The Law of the Blood, part 1
ROUGHLY SPEAKING, in the first third of the 20th century, elites all over the White world began to realize that White mastery of the world was not an a given, eternal thing — began to realize that it needed to be won again. So they waged war, first with the pen and then with applied science. Finally one man saw how dire the situation truly was and rose above the others and took the race in his hands; sought to put the non-White world in its proper place forever, harmless to us. He came within a hair’s breadth of succeeding; but it all came crashing down.
So far.
In 1900, Europe and its colonial offshoots were racially conscious White nations — and they ruled the world. It should have been clear sailing into the evolutionary future along the White race’s special path, but five dangers threatened:
1) The non-White world had more people than the White world, and bred faster
2) Our fabulous riches were a magnet for non-Whites.
3) Our technology was making transport of non-Whites to our countries ever easier.
4) There was a counter-current in White countries of Christians and intellectuals committed to “democracy” and “equality.”
and 5) White countries were infested by Jews.
Had we simply got rid of the Jews, the first four would not have mattered at all.
An historian writing a history of Europe in 1800 would have mentioned the Jews only in passing; they were a thorn in our side, sucking up to Kings, selling liquor, and abusing the peasants through usury.
An historian writing the history of Europe in 1900 would have had to give enormous prominence to Jews, as in the previous 100 years they had infiltrated every aspect of European life and were already predominant in some of these.
When the Jews had no power they poisoned the wells; when they had power they poisoned our minds.
National Socialist legal theorists were deeply immersed in (and impressed by) American racial law, particularly by the way many states had made Black citizenship a dead letter, by American eugenics programs, by Americanir anti-miscegenation laws, and by the Immigration Act of 1924. The Germans thought that the Americans were taking the first steps towards creating a racially pure state — but that they often took those steps durch einen Umweg — not explicitly, but by “devious legal pathways.” On the other hand, they saw that American society also had ominous currents of egalitarianism, which, if not checked, could make America slide back into racial pollution.
* * *
For most of European history, few thought about race or talked about race. They had something better: they had race.
When you begin talking about identity, it’s because you’re losing it.
* * *
In the long and noble history of the White race, today we stand at the crisis point; after a long ascent along our special path, toward the stars and our evolutionary destiny, we all can see a quick and sharp and precipitous decline. The cardinal mistake, of course, was not remaining separate — most notoriously by bringing Negroes into North America. They certainly could never have made it here on their own — and if they had, some naval artillery would have been called for.
In 1735, Linnaeus said that Negroes were “crafty, indolent, and negligent,” an assessment which has stood the test of time.
And if when you begin to talk about identity you are losing it, we can see when the beginning of the loss first registered. One early stirring of racial ideas in America can be found in Thomas Jefferson’s Notes on Virginia. As always, Jefferson was a Utopian waffler, saying on one hand that the Negro was inferior and that we must be separate from them, yet he wrote the French Academy saying that he was “cheered” by the fact that there was a Negro boy in America who understood math. Imagine that! Why, the next thing you know, they’ll be rocketing us to the Moon.
For unalloyed and serious race realism, you need to turn next to the great and uncompromising John C. Calhoun, South Carolina Senator, redoubtable fire-eater, a noble and a scandalously maligned man. Calhoun saw the depredations of Haiti, the slave insurrections in his home South, the horrible prospect of race war — and the insane fanaticism of the abolitionists. He knew that their end goal was not merely emancipation; he knew that they would never be satisfied with that: They would push ever forward to full social and legal equality and onward to the final and coveted prize: Non-White access to White women.
He knew from hard-won experience the ineradicable differences between Black and White, and all his life sounded the fire bell in the night. His South stood…
Read more:
https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/04/the-law-of-the-blood-part-1/
Part 2
https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/04/the-law-of-the-blood-part-2/
