Abuse of Eminent Domain is a Pathway to Fascism

Abuse of Eminent Domain is a Pathway to Fascism
http://targetfreedom.com/cfr/abuse-of-eminent-domain-is-a-pathway-to-fascism/
Testimony of John Perna SC Judiciary on 10-20-15
Benito Mussolini said: "The merger of Government power & Corporate power is FASCISM."
The Fascist View of Private Property isDestruction of Property Rights
The concept of eminent domain was established solely so thatgovernment would be able serveneeds ofpublic.
The concept of eminent domain was not established so thatgovernment could partner with certain select corporations to use force of law for making profits for those corporations.
The fact that these corporations might increase tax base forgovernment, or contribute to political campaigns is not a justification for government involvement in what should be a purely private enterprise.
If government is to seize property for private use by simply claiming that it is for "the public good" we have destroyedfourth Amendment.
While there will always be a claim that force of law is being used for "the public good" we should recognize that destruction of property rights is ultimate assault on "the public good".
It is an outrageous usurpation to use eminent domain to force people off their land, or put them out of their homes, so that corporations can make profits. This is true even if those corporations will pay more taxes, or make bigger political campaign contributions.
The justification that is claimed by every form of totalitarianism is always claimed in every type of eminent domain case:
"The greatest good forgreatest number".
So we are told that we will only destroy lives, lands, & homes of a small number of people & that this will be done for benefit of the larger community.
This is like saying that there will only be a small amount of AIDS virus injected into our blood, or that we will only have a few malignant cancer cells in our bodies.
This is like saying that there will only be a few cockroaches in our food.
Martin Luther King said "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere".
If you hear a term like "public-private partnership" a swastika should appear in your mind. "Public-private partnership" is the definition of fascism.
The merger of Government power & Corporate power is creation of tyranny.
Government power is FORCE OF LAW.
Corporate power is FORCE OF MONEY.
When those two forces are combined corruption is UNAVOIDABLE.
We will be told all about “safeguards” that will eliminate corruption.
We will be told that honor of our public servants will eliminate corruption.
I submit to you that, at the VERY MOMENT that force of law is used on behalf of a corporation, corruption HAS ALREADY OCCURED.
The authority that is being cited for this radical change in law is not even a legislative act, but a Supreme Court decision.
We continuously hear an outrageous myth:
"The Supreme Court has ruled. This is the law of the land".
Someone please correct me if I am wrong:
Is not Supreme Court a part of JUDICIAL BRANCH of our government?
The definition of Supreme Court is found in:
Article. III.  Section. 1. of the Constitution for the United States:
"The judicial power of United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court & in such inferior courts as Congress may from time to time ordain & establish."
On the other hand Legislative powers are defined in:
Article. I. Section. 1. Paragraph 1, Sentence 1 ofConstitution forUnited States of America:
"All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress ofUnited States, which shall consist of a Senate & House of Representatives."
Now let us go back & refresh our understanding of algebra.
If All legislative powers are vested in Congress how much legislative power does Supreme Court have?
The Supreme Court is nine political appointees. They were not elected by people. Our constitution provides that laws will be made by legislators, who are elected by people, in legislative branch.
What part of constitution gives Supreme Court authority to order violation of our constitutionally guaranteed property rights?
"Fascism" is a term that is frequently misused. It is often used simply as a insult for those of any opposing political camp. Yet there is a correct usage for this term.  Fascism is a governmental system which permits a certain degree of "private" property or business ownership, but management of property is under governmental oversight.
1st plank of Communist Manifesto: Abolition of Private Property
The most disgusting part of this scenario is the attempt to justify taking property rights of individuals on grounds that it will benefit the community. In reality the community is equally devastated by destruction of property rights. READ MORE
http://targetfreedom.com/cfr/abuse-of-eminent-domain-is-a-pathway-to-fascism/