The following transcript is brought to you by Katana. For more excellent transcripts like it, on a range of dissident right, nationalist content, visit: https://katana17.com/wp/
There’s a story in the Old Testament. I think it’s in the book of Genesis. The particular names are escaping me... I think it’s Jacob and Esau. The basic story is this: One Jew has wronged another, and then he sees his brother, or half-brother, approaching him. His clan is approaching him and he doesn’t know if he means ill, or not, and he fears being attacked.
So what does he do? To ensure his survival he divides his camp. He sends some of his people to the other camp as basically refugees, as defectors. And basically what these defectors do is they can influence the enemy camp, and if the enemy camp attacks the home camp and destroys it at least some of those people will survive.
If you have an environment where everyone’s playing by individualist rules, and you come in working as a team, then you have a systematic advantage in that environment. The best way to prevent conflicts between different peoples — to the extent that’s possible — is for them to have their sovereign homelands! And lo and behold Jews actually struggled for a very long time to create a sovereign Jewish homeland, namely Israel. It’s very advantageous for them to have it both ways, right?
They have their ethnostate and they also live in the diaspora. Now the ethnostate benefits from that, because the diaspora is constantly meddling in the internal affairs of their host societies to support Israel. And that’s especially true in the United States where we have as many Jews living here as we have living in Israel. And where, you know, Israel gets billions of dollars every year in loans, and just outright giveaways, and loans that will never be paid back — so they’re just giveaways, anyway. And also where we have wasted trillions of dollars since 2003 in fighting wars in the Middle East that are dictated by Israeli strategic interests, or strategic calculations.
Jews are a distinct people and they’re loyal to one another, and that’s all healthy and well and good. But, if that’s true then we cannot give them citizenship in our societies, and power in our societies, and influence over our societies at the same time! And that is what the “Jewish Question” is.
The “Jewish Question” really arose with the emancipation of Jewish communities in Europe. For a very long time they were encapsulated, self-governing communities. And then they were, quote-unquote, “emancipated” by Napoleon. He was the great emancipator of Jewry.
Well, as soon as they were emancipated and became citizens of the societies around them, it became a question. It was like:
“Wait a second here! Not only are they citizens of our society and have all the rights of citizens in our society, but they’re also, in fact, citizens of their own society where they have their primary loyalty to other Jews, all around the world, and even in our rival societies. Even in our enemy societies! Even in societies we’re fighting wars against, right?”
Isn’t there’s something weird about this? And isn’t this an inherently unjust and disadvantageous relationship that we have instituted? And again this goes back to the whole game theoretical issue. Just as a team strategy beats an individualistic strategy, right? You know, if you got somebody with dual citizenship, basically that dual citizenship is a way that their team - a foreign team - can play you! They can hack your system!
If you look at the history of Jewish intellectual movements, and Jewish political involvement since Jewish emancipation, you see this all the time. And the neoconservatives are a beautiful example of this! The main sort of population of neoconservatives comes out of the Zionist wing of the Trotskyite movement. Bolshevism was largely a Jewish thing. Marx was a Jew, right? The core people who advanced Bolshevism, were Jews, or part Jews, or married to Jews. It was a heavily Jewish phenomenon.
[transcript continued in comments section below]
