russell jay gould a self appointed fake FEDERAL POSTAL COURT claiming jurisdiction of the United States & claiming its went bankrupt in 1999 & registering a flag is impotent
No trademark shall be refused registration unless it is any mark …
russell jay gould a self appointed fake FEDERAL POSTAL COURT claiming jurisdiction of the United States & claiming its went bankrupt in 1999 & registering a flag is impotent
No trademark shall be refused registration unless it is any mark that falsely suggest a connection with institutions or national symbols.
Consists of or comprises the flag or coat of arms or other insignia of any State or municipality, or of any foreign nation, or any simulation thereof
without authorization by the competent authorities, either as trademarks or as elements of trademarks, of armorial bearings, flags, and other State emblems,
SEO did It form another design, number, or letter, was it substantially obscured by
other matter in the logo;, was it in the normal flag shape, was A significant feature
of the flag in a different color; or, or A significant feature of the flag changed.
Nearly all flags are old enough that they can't enjoy copyright protection
In the U.S A all works of the Federal government are automatically public domain
BUT
It is possible to trademark any stylized flag design, accept , a true representation of
the flag of any state, municipality, or foreign nation , then its unenforceable
https://archive.md/8iVq8
https://archive.md/Vuges
https://archive.md/6dBpK
Waptek: PLEASE debunk the insane claims made in this video that
the US went bankrupt in 1999 and
russel jay gould took over jurisdiction of the United States
by registering the flag etc (please watch video) thank you
https://www.quora.com/Are-countries-flag-copyrighted
https://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2018/06/flags-as-trademarks-what-are-the-rules-of-the-road/
https://tmep.uspto.gov/RDMS/TMEP/current#/current/TMEP-1200d1e3998.html
my work is transformative in nature as a criticism so some usage of the original is required but uses no more of the original than is necessary & this has no negative affect on the market for the original work its self & my work is protected speech as ou..
