and discovery of Hitler’s actual words and deeds, separated from popular myth and propaganda, partly made possible because of the increasing availability of accurate historical information.
Slowly but surely, the mountain of lies piled onto history by the victorious Allied powers is eroding down to nothing. One sure sign of this trend is the subtle, yet unmistakable ongoing revision of Hitler scholarship by mainstream historians. One of the most recent examples is the new book by Cambridge professor Brendan Simms, titled Hitler: A Global Biography, published by Basic Books in late 2019.
Simms’ biography of Hitler is far from perfect. He discounts critical biographical sources such as the memoirs of August Kubizek, and Hitler’s own autobiography, apparently only because they portray Hitler in a positive light. And in spite of the author’s generally unbiased tone, free from moralizing, he credulously repeats some of the more outlandish propaganda horror stories about the Third Reich in a manner unfit for a work of serious revisionism. As a Cambridge professor, he has his career to protect. He also projects a bit too much of his own Anglocentrism onto Hitler. The Führer certainly admired many aspects of both the British and American cultures, but it would be foolish to suggest his first love wasn’t only and always for his own German people.
Crucially, the book quietly drops or revises dozens of long-standing propaganda myths. Among them are the lies that Hitler was a “lazy dictator,” that he was a “mad rug-chewer,” that he set out with the intention to “exterminate” the Jews, that he deliberately encouraged “polycratic chaos” within the Reich to enhance his own power, that he was driven by megalomania or narcissism, that he issued a “Nero order” against his own people, and that he ever went after or desired “world domination.”
Most thoroughly demolished by this book is the myth that Hitler viewed Soviet communism as a greater threat than Anglo-American plutocracy.
The following passages speak for themselves:
While the connection between Hitler’s anti-Semitism and his anti-capitalism is often noted, and has been the subject of some individual studies, its centrality to his world view, and the extent to which he was fighting a war against “international high finance” and “plutocracy” from start to finish, has not been understood at all.
From the start of Hitler’s political career in the early 1920s:
It was the “international Jewish newspaper corporations”, Hitler claimed, who had prevented a Russo-German rapprochement. It was they who owned the large American companies supplying the Allied war effort and who tricked the “peaceful” American people into [WW1] with Germany against their better natures and best interests. It was the Jews who tried to manipulate Germany’s food supply and who “precipitated the [communist] revolution through hunger”. All this happened because the “New York Stock Exchange” – the “Headquarters of World Jewry” – was determined to crush Germany, the last remaining Nationalstaat which was “not yet completely ruled by stock exchanges”. In short, Hitler remained firmly wedded to the idea of a deadly synthesis between world Jewry, international capitalism and Anglo-America as Germany’s nemesis.
Read more:
https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/11/hitlers-revolutionary-anti-capitalism/
Category | News & Politics |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Related Videos
RAQUEL WELCH - A TRANSVESTIGATION [MR. E]
1 week, 2 days ago
VICTORY SHALL RISE [SECURING THE EXISTENCE OF OUR PEOPLE - THE WHITE RACE]
1 week, 4 days ago
RESURRECTING A NATION - ADOLF HITLER
1 week, 4 days ago
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? - GEORGE LINCOLN ROCKWELL
1 week, 4 days ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.