“non-carcinogenic" “unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans.” results were edited out to allow the International Agency for Research on Cancer to declared roundup probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A)
as of 2015 along with S…
“non-carcinogenic" “unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans.” results were edited out to allow the International Agency for Research on Cancer to declared roundup probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A)
as of 2015 along with Shift work that involves circadian disruption, occupational exposure as a Hair dresser or barber, hot beverages & red meat only if you assess hazard rather than risk or dose-related Acute vs chronic toxicity
Numerous national and international agencies have reviewed glyphosate & European Food Safety Authority & EPA tests showed it can cause serious eye damage , no convincing evidence of potential interaction with the estrogen, androgen or thyroid pathways & " practically non-toxic" to Aquatic fauna, & NO mutagenic effects , carcinogenic effects in male mice & rats MAY "affect" renal tubule carcinoma , haemangiosarcoma , pancreatic islet-cell adenoma Indications of glyphosate toxicity, include initial excitability and tachycardia, ataxia, depression, and bradycardia, although severe toxicity can develop into collapse and convulsions. butt The IARC monograph noted that glyphosate-based formulations can cause DNA strand breaks in various taxa of animals in vitro?
the vast majority of studys & sources expose all findings & data sets SEO Anyone can go to the European Food Safety Authority or Environmental Protection Agency and review their work
No such record of the deliberations behind IARC’s monographs is published. & it was done by a few people WHO are the only ones to have declared glyphosate a probable carcinogen & ,the classification of glyphosate as probably carcinogenic to humans relied entirely upon the conclusion that there was sufficient evidence of animal carcinogenicity
WHY?
because HUMAN epidemiologic evidence was not strong enough to show a link or just contradicted the conclusion
some outside observers are selected and allowed to witness proceedings, but they are banned from talking about wha..
