#273 Supreme Court Rules No "Undue Burden" To Block A Woman's Right To End Her Child's Life
The Supreme Court decided the constitution is pro-baby murder again yesterday.
Basically, Justice Roberts hid behind the court’s previous ruling in 2016, so he didn’t disappoint his masters in 2020. A ruling, by the way, that Roberts ruled against back in 2016. God will be his judge.
I have always found the language surrounding abortion to be revealing. The anti-baby murderers stand against abortion because it is, well, murder. It’s pretty plain Jane and it requires no further explication. Unless you’re a cuck trying to justify the mob behavior of black guys grieving over St. Black Floyd, literally everyone is in agreement that murder is wrong, or that, at least, it cannot be legally tolerated in society.
The baby-muderers have a number of ways to evade the issue to maintain their solipsism.
The first one I noticed- and the one that is still their go-to- is that abortion is primarily about a “Woman’s right.”
“Killing babies is wrong!”
“No. It’s a woman’s right!”
“…What?”
The Left is so deeply committed to Feminism that a woman’s convenience is esteemed to be of more value than the life of a child. So much so that they cannot even acknowledge that a baby is being killed in the process. A child’s life is sacrificed on the altar of the right of a woman to continue to ride the cock carousel, remain I-N-D-E-P-E-N-D-E-N-T, and work her way up to glorious lower management.
There is also the wordspell that seems to be more recent in origin, which calls abortion “reproductive rights.” It’s brilliant rhetoric. It steals turf from pro-lifers by utilizing what should be their own vocabulary. Except, it’s a complete lie. Abortion has nothing to do with the rights to reproduce, as if we were living in China and the government were restricting a woman’s ability to bear a child. (Stay-tuned for that, by the way, in case the satanists win the culture war. They’ll be mandating women having abortions to offset climate change.) I suppose “Child sacrifice rights” just does not have the same ring to it.
I was reminded of all of this obfuscation yesterday when I noticed one of the justices commenting on how the Louisianna law placed an undue burden on a woman’s right to an abortion.
Undue burden?
I am currently in the process of starting a business. I live in a Red state and consequently there are less regulations than if I were to have started my business in a Blue state. Also, my business is in a particular industry where there is less regulation as long as it conducted on a small-scale. (Woohoo! Freedom! ‘Merica! Outlaw Country!) Still, even though there are relatively less regulations for me compared to someone else operating a business in a different industry, there are still absolutely a ton of regulations.
On the other hand, baby murder is such a perceived fundamental right in the eyes of our legal overlords that it cannot be subjected to such petty regulations. It’s so foundational to a woman’s Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness- killing babies, that is- that a state government is not even “Constitutionally” allowed to place a small hurdle in a woman’s path to filicide. This remains true even when the regulation is their to protect the mother who is attempting to kill her child.
Think about that for a second.
Our country is so deeply satanic that it institutionally prevents any legal entity from placing any burden in front of a would be murderous mother.
Our country is run by worshippers of Molech.
#Abortion #SupremeCourt #SCOTUS #Louisianna #ReproductiveRights
#Prolife #Prochoice
Links In The Video Description
My Blog- www.westernreckoning.com
Patreon- Patreon.com/WesternReckoning
YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKpYgV-evDrGJZyHeCqCKoA
Bitchute- https://www.bitchute.com/channel/0wZeHTkf6vJN/
Social Galactic - @WesternReckoning
Parler- Parler.com/profile/westernreckoning
Twitter- @WestReckoning
