"When a man physically forces Jill to have sex, we consider it rape. But when Jill physically forces Jack to have sex,we don't consider it rape. Mary Koss agrees, she's the feminist researcher behind the factoid that 1-in-4 women will…
"When a man physically forces Jill to have sex, we consider it rape. But when Jill physically forces Jack to have sex,we don't consider it rape. Mary Koss agrees, she's the feminist researcher behind the factoid that 1-in-4 women will be raped in her lifetime.In May Koss' original survey,only 1 in 16 women said yes to 'have you been raped'. So how did she get her 1-in-4 number? By asking women 'have you ever been physically forced to have sex, or have had sex under the influence of drugs or alcohol?' Disregarding the womens' answer to 'have you been raped?' Mary Koss went on to publish her findings and '1 in 4' became an oft-repeated feminist talking point. Unfortunately Mary Koss encountered an additional problem: When women and men are asked if they were raped, the number of male victims is low,but when women and men are asked if they were physically forced to have sex, the number of male victims skyrockets. On her efforts to 'correct' the 'problem' of 'too many' men saying Yes to 'have you been physically forced to have sex?' Mary Koss says the following.."
Watch Alison Tieman explain, including her special interview and the squirm response when Alison asks simple questions. Turns out, not only was it outrageously false to have the ideology that anyone who ever stands up for the rights of the accused is a rape apologist when in fact one can and should stand up for rights of both accusers and accused, but the vicious ugly truth is that this chapter in feminist dogma is, itself, in actual reality, rooted in minimizing and defining out of existence male victims of rape, at least, when the perpetrator is female (it's "ok" to "allow" male on male rape in the misandrist ideology because you know, men being horrible and the evil half of humanity, them victimizing other men is part of the story. Expecting women to have the same level of responsibility and culpability and men to have the same #HumanRights protection let alone sympathy when they are violated? Not on your life) Another powerful video from Alison Tieman.
Misandrist attack on male victims of sexual assault/rape by erasing them or defining their victimhood as something 'less' terrible? Or an ideology of misandry making false accusation against men for example when she was drunk (but never against her when he was drunk)? Or both? In the world of double standards, "both" is often the answer, as here.
