Astonishing Proof! Four Physicists Reveal 9/11's Electromagnetic Nuclear Fingerprint
Brian Ruhe in Vancouver hosts Jeff Prager in Minneapolis, introduced by their mutual friend T. Mark Hightower in California. They review the stunning new book, "The Ground Zero Model" Heinz Pommer And Colleagues. The PDF is free and will always be available at: www.independent.academia.edu/Prager . The evidence is that when the towers were being built, 1970 - 1973, they built in the structures necessary to later add a nuclear device. These went off with 13 second "nuclear fizzles", not bombs, which are what brought each of the three towers down. The electromagnetic fingerprints, including from helicopters filming over the towers, provides the proof.
CORRECTION: Jeff Prager sent this message: He stated the thorium and uranium float to the top with liquid granite/water below but it's just the opposite, the uranium and thorium are well below and the liquid granite/water/steam is at the top of the underground bladder and that's what's ejected while x-rays, gamma and neutrons are being sent into the towers at the same time. I'd like to correct thorium and uranium are at the bottom of the mixture, heavier by far than water and liquid granite.
Heinz Pommer studied physics in Germany and France. After his diploma degree he re-trained as a technical writer, documenting complex machinery. Since 2000 he works as CEO in his small enter- prise for Automated Technical Documentation.
In respect to September 11th, 2001, many walks and hikes were needed to get him closer to the truth.
Mr Pommer writes, "Little did I suspect that this research would lead me not only to a better understanding of the dynamics and the nuclear devices that destroyed the WTC on 9/11, but to a deep and much better understanding of history, including German history. History needs to be re-written. The lie is gigantic, but it is not all- powerful. On the contrary, in respect to 9/11 it has failed. It has revealed itself.
It will completely dissolve, if we find the will to stand with the truth, with courage and with love for god’s creation. However, the lie will triumph if we cowardly or complacently accept it. The key word is acceptance. The lie is alive, incessantly courting our subconscience, and our acquiescence is the lie’s true source of energy.
We can stop it with two words, looking into the mirror: “no more!”
This present, small but challenging book is a short excerpt of “The demons trap — A handbook for understanding The 9/11 Deception of Perception”.
As the nearly 1,000 page “handbook” changes and improves over time, it might never see a print publication. However, for those who are interested in the book, which is updated on an irregular basis, some chapters are currently available at:
Mr. Jeff Prager saw the Twin Towers rise in his youth. New York was his home, night and day. He saw the Twin Towers fall, the event destroying the places of his childhood, but even more violent was the impact of his perception of America.
Since then he has fought against the lie, feeling sickened himself by the growing number of 9/11 victims and his impotence to communicate the truth of the nuclear destruction of the WTC. In 2018 he came across the work of some physicists, who—in his own words—think differently, slightly mad. Schrödinger’s cat had entered his life.
The ‘cat thought experiment’ of quantum mechanics is absurd and anticipates that you can’t tell if a cat which hides in a box does actually exist or not. It may have two states. Since this contact Mr. Prager adapted his physical world view. Did the World Trade Center ever symbolize a state of stability and power, when at the same time an internal nuclear destruction scheme was present below it?
By all means, Mr. Prager has become a physicist as well. Mr. Prager retired in 2005 and has published over 100 books since then. Some are located at research and they are all free.
T Mark Hightower's book review:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Ground Zero Model by Heinz Pommer and Colleagues presents a compelling model for how underground nuclear devices of very high energy were likely used to bring down the Twin Towers and Building 7, explaining very well much of what was observed in their destruction. Calling their explanation a model is very much in keeping with the scientific method when one is seeking to explain observations without knowledge of exactly how the deed was carried out.
When I was on Jim Fetzer's show The Real Deal on July 06, 2011 I presented rough calculations for how much conventional high explosives would have been needed to bring the Twin Towers down by just severing the load bearing members. I did not attempt to calculate or estimate what additional quantity of explosives would have been needed to account for the high degree of comminution or pulverization observed... (lack of space to print the remainder here).
|Sensitivity||Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over|
2 weeks, 5 days ago
1 day, 1 hour ago
1 day, 14 hours ago
1 day, 19 hours ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.